Skip to main content

Why Using Insults Won't Make the Filipino First Policy Effective

 

It's really very very easy to use insults instead of getting the facts straight, right? I will admit that it's that easy to use insults to try and win an argument as much as it's easy to blow off one's cool when insulted. These kinds of people are very good at insulting others but will cry foul (and play the "poor innocent victim") when their own personal attacks fire back at them. I could read all the gaslights and virtue signaling. Even worse, these people engage in very pseudo-intellectual arguments which can be displayed often on Facebook and Twitter (which is very toxic these days) just to name a few.

The MARITES Pyramid of Learning 

An essay I wrote was about the MARITES Pyramid of Learning. I've engaged with people who, when their appeal to emotion fails, start mocking me by calling me vulgar names or saying that I'm stupid, that my IQ must be low, that I must still be stuck in elementary, and the list can go on. I used to get irritated. There are times I want to punch such people. They continuously use insults trying to irritate me. However, I was told to stop entertaining such people or not to stoop down to their level. But whether we want to admit it or not, the use of insults really proves these things:

  1. It just shows that the person calling the other person a fool is the real fool. It's very often that the Duning-Kruger Effect shows that stupid people tend to think they're very smart. Again, not all intellectually stupid people are like that. Some intellectually stupid people know their limits. The problem is when stupidity enters the Duning-Kruger Effect zone. 
  2. More often than not, insults are because one is angry or frustrated. It's like I called someone stupid because I was angry. 
This would be very applicable to those people who want to defend the Filipino First Policy. The use of insults is pretty much used by insecure people. I'm really amused that when I ask them for their empirical evidence--I often get fired with insults over and over again. I'm tempted to lose my temper. However, there's a quote that says when a person starts getting personal, it might be a clear sign of losing. A person who insults others thinks that they're going to win by insulting others? It's because they're pretty much like the pigeon that lost the chess game. The pigeon thinks it's going to win by pooping on the board like it won. 

One of my previous essays was written about social media attacks against Philippine Senator Robin Padilla. Instead of addressing the issue, they decided to bring up issues like Padilla's previous status as an ex-convict or calling him names like Boy Sili (Boy Chili). Some people would prefer to shoot down Padilla based on his ex-convict past. All the while, they support a system that keeps voting for people based on popularity rather than credibility. What they did to Padilla is just a small picture. What insults I get is just a small picture. Can Padilla's former status as a criminal ever defeat the argument if he's actually right? Just because one's a scholar in a toga doesn't mean one's always right.

My new imagined scenario if I'm going to ask them who they'd listen to between Davide and Mahbubani

Click to enlarge

Maybe, I could think of possible racist comments if ever I should ask this question. We have two policymakers namely Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. and Professor Kishore Mahbubani. Mahbubani is the founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP). It's really no secret that some Filipinos are quick to accuse others of racism while being racist themselves. It can be like, "Of course, I'll listen to Davide, he's my countryman." The use of the Davide Jr. vs. the late John Gokongwei Jr. can be a categorical error. Gokongwei Jr. is a businessman and Davide Jr. is a policymaker. That's why I chose Mahbubani to be the foil for Davide Jr. Would that even convince them? I doubt it because there's always this cognitive dissonance or resistance to facts.

For an insulter, it's really very easy to just ignore the facts, insult the person, and feel good about it. Some of them may keep saying Davide this, Davide that. Then I'd start bringing up another of my favorite figures namely Mahbubani. I could just imagine the insults that these Filipino insulters could fling in the middle of the argument. They've already done that to Padilla. I can imagine that they'd actually do it to Mahbubani just to defend their admiration for Davide. Knowing all the racist jokes that are thrown against Indians (commonly called Bumbay in the Philippines)--I could imagine the racist jokes.

It might go with rude generalizations about Indians. They might start raising up stereotypes that won't help defend the argument. I could imagine the argument like, "I'd listen to Davide Jr. because he uses deodorant and I'm sure Mahbubani has stinky armpits." Since when did stinky armpits ever become part of the argument? Are they even sure that Mahbubani has stinky armpits just because he's a Bumbay? It's really nothing more than a series of Ad Homimens. Instead of trying to prove Davide Jr. right and Mahbubani wrong with the facts, they start using Ad Hominems instead.

Sorry to say but Filipino First can't be defended by using insults

It's very easy to stay that studies show but where are the studies cited? It's pretty much like how that dishonest former doctor Andrew Wakefield made that dumb research on autism and vaccines. There was also this research about microwaved water vs. purified water which was full of doctored data. I really feel like the person did pour hot water straight from the microwaves to the plants. How can you expect the plants not to wither if you water them with very hot water? It's plain common sense that hot water will kill your plants! The same can happen when advocates of Filipino First might be citing the "studies" of people like the late Alejandro Lichauco's praise of the late Carlos P. Garcia or the likes of IBON Foundation. Sorry to say but I really believe that IBON Foundation is nothing but a bird-tweeting network rather than a real research body! Many times, IBON does some data like blaming past presidents for the rising costs of gasoline. Gasoline is a world market problem. 

I could ask for empirical data all day long but when they can't present it--they start throwing insults instead. It's really annoying and funny at the same time. That's why I'm often told to just laugh at them because insulters hate it when I refuse to stoop down to their level. Get mad, get even, and they have their "I'm the poor innocent victim! I did nothing wrong!" card. They could go ahead and keep saying I must be very stupid, that they are so smart, and you know there's so much they can say. However, Alexander Pope said, "Works are like leaves. It's rare to find fruit among them."

To defend the effectiveness of Filipino First, they need more than just growth rate data. Whether they want to admit it or not, the study of Lichauco has already been proven dishonest. The data proven by the rise of neighboring ASEAN countries is another. The book From Third World to First should be more than just a book used to cite against the Marcoses. What's the use of criticizing the Marcoses if one loves economic protectionism at the same time? The Marcos regime was heavily protectionist, not neoliberal, as some may suggest. If they really read the whole book From Third World to First--they will see how even nations rich in natural resources (such as Vietnam) actually benefited from listening to the late Lee Kuan Yew. Don't just use LKY as a bullet against the Marcoses. Read what LKY has to say from the book such as when he said, "The Philippines needs more discipline than democracy." A country may have a high growth rate because there was room for more growth. Meanwhile, a developed country may have a lower growth rate because it's entered a slowdown period. A country entering a slowdown period may still be economically better overall than the rising tiger. Compare that with the Philippines as a rising tiger under the reign of the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III vs. Singapore under the reign of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong or any stronger tiger. 

In my case, I'm really probably just going to let them insult me. Sure, I can get angry and I can dwell in angry thoughts for certain periods of time. That doesn't change the facts that facts will remain the facts regardless of who's right or wrong. Their use of insults are unscholarly and should be rejected. The fact that they would use insults to defend faulty studies may even further make anybody question the validity of their sources too. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Wanting Wealth WITHOUT Financial Discipline

Many people want to be rich, but not so many people want the discipline on how to be rich. Isn't that the plain hard truth ? As I do this sideline blog , I contemplated whether I should write another post after writing several posts years back, or when I wrote about Venezuela as a cautionary tale . Back on topic, I thought about how financial discipline is something often overlooked. It's easy to talk about Christmas since that's probably the most wonderful time of the year to be spendthrift , only to find out that one's broke by the New Year . The cycle of reckless financial habits tends to restart in January, even when January becomes that time of reckoning between debtors and creditors! January 2026 will end, February 2026 comes, and then the cycle of financial recklessness continues. It's the same cycle over and over! Last Christmas, I remember how DTI Secretary Christina Roque spoke about the PHP 500.00 noche buena, for a family of four . I called it tactless b...
Read more

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...
Read more

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more