Skip to main content

Understanding More Of AXA's Chinese Tycoon Fund


Right now, with the bear market, the advice is often to buy stocks now, hold for as long as possible, and maybe sell them only later. These funds are meant for the long term. I wanted to enter into stocks but my short attention span can be a killer. I decided to buy AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund for a start. The fee is PHP 3,000.02 per month regardless of whether the market is up or down. In investment, it's pretty much called dollar-cost averaging or cost averaging. It's investing the same amount of money per month regardless the market is a bear or a bull. Right now, we're in a bear market so more units are bought when you invest. However, I prefer to mix and match both values cost averaging (add more money than the minimum) and cost averaging (entering the minimum amount for investment) to try and maximize profits. 

The Chinese Tycoon Fund had its top holdings of the following companies in May 2022:
  1. SM Investments Corporation -- 23%
  2. SM Prime Holdings Inc. -- 19.6%
  3. BDO Unibank Inc. -- 13.4%
  4. JG Summit Holdings Inc. -- 8.1%
  5. Metropolitan Bank and Trust -- 6.0%
  6. Jollibee Foods Corporation -- 4.9%
  7. Universal Robina Corp. -- 4.9%
  8. Converge ICT Solutions Inc. -- 3.1%
  9. GT Capital Holding -- 2.3%
  10. Security Bank Corp. -- 2.2%
So, most of my investments via the Chinese Tycoon Fund are based on the late Henry Sy Sr.'s companies. Meanwhile, I also have some investments with companies from the late John Gokongwei Jr. and Tony Tancaktiong. 

Meanwhile, the sector holdings are as follows:
  1. Industrials -- 38.8%
  2. Real Estate -- 24.5%
  3. Financials -- 22.8%
  4. Consumer Staples -- 8.7%
  5. Consumer Discretionary -- 5.2%
What I didn't understand (at first) were the premium charges. It happened during the first three years for Axelerator products such as the Chinese Tycoon Fund. However, it was a good thing I decided to ask before doing anything such as pulling it out. After all, I've been with Metrobank since 2007 (when I first opened a savings account) and AXA is linked to it. The premium charges go to the insurance portion. A small portion is usually invested in cash such as bonds. Bonds would be a beginner's best friend and a good addition to the portfolio. Since I wanted to enter into stocks--I bought the Chinese Tycoon Fund since I feel my short attention span could be a killer. The charge per year though is 2.5% which is kinda high. Though, a combination of active and passive management may justify why the fees are higher. There are a lot of risks involved and I think active management can be a good thing. AXA, being a trusted company, can be trusted with your money. I feel this Bill Baker guy on Youtube probably didn't understand the fund he bought or look at the market performance.

Though, I felt that I wanted to invest a little more. So, what I did was use GInvest on GCash. I did make the mistake of inserting money to test it during the high. However, I decided to research other methods beyond "buy high, sell low" to try and do some cost averaging and value cost averaging. The trust fees for ATRAM range from 1.0% to 1.5%. I decided to purchase a diverse portfolio using GCash to get more stocks (via Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund, read here) and some ATRAM Global Feeder Funds (read here). Dividends are reinvested which would be better. There'd be more units bought or some dividends will be used to pay the management fees. It's unfair, really, not to pay your fund manager, right? 

So why am I still letting the AXA roll? It's because my PHP 3,000.02 will get more units now in a bear market. A bull market is usually an opportunity to sell some stocks though some will still prefer to invest (but less) in a bull market. A bear market is a time to buy more though some prefer to still invest the same amount in fears values will get lower. Though, one could buy a little bit higher than usual during a bear market. I would still want to keep my Chinese Tycoon Fund (while pursuing other funds) to make the best of active management and passive management. 

References

Documents

"Chinese Tycoon Fund" 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...
Read more

A Destructive Obsession with Ayuda (Cash Handouts)

IBON Foundation Yesterday, I decided to write about how Pinoy Pride won't help pay that enormous PHP 13.42 Trillion debt . I thought I'd probably take a bit of a break to do some more research. However, I feel the need to write this post today since one of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's a destructive fetish for foreign investment . Then, another of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's money for Ayuda . I really feel insulted reading these since I'm a Masters Degree graduate in the School of Business and Economics. This really shows the destructive obsession with ayuda (cash handouts) and protectionism. IBON Foundation Above is one of IBON Foundation's charts. Some people on Facebook have gone as far as to call them Birdbrain Foundation. So what if there's money for ayuda or cash handouts? The problem here is that "think tanks" like IBON Foundation want to make it look like ayuda is more important. If asked to account ...
Read more

How is IBON Foundation Viewing and/or Representing FDI in Their Articles?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I can't take IBON Foundation seriously . As the battle for economic charter change is on, I believe it's time to tackle them again. They're tweeting here and there. Okay, I'm no researcher or organization. However, it doesn't mean that I can't do some basic research, share the research of others, and read other books. Even an intellectually stupid person can actually make sense if they gather the best materials. I even recall someone I know who's not intelligent but he actually spoke well about career opportunities, in the very school where he wasn't performing well! Trying to understand IBON's data presentation  I would like to address how IBON Foundation presents FDI growth. They would say stuff such as the claim job creation weakened despite FDI growth .  I was looking at IBON Foundation's claim (above) where it says that job creation allegedly weakened despite FDI inflows. Sure, they named sources but do they ...
Read more