Skip to main content

Why I'm Currently Using GInvest's UITFs over Mutual Funds as Additional Baskets

I remembered wanting to invest in stocks but didn't have the money or expertise. Sometimes, it's advised to stay safe and get involved in stocks indirectly. There's the mutual fund and there's the Unit Investment Trust Fund (UITF). I remembered when I wrote about how it might be wiser to save up first before investing in GInvest. Another one that I wrote focused on investing money in UITFs while studying stock trading. GInvest funds are UITFs since they are measured by Net Asset Value Per Unit (NAVPU). There are two that involve government securities. Others involve stuck (such as the Philippine Stock Index Fund and the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund). Every time I purchase means I get a receipt as proof of purchase. There are also feeder funds which Banco De Oro (BDO) describes as a UITF that invests 90% of the money in a collective scheme. These would involve the use of foreign stocks such as Apple or Samsung--depending on which feeder fund one's investing in.

Meanwhile, Nerdwallet actually has presented the differences. Index funds try to match the performance of the stock market. Mutual funds try to outperform it. What happens is that a more aggressive approach to mutual funds means higher management costs. Meanwhile, management feeds of an index fund are significantly lower because of the less aggressive approach. Index funds are in a fixed set of securities. Mutual funds are in a changing list of securities. In short, the more aggressive approach requires higher fees due to how difficult it is. It's pretty much like choosing between delicious food that's moderately priced vs. super-hard-to-make delicious food.

For example, the ATRAM Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund is invested only in the 30 companies of the Philippine Stock Exchange Index. The ATRAM Global Consumer Trends Feeder Fund is invested in foreign companies involved in consumer needs such as Amazon, Sony, Electronic Arts, and General Motors. I think the fund picks change depending on which is ideal for the portfolio of these funds. So far, I reached my ideal minimum target for one (which is worth one month's salary) while the others may be subjected to either getting a minimum of PHP 1,000.00 for a month or slightly higher if the NAVPU is lower. It would be best to combine both money cost averaging and value cost averaging to get the best results. 

I won't post the exact figures. Financial figures should remain confidential no matter how small or how big. I'll just suggest that if you have GCash and some cash to spare--you may consider adding into GInvest. If not, there's still other great services out there too. 

References


"Index Funds vs. Mutual Funds: The Differences That Matter" by Dayana Yochim (April 27. 2021)
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Filipino Businesses Need More Competition Than Democracy

Enterprise League Oftentimes, I remembered the number of complaints I get such as the Internet being so slow, the recent Typhoon Odette restoration being rather slow, high-cost but low-quality services, and that there's just not enough supply. However, the same people who are complaining about what I just mentioned earlier also said that I'm crazy when I told them to invite foreign direct investments (FDI) such as multinational corporations to invest here. Their line of reasoning goes from every weird direct line such as saying that multinational corporations (MNCs) are the form of the new "imperialism", that only the MNCs will get rich if we let them do business in the Philippines, that MNCs will exploit the people, that it will be overly relying on foreigners, and I don't know where they get such thinking. When I ask them for the solution--they just say that "Let's just do everything ourselves and rely on ourselves." Such logic is really stupid one...
Read more