Skip to main content

One's Defintion of Savings May Explain Why One Has Money or None

It's the New Year and I'm already imagining all the financial mayhem that may have hit (read here). I could imagine somebody right now may be crying over an empty passbook (which causes a bank account to be closed), five-six lenders will be chasing people playing the late Yoyo Villame's parody song "Dayang Daya" on maximum volume (read here), and the fact that they wasted all their money during the holiday season (read here). I think much of this could've been prevented by heeding this Warren Buffett quote. This quote says, "Don't save what is left after spending but spend what is left after savings." It sounds confusing but it would pretty much mean, "Budgeting on what you have."

People can say some people live paycheck-to-paycheck. Yet, there's really that bad habit of wasting the paycheck all year round. The paycheck arrives and instead of focusing on their needs, they focus on their wants (read here). It's a typical sight to see that the salary arrives and the person says, "Where are we eating out later?" They would eat out trying to forget their problems. Never mind that they've got a lot of stuff they may need to face such as bills piling up five feet tall on their desk. Even worse, they still follow the mantra that says, "Mapait? Eh di lagyan mo lang ng asukal." (Translation: "Bitter? Why not just add sugar?") (read here). It's pretty much somebody might be saying, "Lots of bills to pay? Let's add sugar to that by attending the town fiesta this January!" instead of focusing on how to pay the bills. That's why it doesn't make sense to live paycheck-to-paycheck and splurge the money from the paycheck. Even worse, some of them may not even be working properly.

I remembered how I screwed up my allowances only on. One of them was that in high school, I would spend impulsively. I would spend and spend and say, "My savings are based on what's left." Later on, I was taught this basic tip to set aside a certain amount of money and say, "I will only spend when I have this much. I will plan my expenses." It's pretty much allocating a certain sum for emergency funds and a certain sum for spending. It's like I'm only going to buy myself a new smartphone only when I need it. If I want to eat delicious food, I'll choose something that's cheap and delicious. In short, it's all about having planned expenses. 

It can all go down to basic accounting principles 

In a business, you don't get rich based on your gross sales. Instead, wealth is based on net income after taxes. You can't say the profit for the day is the sales for the day. It's because, in a business, there will be payments like labor costs, administrative costs, utility costs, depreciation costs, transportation costs, and the like. The sales are deducted from all expenses which creates taxable income. After that, what remains of the taxable income is the net income after taxes. This is the net profit. The company must then focus on spending on its needs over its wants. If the company decides its savings are based on what's left after its wants then that's not good. 

The company budgets for the expenses. Is the company hiring too many people? Is the company stingy or thrifty? Is the company focusing too much on needs than on wants? Are salaries too low that people are demotivated to work? Would installing solar power in my company be better than spending repeatedly on a cheap generator that could be a fire hazard? Did I pay for the insurance of my business this year? It's pretty much focused on spending for long-term saving. Being stingy or being extravagant are both misguided with money. Any thrifty person would say, "I could care less if I have to spend big now on solar. It's better than that stinky generator that will compound my expenses!" A stingy person would say, "I could only care that I don't spend. The idea of compounded expenses is baloney!" An extravagant person would just spend without thinking.

We can also call that contingency spending. It's like the business owners put most of the money in a common account. The board of directors only takes a reasonable sum of money. It would be like that the co-owners only take PHP 10,000.00 (or higher) while the rest of the money is placed in operating expenses. Each board member can only take that much money per month. They can't just splurge the money from the common account. The only time money from the common account is used is for necessary expenses

This would mean that one prioritizes savings over spending. We have contingency savings which are used as a backup. Contingency savings would mean emergency money used in a just-in-case scenario. Meanwhile, savings for spending means money meant to be spent for personal use. Following this principle can at leats save anybody from having no money when the time is needed. 

Popular posts from this blog

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...

Migrante International: Still Mourning for the Late Flor Contemplacion While Sticking to Third-World Development Economics

Unsurprisingly,  The Flor Contemplacion Story was uploaded a month ago. I wrote that there's a possible political motive behind the film getting uploaded on YouTube . That's why I even wrote a review against the film after I rewatched it in HD . It's no surprise that Migrante International is inducing its own migraines. The evidence against Flor was already overwhelming, as presented by the Singaporean court . Do these people act as if there was no injustice in the Philippines? What about how the Vizconde Massacre was handled where, until now, the real perpetrators have not been found? Two years after Flor's execution, the Chiong Sisters case arrested the wrong people,  and a doubtful Supreme Court of the Philippines' decision was released. Yes, a murder happened in all three cases. Singapore convicted the real killer of the slayings of Delia Maga and Nicholas Huang. Meanwhile, the Philippines had wrongly convicted Hubert Jeffry P. Webb (whose 15 years were wasted) ...

The Tragic Windfall of the Late Flor Contemplacion's Family

PEH.ph Last year, I wrote an article talking about Flor Contemplacion crybabies spreading fake news for 30 years . I noticed that the movie could be watched for free on YouTube (which is one hour and 52 minutes long), and the one that you had to pay for via rent or personal soft copy ( which is two hours and two minutes long). I was looking into the film and realized the "for free" version lacks the exaggerated water dunking and electrocution torture scene, which I believe is available, which is a ten-minute difference. I remember seeing the old version where Flor was tortured by Singaporean police via water dunking and electrocution, to get an answer out of her. The famous line by the late Nora Aunor was, "I did not kill anybody!" It's 31 years, and I don't expect the fake news about Flor to stop just because  it's past 30. No, fake news is that hard to kill even in the digital age. It reminds me of the fate of Flor's sons , where one of them, Sandr...