Skip to main content

One's Defintion of Savings May Explain Why One Has Money or None

It's the New Year and I'm already imagining all the financial mayhem that may have hit (read here). I could imagine somebody right now may be crying over an empty passbook (which causes a bank account to be closed), five-six lenders will be chasing people playing the late Yoyo Villame's parody song "Dayang Daya" on maximum volume (read here), and the fact that they wasted all their money during the holiday season (read here). I think much of this could've been prevented by heeding this Warren Buffett quote. This quote says, "Don't save what is left after spending but spend what is left after savings." It sounds confusing but it would pretty much mean, "Budgeting on what you have."

People can say some people live paycheck-to-paycheck. Yet, there's really that bad habit of wasting the paycheck all year round. The paycheck arrives and instead of focusing on their needs, they focus on their wants (read here). It's a typical sight to see that the salary arrives and the person says, "Where are we eating out later?" They would eat out trying to forget their problems. Never mind that they've got a lot of stuff they may need to face such as bills piling up five feet tall on their desk. Even worse, they still follow the mantra that says, "Mapait? Eh di lagyan mo lang ng asukal." (Translation: "Bitter? Why not just add sugar?") (read here). It's pretty much somebody might be saying, "Lots of bills to pay? Let's add sugar to that by attending the town fiesta this January!" instead of focusing on how to pay the bills. That's why it doesn't make sense to live paycheck-to-paycheck and splurge the money from the paycheck. Even worse, some of them may not even be working properly.

I remembered how I screwed up my allowances only on. One of them was that in high school, I would spend impulsively. I would spend and spend and say, "My savings are based on what's left." Later on, I was taught this basic tip to set aside a certain amount of money and say, "I will only spend when I have this much. I will plan my expenses." It's pretty much allocating a certain sum for emergency funds and a certain sum for spending. It's like I'm only going to buy myself a new smartphone only when I need it. If I want to eat delicious food, I'll choose something that's cheap and delicious. In short, it's all about having planned expenses. 

It can all go down to basic accounting principles 

In a business, you don't get rich based on your gross sales. Instead, wealth is based on net income after taxes. You can't say the profit for the day is the sales for the day. It's because, in a business, there will be payments like labor costs, administrative costs, utility costs, depreciation costs, transportation costs, and the like. The sales are deducted from all expenses which creates taxable income. After that, what remains of the taxable income is the net income after taxes. This is the net profit. The company must then focus on spending on its needs over its wants. If the company decides its savings are based on what's left after its wants then that's not good. 

The company budgets for the expenses. Is the company hiring too many people? Is the company stingy or thrifty? Is the company focusing too much on needs than on wants? Are salaries too low that people are demotivated to work? Would installing solar power in my company be better than spending repeatedly on a cheap generator that could be a fire hazard? Did I pay for the insurance of my business this year? It's pretty much focused on spending for long-term saving. Being stingy or being extravagant are both misguided with money. Any thrifty person would say, "I could care less if I have to spend big now on solar. It's better than that stinky generator that will compound my expenses!" A stingy person would say, "I could only care that I don't spend. The idea of compounded expenses is baloney!" An extravagant person would just spend without thinking.

We can also call that contingency spending. It's like the business owners put most of the money in a common account. The board of directors only takes a reasonable sum of money. It would be like that the co-owners only take PHP 10,000.00 (or higher) while the rest of the money is placed in operating expenses. Each board member can only take that much money per month. They can't just splurge the money from the common account. The only time money from the common account is used is for necessary expenses

This would mean that one prioritizes savings over spending. We have contingency savings which are used as a backup. Contingency savings would mean emergency money used in a just-in-case scenario. Meanwhile, savings for spending means money meant to be spent for personal use. Following this principle can at leats save anybody from having no money when the time is needed. 

Popular posts from this blog

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

The Great Reversal: Democratic Philippines Became MORE Dependent on COMMUNIST Vietnam for Rice

Bao Thanh Nien On January 24, 2026, I read from the Philippine Star Facebook page  that a vendor from Baseco, Tondo, is selling Vietnamese rice at PHP 20.00 per kilo. Honestly, it made me laugh over President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.'s promise. Was this rice from Vietnam a rice surplus if it wasn't premium rice? My experience with rice selling was with wholesale,  and it was a very different time. What I learned in the late 2000s to 2012 may no longer be applicable today.  Taking a look back at the history of Vietnam and the Philippines before Doi Moi This time, I decided to go with history because a certain someone on Facebook (as always, I will not mention names as much as possible) has actually called it that the Philippines' dependency on Vietnam for rice, despite the International Rice Research Institute being actually located in Pili Drive, Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines. This guy (whom I nickname Porky due to his obesity) I just mentioned, sp...

An Interesting Mental Exercise for Chinese as Second Language Class

Back in my day, I remember we kept memorizing what was called bon toi (written as 问题, Wèntí in Mandarin) without understanding them. I hated memorizing those. I guess another reason was to parrot what one can't understand. We had the biak diam too which is Hokkien for oral recitation. Memorizing the question and answer (written as 问题和答案, Wèntí hé dá'àn in Mandarin) would actually not be so tedious if Chinese was taught as a second language. My bizarre idea is to think about having only one bon toi but there are five answers to memorize.  Memorizing (and understanding) why some don't want to learn Chinese These five reasons (above) have to be memorized in both Chinese and English. The teacher (老师, Lǎoshī) would say the question,  "不学中文的最大借口是什么?" (Bù xué zhōngwén de zuìdà jièkǒu shì shénme?). The question can't be answered  until  the student actually translated it as, "What are the top excuses not to learn Chinese?"  The student will eval...