Skip to main content

Procrastination to Pay Bills (for Whatever Reason) May Kill One's Finances (Sooner or Later)

There's always that irritating habit among Filipinos called the mañana habit. It's typical to think about how events tend to start one hour late, people who always show up late for work, and you know the drill. As Christmas draws near, I can expect heavy traffic from last-minute shoppers. There can be various reasons why there's no money for Christmas. Be it the payday blowout problem (read here) or there are various other dumb ways to drain the salary (read here). I would also like to blame the incredibly bad habit of procrastination on paying bills. I don't care what the reasons are but procrastination keeps people poor. Sure, it's typical for teenagers to procrastinate but shouldn't that be outgrown as an adult? 

Some people procrastinate to pay bills because they're reluctant to part with their money

Some people can be so stingy it's borderline unreasonable (read here). A thrifty person spends money wisely. Stingy people are very reluctant to part their money, even if they need to do so. I remember a joke over the local radio in Cebu more than 10 years ago. A miser got into an accident and somebody offered to rescue him. The man called a taxi and he called for a jeepney. The miser was taken to a private hospital and he demanded a public hospital. The end was that the rescuer was so angry he ended up abandoning the man. Sure, it was a criminal act to do so but I might've committed the same mistake in the rescuers' place. Never haggle with your health!

The same might go for paying bills. Some people can go to absurd lengths as not to pay their bills until near the deadline or wait until a notice of disconnection shows up. Such people only think about their own money. They can get mad when somebody doesn't pay them back on time but it's very A-OK for them to do so. They refuse to give a discount but they're always haggling when they buy something. Such people find comfort in their money only, without seeing the value of their money saved and spent. 

Even worse, their employees may suffer as a result of their actions. Talk about the secretary who suddenly offers criticism. The secretary may say, "Sir, if you just paid ahead, you could avoid the stress!" The boss may arrogantly say, "I'm the founder of this business for time immemorial! It's my money and I do what I want with it! I want to keep the money (insert insult) with me as much as possible." This might end up with the people he owed getting frustrated and saying, "Why can't you just pay your bills on time? Don't be so cheap!" He might play the "Customer is always right!" card on them. The employees may even suffer from collecting accounts payable as soon as possible. All the while, their own boss is reluctant to pay his account payables as soon as possible.

In turn, a stingy person's habits can grow worse. Sooner or later, it means losing connections, which in turn, can be bad for businesses. Not having health insurance would mean having to pay the hospitals higher or getting caught unprepared for medical emergencies. It would also mean allowing things to deteriorate all because one's too reluctant to part with one's money for valid reasons. The person may end up like Ebenezer Scrooge in The Christmas Carol in some way--living alone in the world. Scrooge may have changed at the end of the story but some people are Scrooges all their lives. 

Some people procrastinate because they have poor priorities 

My favorite example of such people was General Tomas Mascardo, from the movie Heneral Luna (General Luna). I wrote a post where I discussed the problem of the "If it's bitter then just add sugar." mentality. When one starts to think like that, they're going to start evading the problem because they just want to add sugar. The same bitter can be the amount of bills that one needs to pay. Instead of facing the problem head-on like getting the bills paid as soon as possible, they decide to add the proverbial sugar by doing this and that. One way that the proverbial sugar is added would be like attending a town feast. That was what Mascardo did--he chose to attend a feast in the middle of a war. I guess for Mascardo, he lived with the mentality that adding sugar to the bitter would "solve the problem" when it wouldn't.

The poor priorities can be seen in the one-day paycheck problem (read here). Instead of thinking about paying the bills first--they decide to splurge the paycheck. I guess it's no surprise to see people who keep demanding higher salaries while lowering prices (read here). I ran into a business administration graduate who just gave a haha reaction (😆) on Facebook. I explained to him that salaries do contribute to the overall pricing. If salaries are raised, you have to expect the final product or final service to go higher. Sure, there are times when prices can go lower such as when the cost of materials and utilities have a reduced rate. For example, a restaurant may sell a certain product on a sale because of a surplus. By default, any increase in salary means an increase in the cost of the final product. That's why I even wrote the challenge if such people are willing to open such stores that offer high salaries and lower-priced goods. When I asked some of them, they said it was the government that should do it. Why don't they show that it works first then?

These people think that they can just add the proverbial sugar to solve their problem. For all we know, they're already adding debt to debt. They could've slowly started to work on paying for their problems but they refuse to do so. For example, a credit card can't be used because the bank cut off the line until the bill is settled. Instead of paying for it, they decide to have fun by borrowing money so they can continue to have fun. They live in the mentality that they just want to have fun all the time. What they don't see is that it's not a realistic outcome.

What happens is that they soon find themselves in a miserable situation. Maybe, some of them would choose to blame the rich or hate the rich for simply being rich. They would demand social justice (like those lazy Americans who want socialism, without realizing that China and Vietnam wouldn't want their kind over there) for the problems they themselves caused. Maybe, they might end up miserably buying lottery tickets hoping to win a jackpot instead of learning to be responsible with their money. They can whine all they want but it's their fault if they mishandled the money. 

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...

IBON Foundation: Yes to Wealth Taxing the Rich, No to Economic Reforms?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I don't trust the IBON Foundation as an "economic think-tank" . I remember getting a lot of insults (and I've decided to block such people), telling me stuff like, "What have you done for the Philippines compared to IBON?" or "What about your mass base?" There's also that 88% survey result from Pulse Asia, which I heard has a very biased sampling size. Regardless, it's important to speak out facts and figures even if only one percent believes it and 99% doesn't! As I was looking to challenge myself in writing, I thought of challenging IBON's ongoing stance on the wealth tax. They had an article written in 2023. It's all about taxing the super wealthy . Is it good or bad? It's time to think about it.  Differentiating income from net worth Here's a sample of what IBON had written: A billionaire wealth tax can substitute for many consumption taxes that disproportionately burden millions of F...

Basic Economic Knowledge Tells Us Why Ayuda Will Not Help Filipinos Survive Inflation for Long

IBON Foundation I'm getting amazed at how IBON Foundation still has their ever-destructive obsession with ayuda (read here ). Lately, they have written another article where they say that high inflation "confirms" the need for real ayuda which means cash handouts (read here ). That's totally one thing whenever IBON Foundation decries the need for foreign direct investment (FDI) but they keep saying that cash handouts are good for the economy. That statement is purely stupid because handouts equals expenses and there's really no long-term  Return on Investment (ROI) on that one!  However, for the Philippine government to be able to give more cash handouts without FDIs (and rely too much on local businesses)--it can mean doing the following: Start raising taxes for the rich in order to provide more money for cash handouts. If taxes from the rich aren't enough--why not print more money, right?  The demand for ayuda worth PHP 10,000.00 is utterly stupid. The two ...