Skip to main content

Why I Believe Pinyin Will Bridge the Gap in Learning Mandarin in This Asian Century

Some time ago, I wrote an article where I discussed why I think Chinese language schools should focus on pinyin over zhuyin (read here). I remembered how I disliked the Chinese language subject not only because of long memorizations. I also feel (until now) that zhuyin will never bridge the gap between Chinese speakers and non-Chinese speakers. Chinese schools in the Philippines tend to act like they're in Taiwan. There was hardly any practical application. Eventually, I remembered how later batches who took the Chinese language subject admitted to making erroneous sentences. I remembered two of the Chinese language teachers I had kept getting mad over the sentences, "The people are making people." this was just one of those erroneous sentences. 

Zhuyin was a tool used during the Qing period up to 1911. Why does Taiwan, well, stubbornly still embrace zhuyin? I could respect Taiwan's desire to remain independent of China. I love Taiwanese stuff. Though, I think the insistence on zhuyin is one of them. I still think it'd be a good mental exercise to learn zhuyin since learning it is no different than learning the alphabet of other languages. However, with the Chinese language getting more and more widely spoken--bringing the gap was necessary. I even want to compare the rise of the Chinese language to how the late Bruce Lee made martial arts accessible to non-Chinese. 

Today, the Chinese language isn't just "for the Chinese". I think a fatal flaw back then is that Chinese-Filipino academies never felt that they'd have an increased number of non-Chinese students. Zhuyin was still taught for a very long period. If you want a reading aid, use zhuyin, was the rule. I guess the lack of digital technology made people fail to see how useful pinyin has become in bridging the gap. 

Here's useful trivia from the Hutong School website about pinyin and Taiwan:

The split in Zhuyin versus Pinyin is almost entirely political. In an effort to spread literacy, promote Mandarin over local dialects, and “modernize” the country, the People’s Republic of China official adopted Hanyu Pinyin in the 1950s to replace Zhuyin (as well as other systems of Romanization). The ROC, however, viewed Pinyin as a “Communist invention” that was an antagonist to traditional Chinese culture. This attitude pushed them to continue using Zhuyin.

At the same time, some Taiwanese conservatives were alarmed at the ease people could learn to read without using Chinese characters! They didn’t consider this “legitimate learning” and forbid using this method to promote “full literacy.” Both Bopomofo and GR were restricted to annotating the pronunciation of Chinese characters. Bopomofo was renamed as 注音符號 Zhùyīn Fúhào/Juhin Fwuhaw “National Phonetic Symbols” to emphasize its new, restricted role.

I really said, "If only the ROC knew that its inventor, the late Zhou Yougang, was a critic of Communist China!" Pretty much, Taiwan still keeps the zhuyin as part of their heritage which for me is okay. I think there's no harm in learning both zhuyin and pinyin. However, the PRC (even under the reign of the tyrant, Mao Zedong), saw the power of Hanyu Pinyin over Zhuyin. I felt ROC or Taiwan just didn't see the opportunity they could have had in modernization. I guess there was still this animosity between Chinese in Taiwan and China. 

Fortunately, once again from the Hutong School we read about this change that happened:

Only in the past ten years or so has Taiwan been faced with a growing number of foreigners who have learned Pinyin. Some administrators didn’t want to be seen as adopting a “PRC invention” entirely, so they inserted minor changes that are enough to be different, but not so much to confuse foreigners too excessively. In 2009, the Republic of China finally switched over to Hanyu Pinyin to transliterate Mandarin into Latin letters. However, this is mostly for the benefit of foreigners, since native Mandarin speakers in Taiwan continue to use Zhuyin to teach children and to type Chinese electronically.

Shuyin still remains part of Taiwan's heritage. However, I'm glad that pinyin (with a few modifications) is used in Taiwan. An example is Cai can be alternatively spelled as Tsai or Xu as Hsu. I guess the number of people going to China to learn Mandarin must've caused this change in 2009. I simply saw non-Chinese going to Beijing to learn Mandarin. That alone made me regret why I didn't take the Chinese subject seriously. Again, I'm still criticizing the old outdated methods such as using zhuyin, not having taught pinyin, being overly focused on memorization (that's what ticked me off as a teenager), and having a lack of flexibility. 

So, pinyin as a learning system, maybe what's truly needed. I personally would find it annoying if I had to get a specialized keyboard just to use zhuyin. I've enjoyed learning to type in Chinese using the pinyin. I feel zhuyin was really a burden in my past. Sure, zhuyin might be useful to keeping the mind sharp with a harder challenge. However, pinyin is pretty much a bridge to making Chinese more accessible. I might be Chinese by blood but I've grown up in the Philippines. I think pinyin may be a better way for ethnic Chinese outside China and Taiwan to reconnect and learn their language. Pinyin is now widely accepted due to its ease. 

Just imagine if pinyin wasn't invented. I couldn't imagine how tapioca pearl (波霸) was spelled in the traditional zhuyin instead of as bōba. True, it's been misread and I've misread it and mispronounced it many times over. Some Mandarin words have been integrated into other languages. The Chinese word for tea (茶) has the pinyin chá while the Tagalog says tsaa and the Visayan says tsa. Pinyin has made the gap smaller. Now, it's time to really find more ways to make Mandarin more accessible in this Asian century. 

References

Websites

"Guestblog: Understanding The Difference Between Pinyin and Zhuyin" by Megan Wang

Popular posts from this blog

Hussam Middle Eastern Cuisine's New APM Prime Mall Location

It was sad when I went to Ayala Center Cebu to eat at Hussam Middle Eastern Cuisine. They had closed their office at Il Corso. They moved out of Ayala Center Cebu at the end of January . I remember talking to someone who said that the old location can be "very hard to find" when you enter the mall. Right now, I remember how trying to find Hussam in Ayala can be comparable to trying to find the magic lamp in Aladdin's  Cave of Wonders. That's what I felt back then, I ate at Hussam back in 2024 . Ayala Center Cebu probably had a low visibility problem. They had their soft opening on Black Saturday. They missed the Hari Raya Puasa date, a holiday for the Muslim population. This time, the use of glass walls makes it obvious to passersby that it's a Middle Eastern restaurant, that grilling is underway, and that it's certified halal .  The place still maintains the same pristine cleanliness I recall from Ayala Center Cebu. The place's transparent glass windows ...

Toxic Positivity: Shielding Our ECONOMICALLY OUTDATED Constitution

ABS-CBN News I thought about what life was like in the late 1990s. It was a boomer vs. millennial clash . I remember how often I kept complaining about high school during the K+10 era. Even worse, the real problem why I hated school was that school cared more about grades for the sake of grades , instead of teaching students how to get good grades based on learning first. What may have compounded it is that we've had boomer parents who thought that fatigue is a badge of honor .  What I realized is the common problem of toxic positivity . We have the "good vibes only" or "everything will turn out right in the end". Sadly, life doesn't always turn out that way. You can tell a terminally ill cancer patient that, and the cancer patient would die anyway. No amount of toxic positivity ever fixes the problem. This time, I'd like to rant once more about how toxic positivity has been used to defend the outdated 1987 Constitutio of the Philippines.  The classic r...

How is IBON Foundation Viewing and/or Representing FDI in Their Articles?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I can't take IBON Foundation seriously . As the battle for economic charter change is on, I believe it's time to tackle them again. They're tweeting here and there. Okay, I'm no researcher or organization. However, it doesn't mean that I can't do some basic research, share the research of others, and read other books. Even an intellectually stupid person can actually make sense if they gather the best materials. I even recall someone I know who's not intelligent but he actually spoke well about career opportunities, in the very school where he wasn't performing well! Trying to understand IBON's data presentation  I would like to address how IBON Foundation presents FDI growth. They would say stuff such as the claim job creation weakened despite FDI growth .  I was looking at IBON Foundation's claim (above) where it says that job creation allegedly weakened despite FDI inflows. Sure, they named sources but do they ...

A Destructive Obsession with Ayuda (Cash Handouts)

IBON Foundation Yesterday, I decided to write about how Pinoy Pride won't help pay that enormous PHP 13.42 Trillion debt . I thought I'd probably take a bit of a break to do some more research. However, I feel the need to write this post today since one of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's a destructive fetish for foreign investment . Then, another of IBON Foundation's articles says that there's money for Ayuda . I really feel insulted reading these since I'm a Masters Degree graduate in the School of Business and Economics. This really shows the destructive obsession with ayuda (cash handouts) and protectionism. IBON Foundation Above is one of IBON Foundation's charts. Some people on Facebook have gone as far as to call them Birdbrain Foundation. So what if there's money for ayuda or cash handouts? The problem here is that "think tanks" like IBON Foundation want to make it look like ayuda is more important. If asked to account ...

Why I Don't See IBON Foundation as a Real Economic "Think TanK'

It's one thing to criticize presidents for their performance. It's another without analyzing the data. Sure, we need to study mathematics but the way it's presented can be a reason why it's hated. I felt that high school mathematics focused too much on numbers. Mathematics, in all its aspects, is part of life. Trigonometry is part of life. Calculus is part of life. Statistics is part of life. Speaking of statistics, I was thinking about how IBON Foundation has given its assessment of Duterte's administration. This isn't to say that outgoing President Rodrigo R. Duterte hasn't made mistakes. Rather, this is to point out how IBON Foundation has that tendency to be illogical. IBON Foundation (click to enlarge) This data by IBON Foundation was gathered. I'm not saying that the figures are lies or manipulated. My problem with how IBON Foundation works is their failure to account for the cause and effect  more often than not.  Malaya Business Insight It's ...