Skip to main content

Vietnam's FDI Restrictions vs. Philippines' FDI Restrictions

It's very easy for the Philippines to brag about being a democratic country. Vietnam still considers itself a Communist country, evidenced by the hammer and sickle, and the existence of the Communist Party of Vietnam. I watched the video above this paragraph to see where Vietnam and the Philippines have their individual strengths and weaknesses. The video admits that Vietnam is export-oriented while the Philippines still strongly relies on OFWs. This reminds me of what Filipino economist Andrew J. Masigan cited back in 2021 in Business World:

As usual, the dollar inflows from OFW remittances and service exports (IT-BPO industry) save us from financial ruin. Between 2016 and 2020, OFW remittances pumped-in an average of $32 billion a year while our service exports contributed an average of $36.5 billion a year.

Have OFW remittances and service exports been enough to cover our deficits? No. There is a still a gap and it is funded by debt.

The negative list of Vietnam is rather tame compared to the Philippines

Vietnam, in some way, is a free-market socialist country. Conversely, the Philippines is still using the late Carlos P. Garcia's  Filipino First Policy. I decided to Google Vietnam's 100 percent foreign ownership (in terms of shares, that is) and found this on Vietnam Briefing:

Investors from ASEAN, the United States and Europeand countries are increasingly moving capital into projects in Vietnam, because of its highly attractive environment, and strategic business location.

Vietnam allows 100% foreign ownership in most of its sectors, including trading, manufacturing, IT, education sectors and more. For this reason, the country is viewed as being relatively wide open for foreign investors to enter the market and setup an LLC or other type of business entity.

However, a small number of business fields are limited for foreign-investment, and require that a foreign investor form a joint-venture with a local partner. These include:

  • Advertising services;
  • Agriculture, hunting, and forestry related services;
  • Telecommunication services;
  • Travel agencies; Tour operator services; Entertainment services;
  • Electronic gaming businesses;
  • Container handling; Customs clearance services; Auxiliary transport services;
  • Internal waterways transport, rail and road transport services.

I decided to read through Vietnam's law on foreign investment to get to the bottom of the rules of it. So far, the restrictions with these provisions:

Article 8

Capital contribution of a foreign party or foreign parties to the legal capital of a joint venture enterprise shall be agreed by the parties and shall not be limited provided that the contribution is not less than thirty (30) per cent of the legal capital, except in cases stipulated by the Government.

In the case of a multi-party joint venture enterprise, the minimum capital contribution to be made by each Vietnamese party shall be determined by the Government.

With respect to important economic establishments as determined by the Government, the parties shall agree to increase gradually the proportion of the Vietnamese party's contribution to the legal capital of the joint venture enterprise.

Article 16

The legal capital of an enterprise with foreign owned capital must be at least thirty (30) per cent of its invested capital. In special cases and subject to approval of the body in charge of State management of foreign investment, this proportion may be lower than thirty (30) per cent.

During the course of its operation, an enterprise with foreign owned capital must not reduce its legal capital.


In short, I don't find any 60-40 restrictions. Instead, the requirement for entry is made that any FDI that enters should own 30% for a minimum requirement. 

Let's take a look at the Philippine negative list which is rather long compared to Vietnam 

The recent 2023 negative list (as stated by the Official Gazette of the Philippines) can be summarized as follows:
List A: Foreign Ownership is Limited By Mandate of the Constitution and Specific Laws 
No Foreign Equity
  • Mass media, except recording and internet business
  • Practice of professions, except in cases specifically allowed by the law following the prescribed conditions therein 
    • Professions where foreigners are not allowed to practice in the Philippines, except if the subject to reciprocity as provided in pertinent laws. 
    • Corporate practice of professions with foreign equity restrictions under pertinent laws. 
  • Retail trade enterprises with paid-up capital of less than ₱25,000,000.00  
  • Cooperatives, except investments of former natural-born citizens of the Philippines 
  • Organization and operation of private detective, watchmen or security guards agencies
  • Small-scale mining
  • Utilization of marine resources in archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone as well as small-scale utilization of natural resources in rivers, lakes, bays, and lagoons
  • Ownership, operation, and management of cockpits
  • Manufacture, repair, stockpiling, and/or distribution of nuclear weapons
  • Manufacture, repair, stockpiling, and/or distribution of biological, chemical, and radiological weapons and anti-personnel mines
  • Manufacture of firecrackers and other pyrotechnic devices 
Up to 25% Foreign Equity
  • Private recruitment, whether for local or overseas employment
  • Contracts for the construction of defense-related structures 
Up to 30% Foreign Equity
  • Advertising 
Up to 40% Foreign Equity
  • Procurement of infrastructure projects in accordance with Section 23.4.2.1(b), (c), and (e) of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of RA. 9184
  • Exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources
  • Ownership of private lands, except for a natural-born citizen who has lost his Philippine citizenship and has the legal capacity to enter into a contract under Philippine laws. 
  • Operation of public utilities
  • Educational institutions other than those established by religious groups and mission boards, for foreign diplomatic personnel and their dependents and other foreign temporary residents, or for short-term high-level skills development that do not form part of the formal education system as defined in Section 20 of Batas Pambansa (BP) No. 232 (1982)
  • Culture, production, milling, processing, trading except retailing, of rice and corn and acquiring, by barter, purchase or otherwise, rice and corn and the by-products thereof, subject to a period of divestment.
  • Contracts for the supply of materials, goods, and commodities to Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation (GOCC), company, agency or municipal corporation 
  • Operation of deep-sea commercial fishing vessels
  • Ownership of condominium units
  • Private radio communications network 
List B: Foreign Ownership is Limited for Reason of Security, Defense, Risk to Health and Morals, and Protection of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises 
Up to 40% Foreign Equity
  • Manufacture, repair, storage, and/or distribution of products and/or ingredients requiring Philippine National Police (PNP) clearance: 
    • Firearms (handguns to shotguns), parts of firearms and ammunition therefor, instruments or implements used or intended to be used in the manufacture of firearms; 
    • Gunpowder;
    • Dynamite;
    • Blasting supplies;
    • Ingredients used in making explosives:
      • Chlorates of potassium and sodium;
      • Nitrates of ammonium, potassium, sodium barium, copper (11), lead (11), calcium, and cuprite;
      • Nitric acid;
      • Nitrocellulose;
      • Perchlorates of ammonium, potassium, and sodium;
      • Dinitrocellulose;
      • Glycerol;
      • Amorphous phosphorus;
      • Hydrogen peroxide;
      • Strontium nitrate powder;
      • Toluene; and
    • Telescopic sights, sniper scope, and other similar devices. 
However, the manufacture or repair of these items may be authorized by the Chief of the PNP to non-Philippine nationals; provided that a substantial percentage of output, as determined by the said agency, is exported. Provided further that the extent of foreign equity ownership allowed shall be specified in the said authority/clearance (RA No. 7042 as amended by RA No. 8179). 
  • Manufacture and distribution of dangerous drugs 
  • Sauna and steam bathhouses, massage clinics, and other like activities regulated by law because of risks posed to public health and morals, except wellness centers
  • All forms of gambling, except those covered by investment agreements with Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR)
  • Domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of US$200,000
  • Micro and small domestic markets that involves the following: 
    • Advance technology as determined by Department of Science and Technology (DOST) 
    • Endorsed as a start-up or start-up enablers by Department of Trade Industry, or DOST
    • Employ at least fifty (50) direct employees with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of US$100,000

Getting down to the point for this post

Sure, apologists of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines' apologists may say Vietnam has restrictions. But one needs to think of the reasonability of the restrictions. Unlike Vietnam, the Philippines has a very long list of negatives. Vietnam's negative list says that certain industries will require a local partner but doesn't impose ridiculous impositions such as absolutely no foreign equity or the very long list where only up to 35% up to 40% is allowed to be owned. I find the list rather ridiculous in contrast to Vietnam. Think about it Vietnam's supposedly a Communist country. 

Some Filipinos online tend to blame the following for the Philippines' lack of investments without looking at the ridiculous restrictions put on them. Here are some really laughably stupid reasons:

  1. A devalued Philippine peso, never mind that the Vietnamese Dong is actually much lower. (You may want to read my explanation here)
  2. They blame corruption never mind corruption in Vietnam isn't so low either.
  3. They blame political families like the Aquinos, the Dutertes, the Marcoses, and you can name even more if necessary. I would often raise that Vietnam is a Communist country to raise a point on that. Investing in a Communist country sounds scarier to me!
  4. Some may even blame Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. or just about any president. If Marcos Jr. refuses to usher in a massive overhaul of the negative list--the blame is proper. However, if they blame Marcos Jr. for simply being a Marcos, then that's plain stupid! Also, former Philippine president Rodrigo R. Duterte signed the Public Services Act of 2022 (read why it can help us here), which groups like the League of Filipino Students, denounced as "imperialism".
If I were to seek to create a joint venture based on the select few industries of Vietnam (or simply want to do business with a Vietnamese partner since I'm clueless), I would definitely choose Communist Vietnam over the Philippines. The reason is that 30% is the minimum requirement for entry, not the maximum ownership. Vietnam may be full of Communist flags everywhere. However, I could probably have 50-50 ownership with a Vietnamese partner or own more than my Vietnamese partner. 

In the Philippines, I might as well treat it like overpriced rent (read why here). The 60-40 arrangement or any of those ridiculous arrangements would kill my profits. Can I even imagine if I had to remit 60% or up to 75% of my profits to my lessor who'd demand it. Imagine if I were in a certain industry and my lessor would demand that I give most of my net profits to him or her. I would totally leave the space. That's exactly what the negative list of the Philippines does. It demands net profits after taxes as rental payments. If we use common sense, who'd want ot rent in an overpriced place? 

Vietnam's Doi  Moi program has done it again. In fact, Vietnam proved itself to be able to rise faster than the Philippines (read here). For the Philippines to defeat Vietnam, it should really learn to do better than Vietnam. The second Marcos Administration should work hard to completely amend the ridiculous FDI restrictions that the Philippines has. Free markets need restrictions but not unreasonable restrictions. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Bad Accounting

I would like to apologize in advance to my readers. The picture I'm presenting is in Tagalog, and not all my readers speak Tagalog. I would translate the picture's text into English for convenience. It says:   "Ano ang bumubuo sa mga presyo?" means "What comprises the price?" "Gastos ng materyales" means materials expense "Gastos sa kasangkapan" means depreciation expense ""Gaston sa pasahod" means salary expense "Kapitalista" means capitalist Renta is well, rent "Kayang pababain ang presyo" means "Prices can be lowered". It says that capitalists (industrialists, landlords, bankers) and elitist governments are part in the gross profit. Get rid of excise taxes (either permanently or temporarily) for the prices of goods and services. In the times of crisis, in the burden of sacrifices, we need to be watchful for capacity. Whatever savings for times of difficulty by the workers and countrymen, the...
Read more

Past Chinese School Education in the Philippines was Based on "Sǐ Jì Yìng Bèi"

  Chinoys of my age (and older) may remember these textbooks. I called them as the "symbol of trauma". It was memorizing something without understanding it . One would just memorize (without understanding it) because it was typical. Not being able to memorize what was assigned? Get a bad grade? One can expect physical punishment like hitting the hand with a ruler or chili in the mouth. Chinese language teachers are stereotypically strict . The language textbooks (above) are what were used during the 1990s to the early 2000s. As I wrote it, the Sinjiang textbooks aren't effective in teaching Mandarin , in a world where Mandarin has over a billion speakers!  There's a Chinese proverb that says, "死記硬背 sǐ jì yìng bèi" or "Memorize to the point of death". That's exactly what those textbooks are. Memorize to the point of death! Okay, it may sound exaggerated. However, that's how Chinese language teachers in the Philippines were made to teach the ...
Read more

Migrante International's Really Bad Economic Literacy

March 17 (which is tomorrow) seems to be an unofficial holiday for some people, right? I'm sickened that the late Flor Contemplacion has been treated like she's some national heroine (and thankfully, tomorrow isn't a  holiday) even after Singapore had proven her guilt. A movie was made by Joel Lamangan called The Flor Contemplacion Story . The call for Migrante (Migrant) International has been to remember Flor even after several years. What's not too surprising was to learn that Flor's sons were all arrested for drug-related charges. Even her eldest son died while in prison. You have Migrante International wanting to end the labor export policy. However, a post by Migrante really shows how this group fails basic economics. I will not post the whole press statement but one part that made my eyes roll. >> Further opening the country’s economy to foreign ownership and control will worsen the exploitation of our people and the environment without creating a susta...
Read more

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...
Read more

Remembering the Late Jesse Robredo's Quote on Systems That Force People to be Good

It's been some time since Jesse M. Robredo died too soon. Hopefully, his wife Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo is true to her word, in her willingness to amend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, for the sake of foreign investments. It's a shame I never wrote about the late great man. The CoRRECT Movement on Facebook gave this important note on Robredo's life. Robredo said, "It's not enough for an official to be good. There has to be a system that forces them to be good." Whether or not Robredo was for charter change or a few constitutional amendments, I can't tell. For some racists, let me remind them that Robredo's real surname is Lim  and his paternal grandfather is the late Lim Pay Co.  In terms of Robredo's credentials (and I tend to sometimes brag about the credentials of those I quote), here's what the City Government of Naga website says: He is an Edward Mason Fellow and a graduate of Masters in Public Administration at the John...
Read more

Filipino First Education Created the Fixed Mindset Over Growth Mindset Mentality

Tomorrow is Bonifacio Day. It's effortless to say that Filipino First Policy works. I wouldn't be surprised if Andres Bonifacio gets used as a poster boy. However, Bonifacio worked for British and German investors . I'd like to talk about how decades of Filipino First Policy compromised our education system. Some idiot on Facebook said which I'll paraphrase to avoid getting personal. The idiot said, "If you let foreigners invest here, can Filipinos afford it?" The same idiot also scorns the law of supply and demand (read my post discussing why that's plain silly  here ). People who believe in #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba must first prove it works by opening such stores nationwide, to show that the Philippines doesn't need FDI to succeed (read here ). Of course, I can expect them to say "It's the government's responsibility to raise salaries without raising the prices of goods." That's just plain bad accounting and finance too! Andrew Ja...
Read more

Refuse to Do Business with a Person Who Looks Down on Menial Work

If there's any reason why some people are angry with the rich--it's because of rich people who look down on the poor. Some people are born rich without knowing the struggles of the one who originally acquired the wealth. Some rich parents make the fatal mistake of making their children feel entitled. Meanwhile, some rich parents make their children do the right thing by not waiting until things get too far. Some rich parents end up making their children attend middle-class schools, do summer jobs, work as employees in their own businesses, and teach them the value of wealth, especially by narrating the struggles before they got wealthy. In looking for a business partner, I feel it's very important to look at the attitude of these people. How do they treat people who do menial work? I could imagine looking forward to a business contract. However, it turns out that the potential business partner is a spoiled brat . Maybe, it's already a red alarm if I'm invited to an ...
Read more

Dayang Daya: The Case of Five-Six Lending Services Roaming to Collect Christmas/New Year Debts by January

I remember during the late 1990s when the song "Dayang Dayang" (Princess of the First Degree) was played on the radio. The origins are often debated whether or not it was from Muslim Mindanao or from the other neighboring countries. The Philippines has had settlers also from Malaysia and Indonesia. A parody cover by the late Yoyoy Villame was called Dayang Daya or Cheating Cheating. It was probably making fun of the Indian five-six lending business. Indians tend to be called Bombay because of the location known as Mumbai. I even made the mistake of referring to Indians as "Bombays" more than once. The song "Dayang Daya" does talk about the five-six lending services. It does target a lot of gullible people. I even became nearly distrustful of Indians in college for quite some time.  I wrote how a Merry Christmas may lead to an Unhappy New Year due to debt burden (read here ). I tend to say to myself, "Somebody hasn't paid their debt!" every ti...
Read more

Will Opening the Philippines to 100% FDI Lead to Foreign Monopoly?

Monopoly - Hasbro I was looking at the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum on Facebook. I found more illogical arguments by a certain troll in the forum named Juan Dalisay Jr.--the writer of the Superphysics One website. However, this isn't the first argument I ran into as I've seen arguments from Kabataan Partylist and the League of Filipino Students on Facebook. They have claimed that foreign direct investments (FDIs) will lead to exploitation, only they will get rich, that they will rape resources, and an even funnier claim is that they will lead to monopolies . Some people, even fools, should be allowed to defend themselves at CoRRECT Moderated Public Forum than just live in their echo chamber of Facebook pages. However, Kishore Mahbubani and the late Lee Kuan Yew had long disproven that . The testimony is in the book From Third World to First by Lee himself. Mahbubani said foreign investors create jobs, bring capital, and teach new skills. I wonder if protectionist adv...
Read more