Skip to main content

Being a Landowner Isn't as Easy as Some Social Media Whiners Think

Moving.com

I've seen some posts on Facebook where they actually glorify the mass murderer Mao Zedong. One of their excuses to love Mao was the death of landlords, never mind that Mao's plan for a "Great Leap Forward" came to a crash under his rule. They keep saying that landowners are evil, that it's one of the "easiest jobs in the world". What they don't realize is that being a landowner isn't an easy task. I would like to give out my thoughts (and I'm a landowner too) as to why being a landowner isn't as easy as these social media whiners think.

From Moving.Com, we can read of the eight landlord obligations that show why being a landowner is never as easy as these social media whiners think:
  1. Offer a fair housing environment
  2. To deliver the unit as scheduled to the prospective tenant
  3. Properly manage the security deposit
  4. Ensure one has a copy of the lease (and following it)
  5. Properly maintain the rental property (which requires a lot of money)
  6. Respecting the privacy rights of the tenants by not walking in unannounced
  7. Providing notice before raising the rent
  8. To be accessible to the tenant
As a small-time landowner, I can feel all these burdens. It can go with something like:
  1. I can't discriminate against a tenant just because of their ethnicity, religion, etc. but only reject them if I'm aware of their bad activities. I can receive any tenant, whether Filipino or foreigner. It matters not if the person is a Filipino or a foreigner, as long as they're good tenants.
  2. If the scheduled delivery is done then it must be done. The only reason for delays would be that if I got really sick, there was a disaster that caused it to happen (ex. storms, floods, pandemic). Otherwise, if I expect people to rent the land, I must deliver it on time.
  3. The security deposit isn't for my spending pleasure. It's rather there just in case the tenant may not be able to pay for up to two-three months. A tenant can only be kicked out if they're unable to pay and the security deposit is over. 
  4. I must make sure that I have a copy of the contract. The contract can give me a reason to kick out the tenant or the tenant to leave. If I also violate agreements, the tenant has every right to leave my place. 
  5. I just can't doze and do nothing all the time. If there are problems like leaking faucets, bad drainage, damage from a disaster, faulty wiring, and the like then I'm required to answer these problems. As the owner of the land and/or building, I'm obligated to make sure that the property is in good condition. Otherwise, the tenant has every right to leave. That's why rental money is important because if they don't pay, what will I use to pay for the repairs?
  6. If I don't respect the privacy right of the tenants, that too can be a very good ground for why they would want to get out of the space. For example, I can't use my power as the landowner to peep into their most private moments or commit acts of voyeurism, which in themselves, are criminal acts that can give the tenants the right to move out and the duty to call the police.
  7. Any good landowner should never just raise the rent without a good reason. I should notify the tenants months beforehand that it's time to raise the rent and provide the reasons why. For example, if there's inflation or the cost of repairs has increased, it would make sense to raise rent but I need to inform the tenants first.
  8. I need to be as accessible as possible. This is because tenants will have complaints such as damages that fall under the responsibility of the landowner. As mentioned in contracts, landowners are required to make the place livable. This means that the landowner should be available as much as possible (or have someone who can help manage things) to check out any possible tenant complaints.
These principles apply to all forms of real estate businesses. It may be a piece of land that farmers rent to raise their crops. It may be the shopping mall that contains a lot of commercial establishments renting. It may be the basic commercial building rented out to different types of tenants. It may be apartment spaces and condominiums. The landowner is required to make sure that these places are rentable and livable. 

The key to long-term profitable land ownership is all about fulfilling the eight obligations. For example, I rent land to farmers or any agricultural company. The farmers find out that there are certain problems that I must fix. For example, there's stinky drainage, or the barn needs repair after a storm. I need to answer the farmers' valid complaints if I expect the farmers to continue renting. The farmers keep their net profits after taxes while I get the rental fees, from which the gross profit is deducted from. The farmers are required to pay me a reasonable amount. If I charge too low or too high, it wouldn't be good. If I bully the farmers, word of mouth can destroy me causing nobody to want to rent the space. I must also honor the rental agreements. If the farmers wish to leave for valid reasons (ex. having purchased their own land or found a better place to rent), I must respect their decision and carry out the procedures for them to move out as scheduled.

I'm also required to follow environmental laws. I should kick out a tenant who does illegal dumping. If I do illegal dumping, my tenant has the right to leave and the duty to report me to the authorities. As a landowner, I should make sure that the space for rent is clean and livable. Who would want to rent or live in a place that's poorly maintained? If I don't comply with those laws then how cna I expect to make a good long-term profit out of being a landowner? 

I'd say that those whiners have no idea of how business isn't so easy. They feel like the workers have it all hard, that the working class is "oppressed", even if the capitalist treats them rather well. One must ask if Mao treated the farmers any better during the Great Leap Forward. Mao ended up torturing farmers, whom he claimed to protect when they failed to reach his goals. Any good capitalist or businessperson knows that ethical businesses are more profitable than short-term unethical business practices. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...
Read more

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...
Read more

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...
Read more

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...
Read more

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...
Read more