Skip to main content

Tealive's Rise as a Malaysian Milk Tea Brand Innovation in FDI-Friendly Malaysia

KL Foodie

I remembered having a meal at Tealive Ayala Central Bloc (read here). What I never thought of was that Bryan Loo, the founder of Tealive and CEO of Loob Holdings, was once the CEO of Chatime Malaysia. I read through Compare Hero's article on Chatime vs. Tealive (the article was updated last November 2021). From the ashes of a terminated contract came forth a rival for Chatime. 

The Bubble Tea Disagreement

The original disagreement between Chatime and Tealive started back in January when La Kaffa, the Taiwanese owner of the Chatime brand, announced they had terminated the master franchise agreement with Bryan Loo and his company Loob Holding even though the agreement still had more than 20 years to go. The reason for the termination was that Loob Holding was allegedly using raw materials that were not part of the prescribed recipe to produce its tea.

During the initial press release, La Kaffa International also declared that all Chatime outlets would now fall under the direct control of La Kaffa. They intended to effectively cut out Loob Holding of the franchising chain but what they failed to take into account was Bryan Loo’s powers of persuasion.

Within days of the initial announced by La Kaffa, Bryan Loo issued his own statement. He characterized the disagreement as the result of longer relationship issues between his company and La Kaffa. One of the major pain points was the tight control that the franchisor had over the product offerings. Bryan Loo wanted to continually innovate his tea products, and he claimed that the Taiwanese franchisor withheld him from doing that.

What was announced next, probably came as a big shock to everyone. Loob Holding announced that 95% of all existing Chatime outlets would join him in a new venture under the Tealive brand. In what is an almost unbelievably shrewd business move, Bryan Loo was able to convince 162 bubble tea outlets to abandon their existing franchise agreements and join his new and unproven venture.

This must have come as quite a shock to La Kaffa, who had initially expected not much trouble in retaining their individual franchises. At the time of the takeover, Chatime in Malaysia was bringing in more than 100 million ringgit in annual revenue, and accounted for more than 20% of La Kaffa’s total revenue. Their entire position in the Malaysian market evaporated instantly.

This would be a very bold move. Loo himself was going to start from scratch. Rather than cry, he chose to finally use his power of persuasion to get the 162 outlets to start all over It wasn't a very easy move since it means that Loo would need to go against an already huge power from Taiwan. This reminds me of the lesson that the late John Gokongwei Jr.'s maternal grandfather said, "Don't fear the big businesses. They were once small." Loo saw the opportunity of the franchise termination to start his own milk tea brand. Loo had his struggles before becoming the CEO of Chatime Malaysia. Now, Loo was willing to turn the tables with innovation and past experience than cry over what happened. 

Chatime wasn't going to be that easy to defeat. Even without Loo who made it strong--it was still a strong presence. Just reading this should make one think about how Chatime still proves to be a strong competitor against the Malaysian brand.

Time to shake the blues away – a closer look at the Chatime brand

Robbed of its franchise outlets, Chatime still has strong brand recognition which could be a significant advantage if it can recreate the massive franchising network that it had before. This will be a challenge because the market dominance that Chatime had in the Malaysian market was largely the result of the efforts of Bryan Loo.

Even before the whole franchising disagreement, Bryan was already famous because he was able to grow Chatime in Malaysia at an astounding pace. If Chatime wants to re-emerge as the dominant bubble tea brand, it is going to have to find someone who can do the same. This time, it will be a lot harder because the new master franchisee will have to differentiate itself in a market that is already very familiar with bubble tea, while competing against a very strong competitor in the form of Tealive.

Despite the odds being stacked against them, Chatime seems to have every intention of reclaiming its former glory. La Kaffa has already reached an agreement with a new company to become the next master-franchisee in Malaysia. La Kaffa has chosen Will Group to become the new master-franchisee of Chatime Malaysia. Will Group is reportedly no stranger to bubble tea and is planning to open 70 new Chatime outlets over the course of 2017.

More recently, Chatime published a cryptic message on their Facebook page, suggesting that former franchisees might be coming back to the Chatime brand. If that were the case, and the number of outlets is actually significant, Bryan Loo’s Tealive brand might have lost its edge before the real battle even began.

Basically, it was going to be a difficult move since Loo may have met his match. However, he didn't fear competition. Instead, a closer look at the Tealive brand would totally show that the company was more than willing to face competition.

Positioned as a new and innovative bubble tea brand, Tealive is currently in the prime spot to become the next Malaysian tea empire. In the Malaysian market, Tealive is currently miles ahead of Chatime and this has several reasons.

The first and probably most important reason is the massive scale that the Tealive franchise network inherited from its Chatime ancestor. With more than 160 outlets throughout Malaysia, Tealive’s brand recognition is expected to grow rapidly. With brand recognition on the rise, Tealive can expect to increase its current revenue and even add to it by opening more outlets. In a recent interview, Bryan mentioned that he intends to raise the number of outlets from 160 to 250 by the end of October. An ambitious goal that, if achieved, might establish Tealive as the number one bubble tea brand in Malaysia.

Next to a sizeable distribution network, Tealive also enjoys freedom to innovate on its products. Highlighted by Bryan Loo as one of the prime reasons of the disagreement, the freedom to innovate could allow Tealive to offer products that are more adjusted to the wants and needs of the Malaysian customers. With years of experience in the Malaysian market, Loob Holding can adjust quickly to changing consumer demands and remain relevant as a trending tea brand. Because Loob Holding was solely responsible for the growth of Chatime in Malaysia, La Kaffa will now have a knowledge disadvantage when it comes to adapting its products to the Malaysian market.

Innovation will always be the key player. In the case of Loo, it would be to make sure his milk tea brand would fit more into the needs and wants of Malaysian customers. That means the usage of Halal-certified products since most Malaysian citizens are Muslims. The ongoing Aren Caramel series (read here) might have that Southeast Asian flavor Malaysians love. I tried drinking it and I'm reminded of Surigao. I remembered using palm sugar syrup during my trips to Surigao City. it would also face the Singaporean brand KOI which intended to open its first branch in Malaysia last 2017. Also, Singapore used to be part of Malaysia before becoming independent. 

Eventually, Tealive went from being a Malaysian brand to actually being Chatime's competitor abroad. From Loob Holdings' website, this can be read about Tealive which is part of their family:

Tealive is Southeast Asia's largest lifestyle tea brand currently brewing strong in 650 outlets across three continents. Born in Malaysia in 2017 with a mission is to always bring joyful experiences through tea, it has won the backing of Creador, a leading private equity group with deep market knowledge and operational expertise to help grow world-class businesses.

Tealive now has a variety of beverages, from signature brown sugar pearl milk tea and hand-crafted teas to coffee and smoothies. Already the top-of-mind leader in Malaysia, Tealive is now in Vietnam, Myanmar, Brunei, the Philippines, Cambodia, Mauritius, and Canada.

With set plans to continue spreading the “Joy of Tea” through strategic expansion and product innovation, Tealive has its eyes on the world.

According to the official site, there are already over 800 outlets around the world. This really shows that Tealive's choosing to be innovative allowed it to continue to have an edge over Chatime. Maybe, it can have a stronger advantage in Southeast Asia due to its preparation of style. I feel that Tealive might gain a strong territory in the Philippines due its more Southeast Asian appeal. It's no surprise that fitting something fit for most Southeast Asians makes it a worthy competitor to the already legendary Chatime. 

Popular posts from this blog

Wanting Wealth WITHOUT Financial Discipline

Many people want to be rich, but not so many people want the discipline on how to be rich. Isn't that the plain hard truth ? As I do this sideline blog , I contemplated whether I should write another post after writing several posts years back, or when I wrote about Venezuela as a cautionary tale . Back on topic, I thought about how financial discipline is something often overlooked. It's easy to talk about Christmas since that's probably the most wonderful time of the year to be spendthrift , only to find out that one's broke by the New Year . The cycle of reckless financial habits tends to restart in January, even when January becomes that time of reckoning between debtors and creditors! January 2026 will end, February 2026 comes, and then the cycle of financial recklessness continues. It's the same cycle over and over! Last Christmas, I remember how DTI Secretary Christina Roque spoke about the PHP 500.00 noche buena, for a family of four . I called it tactless b...

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Helping Others is Good But Not to One's Own Expense

I advocate for helping others. I believe in helping others but there were times I overdid it. One time, I gave up so much that I had to be stopped. I was told, "If you gave everything now, how can you help others later?" I would donate some sums here and there, without thinking much. I'm not going to write them all. Some of them left me good while others left a bad taste (and a bad record) for me to endure. Sure, I want to help people but I tend to overlook the consequences. Some of the bad habits I had in the name of helping others are like: Being too generous with buying with credit. Eventually, I lost a lot of money which was never recovered . Some seasoned entrepreneurs may admit their own falls including the credit trap pitfall. Being too willing to give a discount without thinking about how it'd affect profits. Sure, a cheap price can draw people near. However, there are times when the prices of goods and services need to be raised to keep a business running. I ...

Why I Believe the Philippines Needs to be Become a Parliamentary Republic ASAP

China Daily Today is the entrance of a new administration of incoming Philippine president, Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. aka Bongbong or BBM. For the first time in so long--we already have a president and a vice president (both from the same party) elected by the majority over plurality. Several presidents won by plurality such as former Philippine presidents Fidel V. Ramos, Joseph M. Ejercito-Estrada, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III, and Rodrigo R. Duterte. The same can be said for several vice presidents. I was thinking about it that several projects under Aquino III's were later completed during Duterte's administration. It made me think of the limits of just six years or how the presidential system isn't enough. Aquino III had some pros and cons. Duterte had some pros and cons. I feel that many promises can't be kept because of the presidential system.  Charter change can be good--if done right! I was reading through Andr...