Skip to main content

The Saying "The Customer is Always Right" isn't Right

I remember being chastised and said, "The customer is always right!" It became hypocritical because the same person who told me that later chastised me for yelling at the service provider in public. I'd admit that I screamed at the phone or even in person because things didn't go my way. My favorite excuse would be, "You said the customer is always right, right?" Going by the logic that the customer is always right, I'm right in doing the wrong that I did to service providers. It also reminds me of some rude manager lady (who I believe got fired sometime later, not going to mention her name or the company) who's heard to be highly unreasonable. She would scream in public louder than the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago. 

I'd like to give an illustration of the fault of that phrase. The news of a raging customer who threw hot soup at the manager can create debate. Was she in the right when she threw the hot soup at the manager instead of talking things properly? Going by the line that the customer is always right, people should defend the raging woman. Just reading should make one think why the line, "The customer is always right." is definitely wrong:

A customer who was accused of throwing hot soup in a restaurant manager's face was arrested and charged with assault on Wednesday.

Amanda Martinez, 31, was booked into the Bell County Jail after a warrant was issued for her arrest.

Martinez has been charged with assault causing bodily injury and is now being held on a $5,000 bond.

A viral TikTok video captured the moment Martinez reportedly threw menudo soup in manager Jannelle Broland's face at the Sol de Jalisco restaurant in Temple, Texas, on November 7.  

Broland, 24, was doused in the soup after Martinez angrily confronted her, claiming it was so hot that the plastic lid had melted into it.  

Broland said the soup, which was still hot, 'felt like she had been pepper sprayed' and caused her eyes to burn and her nose to bleed

By the time police arrived at the scene, Martinez and a male companion who witnessed the altercation had already left. She has since been banned from the restaurant.  

We tend to think that we should never ban customers. However, think about what Amanda Martinez did. Her behavior may have caused life-threatening damage to the manager. Let's say that I got so mad that I assaulted a front desk clerk. My behavior would put any customer in that hotel in danger. However, refusing to ban me because I was a customer, would hurt the good customers. If that customer is notorious for buying things on credit and not paying back the company, isn't it high time not to add credit to credit? That was a mistake I made back in my younger days. 

As I was looking for more reasons why the customer isn't always right, I ran into these reasons why it's just plain stupid:

1. It Puts Undo Stress on Employees

No matter your clientele base, you are going to invariably come across at least a few unreasonable, belligerent ones. There are plenty of examples of employees providing subpar customer service. Know how to differentiate between this and an unreasonable customer. Try your best to resolve the conflict, but if it comes to either taking the side of a customer or that of your employee, it is best to choose that of your employee. Supporting your employees will always pay off for your business in the long run. Happy employees will go the extra mile to provide good service and make your customers happy.

Gordon Bethune is a brash Texan who is best known for revamping Continental Airlines. In his book, he discussed this topic.

He said, “You can’t treat your employees like serfs. You have to value them. If they think that you won’t support them when a customer is out of line, even the smallest problem can cause resentment.”

This viewpoint balances the employee and customer relationship. When you consistently value the customer over the employee, it causes resentment among employees. Your customers must understand that while they are valued and appreciated, the business and your employees come first. How your customer feels cannot always come before your team.

2. It Strains the Management-Employee Relationship

If a business owner consistently sides with the customer in times of conflict without giving the employee a chance to provide their input, it demoralizes the employee and can result in hard feelings. The employee often ends up resenting management and becomes bitter. This can affect their job performance, ultimately ending in poorer customer service to other customers.

It might be worth remembering the old popular Latin phrase: caveat emptor – buyer beware. Sometimes the customer may bear some responsibility. Continually taking the customer’s side over your employee’s can also convey to your employee that you do not trust their judgment or ability to address situations themselves. This is a recipe for disaster in any business model.

Amazon, though one of the largest retailers in the world according to Forbes, has suffered many complaints from its workforce. One might attribute that to Jeff Bezos’s long-standing emphasis on customer satisfaction over everything.

3. Some Customers Will Hurt Your Business

It is somewhat logical to assume that in business, the more customers you have, the better. However, holding on to some customers can be bad for your business. Customers who are consistently abusive and rude to your employees – despite the amount of money they contribute to your business – will only end up causing problems and more stress for your employees.

Sometimes, customer complaints might be completely fabricated due to a personal vendetta against the company overall, or one of your workers.

At a certain point, you need to decide if it is better to lose one customer than the loyalty and support of your workforce. It is merely a matter of respecting your employees and treating them with dignity.

Founder of bookbyslot.com, Anubhav Agarwal, believes: “To stay in business for a long time, entrepreneurs need to avoid unreasonably disgruntled customers. Getting rid of bad customers might cost a little profit, but it’s healthier in the long-term goals of the business.” 

4. It Results in Poorer Customer Service

Employees are much happier and satisfied at work if you put them first. When your workforce is happy, they are much more likely to put your customers first. They will be more energetic, motivated, and more willing to interact with customers. This creates a pleasant environment for both the employee and the customer.  

5. Some Customers Are Wrong

The customer often thinks they know better than employees or share an opinion or advice on how the business should operate or how a product should work. Some can be quite insistent and belligerent. The owner of a company, management, and properly-trained staff know the most about the product or service they provide. It is, after all, their job to know.

Many times, when a product or service does not work as they expect, a customer can become entirely unrealistic or demand ridiculous solutions. The goal should be to stress to these customers professionally that the makers of the product or service are the final authority on its operations and services.

The bottom line: business has changed significantly over the past few decades and many are putting more of an emphasis on employee happiness. It has proven to be an effective method to increase sales and improve customer loyalty. Happy employees = happy customers. While it may be hard to adopt this new mindset, it can be incredibly beneficial to your business both in the short and long term.

Besides, the company has the right to refuse anything not on the menu or not offered. I'd like to give some examples that there's the right to politely refuse the customer if they ask for anything not on the menu or not offered at all. If it isn't on the menu then don't ask for it. If the company doesn't offer it, don't demand it. Customers have the right to look for someone else. If Baker A refuses to do the job then why not go to Baker B? Unfortunately, the customer is always right policy has allowed for some utterly ridiculous lawsuits. Some people even play the victim even if the service provider exercised his or her freedom to refuse something not on the menu. Going to the Supreme Court over a cake? Why didn't the customer just go somewhere else? If I'm looking for pork curry, wouldn't it be best if I go to an Indian restaurant that serves pork because Middle Eastern restaurants don't serve it?

There's even a difference between discrimination and refusal of something not on the menu. Discrimination is if I don't allow Africans, Mexicans, etc. into my store because they're not of my people. It's like if I establish a store and only allow ethnic Chinese to dine in and I throw discrimination against non-ethnic Chinese. It's like if I refuse people of African descent, white descent, or Latin American descent to enter assuming they're all hoodlums and crooks, when they aren't. However, it's not discrimination if I refuse to serve anything not on the menu or that goes against company principles. It's like if I refuse to let my attractive employees do a striptease for the customers, it's because it's against company principles. Sadly, some customers will cry discrimination even if the service was politely declined. They may even want to throw in a show because they're spoiled brats, even if the employees did their best to serve the customers with utmost respect

It can also go the same with the real estate business. Renting out spaces can be very tricky in the long run. It might also mean sacrificing momentary income because the lessor who pays good money, may have been involved with human trafficking or by negligence, inadvertently allowed human trafficking to happen in his or her space. Even if a tenant pays well, if they're violating rules on laws and morals, that person has already breached the contract. It may also mean becoming an enabler of immoral activity if the lessor refuses to fire the lessee. The lessor is the customer. The lessor has no freedom to break the rules or the law. 

There are always rules above the customer and the service provider. With all the rules, no rule should ever put customers exempt from following them. 

Popular posts from this blog

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Does It Even Matter If the Investor is a Filipino or a Foreigner?

Shenzhen Noted As elections draw near, I still think about why it's important to support political candidates who are in favor of removing excessive restrictions. It's a good thing that President Rodrigo R. Duterte signed the Public Services Act of 2022 regarding telecommunications and transportation. We've also got some economic neanderthals who continue to spread the wrong information about foreign investors. Some people would still argue, "Why are you letting foreign investors invest here? It's only they who will get rich if you let them do that!" That's one argument that should be dismissed as absurd. I would like to fire back and say, "Does it matter if an investor is a Filipino or a foreigner?" Deng Xiaoping, the founder of Modern China, said, "It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white. What matters more is it that catches mice." Deng didn't care if the cat was black or white as long as it did its job.  In business a...