Skip to main content

"But the Philippines Isn't Taiwan!" is Just Another Lame Excuse to Justify Filipino First Policy

Atlas Institute for Internal Affairs
 
Happy Double 10 to Taiwan! Chinese Filipino schools would take part in what's often called the Double 10 celebrations. October is the 10th month and it's the 10th day. I remember talking about how Taiwan succeeded by accepting FDIs and how the Filipino First Policy caused us to fail. The typical response I would get on American-made social media (of all places), such as Facebook, would be, "How many times do I need to stress that the Philippines isn't Taiwan. We are the Philippines! We are unique!" If those fools did a study, they may realize that there's a link between the Taiwanese aborigines and the Filipino aborigines (read here).

The Philippines should've learned from Taiwan during COVID-19

One of the best models for fighting COVID-19 was Taiwan. Sure, I'm more in favor of shifting to a parliamentary system and Taiwan is still a presidential country (with parliamentary features). Former Taiwanese president Tsai Ing Wen herself proved to be an example of combatting COVID-19Former Taiwanese vice president Dr. Chen Chien Jen (an epidemiologist) also served as a model for combatting COVID-19. Some people were demanding this and that. The big question is would the people demanding this and that be willing to follow Dr. Chen's guidelines such as social distancing and practicing discipline? That's a question that they haven't answered until now. 

Maybe, if I told them about Dr. Chen's policies, they would've screamed, "But the Philippines isn't Taiwan!" followed by excuses such as how "unique" Filipinos and the Philippines are. The so-called Filipino uniqueness has been used to justify that the Philippines should just "learn everything by itself" and "not be tainted by foreign influence". Ironically, such statements can be found on again, you guessed it, American-made social media.

If the Philippines learned from Taiwan, maybe the epidemic wouldn't be so bad and would be under control. Incidents such as wasted vaccines would've been reduced. One must think about it there's still COVID-19 debt to pay. How do these Filipino First Policy advocates propose to pay for the COVID-19 debts? I bet Taiwan's now paying whatever debts they accumulated. What about the Philippines? Don't tell me that the Philippines can't learn from Taiwan how to pay that debt?

Taiwan's economic model can be learned by Filipinos even if the Philippines isn't Taiwan

The country that pioneered the British invention called milk tea is Taiwan. The Philippines is one of the hugest markets for the milk tea beverage. The Malaysian company Tealive also looked at the study of Bryan Loo of Loob Holdings. The study showed that Filipinos are huge lovers of milk teaThe bubble tea also originated from Taiwan. If one uses the excuse, "The Philippines isn't Taiwan!' then it's time for Filipinos to dump bubble tea or the use of tapioca pearls in some of their beverages. People who say, "But the Philippines isn't Taiwan!" but are enjoying the bubble milk tea need to rethink. "Then why are they enjoying a Taiwanese invention?" 

Taiwan's economic score according to the Heritage Foundation shows a better score compared to the Philippines:
Taiwan’s economic freedom score is 80.1, making its economy the 6th freest in the 2022 Index. Taiwan is ranked 3rd among 39 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is above the regional and world averages.

Taiwan is one of the few countries in the world to have experienced continuous economic growth during the past five years. Economic freedom has increased significantly during that period as well. With strong scores across the board boosted by increases in judicial effectiveness and labor freedom, Taiwan has recorded a 3.6-point overall gain of economic freedom since 2017 and has made it over the threshold into the top, “Free” Index category for the first time. Additional improvements in business freedom and financial freedom would propel economic freedom even higher.

Meanwhile, the Philippines is scoring lower: 

The Philippines’ economic freedom score is 61.1, making its economy the 80th freest in the 2022 Index. The Philippines is ranked 15th among 39 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is above the regional and world averages.

Economic growth in the Philippines slowed from 2017 through 2019, turned negative in 2020, and rebounded in 2021. Over the same five-year period, economic freedom has slipped. Dragged down by decreased scores for fiscal health and monetary freedom, the Philippines has recorded a 4.5-point overall loss of economic freedom since 2017 and has fallen to the bottom ranks of the “Moderately Free” countriesThe tax burden is not heavy, and trade freedom is a bright spot, but judicial effectiveness and government integrity exhibit weaknesses.

Taiwan learned from Singapore. Why didn't the Philippines learn from Singapore? What's the use of citing the late Lee Kua Yew about the Marcoses while ignoring his sound economic advice (read here)? Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the Philippines (TECO) Representative Michael Peiyung Hsu who had given his urge to scrap off 60-40 from the Philippines. Here's an excerpt that I feel like highlighting in this post which was written last March 19, 2021, and should be a top priority:
THE GOVERNMENT should scrap its 40% foreign ownership limit in certain industries to encourage more investments particularly from Taiwan, according to its ambassador in the Philippines. 

“Please try your best to abolish the 40% restriction for foreigners in the Philippine Constitution,” Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the Philippines (TECO) Representative Michael Peiyung Hsu told an online forum on Wednesday. 

“It’s very painful for many because we’ve lost a lot of money,” he said at the forum hosted by the University of Asia and the Pacific School of Law and Governance and BusinessWorld. 

A Taiwanese science and technology university had considered opening a branch in Batangas province, but would not do so because of the limit, he added

The 1987 Constitution prescribes a 40-60% ownership ratio in favor of Filipinos for many sectors. Foreigners are also barred from owning land and media enterprises, among other limits

Philippine congressmen are debating on a proposal to ease economic restrictions of the Charter. 

Taiwanese investments in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) reached $2.66 billion (P127 billion) last year, $133 million of which went to the Philippines, Mr. Hsu said. 

ASEAN is Taiwan’s second-biggest trading partner after mainland China, with a total trading volume of $890 billion last year. 

Mr. Hsu said the Philippines is not efficiently linked to the global supply chain, which is a disincentive to Taiwanese investors. “Big companies have big concerns like how they are going to export their products overseas.” 

Another concern is high electricity costs, he said. 

Mr. Hsu said the Philippines has a “very good labor force.” Filipinos, he said, have the advantage of being able to speak English well, which is why companies still come to the Philippines

He said Taiwan wants to boost cooperation with ASEAN countries including the Philippines especially in agriculture, health, higher education, the environment and tourism as part of its New Southbound Policy under President Tsai Ing-wen. 

Mr. Hsu said the move is in response to geopolitical factors, regional integration and US-China trade wars, among other things.  

He said the Philippines is important to Taiwan not only because they are near each other, but also given that more than 150,000 migrant Filipinos are working there, mostly in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry.  

Taiwan is inviting more Filipinos and other Southeast Asians to work there given its aging population.  

Fools are bound to dismiss FDI simply as foreign imperialism. Do I need to stress out that imperialism isn't an act of conquest and investing isn't conquest (read here)? Fools from organizations like the Bayan Muna, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Migrante International are either plain ignorant or have some agenda in their anti-FDI stance. I could show them that and they might say that Hsu is simply "trying to invade the Philippines". However, they might be seen hanging out at Chatime or Gong Cha after saying that. Isn't that plain self-contradictory?

Think about how much the Philippines can learn from Taiwan. True, the Philippines has a different climate and culture from Taiwan. However, it doesn't mean that the Philippines can't learn new stuff such as new science and technology, many of these might help in the agricultural sector. A shame that Communist Vietnam has been learning new technologies for agriculture (read here) while the Philippines is still stuck with an obsession with protectionism while typing anti-FDI rants on imported platforms and imported social media (read here). 

Besides, that hoax of Taiwanese fetus soup was already debunked years ago. It was even said to be in China but that too was debunked. I guess they'll all use Ad Hominems and red herrings based on Internet hoaxes, to justify their blunder. It's pretty much like the anti-vaxxers who still insist on falsified studies. If anything, there are people who love to enjoy their blunder. The facts are facts and their feelings will never change facts. If they want to reject the Philippines learning from Taiwan from a disproven hoax--they're just showing how they're the real fools indeed! 

Popular posts from this blog

Real Talk: No MNCs In Their Right Mind, Would Ever AGREE to That Ridiculous 60-40 Proposal

Here's another art I found on Facebook. Some time ago, I wrote about how the 60-40 policy may not prohibit, while still discouraging FDIs from entering . It's plain common sense, really, that nobody would want to rent a space if they had to part with 60% of their net profits to the lessor (read here ).  It annoys me to think that certain Netizens on Facebook are still blaming government corruption over the 60-40 policy. That can get annoying. I can link the 60-40 policy to government corruption . After all, corrupt officials want to perpetuate their stay in power through an ignorant and impoverished population. However, blaming corruption alone is really downright stupid. Some say investors are going to Communist Vietnam because the Communist Party of Vietnam-Vietnam People's Army is serious about cracking corruption. However, the reality is that, ironically, Communist Vietnam has more reasonable economic restrictions compared to the Philippines (read here ). Only a few sec...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Kabataan Partylist Seriously Needs to Learn ECONOMICS from the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union

Vietnam National University, Hanoi Kabataan Partylist, is that you? No, it's actually the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union (Đoàn Thanh niên Cộng sản Hồ Chí Minh), or alternatively, it can be called the Vietnam Youth Union . The color blue may remind some of Kabataan Partylist. Both Kabataan Partylist and the Vietnam Youth Union are involved with recruiting youths into the organization. However, there's a crucial difference between Kabataan Partylist and the Youth Union in how they view economics. The  Kabataan Partylist Laguna's blog  even writes this: It believes that the Philippines, as a semi-colonial and semi-feudal country, is plagued by a system which allows foreign and big business interests to dominate, while the majority of our countrymen are left poor and hungry . We are living in a society where foreign subservience, peasant landlessness, and rampant corruption are the top three ills. To that end, Kabataan Party-list strives to galvanize the Filipino youth in u...

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent

I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares  ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership . Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary. An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there ...