Skip to main content

Blaming the Rich for One's Poverty Will NEVER Improve One's Financial Condition


Previously, I wrote about how the Philippines can never get rich by blaming its richer Asian neighbors. Right now, I think I want to write this new short where I'm talking about the anti-successful people mindset. I remembered a couple of people I met in college who had this bad habit of saying, "It's the fault of the rich that we're poor!" I was often told that I "bullied" them because I was one of those whom they call "may kaya" (those who are better off). Such statements happen when I also mention something like, "Do you people wonder why you have little to no money?" I must "applaud" the stupidity of the argument that says, "It's the fault of the rich that we're poor!" 

Why is it common for some poor people to rudely generalize the rich as insensitive people while they're the victim? Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others. It's really something when you think about this:

Study 1 findings: Poor emotion regulators “made more false other-ascriptions of self-selected unattractive activities (FOAself) when experiencing negative affect.” This supports the view that individuals who have difficulty coping with negative emotions tend to blame other people for their own bad choices. Good emotion regulators, in contrast, were not affected in this way by negative emotions.

Study 2 findings: Poor emotion regulators “made more false other-ascriptions of self-selected unattractive items (FOAself) when reporting high compared to low subjective anger.” In contrast, good emotion regulators’ “FOAself rates for unattractive items were unaffected by their level of subjective anger.”

Study 3 findings: Negative feelings appeared to “lead poor emotion regulators to project their own poor choices onto someone else.” After recalling a negative (versus positive) event, only poor emotion regulators “made more false other-ascriptions of self-selected unattractive items (FOAself).” Not surprisingly, blaming others appeared to reduce negative feelings.

It's very easy to blame others, right? It's harder to work your way out of poverty. That's why it was easy for Communist leaders to dupe others. Think about how Karl Marx blamed the rich. Mao Zedong also blamed the rich. Some idiots claim that the Great Leap Forward was a good thing (never mind the well-documented atrocities) because of the deaths of landlords. What's often ignored is that the landlord has the duty to make sure that the land that tenants rented on is well taken care of. Be a good landlord and you get the best profits eventually. If you are a bad landlord who only wants easy profits then you expect really bad outcomes. 

I wonder if poor people who blame the rich for their poverty ever realize some of the rich they hate used to be poor. Did you know that Lucio Tan Sr. once worked as a janitor? Did you know that Jollibee's founder Tony Tan Caktiong also used to be poor? Did you know that the late Henry Sy Sr. used to sell shoes for a living? These men that I mentioned are examples of from broke to billionaires. Yet, you have some bitter poor people who keep saying, "No to billionaires! The rich are evil! The poor are oppressed!" Such people could still be hypocritically wanting expensive stuff, eating at expensive places, dressing up expensively, wanting fancy cars, and in short, a very expensive lifestyle. Most of the hatred against the rich for simply being rich is rooted in a bitter attitude

Reading the rags-to-riches story is the story of working hard and working smart. It's not like the mindset that Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) have where they must "reclaim the riches of the rich". True, some rich people got rich by dishonest means or cutting corners. However, wealth perpetuity is maintained by honest work such as paying employees the right salary, spending on making sure that there's a healthy work environment, participating in charity work, and giving customers the best of what one can offer. What's ironic is that some poor people would rather get rich quick fast. Jeff Bezos of Amazon asked Warren Edward Buffett why people refuse to follow the latter's simple investment strategy. Buffett says it's because people want to get rich quick fast.

Not everybody will be rich. It's a matter of lifestyle principles. Sure, not everyone will be entrepreneurs otherwise there will be no employees. Some people may get stuck working a 9 AM to 5 PM job. However, one can learn from Buffett's simple investing strategy such as cost-averaging into an index fund, investing the money you don't need now (such as setting aside 20% of money for investments), and not splurging one's paycheck. If one ends up losing money because of an irresponsible financial habit then there's no one else to blame but one's self. 

Popular posts from this blog

Real Talk: No MNCs In Their Right Mind, Would Ever AGREE to That Ridiculous 60-40 Proposal

Here's another art I found on Facebook. Some time ago, I wrote about how the 60-40 policy may not prohibit, while still discouraging FDIs from entering . It's plain common sense, really, that nobody would want to rent a space if they had to part with 60% of their net profits to the lessor (read here ).  It annoys me to think that certain Netizens on Facebook are still blaming government corruption over the 60-40 policy. That can get annoying. I can link the 60-40 policy to government corruption . After all, corrupt officials want to perpetuate their stay in power through an ignorant and impoverished population. However, blaming corruption alone is really downright stupid. Some say investors are going to Communist Vietnam because the Communist Party of Vietnam-Vietnam People's Army is serious about cracking corruption. However, the reality is that, ironically, Communist Vietnam has more reasonable economic restrictions compared to the Philippines (read here ). Only a few sec...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Kabataan Partylist Seriously Needs to Learn ECONOMICS from the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union

Vietnam National University, Hanoi Kabataan Partylist, is that you? No, it's actually the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union (Đoàn Thanh niên Cộng sản Hồ Chí Minh), or alternatively, it can be called the Vietnam Youth Union . The color blue may remind some of Kabataan Partylist. Both Kabataan Partylist and the Vietnam Youth Union are involved with recruiting youths into the organization. However, there's a crucial difference between Kabataan Partylist and the Youth Union in how they view economics. The  Kabataan Partylist Laguna's blog  even writes this: It believes that the Philippines, as a semi-colonial and semi-feudal country, is plagued by a system which allows foreign and big business interests to dominate, while the majority of our countrymen are left poor and hungry . We are living in a society where foreign subservience, peasant landlessness, and rampant corruption are the top three ills. To that end, Kabataan Party-list strives to galvanize the Filipino youth in u...

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...

60-40 Foreign Direct Investment Ownership is Nothing More Than OVERPRICED Rent

I'm amazed that there are some people who still insist that the Philippines should retain the 60-40 investment scheme or even lesser shares  ownership for foreign investments. The argument always goes such as (1) Filipinos must be the majority shareholder because it's their country, (2) only foreign investors will get rich if you let them invest in here 100%, and (3) you're basically selling land. This is the problem when people can't tell the difference between shares ownership and land ownership . Shares ownership means owning a percentage of the company. Land ownership is where the land is leased upon. This is where I would like to argue why easing certain foreign investment restrictions is necessary. An illustration that will help see why 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent I would like to give this picture. Let's imagine you're a businessman and you're looking for a space to rent. Not everyone is willing to sell their commercial space but there ...