Skip to main content

The Stupidity of Buying High and Selling During a Crash

 


Business World Online

I was looking at Facebook comments some time ago when the stock market opened red. This caused me to write about why I'd listen to investor Warren Buffett over social media naysayers. One thing I noticed (but never wanted to speak of immediately) is how people buy stocks during the high and sell them during a crash. It's pretty much contrary to what Buffett advises to buy during a dip that happened for some time. I've been checking the stock market performance (because I've got index funds) to see what my next move would be. It's because the GInvest system, unlike the AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund, allows me to be flexible to insert a certain amount within the minimum. A person may invest PHP 1,000.00 during regular days and invest PHP 2,000.00 or more during a dip. Right now, some of the GInvest products are at a high, making me think, "If I invest for another year then I should do cost averaging instead!"

Instead, from Bankrate, you may want to follow this advice during a dip:

3 investing strategies to consider if you want to buy the dip

If you’re thinking about buying the dip for the long term, you have a number of strategies that you could use to find attractive returns. Here are three of the most popular:

  • Buy the best stocks in a beaten-down sector. If a whole sector has fallen because investors have turned sour on it, you may have an opportunity to buy the best one or two stocks in the sector. You’ll be able to find the most competitively advantaged players and then buy them before the sector returns to investors’ favor in a couple years.
  • Buy a sector ETF. If you don’t want to do the legwork of investing in individual stocks, then you may be able to turn to a sector ETF and just buy a stake in all the companies in the sector. You’ll want to be careful that you’re actually buying the companies you intend, because some ETFs can be misnamed and hold many stocks you don’t want.
  • Buy the market with an index fund. If you don’t want to do the work to invest in individual stocks or specific sectors, you still have the option to invest in the market with an index fund. A fund based on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index can give you a stake in hundreds of America’s best stocks, and you can buy while it’s out of favor. It’s a great pick for investors who don’t have the time or energy required for more intense investing, and it’s also Warren Buffett’s recommendation for most investors.

Buying while the market is falling is difficult for many investors, however, because it hurts to lose money and the negative sentiment may be worrying, at least in the short term. That’s why Buffett has said, “The most important quality for an investor is temperament, not intellect. You need a temperament that neither derives great pleasure from being with the crowd or against the crowd.”

If you’re buying the dip for the long term, you’ll need to have the fortitude to stick with your investments while they fall and hold them through the eventual upturn (hopefully). 

I'm not saying it's stupid to buy during a high. Some people buy during a high when they do cost averaging i.e. invest the same amount for a certain period of time. It's like I would release PHP 1,000.00 to PHP 2,000 a month if the market is high then buy in bulk during bear markets. Right now, if the bear market is over, I would need to limit the purchase to limit the losses. Buying during a high means buying appreciated stocks that may go higher. Cost averaging would mean combining buy high-sell higher and buy low-sell high depending on the NAVPU. The same can apply when buying index funds. Granted, I prefer index funds (for now) so I would buy low during a high and buy high during a low.

Good-performing companies with undervalued stocks provide good opportunities. I decided to get more money into the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund because of the lower values. Now, I'll have to think about my next move if I should buy more for it before the market recovers. Yet, I feel I still need to keep some cash on hand in the savings for emergency reasons. Sure, I had my health insurance but there are still other emergencies to deal with. That's why I feel cost averaging may be the best move to avoid "timing the market". The only "timing the market" is when it's a bear market or a crash. Other than that, setting aside the same sum for a fixed time interval can be a better option. 

The best thing to do with a crash isn't to sell but to buy more. I wonder if these people bought too much when the stock market rose up. If so, maybe that's why they sold during the crash. That's why I feel like stock investment needs to have more managed risk. The crash is an opportunity to buy. A rise is an opportunity to sell if you really need the money. Instead, people who rely too much on emotions ignore stock knowledge. I've been there and done that. This is one mistake I want to avoid. 

References

"Buying the dip: Is this a good strategy when markets are falling?" by James Royal (May 26, 2022)

"What Is an Index Fund? An Easy Way to Enter the Stock Market" by Kevin Voigt (March 20, 2021)

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...

A Destructive Obsession with Ayuda (Cash Handouts)

IBON Foundation Yesterday, I decided to write about how Pinoy Pride won't help pay that enormous PHP 13.42 Trillion debt . I thought I'd probably take a bit of a break to do some more research. However, I feel the need to write this post today since one of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's a destructive fetish for foreign investment . Then, another of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's money for Ayuda . I really feel insulted reading these since I'm a Masters Degree graduate in the School of Business and Economics. This really shows the destructive obsession with ayuda (cash handouts) and protectionism. IBON Foundation Above is one of IBON Foundation's charts. Some people on Facebook have gone as far as to call them Birdbrain Foundation. So what if there's money for ayuda or cash handouts? The problem here is that "think tanks" like IBON Foundation want to make it look like ayuda is more important. If asked to account ...

How is IBON Foundation Viewing and/or Representing FDI in Their Articles?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I can't take IBON Foundation seriously . As the battle for economic charter change is on, I believe it's time to tackle them again. They're tweeting here and there. Okay, I'm no researcher or organization. However, it doesn't mean that I can't do some basic research, share the research of others, and read other books. Even an intellectually stupid person can actually make sense if they gather the best materials. I even recall someone I know who's not intelligent but he actually spoke well about career opportunities, in the very school where he wasn't performing well! Trying to understand IBON's data presentation  I would like to address how IBON Foundation presents FDI growth. They would say stuff such as the claim job creation weakened despite FDI growth .  I was looking at IBON Foundation's claim (above) where it says that job creation allegedly weakened despite FDI inflows. Sure, they named sources but do they ...