Skip to main content

My Thoughts on the Misunderstood PHP 8,000.00 Rule in Stock Investments

I think one of the most misunderstood rules is the PHP 8,000.00 rule. One reason why I decided to reach at least PHP 8,000.00 for my three GInvest funds (ATRAM Global Consumer Trends Feeder Fund, ATRAM Global Technology Feeder Fund, and the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund) is because of that rule. Though, some people tend to misinterpret it that they shouldn't enter the stock market (in any way either through DIY trading or buying an index fund) until they have PHP 8,000.00. Personally, I took advantage of GInvest's minimum start-up for the local fund (start with PHP 50.00 but it's not going to grow big with just that) and the feeder funds with PHP 1,000.00 each. What I did (instead) was to slowly invest money until the minimum was met. 

Why do I feel waiting until you have PHP 8,000.00 before you invest in a bad rule? The fees are there, yes, but you may not be able to take advantage of the low dips. The market is rather unpredictable with the supply and demand. Stocks get affected by company performance, economic performance, industry performance, and public sentiments. Instead, some people suggest doing cost averaging which is to invest the same amount per month. 

The NAVPU goes higher or lower per month. Instead, beginners may want to try these two alternatives to reach a minimum of PHP 8,000.00 before adding more than that:

  1.  The first rule may be to invest PHP 1,000.00 for eight months.
  2. The second rule may be to invest PHP 2,000.00 for four months.
  3. The third rule may be to invest PHP 4,000.00 for two months.
Of course, I don't say to stop with PHP 8,000.00. Instead, it would be ideal to maintain PHP 8,000.00 for the purchase of a certain stock (for direct trading) or for the purchase of indexes and feeder funds. In my case, I prefer the use of the index fund (and it's Warren Edward Buffett's advice to most investors) and the feeder funds for global stocks. The idea is to try and reach PHP 8,000.00 within with three timeframes that I've mentioned. This is called cost averaging in order to minimize losses. I think waiting until you have PHP 8,000.00 then buying a stock or a stock index that amount during a bull market isn't very advisable. Sure, it's not wrong to buy stocks during a bull market. However, it's very risky to purchase by bulks during a bull market in contrast to a bear market. 

For beginners, just think if you bought PHP 1,000.00 for eight months (or PHP 2,000.00 for four months) during a bull market. This would mean minimizing risks for those eight months. Then a bear market strikes and you start investing higher beyond the PHP 8,000.00 that was achieved. The bull market is still subject to lower performances so one may get more units during a bull market. In short, more units are bought when the NAVPU is down. Meanwhile, the bear market would mean getting even more units per PHP 1,000.00 purchased. The risk is rather minimized. Meanwhile, it might be a wise decision to purchase more shares during a dip (but only use the money you don't need now) than to remain investing the same amount. Though, some prefer cost-averaging since it tends to minimize risk. I tend to do a mixture of value averaging and cost averaging. 

Though, it's much easier to invest PHP 8,000.00 rule in a wide array of portfolios 

It's also right to invest PHP 8,000.00 immediately during a dip. Granted, my access to Philippine-based stocks isn't just my AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund (which uses PHP 3,000.02 regardless of bear or bull, read more here) but also my recent purchase of the Philippine Equity Stock Index Fund (read here). Let's say I decided to invest PHP 8,000.00 immediately in an index fund than individual stocks (which can be a burden for some). This PHP 8,000.00 will be allocated to the Top 30 companies that are in the Philippine Stock Exchange Index (PSEi). It would be interesting to know that you get a basket of stocks from companies like SM Investments, SM Prime Holdings, Banco De Oro (BDO), Ayala Corporation, PLDT, BPI, JG Summit Holdings, and Meralco to name a few out of the 30 companies listed. 

One issue I have with direct stock trading is that it's not recommended by Buffett for most investors. Some people do prefer the direct trading approach (where they select their portfolio to buy and hold for some time). However, I prefer the equity fund approach (such as the index fund and feeder fund) to avoid having to do that much research. I think it can be tiresome if I have to slowly choose to invest PHP 1,000.00 until it reaches at least PHP 8,000.00 with one company and then choose the next. It might also mean that I'll have to reach PHP 8,000.00 for each company I'm investing in. Meanwhile, I think spending PHP 8,000.00 immediately over a diverse list can be a better idea. It's because the PHP 8,000.00 will be allocated like this:
  1. SM Prime Holdings (13.2%) -- PHP 1,056.00
  2. SM Prime Holdings (11.1%) -- PHP 888.00
  3. International Services Container Inc. (7.2%) -- PHP 576.00
  4. BDO Unibank Inc. (7.1%) -- PHP 568.00
  5. Ayala Land Inc. (6.9%) -- PHP 552.00
  6. Ayala Corp. (6.4%) -- PHP 512.00
  7. PLDT (6.0%) -- PHP 480.00
  8. BPI (7.0%) -- PHP 560.00
  9. JG Summit Holdings Inc. (4.3%) -- PHP 344.00
  10. Meralco (3.3%) -- PHP 264.00
It all gets allocated into several funds in one basket. It would be easier to apply the PHP 8,000.00 rule with a basket of stocks than to individual stocks. Though, those who are better are more comfortable applying the PHP 8,000.00 rule across various stocks. Personally, I think I'd take the side with the majority in Buffett's advice. I don't intend to stop with PHP 8,000.00 for all three investments. In fact, I placed more than PHP 8,000.00 in my Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund. I want to put more into the feeder funds I just bought but they're not in a dip. So, it might be wise to simply allocate PHP 1,000.00 each until it reaches another certain amount. I'm not going to spill out the final amount either for confidential reasons.

Popular posts from this blog

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...

An Interesting Mental Exercise for Chinese as Second Language Class

Back in my day, I remember we kept memorizing what was called bon toi (written as 问题, Wèntí in Mandarin) without understanding them. I hated memorizing those. I guess another reason was to parrot what one can't understand. We had the biak diam too which is Hokkien for oral recitation. Memorizing the question and answer (written as 问题和答案, Wèntí hé dá'àn in Mandarin) would actually not be so tedious if Chinese was taught as a second language. My bizarre idea is to think about having only one bon toi but there are five answers to memorize.  Memorizing (and understanding) why some don't want to learn Chinese These five reasons (above) have to be memorized in both Chinese and English. The teacher (老师, Lǎoshī) would say the question,  "不学中文的最大借口是什么?" (Bù xué zhōngwén de zuìdà jièkǒu shì shénme?). The question can't be answered  until  the student actually translated it as, "What are the top excuses not to learn Chinese?"  The student will eval...