Skip to main content

The Problem of Too Much Focus on Memorization in Schools

Right now, I'm glad that the K+12 education (read more about it here) got implemented during the time of the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III. There are times that I tend to remember how dreadful high school life can be, how I kept complaining that high school is difficult nearly 24/7, I felt weekends weren't even weekends (and I ended up addicted to gaming and television as a form of escapism), and how often I felt like I wanted to drop out of high school. It was the K+10 curriculum which was six years of elementary and four years of high school. I barely passed and I always considered myself stupid, therefore, if you're stupid, you can't learn anything. 

The emphasis on grades became another thing. Too many times, we're told that if our grades in math and science weren't good--why not take Hotel & Restaurant Management (HRM)? Not even being told that a chef's salary can be decent convinced me it may not be a bad thing. I was even told that if HRM was "so easy" then that course shouldn't exist at all. A better thing to say is that if you don't study hard--you might as well be an editor of vernacular comics instead. Though, taking B.S. Business Administration and having classmates taking B.S. HRM made me realize its importance (read here). It's because the B.S. Information Technology course (BSIT) was so glamorized. It was pretty much, "If you're not taking it--you must be very stupid."

How was grading done? One could think about the overemphasis on memorization. True, memorization helps in real life. You need to memorize the basic arithmetic table to function in life. You need to memorize the color coding of traffic lights, street tules, and the like to be street smart. Memorization of basic science also helps in life. Knowing how vaccines work helps deal against the flood of disinformation done by the anti-vaxxers. Knowing about how a virus is transmitted would help in times of a pandemic. Memorization is indeed part of life. The problem isn't memorization but too much on it without understanding what's memorized.

From Education Week--I felt this is another reason why history classes are failing in the USA:

Students in U.S. classrooms are startlingly ignorant of American history, but it’s not because their teachers have failed them. It’s because the curriculum in most schools focuses on memorizing “irrelevant, boring” names and dates, according to a study released Tuesday.

Researchers for the Woodrow Wilson Foundation surveyed the 50 states and found that students are indeed weak on their knowledge of American history. But unlike some critics, who fault teacher training or weak course requirements, the report’s authors say bad curriculum is to blame.

“Based on our analysis, this is not an issue of whether high school history teachers are adequately prepared or whether children today even study American history in school,” the foundation’s president, Arthur Levine, says in a statement. “The answer to both questions is yes. This is an issue of how we teach American history and whether today’s learners see relevance and are engaged in what and how history is taught.

The same can be true for any subject. I confess that I hated mathematics with a passion in high school. The more it haunts me--the more I did research and found out that we're teaching mathematics wrong (read here). Nothing in mathematics makes sense until you know how they're used in real life. Calculus is heavily used not just in engineering but also in business and economics decisions (read here). Every mathematics is part of life. Yet, the way it's taught makes it so separate from life. How can science and mathematics make sense if the way they're taught is pretty much like they're disconnected? I even tried to divorce physics from mathematics when they're just related. I'd say it's the way it's taught. We had brilliant teachers but the Philippine education system really sucks. Either school apply too much pressure or too little of it. Too much pressure can break a person down. Too little pressure can make a person too soft. The right amount of pressure makes a person better. It's like the pressure is used in the exercise. Apply too much pressure in exercise and you can injure yourself. Don't exercise and you can start to experience a lot of health issues like extreme obesity and higher stress.

This has resulted in another vicious cycle. Some people may have wanted to drop out of school because of their grades. Many times, I just wanted to drop out of school, especially during my fourth year during K+10. I felt like mathematics was truly my biggest Waterloo. The teacher tried to help me but I just kept shouting in her class. I even told the teacher to forget about me because I'm just stupid and useless. My science teacher would warn me about my lack of diligence. Both the math teacher and science teacher tried to help me. I only told them that once a person's stupid--there's no hope for it. I barely passed because they prodded me. I took a two-year course--something I felt ashamed of as a "badge of shame". Later, I felt that not being accepted into BSIT was probably for the best. A lot of BSIT students shifted after their second year or even after their first year. I kinda had a good laugh meeting somebody who admitted he shifted. 

What I felt became the problem is how too much memorization is focused. The grades are usually focused on memorization. I think another problem in foreign language courses is how often people just memorize without understanding. I felt I hated the Chinese subject because of that. Was I really learning Mandarin with all those memorizations? I felt that zhuyin (use of the ancient Chinese alphabet) should be abolished in favor of pinyin. I use pinyin to search for Chinese characters on the Internet these days! I feel the Chinese language course needs to focus more on how to speak and how to read instead of memorizing too much. During my MBA, I remembered a Chinese language teacher from Cebu Eastern College (CEC) serving as an interpreter. Yet, it also reminded me of how I also hated the Chinese language subject and hated my Chinese blood in the process. What became the result was that people didn't learn to speak Mandarin--only memorized without understanding. The same goes for almost every subject.

I guess that's why cheating's very prevalent in schools too. People care too much about their grades can be a good reason. Another reason is because of the one-size-fits-all scenario. I remembered how my classmate got suspended for cheating on a Chinese language exam. I remembered attempting cheating back then when I was in my late tweens. It's because we had to have good grades or else. I guess the threat of punishment over failure might enforce the need to cheat. The student cheats, get punished, and then for all we know, the student may have some form of attention deficiency going on. Even worse, people who somehow can't fit in the whole one-size-fits-all scenario might even decide it's better to fail honestly than cheat. However, honesty seems hardly rewarded in society which may also encourage cheating even if cheating remains a punishable offense. 

I think we need to do this--connect everything to life applications. Mathematics and sciences should be viewed as more than just, "If you don't do well here-- take HRM!" Instead, it should be viewed as, "If you don't know these--you'll fail to understand life regardless of what course you'll take." I felt like our science teacher was intelligent but she was wrong about HRM. Mathematics and sciences are used everywhere. I feel like I understand trigonometry and geometry now (two mathematic subjects that are just not my type) in building the Cebu IT Park at Salinas Drive. Knowing about mathematical algorithms help me appreciate the computer technology I took for granted. I may have failed to become an IT expert--I can still make money via IT feeder funds. Learning biology, chemistry, and physics helped me appreciate my food trips and appreciate food preparation. Just imagine taking HRM and you don't know basic science. It'd be dumb actually if a chef doesn't know that cooking food is a chemical change. Schools should prepare students to think beyond the classroom. 

We need to look at how lessons are taught. Lessons will get harder because of new information. It's best for parents to stop expecting their children to be honor students if they were honor students. Instead, focus on the learning process. School back in my day can be easier than school today. Lessons will get harder but the learning process can be made more encouraging. If people see a better connection between the lessons and life--the difficulty of the struggle will be worth it in the long run. 

References

Websites

"History Instruction Indicted: Too Much Memorization, Too Little Meaning" by Catherine Gewetz (May 07, 2019)
https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/history-instruction-indicted-too-much-memorization-too-little-meaning/2019/05

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...