Skip to main content

One's Defintion of Savings May Explain Why One Has Money or None

It's the New Year and I'm already imagining all the financial mayhem that may have hit (read here). I could imagine somebody right now may be crying over an empty passbook (which causes a bank account to be closed), five-six lenders will be chasing people playing the late Yoyo Villame's parody song "Dayang Daya" on maximum volume (read here), and the fact that they wasted all their money during the holiday season (read here). I think much of this could've been prevented by heeding this Warren Buffett quote. This quote says, "Don't save what is left after spending but spend what is left after savings." It sounds confusing but it would pretty much mean, "Budgeting on what you have."

People can say some people live paycheck-to-paycheck. Yet, there's really that bad habit of wasting the paycheck all year round. The paycheck arrives and instead of focusing on their needs, they focus on their wants (read here). It's a typical sight to see that the salary arrives and the person says, "Where are we eating out later?" They would eat out trying to forget their problems. Never mind that they've got a lot of stuff they may need to face such as bills piling up five feet tall on their desk. Even worse, they still follow the mantra that says, "Mapait? Eh di lagyan mo lang ng asukal." (Translation: "Bitter? Why not just add sugar?") (read here). It's pretty much somebody might be saying, "Lots of bills to pay? Let's add sugar to that by attending the town fiesta this January!" instead of focusing on how to pay the bills. That's why it doesn't make sense to live paycheck-to-paycheck and splurge the money from the paycheck. Even worse, some of them may not even be working properly.

I remembered how I screwed up my allowances only on. One of them was that in high school, I would spend impulsively. I would spend and spend and say, "My savings are based on what's left." Later on, I was taught this basic tip to set aside a certain amount of money and say, "I will only spend when I have this much. I will plan my expenses." It's pretty much allocating a certain sum for emergency funds and a certain sum for spending. It's like I'm only going to buy myself a new smartphone only when I need it. If I want to eat delicious food, I'll choose something that's cheap and delicious. In short, it's all about having planned expenses. 

It can all go down to basic accounting principles 

In a business, you don't get rich based on your gross sales. Instead, wealth is based on net income after taxes. You can't say the profit for the day is the sales for the day. It's because, in a business, there will be payments like labor costs, administrative costs, utility costs, depreciation costs, transportation costs, and the like. The sales are deducted from all expenses which creates taxable income. After that, what remains of the taxable income is the net income after taxes. This is the net profit. The company must then focus on spending on its needs over its wants. If the company decides its savings are based on what's left after its wants then that's not good. 

The company budgets for the expenses. Is the company hiring too many people? Is the company stingy or thrifty? Is the company focusing too much on needs than on wants? Are salaries too low that people are demotivated to work? Would installing solar power in my company be better than spending repeatedly on a cheap generator that could be a fire hazard? Did I pay for the insurance of my business this year? It's pretty much focused on spending for long-term saving. Being stingy or being extravagant are both misguided with money. Any thrifty person would say, "I could care less if I have to spend big now on solar. It's better than that stinky generator that will compound my expenses!" A stingy person would say, "I could only care that I don't spend. The idea of compounded expenses is baloney!" An extravagant person would just spend without thinking.

We can also call that contingency spending. It's like the business owners put most of the money in a common account. The board of directors only takes a reasonable sum of money. It would be like that the co-owners only take PHP 10,000.00 (or higher) while the rest of the money is placed in operating expenses. Each board member can only take that much money per month. They can't just splurge the money from the common account. The only time money from the common account is used is for necessary expenses

This would mean that one prioritizes savings over spending. We have contingency savings which are used as a backup. Contingency savings would mean emergency money used in a just-in-case scenario. Meanwhile, savings for spending means money meant to be spent for personal use. Following this principle can at leats save anybody from having no money when the time is needed. 

Popular posts from this blog

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, MalacaƱan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...

How Open FDI Can Help Tatak Pinoy Bill Reach Its Objective for Better Filipino Businesses

Net25.COM Is it me or is the Philippines' economic policy not that well-defined? One can always argue there's no need for an economic charter change, never mind that the economic legacy of the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino had economic amendments. I was looking into Facebook and found the updates on the Senate of the Philippines' Facebook page.  The update above from the Senate of the Philippines' Facebook page has me skeptical. Now, I decided to do a little more Googling before I criticize. It would be best to get what the other party says. I would like to share a part of what Philippine Senator Sonny Angara has to say, which I might provide some constructive criticism along the way: When we came up with our Tatak Pinoy or Proudly Filipino advocacy in 2019, the overarching goal was to transform the Philippines into a progressive and vibrant economy, to help Filipino entrepreneurs and industries become more competitive, and to provide our people with more opportunitie...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...