Skip to main content

Vietnam's FDI Restrictions vs. Philippines' FDI Restrictions

It's very easy for the Philippines to brag about being a democratic country. Vietnam still considers itself a Communist country, evidenced by the hammer and sickle, and the existence of the Communist Party of Vietnam. I watched the video above this paragraph to see where Vietnam and the Philippines have their individual strengths and weaknesses. The video admits that Vietnam is export-oriented while the Philippines still strongly relies on OFWs. This reminds me of what Filipino economist Andrew J. Masigan cited back in 2021 in Business World:

As usual, the dollar inflows from OFW remittances and service exports (IT-BPO industry) save us from financial ruin. Between 2016 and 2020, OFW remittances pumped-in an average of $32 billion a year while our service exports contributed an average of $36.5 billion a year.

Have OFW remittances and service exports been enough to cover our deficits? No. There is a still a gap and it is funded by debt.

The negative list of Vietnam is rather tame compared to the Philippines

Vietnam, in some way, is a free-market socialist country. Conversely, the Philippines is still using the late Carlos P. Garcia's  Filipino First Policy. I decided to Google Vietnam's 100 percent foreign ownership (in terms of shares, that is) and found this on Vietnam Briefing:

Investors from ASEAN, the United States and Europeand countries are increasingly moving capital into projects in Vietnam, because of its highly attractive environment, and strategic business location.

Vietnam allows 100% foreign ownership in most of its sectors, including trading, manufacturing, IT, education sectors and more. For this reason, the country is viewed as being relatively wide open for foreign investors to enter the market and setup an LLC or other type of business entity.

However, a small number of business fields are limited for foreign-investment, and require that a foreign investor form a joint-venture with a local partner. These include:

  • Advertising services;
  • Agriculture, hunting, and forestry related services;
  • Telecommunication services;
  • Travel agencies; Tour operator services; Entertainment services;
  • Electronic gaming businesses;
  • Container handling; Customs clearance services; Auxiliary transport services;
  • Internal waterways transport, rail and road transport services.

I decided to read through Vietnam's law on foreign investment to get to the bottom of the rules of it. So far, the restrictions with these provisions:

Article 8

Capital contribution of a foreign party or foreign parties to the legal capital of a joint venture enterprise shall be agreed by the parties and shall not be limited provided that the contribution is not less than thirty (30) per cent of the legal capital, except in cases stipulated by the Government.

In the case of a multi-party joint venture enterprise, the minimum capital contribution to be made by each Vietnamese party shall be determined by the Government.

With respect to important economic establishments as determined by the Government, the parties shall agree to increase gradually the proportion of the Vietnamese party's contribution to the legal capital of the joint venture enterprise.

Article 16

The legal capital of an enterprise with foreign owned capital must be at least thirty (30) per cent of its invested capital. In special cases and subject to approval of the body in charge of State management of foreign investment, this proportion may be lower than thirty (30) per cent.

During the course of its operation, an enterprise with foreign owned capital must not reduce its legal capital.


In short, I don't find any 60-40 restrictions. Instead, the requirement for entry is made that any FDI that enters should own 30% for a minimum requirement. 

Let's take a look at the Philippine negative list which is rather long compared to Vietnam 

The recent 2023 negative list (as stated by the Official Gazette of the Philippines) can be summarized as follows:
List A: Foreign Ownership is Limited By Mandate of the Constitution and Specific Laws 
No Foreign Equity
  • Mass media, except recording and internet business
  • Practice of professions, except in cases specifically allowed by the law following the prescribed conditions therein 
    • Professions where foreigners are not allowed to practice in the Philippines, except if the subject to reciprocity as provided in pertinent laws. 
    • Corporate practice of professions with foreign equity restrictions under pertinent laws. 
  • Retail trade enterprises with paid-up capital of less than ₱25,000,000.00  
  • Cooperatives, except investments of former natural-born citizens of the Philippines 
  • Organization and operation of private detective, watchmen or security guards agencies
  • Small-scale mining
  • Utilization of marine resources in archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone as well as small-scale utilization of natural resources in rivers, lakes, bays, and lagoons
  • Ownership, operation, and management of cockpits
  • Manufacture, repair, stockpiling, and/or distribution of nuclear weapons
  • Manufacture, repair, stockpiling, and/or distribution of biological, chemical, and radiological weapons and anti-personnel mines
  • Manufacture of firecrackers and other pyrotechnic devices 
Up to 25% Foreign Equity
  • Private recruitment, whether for local or overseas employment
  • Contracts for the construction of defense-related structures 
Up to 30% Foreign Equity
  • Advertising 
Up to 40% Foreign Equity
  • Procurement of infrastructure projects in accordance with Section 23.4.2.1(b), (c), and (e) of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of RA. 9184
  • Exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources
  • Ownership of private lands, except for a natural-born citizen who has lost his Philippine citizenship and has the legal capacity to enter into a contract under Philippine laws. 
  • Operation of public utilities
  • Educational institutions other than those established by religious groups and mission boards, for foreign diplomatic personnel and their dependents and other foreign temporary residents, or for short-term high-level skills development that do not form part of the formal education system as defined in Section 20 of Batas Pambansa (BP) No. 232 (1982)
  • Culture, production, milling, processing, trading except retailing, of rice and corn and acquiring, by barter, purchase or otherwise, rice and corn and the by-products thereof, subject to a period of divestment.
  • Contracts for the supply of materials, goods, and commodities to Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation (GOCC), company, agency or municipal corporation 
  • Operation of deep-sea commercial fishing vessels
  • Ownership of condominium units
  • Private radio communications network 
List B: Foreign Ownership is Limited for Reason of Security, Defense, Risk to Health and Morals, and Protection of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises 
Up to 40% Foreign Equity
  • Manufacture, repair, storage, and/or distribution of products and/or ingredients requiring Philippine National Police (PNP) clearance: 
    • Firearms (handguns to shotguns), parts of firearms and ammunition therefor, instruments or implements used or intended to be used in the manufacture of firearms; 
    • Gunpowder;
    • Dynamite;
    • Blasting supplies;
    • Ingredients used in making explosives:
      • Chlorates of potassium and sodium;
      • Nitrates of ammonium, potassium, sodium barium, copper (11), lead (11), calcium, and cuprite;
      • Nitric acid;
      • Nitrocellulose;
      • Perchlorates of ammonium, potassium, and sodium;
      • Dinitrocellulose;
      • Glycerol;
      • Amorphous phosphorus;
      • Hydrogen peroxide;
      • Strontium nitrate powder;
      • Toluene; and
    • Telescopic sights, sniper scope, and other similar devices. 
However, the manufacture or repair of these items may be authorized by the Chief of the PNP to non-Philippine nationals; provided that a substantial percentage of output, as determined by the said agency, is exported. Provided further that the extent of foreign equity ownership allowed shall be specified in the said authority/clearance (RA No. 7042 as amended by RA No. 8179). 
  • Manufacture and distribution of dangerous drugs 
  • Sauna and steam bathhouses, massage clinics, and other like activities regulated by law because of risks posed to public health and morals, except wellness centers
  • All forms of gambling, except those covered by investment agreements with Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR)
  • Domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of US$200,000
  • Micro and small domestic markets that involves the following: 
    • Advance technology as determined by Department of Science and Technology (DOST) 
    • Endorsed as a start-up or start-up enablers by Department of Trade Industry, or DOST
    • Employ at least fifty (50) direct employees with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of US$100,000

Getting down to the point for this post

Sure, apologists of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines' apologists may say Vietnam has restrictions. But one needs to think of the reasonability of the restrictions. Unlike Vietnam, the Philippines has a very long list of negatives. Vietnam's negative list says that certain industries will require a local partner but doesn't impose ridiculous impositions such as absolutely no foreign equity or the very long list where only up to 35% up to 40% is allowed to be owned. I find the list rather ridiculous in contrast to Vietnam. Think about it Vietnam's supposedly a Communist country. 

Some Filipinos online tend to blame the following for the Philippines' lack of investments without looking at the ridiculous restrictions put on them. Here are some really laughably stupid reasons:

  1. A devalued Philippine peso, never mind that the Vietnamese Dong is actually much lower. (You may want to read my explanation here)
  2. They blame corruption never mind corruption in Vietnam isn't so low either.
  3. They blame political families like the Aquinos, the Dutertes, the Marcoses, and you can name even more if necessary. I would often raise that Vietnam is a Communist country to raise a point on that. Investing in a Communist country sounds scarier to me!
  4. Some may even blame Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. or just about any president. If Marcos Jr. refuses to usher in a massive overhaul of the negative list--the blame is proper. However, if they blame Marcos Jr. for simply being a Marcos, then that's plain stupid! Also, former Philippine president Rodrigo R. Duterte signed the Public Services Act of 2022 (read why it can help us here), which groups like the League of Filipino Students, denounced as "imperialism".
If I were to seek to create a joint venture based on the select few industries of Vietnam (or simply want to do business with a Vietnamese partner since I'm clueless), I would definitely choose Communist Vietnam over the Philippines. The reason is that 30% is the minimum requirement for entry, not the maximum ownership. Vietnam may be full of Communist flags everywhere. However, I could probably have 50-50 ownership with a Vietnamese partner or own more than my Vietnamese partner. 

In the Philippines, I might as well treat it like overpriced rent (read why here). The 60-40 arrangement or any of those ridiculous arrangements would kill my profits. Can I even imagine if I had to remit 60% or up to 75% of my profits to my lessor who'd demand it. Imagine if I were in a certain industry and my lessor would demand that I give most of my net profits to him or her. I would totally leave the space. That's exactly what the negative list of the Philippines does. It demands net profits after taxes as rental payments. If we use common sense, who'd want ot rent in an overpriced place? 

Vietnam's Doi  Moi program has done it again. In fact, Vietnam proved itself to be able to rise faster than the Philippines (read here). For the Philippines to defeat Vietnam, it should really learn to do better than Vietnam. The second Marcos Administration should work hard to completely amend the ridiculous FDI restrictions that the Philippines has. Free markets need restrictions but not unreasonable restrictions. 

Labels

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

When the Education Cares TOO MUCH About Grades, Schools Produce Idiots Instead of Intellectuals

During the pandemic, I was left in limbo thinking about my poor performance under K+10. It was something to think about that a classmate of mine who was both a summa cum laude and an honor student, ended up posting on his wall, "Students cheat because the education system cares more about grades instead of learning." The class salutatorian of our batch even commented about the good old days. I always had that feeling of insecurity and envy towards people better than me. But as Warren Edward Buffet would say, "Don't hate successful people. Learn from them instead." One of them is currently a teacher and the other is in Canada. I thought about my insecurities especially when I used to believe I was descended from a fine scholar and my family was a family of scholars.  I remembered the time I was taking MBA and got conned. I was asked, "Is that what MBA taught you?" I got touchy and ended up admitting, eventually, that I was only taking MBA for the presti...
Read more

My Thoughts on the NOT So Surprising Downfall of "Axie Infinity"

llustration: Daniel Guerrero Fernandez for Bloomberg Businessweek I remembered some time ago when I wrote about Axie Infinity . One article I wrote about why I never bothered to enter the Axie Infinity arena was the poor security . I compared it to a cockfighting game--a game where so few win and so many lose. A previous article I wrote was all about why play-to-earn games are too good to be true . What's not too surprising is the collapse of Axie Infinity . It's pretty much too good to be true. A casual gamer can testify that they buy online passes not to earn but to play . It's like buying a Playstation Plus card to play online for an entire year. You buy games out of the money you earn. You don't earn money out of gaming.  What truly never surprised me was how Axie Infinity crashed. It promised riches but onoy resulted to disaster. I even wrote that there could be an ironic moment somebody says that AXA is a scam while playing Axie Infinity thinking that it's an...
Read more

Piracy is Almost Impossible to Defeat Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

Disney Let's face it piracy is hard to combat, right? For Filipinos, it's time to be honest that people have been engaged in piracy in some form. It may be pirated video games, CDs, VCDs, DVDs, etc. There are laws passed against piracy. However, one must ask why piracy is so hard to combat. Piracy bypasses through legalities. It's a common practice to have a pirated version of this and that application, because of the price . Installing MS Office and Windows 11 can be costly. It can cost PHP 7,000.00 for Windows 11 Home and PHP 5,400.00 for MS Office. Back in college, people would do anything to get the MS Office and Windows 11 because they needed it for their projects . It doesn't help that some well-to-do boomer are stingy instead of thrifty. It doesn't help either that some people just can't afford to buy the original software--given their income bracket .  It's easy to raise the Filipino First Policy by saying, "Tangkilikin ang sariling atin!" ...
Read more

Getting Nuts About Standard Chinese, By Learning About the Chinese Names of Nuts

Hanbridge Mandarin In pursuing the need to teach Mandarin Chinese, it's important to deviate from the old-fashioned Chinese language education (read here ). Instead, we need to get people interested in basic vocabulary. This would be a good exercise to learn from basic sentence making and conversations.  Here's an example of what's called bon toi back in my day. Let's think of learning Chinese through nuts. Question: 你想要巴西坚果、核桃、杏仁还是腰果? (Nǐ xiǎng yào bāxī jiānguǒ, hétáo, xìngrén háishì yāoguǒ) Translation: Do you want brazil nuts, walnuts, almonds, or cashews? Answer: 我想要杏仁，非常感谢. (Wǒ xiǎng yào xìngrén, fēicháng gǎnxiè.) Translation: I want to have almonds, please, thank you very much. However, there's a mistake in the chart because the coconut isn't a nut. Instead, it's a coconut fruit of the coconut tree, of the coconut palm family. The song was written by Filipino musician Ryan Cayabyab.  Now, it's time to enjoy learning Chinese through learning about n...
Read more

The STUPIDITY of Insisting that Equity Restrictions in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines Exist for "National Security"

As the call for economic charter change goes on, I feel the need to educate some people with common sense . I'm reading comments on Facebook that 60-40 (or any similar ownership restrictions) is for the "security of the Philippines" or that certain sectors can't be allowed 100% ownership on the part of the MNC. Once again, do I need to remind people for the nth time that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership ? Sadly, many Filipinos misunderstand what 100% FDI means (read here ). What 100% FDI ownership means is that MNCs don't need to look for a Filipino partner, only to be burdened with having to give up 60% (or more) of the net profits after taxes  and they only keep 40% (or less). That's why I called such an arrangement as overpriced rent (read here ). Some of these people I ran into on Facebook (of all places) are too beholden to Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. It was last 2018 when Davide Jr. also said that the Philippines may become a "colony ...
Read more

My Experience with Pyramid Scams in College Up to Present

  Often, a pyramid is often confused with a Ponzi scheme. Both are illegal schemes but there's the difference. A pyramid scam emphasizes on recruitment and selling of products. A Ponzi scheme guarantees high returns for short periods. Both operate similarly but scam people differently. Both should be shunned and be considered  defective baskets.  I remembered my college days at the University of San Carlos-Main Campus (USC-Main) when I was still a newbie with money. It sucks really when high school didn't teach us financial literacy and people seemingly need to take commerce to do so. One of the biggest scams that hit even graduate school students was the pyramid scam. Even worse, some of those who got suckered with ongoing financial scams were graduate school students of the School of Business and Economics! The Investor.gov website from the United States of America (USA) would tell us these are the hallmarks of a pyramid scam: These are some of the hallmarks of a pyram...
Read more

Refuting the BOGUS Claim That Wage Increase Alone, Not FDI, is the Key to Long-Term National Development

This is yet another stupid claim from Kabataan (Youth) Partylist. I wonder if the organization is linked to that joke of a Facebook page called the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa). You have had other similar organizations such as Anakbayan (Children of the Nation), Bayan Muna (Nation First), IBON Foundation, Kilusang Mayo Uno (May 1 Movement), and the League of Filipino Students that insist on the unsustainable demand for higher salaries, lowering the prices of commodities, and handouts for everyone. The idea itself is already not feasible  (read  here ) yet they keep demanding it. One must wonder are they a group of economic idiots or do they have ulterior motives? Do these groups understand what FDI really means? I noticed that people coming from like-minded groups (such as Teodoro Casiño of Bayan Muna) have their own bizarre ideas. I could still remember his Rappler article which he also wrote about FDI. If the likes of Casiño are linked with the likes of Kabata...
Read more

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Act” as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, Malacañan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...
Read more

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...
Read more

Singapore Proves That FDIs Aren't There to "Take Jobs Away" from Locals

I'm amazed at the same lies that are still said by similar "thought leaders" such as the members of groups such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, and League of Filipino Students making their lies about foreign direct investments (FDIs). One of the lies that they made is that foreign investors are there to invade, exploit, and steal away jobs from the locals. We have the Filipino First Policy by Carlos P. Garcia which sadly caused the Philippines to fail . The aim was to make sure that majority of those who own the businesses are Filipinos. However, a big challenging question is if there are enough Filipino businessmen to fill in the supply and demand. I'm amazed some people quote from portions of the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First . Yes, it's often quoted but only if they want to make the current incumbent president, Ferdinand R. Marcos Sr., look bad. I'm still one of the peop...
Read more