Skip to main content

One's Defintion of Savings May Explain Why One Has Money or None

It's the New Year and I'm already imagining all the financial mayhem that may have hit (read here). I could imagine somebody right now may be crying over an empty passbook (which causes a bank account to be closed), five-six lenders will be chasing people playing the late Yoyo Villame's parody song "Dayang Daya" on maximum volume (read here), and the fact that they wasted all their money during the holiday season (read here). I think much of this could've been prevented by heeding this Warren Buffett quote. This quote says, "Don't save what is left after spending but spend what is left after savings." It sounds confusing but it would pretty much mean, "Budgeting on what you have."

People can say some people live paycheck-to-paycheck. Yet, there's really that bad habit of wasting the paycheck all year round. The paycheck arrives and instead of focusing on their needs, they focus on their wants (read here). It's a typical sight to see that the salary arrives and the person says, "Where are we eating out later?" They would eat out trying to forget their problems. Never mind that they've got a lot of stuff they may need to face such as bills piling up five feet tall on their desk. Even worse, they still follow the mantra that says, "Mapait? Eh di lagyan mo lang ng asukal." (Translation: "Bitter? Why not just add sugar?") (read here). It's pretty much somebody might be saying, "Lots of bills to pay? Let's add sugar to that by attending the town fiesta this January!" instead of focusing on how to pay the bills. That's why it doesn't make sense to live paycheck-to-paycheck and splurge the money from the paycheck. Even worse, some of them may not even be working properly.

I remembered how I screwed up my allowances only on. One of them was that in high school, I would spend impulsively. I would spend and spend and say, "My savings are based on what's left." Later on, I was taught this basic tip to set aside a certain amount of money and say, "I will only spend when I have this much. I will plan my expenses." It's pretty much allocating a certain sum for emergency funds and a certain sum for spending. It's like I'm only going to buy myself a new smartphone only when I need it. If I want to eat delicious food, I'll choose something that's cheap and delicious. In short, it's all about having planned expenses. 

It can all go down to basic accounting principles 

In a business, you don't get rich based on your gross sales. Instead, wealth is based on net income after taxes. You can't say the profit for the day is the sales for the day. It's because, in a business, there will be payments like labor costs, administrative costs, utility costs, depreciation costs, transportation costs, and the like. The sales are deducted from all expenses which creates taxable income. After that, what remains of the taxable income is the net income after taxes. This is the net profit. The company must then focus on spending on its needs over its wants. If the company decides its savings are based on what's left after its wants then that's not good. 

The company budgets for the expenses. Is the company hiring too many people? Is the company stingy or thrifty? Is the company focusing too much on needs than on wants? Are salaries too low that people are demotivated to work? Would installing solar power in my company be better than spending repeatedly on a cheap generator that could be a fire hazard? Did I pay for the insurance of my business this year? It's pretty much focused on spending for long-term saving. Being stingy or being extravagant are both misguided with money. Any thrifty person would say, "I could care less if I have to spend big now on solar. It's better than that stinky generator that will compound my expenses!" A stingy person would say, "I could only care that I don't spend. The idea of compounded expenses is baloney!" An extravagant person would just spend without thinking.

We can also call that contingency spending. It's like the business owners put most of the money in a common account. The board of directors only takes a reasonable sum of money. It would be like that the co-owners only take PHP 10,000.00 (or higher) while the rest of the money is placed in operating expenses. Each board member can only take that much money per month. They can't just splurge the money from the common account. The only time money from the common account is used is for necessary expenses

This would mean that one prioritizes savings over spending. We have contingency savings which are used as a backup. Contingency savings would mean emergency money used in a just-in-case scenario. Meanwhile, savings for spending means money meant to be spent for personal use. Following this principle can at leats save anybody from having no money when the time is needed. 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...