Happy Halloween, I guess? I decided to write this article just today to tackle scare tactics against economic liberalization. A scare tactic is defined as a strategy intended to manipulate public opinion about a particular issue by arousing fear or alarm. Economic liberalization is defined by Investopedia as:
Trade liberalization is the removal or reduction of restrictions or barriers on the free exchange of goods between nations. These barriers include tariffs, such as duties and surcharges, and nontariff barriers, such as licensing rules and quotas. Economists often view the easing or eradication of these restrictions as steps to promote free trade.
This is also where we have free trade. I've read protectionist scare tactics during the times of former Philippine presidents, the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino, and Rodrigo R. Duterte. I found a lot on Facebook and Twitter. It's not uncommon really that stupid people abound on social media and write the stupidest things. These scare tactics abound and it's no surprise. There are many to name though I'd like to name a few.
The scare tactic of saying only foreigners will get the jobs
Above is an example of a scare tactic. The meme belongs to the Philippine Anti-Fascist League Facebook page. I'm pretty disgusted by this one. They use a meme of the devilish clown from the Stephen King novel It. I'll translate what It the Clown is saying into English for the sake of non-Filipino readers. It is saying, "There will be many jobs if we open the Philippines to foreigners." However, the meme insinuates that only foreigners will get jobs instead of Filipinos.
Again, I've already explained that it's a blatant lie that only foreigners will get jobs as a result of FDI (read here). Yet, that's the same lie that was given. The same lie that only foreigners will get rich. They may make up stories such as a certain Korean school only gave Filipinos menial jobs than office jobs. However, one needs to check Korean schools and you may notice some Filipinos have already worked as secretaries, accountants, and English language teachers!
I wonder if these people know that Grab is Singaporean and Food Panda is German (read here). Both Singapore and Germany are very open economies. I've been ordering from Grab and Food Panda--both imported companies. The drivers that have arrived at my doorstep are Filipino drivers. How's that for FDIs will not provide jobs for Filipinos? How's that trying to refute my claim that FDIs provide jobs for the locals? I've ordered from both services. Grab drivers and Food Panda drivers in the Philippines are all Filipinos. I haven't seen a single Singaporean driver or German driver. I'll get a Singaporean driver if I go to Singapore. I'll get a German driver if I go to Germany.
The scare tactic that only foreigners will get rich leaving the country with nothing
Malaya Business Insight |
Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020 |
The scare tactic that open FDI equals environmental destruction
The scare tactic that FDI equals increasing debt
Foreign debt is money borrowed by a government, corporation or private household from another country's government or private lenders. Foreign debt also includes obligations to international organizations such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Total foreign debt can be a combination of short-term and long-term liabilities.Foreign debt, also known as external debt, has been rising steadily in recent decades, with unwelcome side-effects in some borrowing countries. These include slower economic growth, particularly in low-income countries, as well as crippling debt crises, financial market turmoil, and even secondary effects such as a rise in human-rights abuses.
Meanwhile, we have FDI defined as follows:
Foreign investment involves capital flows from one country to another, granting the foreign investors extensive ownership stakes in domestic companies and assets. Foreign investment denotes that foreigners have an active role in management as a part of their investment or an equity stake large enough to enable the foreign investor to influence business strategy. A modern trend leans toward globalization, where multinational firms have investments in a variety of countries.
Once again, the difference is really big. The Sri Lankan crisis is not because of investment but based on onerous loans. Why would Sri Lanka borrow that much money that it can't pay? Debt isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, borrowing more than you can pay isn't.
The scare tactic that FDI equals Foreign Direct Invasion which ignores the local industries
Without definite limits on foreign ownership and with no preference for Filipino citizens and corporations, the Constitutional provisions on the national economy and patrimony would become a tabula rasa. It would now be up to the Federal Assembly to determine policies on foreign equity sharing and just about anything there is about the economy and our natural resources. This, of course, creates an entirely new window for corporate lobbying, putting small, underfunded Filipino citizens and corporations at a great disadvantage.Worse, by totally removing the State’s role in developing an industrialized, self-reliant economy, in implementing agrarian reform, in promoting and protecting Filipino enterprises and producers, and in reserving our natural resources for Filipinos, Duterte’s Cha-Cha will leave small enterprises, workers and farmers having to fend for themselves from the onslaught of even more globalization.These amendments are the culmination of 3 decades of “economic reforms” toward a totally free market, neoliberal economy. Combined with the existing policies of economic liberalization, deregulation and privatization, the amendments remove the last impediments to the total domination, control and plunder of our economy and natural resources by foreign corporations and banks.
Even worse, Hilario G. Davide Jr., a former United Nations (UN) diplomat even said the following:
MANILA - The provisions of the Constitution on foreign ownership should remain because amending it may lead to the Philippines being a "colony" of foreign investors, a former chief justice said Monday.The Philippines has "one-fifth of the richest natural resources" and it was "designed that it should only be for Filipinos," said Hilario Davide Jr., a member of the commission that crafted the 1987 charter.
"If you remove the Filipino citizenship requirement in the exploitation of natural resources, on the acquisition of public lands, or even in mass media, in education, you remove the solemnity of nationalism," he told ANC's Headstart.
Davide said lawmakers should be guaranteed to be incorruptible because Congress can be prevailed upon by foreign interests in order to favor exploitation of the country's natural resources."One country may have businessmen so strong because they have the money. If you are in Congress, there might be a temptation to agree to certain propositions, to reduce the limit, for instance, of Filipino participation and increase the participation of foreigners," he said."In the end, we will become a colony of businessmen of other countries," he added.Davide said the 60-40 foreign equity ratio should stay also because the Philippine population is growing annually and they should have food security."What will you feed the people afterwards if all our assets here, natural assets, would be [granted] to foreign investors?...Congress should stick to it [60-40] and fully implement the same," he said.The Constitution restricts ownership of certain areas of investments to firms with at least 60-percent Filipino capital.The restriction also covers exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources through co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations.
This is why I even wrote an article asking if you'd trust Davide Jr. or Kishore Mahbubani from Singapore (read here). Both grandpas are former UN diplomats and policymakers. The comparison between Davide Jr. and the late John Gokongwei Jr. isn't that good. I prefer to compare Davide Jr. to Mahbubani. Mahbubani didn't just say it--he also proved it. Singapore is a testament to Mahbubani's statements. Mahbubani can directly prove the claim wrong that Singapore only opened up after it became a first-world country. Meanwhile, Davide Jr. is yet to prove his statements as the Philippines is left behind by its ASEAN neighbors.