Skip to main content

Social Media Gossipers Make Terrible Economists

Soft Icons


I guess my frustrations today aren't so easily vented, right? Some time ago, I wrote about how social media gossipers make terrible financial advisers. Just reading comments on Facebook about the Philippine stock market makes me cringe. That's why if you want to listen to someone for financial advice--make sure that person knows finance better than you such as Lucio Tan Sr., Tony Tancaktiong, the late Henry Sy Sr., and the late John Gokongwei Jr. If there's another area worth thinking about--it's about how social media gossipers also make terrible economists. I guess the two blue birds that are gossiping above this paragraph should tell you how much I can't take IBON Foundation seriously (read here).

I could remember reading social media posts on Facebook when it came to several economic reforms. Similar gossip was written during the terms of two former Philippine presidents--the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III and Rodrigo R. Duterte. Aquino III had invited some investors over in certain sectors. Later, Duterte signed the Public Services Act of 2022. The two former presidents weren't spared from social media gossipers who know nothing about practical economics. Sure, one can even get a bachelor's degree in economics but still fail in life. I can go ahead and study for a Ph.D. from the School of Business and Economics (SBE) at the University of San Carlos (USC) and still be a fool. Though, I think the other gossipers are graduates of non-business-related courses. Then again, even a non-business graduate can still try and understand economics.

The gossips were really that stupid. I could start to talk about interactions on various Facebook pages that I've run into. I won't be too busy screenshotting all of them. Instead, I would actually start to summarize the gossip into what's commonly found:
  1. The common series of lies that opening the country to foreign direct investments (FDI) means the following: we're allowing our national sovereignty to be lost, we're neglecting our local industries, we're allowing ourselves to be exploited by foreigners, and only FDIs will get rich if you let them invest here, and the long list can go on. 
  2. First-world countries didn't develop by accepting FDIs but by protecting their local industries. That's why we should develop our national industry first before opening up the country. 
  3. The Public Services Act of 2022 is Duterte's gift to China! If I remember correctly, they also said the same thing when Aquino III also tried to invite Chinese investors. Maybe, I should thank Aquino III that Xiaomi is in the Philippines. Xiaomi was opened in 2010 which was during the reign of Aquino III. 
  4. Singapore only accepted FDIs because they're not rich in natural resources, unlike the Philippines. This is yet another dumb response. They say that the Philippines has natural resources and should just self-industrialize. 
Right now, my headache is triggered just trying to summarize the long list of nonsense that's been written by the social media gossipers. I try to explain to them over and they would give rebuttals from "think tanks" like IBON Foundation and Bayan Muna. Their other favorite sources are Christian Monsod and his wife Solitas "Winnie" Collas-Monsod. I try to present arguments such as Singaporean-Indian Kishore Mahbubani's famous quote from The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009 about foreign investments. Mahbubani, like Hilario Davide Jr. was a longtime, multi-awarded United Nations (UN) diplomat (read more about here). What I tried next was to cite other sources such as the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First. They may start to give out excuses like such as that Singapore has no natural resources but the Philippines has them. I can cite the late Deng Xiaoping's achievements with China. I can even go get as many sources as possible. However, these people can be very close-minded one way or another.

Maybe, one annoying rebuttal these social media gossipers can speak in Tagalog is, "Bakit puro foreigner ang sources mo? Bakit walang Pinoy" (Why is it all your sources are foreigner? Why no Filipino or Pinoy?) That again becomes another source of annoyance. Why am I citing from non-Filipino sources like Mahbubani and Lee? It's because they helped build Singapore from a third-world country into a first-world country. Though, even if I cite Filipino sources, these people may throw whatever Ad Hominems and name callings they can. That so and so is a "traitor". All the while, the irony is that they're actually arguing it on Facebook or Twitter which are American-made platforms. 

In short, these social media gossipers will just ignore the evidence if it doesn't suit them. I guess they don't care how contradictory they are to using capitalist-made gadgets while whining against capitalism. They will just say, "We're forced to participate in it." or "The last capitalist we hung is the one who sold us the rope." If they care about workers' welfare (which I feel is just an act) then why buy capitalist products that are supposedly exploiting all the working class? That will give the companies more power. Instead, any real capitalist values their labor which adds value to their capital. Workers own their salaries but only according to contribution. Some of them are also anti-American but they're using American-based platforms such as Google and WordPress. It's really funny how they only know how to use things but do not appreciate them. Hence, all their self-contradictions even further verify how they make... terrible economists. 

References

Books

"From Third World to First--The Singapore Story: 1965-2000) by Lee Kuan Yew
Harpers Collins Publishers

Videos

"The Singapore economic model - VPRO documentary - 2009"  by VRPO Documentary (September 8, 2018)

Popular posts from this blog

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, MalacaƱan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...

Is the Philippines About to Checkmate South Korea as Jollibee is About to Get 70% of Compose Coffee's Equity?

Yes, you read it right--Jollibee is set to acquire 70% of the shares of South Korean coffee brand Compose Coffee. This is an excerpt from the Philippine Star Global : JFC’s wholly owned subsidiary Jollibee Worldwide Pte. Ltd. (JWPL) is set to acquire majority shareholding of 70 percent in Compose Coffee Co. Ltd. and JMCF Co. Ltd., collectively called Compose Coffee, for approximately $340 million . Titan Dining II LP and Elevation Equity Partners Korea Limited will hold the remaining shareholdings in Compose Coffee with effective interest of five percent and 25 percent, respectively. Through JWPL, JFC has a 90 percent participating interest in Titan Fund II , which is focused on strategic investments in food and beverage concepts with the objective to further grow in Asia Pacific food service brands and bring strong global food service brands to the region. It's effortless to start the cheer and dance when a Filipino company opens abroad. This is a meme by the CoRRECT Movement on F...

The WORLDWIDE Great Depression Was Worsened, NOT Relieved, by Economic Protectionism

I feel like doing a study with history right now. People tell me to study history when they try to defend how protectionism made first-world countries a powerhouse. However, a flick on the pages of Lee Kuan Yew's classic From Third World to First  will tell you that's a big fat lie. I feel like talking about the Great Depression from 1929 to 1939 which also involved the Stock Market Crash of 1929. These events can be rooted in economic protectionism . Economic protectionism is defined by the Investopedia as follows: Protectionism refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns. The dumb legislation that made it worse I remembered reading about the Stock Market Crash of 1929. The causes of it were linked to people buying too many stocks. Local companies overprod...