Skip to main content

Will Opening the Philippines to 100% FDI Lead to Foreign Monopoly?

Monopoly - Hasbro

I was looking at the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum on Facebook. I found more illogical arguments by a certain troll in the forum named Juan Dalisay Jr.--the writer of the Superphysics One website. However, this isn't the first argument I ran into as I've seen arguments from Kabataan Partylist and the League of Filipino Students on Facebook. They have claimed that foreign direct investments (FDIs) will lead to exploitation, only they will get rich, that they will rape resources, and an even funnier claim is that they will lead to monopolies. Some people, even fools, should be allowed to defend themselves at CoRRECT Moderated Public Forum than just live in their echo chamber of Facebook pages.

However, Kishore Mahbubani and the late Lee Kuan Yew had long disproven that. The testimony is in the book From Third World to First by Lee himself. Mahbubani said foreign investors create jobs, bring capital, and teach new skills. I wonder if protectionist advocates like IBON Foundation and Philippine Anti-Fascist League have the guts to go to Singapore, have an appointment with the National University of Singapore, and tell Mahbubani, "Foreign investments are bad. It's like allowing yourself to be raped." All the while, Singapore has beaten the Philippines economically for more than 30 years. All the protectionist advocates were proven wrong yet they insist on their error. They need to go to Singapore and tell Mahbubani he's wrong about FDI. If they do, maybe I'll believe them but I doubt Mahbubani will believe them. 

Let's define the word monopoly. Mono is the Greek word for single. Polein is the Greek word for seller. In short, a monopoly means a singular seller. How in the world would 100% FDI (in terms of shares ownership) lead to a monopoly? The advocacy is to let foreigners invest 100% without a Filipino partner. They don't need to split 60% of their net income after taxes with a Filipino partner. Instead, they keep all their net income after taxes after they've as said, paid everything needed such as their suppliers (which will have local suppliers), employees (which will be mostly locals), and the BIR gets the monthly value tax, the quarterly tax, and the annual income tax. The profits are theirs to keep but it's what's left of revenues minus all of the expenses. In turn, when there are more players, it doesn't become a monopoly anymore. How can it be a monopoly if there are many players involved? 

I would like to point out some recurring foreign investments in the Philippines. I know some of these are no longer restricted by the negative list of the Philippines. Some foreign investments have been given exemptions already--something that prevented the Philippines from becoming another Venezuela or North Korea. I'm going to point out multinational franchises in the Philippines. We have foreign retail stores, food chains, services, and so on which are currently allowed on the negative list. The late former Philippine President, Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, did more than invite--he relaxed certain restrictions too. Outgoing Philippine President, Rodrigo R. Duterte, later signed the Public Services Act of 2022. I believe those two measures would help stabilize the Philippines. Hopefully, we'll get an economic charter change that Andrew James Masigan, an economist, so pushes for. That's why I even wrote that I'm in favor of having an economic charter change. Masigan is an economist and has had a better background than that Dalisay Jr. I keep running into on Facebook. 

Let's think about many foreign firms with Philippine outlets. We have different industries where foreign players are in. Did these create a monopoly? Here's a list of some of the foreign players here and there:
  • The milk and coffee shop industry has had several players. Before the milk tea craze, there was already Starbucks before Bo's Coffee Club opened. Sometime after Bo's Coffee Club opened--we've had other players like Chatime, Gong Cha, Yifang, Tiger Sugar, Coffee Bean, and Seattle's Best which are all foreign players. I'd like to congratulate Bo's Coffee Club for standing strong and pray it will reach the multinational levels. 
  • We've got several foreign food chains. McDonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), Kenny Rogers Roasters, Sbarro, Krispy Creme, Pizza Hut, and Shakey's are among the few. Later, local players are like Yellow Cab Pizza (owned by Max's Group which includes my childhood memory of Max's Fried Chicken), La Tegola (which is owned by an Italian but still a Filipino business), ABACA Group of Companies' restaurants, and Jollibee (which is now a worldwide franchise).
  • I go to the technology section of either SM City Cebu or Ayala Center Cebu and find many imported retail stores. You've got Samsung, Apple, Xiaomi, and HP stores. We have local technological providers that sell all imported equipment.
  • We have banks like Citibank, Commerce International Merchant Bankers (CIMB), the Internationale Nederlanden Groep (ING) Bank, and even Western Union. They all end up employing Filipinos and serving Filipinos. If we're going to have foreign investment--we also need more banks eventually to cater to locals and foreigners. 
  • Some hotels in the Philippines are foreign-owned such as Shangri-La, Sofitel, Accor Hotels, and Marriot. 
A big common sense question here (and it doesn't take an MBA to figure it out) is did these foreign investments create what fearmongers say--a foreign monopoly? I don't remember buying my favorite imported products from a foreign monopoly. In fact, I'm still able to get choices whether I want some Yellow Cab Pizza (local) or some Pizza Hut (imported). I'm still able to go to Jolly Bubble for their fruit tea or enjoy a latte from Bo's Coffee Club. No, it's because these FDIs add up to the number of players. An oligopoly is where we have few sellers and many buyers. In FDI, we want to achieve free markets where there will be many buyers and many sellers. There will be more choices as long as players abide by rules such as fair competition laws, intellectual property laws, and labor laws. Of course, it's first come, first served, so the one who gets the reservation gets to do business first. 

The argument is just nonsensical. I wonder where such people get such ideas? If it's a monopoly then why are there many sellers to many buyers? Singapore had long disproven it. Malaysia had long disproven it. The Philippines should be more open to FDI to avoid monopolies or oligopolies. What we need is more healthy competition to develop the local business industry. The only businesses that will die, whether local or foreign, are those that don't innovate. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Websites

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...
Read more

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...
Read more

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, Malacañan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...
Read more

How Open FDI Can Help Tatak Pinoy Bill Reach Its Objective for Better Filipino Businesses

Net25.COM Is it me or is the Philippines' economic policy not that well-defined? One can always argue there's no need for an economic charter change, never mind that the economic legacy of the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino had economic amendments. I was looking into Facebook and found the updates on the Senate of the Philippines' Facebook page.  The update above from the Senate of the Philippines' Facebook page has me skeptical. Now, I decided to do a little more Googling before I criticize. It would be best to get what the other party says. I would like to share a part of what Philippine Senator Sonny Angara has to say, which I might provide some constructive criticism along the way: When we came up with our Tatak Pinoy or Proudly Filipino advocacy in 2019, the overarching goal was to transform the Philippines into a progressive and vibrant economy, to help Filipino entrepreneurs and industries become more competitive, and to provide our people with more opportunitie...
Read more

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...
Read more