Why Using Insults Won't Make the Filipino First Policy Effective

It's really very very easy to use insults instead of getting the facts straight, right? I will admit that it's that easy to use insults to try and win an argument as much as it's easy to blow off one's cool when insulted. These kinds of people are very good at insulting others but will cry foul (and play the "poor innocent victim") when their own personal attacks fire back at them. I could read all the gaslights and virtue signaling. Even worse, these people engage in very pseudo-intellectual arguments which can be displayed often on Facebook and Twitter (which is very toxic these days) just to name a few.

The MARITES Pyramid of Learning

An essay I wrote was about the MARITES Pyramid of Learning. I've engaged with people who, when their appeal to emotion fails, start mocking me by calling me vulgar names or saying that I'm stupid, that my IQ must be low, that I must still be stuck in elementary, and the list can go on. I used to get irritated. There are times I want to punch such people. They continuously use insults trying to irritate me. However, I was told to stop entertaining such people or not to stoop down to their level. But whether we want to admit it or not, the use of insults really proves these things:

It just shows that the person calling the other person a fool is the real fool. It's very often that the Duning-Kruger Effect shows that stupid people tend to think they're very smart. Again, not all intellectually stupid people are like that. Some intellectually stupid people know their limits. The problem is when stupidity enters the Duning-Kruger Effect zone.
More often than not, insults are because one is angry or frustrated. It's like I called someone stupid because I was angry.

This would be very applicable to those people who want to defend the Filipino First Policy. The use of insults is pretty much used by insecure people. I'm really amused that when I ask them for their empirical evidence--I often get fired with insults over and over again. I'm tempted to lose my temper. However, there's a quote that says when a person starts getting personal, it might be a clear sign of losing. A person who insults others thinks that they're going to win by insulting others? It's because they're pretty much like the pigeon that lost the chess game. The pigeon thinks it's going to win by pooping on the board like it won.

One of my previous essays was written about social media attacks against Philippine Senator Robin Padilla. Instead of addressing the issue, they decided to bring up issues like Padilla's previous status as an ex-convict or calling him names like Boy Sili (Boy Chili). Some people would prefer to shoot down Padilla based on his ex-convict past. All the while, they support a system that keeps voting for people based on popularity rather than credibility. What they did to Padilla is just a small picture. What insults I get is just a small picture. Can Padilla's former status as a criminal ever defeat the argument if he's actually right? Just because one's a scholar in a toga doesn't mean one's always right.

My new imagined scenario if I'm going to ask them who they'd listen to between Davide and Mahbubani

Click to enlarge

Maybe, I could think of possible racist comments if ever I should ask this question. We have two policymakers namely Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. and Professor Kishore Mahbubani. Mahbubani is the founder and former dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP). It's really no secret that some Filipinos are quick to accuse others of racism while being racist themselves. It can be like, "Of course, I'll listen to Davide, he's my countryman." The use of the Davide Jr. vs. the late John Gokongwei Jr. can be a categorical error. Gokongwei Jr. is a businessman and Davide Jr. is a policymaker. That's why I chose Mahbubani to be the foil for Davide Jr. Would that even convince them? I doubt it because there's always this cognitive dissonance or resistance to facts.

For an insulter, it's really very easy to just ignore the facts, insult the person, and feel good about it. Some of them may keep saying Davide this, Davide that. Then I'd start bringing up another of my favorite figures namely Mahbubani. I could just imagine the insults that these Filipino insulters could fling in the middle of the argument. They've already done that to Padilla. I can imagine that they'd actually do it to Mahbubani just to defend their admiration for Davide. Knowing all the racist jokes that are thrown against Indians (commonly called Bumbay in the Philippines)--I could imagine the racist jokes.

It might go with rude generalizations about Indians. They might start raising up stereotypes that won't help defend the argument. I could imagine the argument like, "I'd listen to Davide Jr. because he uses deodorant and I'm sure Mahbubani has stinky armpits." Since when did stinky armpits ever become part of the argument? Are they even sure that Mahbubani has stinky armpits just because he's a Bumbay? It's really nothing more than a series of Ad Homimens. Instead of trying to prove Davide Jr. right and Mahbubani wrong with the facts, they start using Ad Hominems instead.

Sorry to say but Filipino First can't be defended by using insults

It's very easy to stay that studies show but where are the studies cited? It's pretty much like how that dishonest former doctor Andrew Wakefield made that dumb research on autism and vaccines. There was also this research about microwaved water vs. purified water which was full of doctored data. I really feel like the person did pour hot water straight from the microwaves to the plants. How can you expect the plants not to wither if you water them with very hot water? It's plain common sense that hot water will kill your plants! The same can happen when advocates of Filipino First might be citing the "studies" of people like the late Alejandro Lichauco's praise of the late Carlos P. Garcia or the likes of IBON Foundation. Sorry to say but I really believe that IBON Foundation is nothing but a bird-tweeting network rather than a real research body! Many times, IBON does some data like blaming past presidents for the rising costs of gasoline. Gasoline is a world market problem.

I could ask for empirical data all day long but when they can't present it--they start throwing insults instead. It's really annoying and funny at the same time. That's why I'm often told to just laugh at them because insulters hate it when I refuse to stoop down to their level. Get mad, get even, and they have their "I'm the poor innocent victim! I did nothing wrong!" card. They could go ahead and keep saying I must be very stupid, that they are so smart, and you know there's so much they can say. However, Alexander Pope said, "Works are like leaves. It's rare to find fruit among them."

To defend the effectiveness of Filipino First, they need more than just growth rate data. Whether they want to admit it or not, the study of Lichauco has already been proven dishonest. The data proven by the rise of neighboring ASEAN countries is another. The book From Third World to First should be more than just a book used to cite against the Marcoses. What's the use of criticizing the Marcoses if one loves economic protectionism at the same time? The Marcos regime was heavily protectionist, not neoliberal, as some may suggest. If they really read the whole book From Third World to First--they will see how even nations rich in natural resources (such as Vietnam) actually benefited from listening to the late Lee Kuan Yew. Don't just use LKY as a bullet against the Marcoses. Read what LKY has to say from the book such as when he said, "The Philippines needs more discipline than democracy." A country may have a high growth rate because there was room for more growth. Meanwhile, a developed country may have a lower growth rate because it's entered a slowdown period. A country entering a slowdown period may still be economically better overall than the rising tiger. Compare that with the Philippines as a rising tiger under the reign of the late former Philippine president Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III vs. Singapore under the reign of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong or any stronger tiger.

In my case, I'm really probably just going to let them insult me. Sure, I can get angry and I can dwell in angry thoughts for certain periods of time. That doesn't change the facts that facts will remain the facts regardless of who's right or wrong. Their use of insults are unscholarly and should be rejected. The fact that they would use insults to defend faulty studies may even further make anybody question the validity of their sources too.

The Problem with the Philippine Education System is That It Inadvertently Tends to Make One Stroke One's Ego

What happens is that the traditional Philippine education system focuses too much on monuments of fame rather than learning milestones . It reminds me of the incident where Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel stressed out he was a cum laude, and that he's not stupid. I feel this is a microcosm of a much bigger problem that happens with the education system. I'm not going to deny that going to the University of the Philippines and graduating summa cum laude isn't an easy feat. However, I wrote an article on what's the use of being a summa cum laude when one opposes badly needed reforms . It's because whether we want to admit it or not, schools focus too much on the ability to memorize without also focusing on the ability to understand . Memory is also the least reliable tool. It would be time to continuously attack the problems of the education system. I felt shamed back then because students were often told, "Your grades will determine your future!" In college, I

What's the Use of Complaining About Jollibee Acquiring Companies BUT Not Accepting Open FDI to Bring in COMPETITION to the Philippines?

Anti-Snowflake Squad Facebook Page I was checking across Facebook and noticed some idiots complaining about Jollibee acquiring companies. The same idiots turned out to be anti-FDI--the same group that converses with Porky Madugo and Mukhang Adik. As usual, I will not directly link the idiots (or even reveal them directly, they will reveal themselves) to avoid giving them clout. Here's a statement by Porky that may make anyone wonder if (1) he knows he's lying (which I think he is for some self-serving reason ), or (2) he doesn't know what he's talking about: The monopolization of business ruins the business. It degrades the quality of the business of a product. If you think monopolization is good, that's stupidity. It kills the competition and it kills the business. Well, as old saying goes: "capitalists are the only one will destroy themselves." Since when did capitalism mean killing competition? Isn't Porky supposedly a die-hard Communist? In the

The Philippines' Decades-Long OUTDATED Education System

As a child born in the 1980s, I would say I was born during the Marcos Years and I was about a year old when the EDSA Revolution happened. That means I've passed through a lot of stuff rendered obsolete today such as dial-up Internet (which my parents refused to get due to how it interrupted the phone lines unlike the Digital Subscriber Line), cassette players, VHS players, and may I mention the education system . It might be fun to think of times when people of my age group watched The Flintstones or The Flintstone Kids (picture above) during the 1990s imagining school during the stone age. However, these photos today may make me cringe to think about how I grew up in an outdated education system. My recollection of the outdated education system in my eyes from the 1990s before K+12 got implemented My current readings through the book From Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew made me want to write this. The recent chapters I'm in are "Deng Xiaoping's China&qu

The Insanity of Quoting the Late Lee Kuan Yew About the Marcoses While Ignorning the Rest of His Helpful Advice for the Philippines

It may not be Singapore day yet, it's still July and that event is in August. However, some people are now raising placards all over again because the 17th Philippine president is none other than Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. Som people tend to quote from the book From Third World to First . I did buy the book last year and started reading it slowly. I did get a slow read when it came to the late Lee Kuan Yew meeting the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. The description of Marcos was anything but flattering. I read the book and LKY mentioned that he was not confident that Marcos Sr. could pay back the money. The Philippines wasn't in the "golden years" as some would like to make it out. Yet, it seems that the only time LKY is ever mentioned is whenenver it's about the Marcoses and tends to be ignored when it's about how the Philippines can improve. Parliamentary system is often viewed in the wrong way Whenever Singapore is mentioned, I tend to talk about the parliamenta

The Economic Ignorance of Saying Landlords and Stock Traders Contribute Nothing to Society

Finding anti-capitalist (or better said, anti-business) wokes on Facebook (of all places) is just plain funny. Maybe, the term socialist isn't so negative since the late Lee Kuan Yew considered himself a socialist, the late Deng Xiaoping is the author of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, and Vietnam still considers itself as a socialist country. The picture above this paragraph says that landlords and stock traders allegedly "contribute absolutely nothing to society". I feel compelled to write a bit of a post since, as a business graduate, I do feel insulted. Then again even if I didn't get an MBA--I do still feel insulted myself! How good landlords contribute to society Landlords are often said to be a blight. Some say that it's the "easiest job in the world". However, managing real estate (especially rentals ) isn't as easy as some think. I wrote an essay as to why being a landowner isn't as easy as some people think . I would like to d

Pinoy Pride Economics' Filipino vs. Foreigner False Dichotomy

Two years ago, I wrote about the socio-economic cost of Pinoy Pride Economics . It might be better to call it Pinoy Fried Economics because such mentalities have caused the Philippines to fail. Pinoy Pride Economics has fried up any potential for the Philippines to improve. As it's August, the month is commonly called Buwan Ng Wika (month of the language), the celebrations tend to focus more on the celebration of Filipino Culture instead of Tagalog. I remember Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to showcase how cultural exchange evolved the Filipino Culture--such as showing the Chinese traders and Americans in their interaction with Filipinos. On this very first day of August, I'll discuss the problem of the Filipino vs. Foreigner dichotomy. Last I re-studied Filipino History, I never saw it as once free from foreign influence. The Chinese traded with the Philippines--way before the Chinese Communist of China (CCP) caused trouble because of their country's terrible leadership .

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at

#ThrowbackThursdays: When Values Education Tend to Teach Children to Patronize Local Products First Because They're Local

High School Philippine History Movement I was afraid I would be running out of ideas. I wanted to recall some businesses that closed down such as Nova Fontana (my once favorite toy store), Alyssa Caramel (my favorite candy store), El Loco (which used to open at IT Park), etc. Now, I decided to focus on remembering my childhood and values education. Values education is supposed to teach proper manners and good conduct. However, values education tends to become a propaganda tool of the National Economic Protectionist Association (NEPA) to justify Carlos P. Garcia's erroneous Filipino First Policy. However, the whole policy really helped cause the Philippines to fail. Its very idea of Garcia is that majority of the economic participants had to be Filipinos. It might sound good in theory but it wouldn't work with how the late Lee Kuan Yew would put it. Apparently, Garcia has never learned the consequences of protectionism from history--whether it'd be the Stock Market Crash of

Trying to Discipline EVERY SINGLE FILIPINO Isn't a Sound Economic Plan

CoRRECT Movement It's the -ber months and it's only 90+ days before Christmas . I feel like every year, Christmas gets worse . Just Google "Christmas Day disasters" and let's stop thinking Christmas is some magical special time where the world is at peace with love. At this point, I feel like always complaining about last-minute Christmas shopping (read here ). It's been a leading cause of traffic. Some people even plan to do their shopping on December 24th. Some argue that some people are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Some are still waiting for their Christmas bonuses. However. one must question why they don't have money left. Think every dumb way possible to drain that paycheck (read here ). One can take a look at poor money habits such as putting your wants over needs. People living paycheck-to-paycheck should focus on their needs, maybe avoid payday blowouts as much as possible, and focus on trying to make ends meet first before anything. Yet, we know

Can Diehard 1987 Constitution Defenders Prove Their Claims to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy?

It's not enough to say something. The question is, "Where's the substance or the empirical evidence?" When I start quoting from the late Lee Kuan Yew, these diehard 1987 Constitution of the Philippines defenders start diverting the topic by pointing out my errors to spite me than to correct me. They would ask if I know the Deming Theory of Management which talks about quality management in the company culture. Okay, that was something worth asking but as said, can these people really understand the problem of the Philippines has been more systemic (that is, within the system ) than just the people running the system? What allowed the legislative to be filled with people who know-nothing anyway? That's why I didn't want to vote for Senator Robin Padilla (who ironically understands the need for reforms, read here ). Unfortunately, so many Ad Hominem attacks have been done. A past article I wrote was Should you listen to either Davide Jr. or Kishore Mahbubani

Shaun T. Dy's Business & Economics Perspective Blog

Search This Blog