Skip to main content

Will Opening the Philippines to 100% FDI Lead to Foreign Monopoly?

Monopoly - Hasbro

I was looking at the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum on Facebook. I found more illogical arguments by a certain troll in the forum named Juan Dalisay Jr.--the writer of the Superphysics One website. However, this isn't the first argument I ran into as I've seen arguments from Kabataan Partylist and the League of Filipino Students on Facebook. They have claimed that foreign direct investments (FDIs) will lead to exploitation, only they will get rich, that they will rape resources, and an even funnier claim is that they will lead to monopolies. Some people, even fools, should be allowed to defend themselves at CoRRECT Moderated Public Forum than just live in their echo chamber of Facebook pages.

However, Kishore Mahbubani and the late Lee Kuan Yew had long disproven that. The testimony is in the book From Third World to First by Lee himself. Mahbubani said foreign investors create jobs, bring capital, and teach new skills. I wonder if protectionist advocates like IBON Foundation and Philippine Anti-Fascist League have the guts to go to Singapore, have an appointment with the National University of Singapore, and tell Mahbubani, "Foreign investments are bad. It's like allowing yourself to be raped." All the while, Singapore has beaten the Philippines economically for more than 30 years. All the protectionist advocates were proven wrong yet they insist on their error. They need to go to Singapore and tell Mahbubani he's wrong about FDI. If they do, maybe I'll believe them but I doubt Mahbubani will believe them. 

Let's define the word monopoly. Mono is the Greek word for single. Polein is the Greek word for seller. In short, a monopoly means a singular seller. How in the world would 100% FDI (in terms of shares ownership) lead to a monopoly? The advocacy is to let foreigners invest 100% without a Filipino partner. They don't need to split 60% of their net income after taxes with a Filipino partner. Instead, they keep all their net income after taxes after they've as said, paid everything needed such as their suppliers (which will have local suppliers), employees (which will be mostly locals), and the BIR gets the monthly value tax, the quarterly tax, and the annual income tax. The profits are theirs to keep but it's what's left of revenues minus all of the expenses. In turn, when there are more players, it doesn't become a monopoly anymore. How can it be a monopoly if there are many players involved? 

I would like to point out some recurring foreign investments in the Philippines. I know some of these are no longer restricted by the negative list of the Philippines. Some foreign investments have been given exemptions already--something that prevented the Philippines from becoming another Venezuela or North Korea. I'm going to point out multinational franchises in the Philippines. We have foreign retail stores, food chains, services, and so on which are currently allowed on the negative list. The late former Philippine President, Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, did more than invite--he relaxed certain restrictions too. Outgoing Philippine President, Rodrigo R. Duterte, later signed the Public Services Act of 2022. I believe those two measures would help stabilize the Philippines. Hopefully, we'll get an economic charter change that Andrew James Masigan, an economist, so pushes for. That's why I even wrote that I'm in favor of having an economic charter change. Masigan is an economist and has had a better background than that Dalisay Jr. I keep running into on Facebook. 

Let's think about many foreign firms with Philippine outlets. We have different industries where foreign players are in. Did these create a monopoly? Here's a list of some of the foreign players here and there:
  • The milk and coffee shop industry has had several players. Before the milk tea craze, there was already Starbucks before Bo's Coffee Club opened. Sometime after Bo's Coffee Club opened--we've had other players like Chatime, Gong Cha, Yifang, Tiger Sugar, Coffee Bean, and Seattle's Best which are all foreign players. I'd like to congratulate Bo's Coffee Club for standing strong and pray it will reach the multinational levels. 
  • We've got several foreign food chains. McDonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), Kenny Rogers Roasters, Sbarro, Krispy Creme, Pizza Hut, and Shakey's are among the few. Later, local players are like Yellow Cab Pizza (owned by Max's Group which includes my childhood memory of Max's Fried Chicken), La Tegola (which is owned by an Italian but still a Filipino business), ABACA Group of Companies' restaurants, and Jollibee (which is now a worldwide franchise).
  • I go to the technology section of either SM City Cebu or Ayala Center Cebu and find many imported retail stores. You've got Samsung, Apple, Xiaomi, and HP stores. We have local technological providers that sell all imported equipment.
  • We have banks like Citibank, Commerce International Merchant Bankers (CIMB), the Internationale Nederlanden Groep (ING) Bank, and even Western Union. They all end up employing Filipinos and serving Filipinos. If we're going to have foreign investment--we also need more banks eventually to cater to locals and foreigners. 
  • Some hotels in the Philippines are foreign-owned such as Shangri-La, Sofitel, Accor Hotels, and Marriot. 
A big common sense question here (and it doesn't take an MBA to figure it out) is did these foreign investments create what fearmongers say--a foreign monopoly? I don't remember buying my favorite imported products from a foreign monopoly. In fact, I'm still able to get choices whether I want some Yellow Cab Pizza (local) or some Pizza Hut (imported). I'm still able to go to Jolly Bubble for their fruit tea or enjoy a latte from Bo's Coffee Club. No, it's because these FDIs add up to the number of players. An oligopoly is where we have few sellers and many buyers. In FDI, we want to achieve free markets where there will be many buyers and many sellers. There will be more choices as long as players abide by rules such as fair competition laws, intellectual property laws, and labor laws. Of course, it's first come, first served, so the one who gets the reservation gets to do business first. 

The argument is just nonsensical. I wonder where such people get such ideas? If it's a monopoly then why are there many sellers to many buyers? Singapore had long disproven it. Malaysia had long disproven it. The Philippines should be more open to FDI to avoid monopolies or oligopolies. What we need is more healthy competition to develop the local business industry. The only businesses that will die, whether local or foreign, are those that don't innovate. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Websites

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Toxic Positivity: Shielding Our ECONOMICALLY OUTDATED Constitution

ABS-CBN News I thought about what life was like in the late 1990s. It was a boomer vs. millennial clash . I remember how often I kept complaining about high school during the K+10 era. Even worse, the real problem why I hated school was that school cared more about grades for the sake of grades , instead of teaching students how to get good grades based on learning first. What may have compounded it is that we've had boomer parents who thought that fatigue is a badge of honor .  What I realized is the common problem of toxic positivity . We have the "good vibes only" or "everything will turn out right in the end". Sadly, life doesn't always turn out that way. You can tell a terminally ill cancer patient that, and the cancer patient would die anyway. No amount of toxic positivity ever fixes the problem. This time, I'd like to rant once more about how toxic positivity has been used to defend the outdated 1987 Constitutio of the Philippines.  The classic r...
Read more

Hussam Middle Eastern Cuisine's New APM Prime Mall Location

It was sad when I went to Ayala Center Cebu to eat at Hussam Middle Eastern Cuisine. They had closed their office at Il Corso. They moved out of Ayala Center Cebu at the end of January . I remember talking to someone who said that the old location can be "very hard to find" when you enter the mall. Right now, I remember how trying to find Hussam in Ayala can be comparable to trying to find the magic lamp in Aladdin's  Cave of Wonders. That's what I felt back then, I ate at Hussam back in 2024 . Ayala Center Cebu probably had a low visibility problem. They had their soft opening on Black Saturday. They missed the Hari Raya Puasa date, a holiday for the Muslim population. This time, the use of glass walls makes it obvious to passersby that it's a Middle Eastern restaurant, that grilling is underway, and that it's certified halal .  The place still maintains the same pristine cleanliness I recall from Ayala Center Cebu. The place's transparent glass windows ...
Read more

How is IBON Foundation Viewing and/or Representing FDI in Their Articles?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I can't take IBON Foundation seriously . As the battle for economic charter change is on, I believe it's time to tackle them again. They're tweeting here and there. Okay, I'm no researcher or organization. However, it doesn't mean that I can't do some basic research, share the research of others, and read other books. Even an intellectually stupid person can actually make sense if they gather the best materials. I even recall someone I know who's not intelligent but he actually spoke well about career opportunities, in the very school where he wasn't performing well! Trying to understand IBON's data presentation  I would like to address how IBON Foundation presents FDI growth. They would say stuff such as the claim job creation weakened despite FDI growth .  I was looking at IBON Foundation's claim (above) where it says that job creation allegedly weakened despite FDI inflows. Sure, they named sources but do they ...
Read more

A Destructive Obsession with Ayuda (Cash Handouts)

IBON Foundation Yesterday, I decided to write about how Pinoy Pride won't help pay that enormous PHP 13.42 Trillion debt . I thought I'd probably take a bit of a break to do some more research. However, I feel the need to write this post today since one of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's a destructive fetish for foreign investment . Then, another of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's money for Ayuda . I really feel insulted reading these since I'm a Masters Degree graduate in the School of Business and Economics. This really shows the destructive obsession with ayuda (cash handouts) and protectionism. IBON Foundation Above is one of IBON Foundation's charts. Some people on Facebook have gone as far as to call them Birdbrain Foundation. So what if there's money for ayuda or cash handouts? The problem here is that "think tanks" like IBON Foundation want to make it look like ayuda is more important. If asked to account ...
Read more

Why I Don't See IBON Foundation as a Real Economic "Think TanK'

It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical. IBON Foundation (click to enlarge) This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect  more often than not.  Malaya Business Insight It's ...
Read more