Skip to main content

Social Media Gossipers Make Terrible Economists

Soft Icons


I guess my frustrations today aren't so easily vented, right? Some time ago, I wrote about how social media gossipers make terrible financial advisers. Just reading comments on Facebook about the Philippine stock market makes me cringe. That's why if you want to listen to someone for financial advice--make sure that person knows finance better than you such as Lucio Tan Sr., Tony Tancaktiong, the late Henry Sy Sr., and the late John Gokongwei Jr. If there's another area worth thinking about--it's about how social media gossipers also make terrible economists. I guess the two blue birds that are gossiping above this paragraph should tell you how much I can't take IBON Foundation seriously (read here).

I could remember reading social media posts on Facebook when it came to several economic reforms. Similar gossip was written during the terms of two former Philippine presidents--the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III and Rodrigo R. Duterte. Aquino III had invited some investors over in certain sectors. Later, Duterte signed the Public Services Act of 2022. The two former presidents weren't spared from social media gossipers who know nothing about practical economics. Sure, one can even get a bachelor's degree in economics but still fail in life. I can go ahead and study for a Ph.D. from the School of Business and Economics (SBE) at the University of San Carlos (USC) and still be a fool. Though, I think the other gossipers are graduates of non-business-related courses. Then again, even a non-business graduate can still try and understand economics.

The gossips were really that stupid. I could start to talk about interactions on various Facebook pages that I've run into. I won't be too busy screenshotting all of them. Instead, I would actually start to summarize the gossip into what's commonly found:
  1. The common series of lies that opening the country to foreign direct investments (FDI) means the following: we're allowing our national sovereignty to be lost, we're neglecting our local industries, we're allowing ourselves to be exploited by foreigners, and only FDIs will get rich if you let them invest here, and the long list can go on. 
  2. First-world countries didn't develop by accepting FDIs but by protecting their local industries. That's why we should develop our national industry first before opening up the country. 
  3. The Public Services Act of 2022 is Duterte's gift to China! If I remember correctly, they also said the same thing when Aquino III also tried to invite Chinese investors. Maybe, I should thank Aquino III that Xiaomi is in the Philippines. Xiaomi was opened in 2010 which was during the reign of Aquino III. 
  4. Singapore only accepted FDIs because they're not rich in natural resources, unlike the Philippines. This is yet another dumb response. They say that the Philippines has natural resources and should just self-industrialize. 
Right now, my headache is triggered just trying to summarize the long list of nonsense that's been written by the social media gossipers. I try to explain to them over and they would give rebuttals from "think tanks" like IBON Foundation and Bayan Muna. Their other favorite sources are Christian Monsod and his wife Solitas "Winnie" Collas-Monsod. I try to present arguments such as Singaporean-Indian Kishore Mahbubani's famous quote from The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009 about foreign investments. Mahbubani, like Hilario Davide Jr. was a longtime, multi-awarded United Nations (UN) diplomat (read more about here). What I tried next was to cite other sources such as the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First. They may start to give out excuses like such as that Singapore has no natural resources but the Philippines has them. I can cite the late Deng Xiaoping's achievements with China. I can even go get as many sources as possible. However, these people can be very close-minded one way or another.

Maybe, one annoying rebuttal these social media gossipers can speak in Tagalog is, "Bakit puro foreigner ang sources mo? Bakit walang Pinoy" (Why is it all your sources are foreigner? Why no Filipino or Pinoy?) That again becomes another source of annoyance. Why am I citing from non-Filipino sources like Mahbubani and Lee? It's because they helped build Singapore from a third-world country into a first-world country. Though, even if I cite Filipino sources, these people may throw whatever Ad Hominems and name callings they can. That so and so is a "traitor". All the while, the irony is that they're actually arguing it on Facebook or Twitter which are American-made platforms. 

In short, these social media gossipers will just ignore the evidence if it doesn't suit them. I guess they don't care how contradictory they are to using capitalist-made gadgets while whining against capitalism. They will just say, "We're forced to participate in it." or "The last capitalist we hung is the one who sold us the rope." If they care about workers' welfare (which I feel is just an act) then why buy capitalist products that are supposedly exploiting all the working class? That will give the companies more power. Instead, any real capitalist values their labor which adds value to their capital. Workers own their salaries but only according to contribution. Some of them are also anti-American but they're using American-based platforms such as Google and WordPress. It's really funny how they only know how to use things but do not appreciate them. Hence, all their self-contradictions even further verify how they make... terrible economists. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Tragic Windfall of the Late Flor Contemplacion's Family

PEH.ph Last year, I wrote an article talking about Flor Contemplacion crybabies spreading fake news for 30 years . I noticed that the movie could be watched for free on YouTube (which is one hour and 52 minutes long), and the one that you had to pay for via rent or personal soft copy ( which is two hours and two minutes long). I was looking into the film and realized the "for free" version lacks the exaggerated water dunking and electrocution torture scene, which I believe is available, which is a ten-minute difference. I remember seeing the old version where Flor was tortured by Singaporean police via water dunking and electrocution, to get an answer out of her. The famous line by the late Nora Aunor was, "I did not kill anybody!" It's 31 years, and I don't expect the fake news about Flor to stop just because  it's past 30. No, fake news is that hard to kill even in the digital age. It reminds me of the fate of Flor's sons , where one of them, Sandr...
Read more

Has Passing Down Hatred for Singapore (Because of Flor Contemplacion) Economically Helped the Philippines?

PEH.ph It was on March 17, 1995, when Flor Contemplacion was executed in Singapore. I've noticed that I've been addressing her as the late many times, even if the late is a statement that may be ony appropriate if the person has been recently deceased within 10 years. It's about to become 30 years since Flor was hanged in Singapore. However, generational hatred would've been passed down from 1995 up to 2025. Some people are still tagging #JusticeFor Flor. These traits may be passed down from the Batang 1990s to their children in this generation. It may also be passed down from parent to child, even if the child was born in the 2000s to 2010s. Somebody born in 2000s and beyond might even say, "Papa and mama told me about Flor Contemplacion! That's why I hate Singapore!" Talk about a child born in 2004 who's probably angry with Singapore, because his parents kept telling him about how Flor was supposedly "unjustly treated" over there.  Some tim...
Read more

It's A Myth: First World Countries Self-Industrialized and Only Opened to FDI, After They Succeeded

The Straits Times As the battle for economic charter change goes on, another lie often spread: "First world countries, first industrialized by themselves, before they opened their economy to FDI." I'm seeing it ironically on Facebook. I tell them, "If you hate foreigners so much, why don't you get out of the Internet?" Some of them give replies like, "We're not hypocrites for badmouthing FDI on Facebook. We're simply forced to use imported equipment because foreigners unfairly own the means of production (read rebuttal here )." When I ask for their sources, they give sources like people from Bayan Muna (Nation First), the League of Filipino Students, the IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist (Youth Partylist), the Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT), and maybe even the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP). Most of these sources (not all) are the favorite sources of those going against badly needed economic cha-cha.  I...
Read more

Why FDIs are Choosing COMMUNIST Vietnam Over DEMOCRATIC Philippines

China Daily HK Tomorrow is Ho Chi Minh's birthday. I would like to raise another FDI issue between democratic Philippines and Communist Vietnam. I remember with a certain woman I'll call Miss Clueless, to respect her privacy. Miss Clueless probably never saw a map, called FDI as Favored Duterte-China Investments, and I told her the bigger problem with the constitutional restrictions. Miss Clueless kept talking about that the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III made us a tiger economy, regardless. However, I wrote that relying too much on Noynoy's economic legacy, is pretty much landing into the same fatal mistake that Nokia did . Relying on past successes is a surefire recipe for failure. As Miss Clueless blamed former president Rodrigo R. Duterte, the person still believes that people must change first before systems. I asked her, "Why are people choosing Communist Vietnam over the Philippines." The reason I heard from Miss Clueless was something...
Read more

Is Jollibee "Invading" South Korea Now as It's About to Acquire 70% of Shabu All Day?

I must confess that I find this new rather hilarious . It's because the word shabu is often associated with drugs. All the while, shabu shabu is a Korean delicacy! Well, I'm going to say that Jollibee Foods Corporation has now become a multinational buyer . Jollibee acquired 70% of Compost Coffee back in 2024 . This year, Jollibee as a multinational corporation is now acquiring Shabu All Day for PHP 5.1 billion pesos. Is Jollibee checkmating South Korea or is the Philippines conquering South Korea not just by OFWs but als through Jollibee? The answer is still no. From GMA News , we can read this article by Jon Viktor D. Cabuenas: Under the deal, Shabu All Day will be consolidated into Jollibee Foods Corp.’s (JFC) financial statements immediately upon completion of the acquisition for a total consideration equivalent to KRW127 billion. Completion of the transaction is subject to closing and financing conditions. The acquisition is expected to lead to a 2% jump in revenues, incre...
Read more