Skip to main content

Will Opening the Philippines to 100% FDI Lead to Foreign Monopoly?

Monopoly - Hasbro

I was looking at the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum on Facebook. I found more illogical arguments by a certain troll in the forum named Juan Dalisay Jr.--the writer of the Superphysics One website. However, this isn't the first argument I ran into as I've seen arguments from Kabataan Partylist and the League of Filipino Students on Facebook. They have claimed that foreign direct investments (FDIs) will lead to exploitation, only they will get rich, that they will rape resources, and an even funnier claim is that they will lead to monopolies. Some people, even fools, should be allowed to defend themselves at CoRRECT Moderated Public Forum than just live in their echo chamber of Facebook pages.

However, Kishore Mahbubani and the late Lee Kuan Yew had long disproven that. The testimony is in the book From Third World to First by Lee himself. Mahbubani said foreign investors create jobs, bring capital, and teach new skills. I wonder if protectionist advocates like IBON Foundation and Philippine Anti-Fascist League have the guts to go to Singapore, have an appointment with the National University of Singapore, and tell Mahbubani, "Foreign investments are bad. It's like allowing yourself to be raped." All the while, Singapore has beaten the Philippines economically for more than 30 years. All the protectionist advocates were proven wrong yet they insist on their error. They need to go to Singapore and tell Mahbubani he's wrong about FDI. If they do, maybe I'll believe them but I doubt Mahbubani will believe them. 

Let's define the word monopoly. Mono is the Greek word for single. Polein is the Greek word for seller. In short, a monopoly means a singular seller. How in the world would 100% FDI (in terms of shares ownership) lead to a monopoly? The advocacy is to let foreigners invest 100% without a Filipino partner. They don't need to split 60% of their net income after taxes with a Filipino partner. Instead, they keep all their net income after taxes after they've as said, paid everything needed such as their suppliers (which will have local suppliers), employees (which will be mostly locals), and the BIR gets the monthly value tax, the quarterly tax, and the annual income tax. The profits are theirs to keep but it's what's left of revenues minus all of the expenses. In turn, when there are more players, it doesn't become a monopoly anymore. How can it be a monopoly if there are many players involved? 

I would like to point out some recurring foreign investments in the Philippines. I know some of these are no longer restricted by the negative list of the Philippines. Some foreign investments have been given exemptions already--something that prevented the Philippines from becoming another Venezuela or North Korea. I'm going to point out multinational franchises in the Philippines. We have foreign retail stores, food chains, services, and so on which are currently allowed on the negative list. The late former Philippine President, Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, did more than invite--he relaxed certain restrictions too. Outgoing Philippine President, Rodrigo R. Duterte, later signed the Public Services Act of 2022. I believe those two measures would help stabilize the Philippines. Hopefully, we'll get an economic charter change that Andrew James Masigan, an economist, so pushes for. That's why I even wrote that I'm in favor of having an economic charter change. Masigan is an economist and has had a better background than that Dalisay Jr. I keep running into on Facebook. 

Let's think about many foreign firms with Philippine outlets. We have different industries where foreign players are in. Did these create a monopoly? Here's a list of some of the foreign players here and there:
  • The milk and coffee shop industry has had several players. Before the milk tea craze, there was already Starbucks before Bo's Coffee Club opened. Sometime after Bo's Coffee Club opened--we've had other players like Chatime, Gong Cha, Yifang, Tiger Sugar, Coffee Bean, and Seattle's Best which are all foreign players. I'd like to congratulate Bo's Coffee Club for standing strong and pray it will reach the multinational levels. 
  • We've got several foreign food chains. McDonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), Kenny Rogers Roasters, Sbarro, Krispy Creme, Pizza Hut, and Shakey's are among the few. Later, local players are like Yellow Cab Pizza (owned by Max's Group which includes my childhood memory of Max's Fried Chicken), La Tegola (which is owned by an Italian but still a Filipino business), ABACA Group of Companies' restaurants, and Jollibee (which is now a worldwide franchise).
  • I go to the technology section of either SM City Cebu or Ayala Center Cebu and find many imported retail stores. You've got Samsung, Apple, Xiaomi, and HP stores. We have local technological providers that sell all imported equipment.
  • We have banks like Citibank, Commerce International Merchant Bankers (CIMB), the Internationale Nederlanden Groep (ING) Bank, and even Western Union. They all end up employing Filipinos and serving Filipinos. If we're going to have foreign investment--we also need more banks eventually to cater to locals and foreigners. 
  • Some hotels in the Philippines are foreign-owned such as Shangri-La, Sofitel, Accor Hotels, and Marriot. 
A big common sense question here (and it doesn't take an MBA to figure it out) is did these foreign investments create what fearmongers say--a foreign monopoly? I don't remember buying my favorite imported products from a foreign monopoly. In fact, I'm still able to get choices whether I want some Yellow Cab Pizza (local) or some Pizza Hut (imported). I'm still able to go to Jolly Bubble for their fruit tea or enjoy a latte from Bo's Coffee Club. No, it's because these FDIs add up to the number of players. An oligopoly is where we have few sellers and many buyers. In FDI, we want to achieve free markets where there will be many buyers and many sellers. There will be more choices as long as players abide by rules such as fair competition laws, intellectual property laws, and labor laws. Of course, it's first come, first served, so the one who gets the reservation gets to do business first. 

The argument is just nonsensical. I wonder where such people get such ideas? If it's a monopoly then why are there many sellers to many buyers? Singapore had long disproven it. Malaysia had long disproven it. The Philippines should be more open to FDI to avoid monopolies or oligopolies. What we need is more healthy competition to develop the local business industry. The only businesses that will die, whether local or foreign, are those that don't innovate. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Websites

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

Filipino Businesses Need More Competition Than Democracy

Enterprise League Oftentimes, I remembered the number of complaints I get such as the Internet being so slow, the recent Typhoon Odette restoration being rather slow, high-cost but low-quality services, and that there's just not enough supply. However, the same people who are complaining about what I just mentioned earlier also said that I'm crazy when I told them to invite foreign direct investments (FDI) such as multinational corporations to invest here. Their line of reasoning goes from every weird direct line such as saying that multinational corporations (MNCs) are the form of the new "imperialism", that only the MNCs will get rich if we let them do business in the Philippines, that MNCs will exploit the people, that it will be overly relying on foreigners, and I don't know where they get such thinking. When I ask them for the solution--they just say that "Let's just do everything ourselves and rely on ourselves." Such logic is really stupid one...
Read more