Skip to main content

Raising Salaries During Inflation Can Worsen Inflation


Translation: 

Raise up salaries! Lower prices! 

Let's all be united and move for a sustainable salary! 

It's tomorrow! Let's see each other on #MayOne2023!

It's May 1 today and it's referred to as Labor Day. One of the many organizations in the Philippines called Kilusang Mayo Uno (May 1 Movement) has been doing the same nonsense all the time. Do these people even have the slightest idea of wealth generation? I doubt it. They have been demanding the same thing all over again. I wonder if these people are aware that it's not sustainable (read here). The same movement has been to have salary increases in the midst of inflation.

At first, it sounds like a good idea. However, the economic aspect will totally reveal why it isn't feasible. The Economics Help website presents why doing so can actually worsen inflation:

Wage Push Inflation. If labour is able to push for higher wages, despite lower growth, then we could get a combination of rising inflation, but slow growth. This is especially a problem if a country is part of the single currency. If wages rise, they become uncompetitive leading to lower demand. Therefore there is an unwelcome combination of rising prices, but lower growth. If countries were not in a single currency, the uncompetitiveness would lead to a depreciation in the exchange rate to restore competitiveness and increase demand.

The reality would be that basic accounting would defeat the argument. Every increase in salary means an additional cost to production. It's common sense that for a company to pay higher salaries--it must sell at a higher price to survive. Higher costs can be justifiable if there's good quality. It's like if I enjoyed a restaurant's good quality cooking and service--there's an extra cost to it. To sell lower when the prices are higher is selling at a loss. What do you expect from people who feel like economics is just so easy. They can talk that they will just do this and that. However, when asked for financial sources, they either fall silent, hurl insults or do anything stupid to hide their insecurities

Since when did these labor unions know anything about economics? They have been against badly-needed foreign ownership laws that will bring the jobs they so demand. When they are asked how they propose to make jobs, I even doubt they have a feasible answer. One common answer I usually get is, "It's the government's job! Let them create the jobs!" True, government needs employees but it's private enterprises that fund government spending (read here). The government should make policies that encourage job creation. Among them is the removal of the Filipino First Policy (read why here). Yet, they demand the government uphold Filipino First Policy while they still demand jobs. 

These guys just shout and shout with no solutions whatsoever. As the saying goes, "Empty vessels make the most noise." 

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...

IBON Foundation: Yes to Wealth Taxing the Rich, No to Economic Reforms?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I don't trust the IBON Foundation as an "economic think-tank" . I remember getting a lot of insults (and I've decided to block such people), telling me stuff like, "What have you done for the Philippines compared to IBON?" or "What about your mass base?" There's also that 88% survey result from Pulse Asia, which I heard has a very biased sampling size. Regardless, it's important to speak out facts and figures even if only one percent believes it and 99% doesn't! As I was looking to challenge myself in writing, I thought of challenging IBON's ongoing stance on the wealth tax. They had an article written in 2023. It's all about taxing the super wealthy . Is it good or bad? It's time to think about it.  Differentiating income from net worth Here's a sample of what IBON had written: A billionaire wealth tax can substitute for many consumption taxes that disproportionately burden millions of F...

Basic Economic Knowledge Tells Us Why Ayuda Will Not Help Filipinos Survive Inflation for Long

IBON Foundation I'm getting amazed at how IBON Foundation still has their ever-destructive obsession with ayuda (read here ). Lately, they have written another article where they say that high inflation "confirms" the need for real ayuda which means cash handouts (read here ). That's totally one thing whenever IBON Foundation decries the need for foreign direct investment (FDI) but they keep saying that cash handouts are good for the economy. That statement is purely stupid because handouts equals expenses and there's really no long-term  Return on Investment (ROI) on that one!  However, for the Philippine government to be able to give more cash handouts without FDIs (and rely too much on local businesses)--it can mean doing the following: Start raising taxes for the rich in order to provide more money for cash handouts. If taxes from the rich aren't enough--why not print more money, right?  The demand for ayuda worth PHP 10,000.00 is utterly stupid. The two ...