Skip to main content

The Saying "The Customer is Always Right" isn't Right

I remember being chastised and said, "The customer is always right!" It became hypocritical because the same person who told me that later chastised me for yelling at the service provider in public. I'd admit that I screamed at the phone or even in person because things didn't go my way. My favorite excuse would be, "You said the customer is always right, right?" Going by the logic that the customer is always right, I'm right in doing the wrong that I did to service providers. It also reminds me of some rude manager lady (who I believe got fired sometime later, not going to mention her name or the company) who's heard to be highly unreasonable. She would scream in public louder than the late Miriam Defensor-Santiago. 

I'd like to give an illustration of the fault of that phrase. The news of a raging customer who threw hot soup at the manager can create debate. Was she in the right when she threw the hot soup at the manager instead of talking things properly? Going by the line that the customer is always right, people should defend the raging woman. Just reading should make one think why the line, "The customer is always right." is definitely wrong:

A customer who was accused of throwing hot soup in a restaurant manager's face was arrested and charged with assault on Wednesday.

Amanda Martinez, 31, was booked into the Bell County Jail after a warrant was issued for her arrest.

Martinez has been charged with assault causing bodily injury and is now being held on a $5,000 bond.

A viral TikTok video captured the moment Martinez reportedly threw menudo soup in manager Jannelle Broland's face at the Sol de Jalisco restaurant in Temple, Texas, on November 7.  

Broland, 24, was doused in the soup after Martinez angrily confronted her, claiming it was so hot that the plastic lid had melted into it.  

Broland said the soup, which was still hot, 'felt like she had been pepper sprayed' and caused her eyes to burn and her nose to bleed

By the time police arrived at the scene, Martinez and a male companion who witnessed the altercation had already left. She has since been banned from the restaurant.  

We tend to think that we should never ban customers. However, think about what Amanda Martinez did. Her behavior may have caused life-threatening damage to the manager. Let's say that I got so mad that I assaulted a front desk clerk. My behavior would put any customer in that hotel in danger. However, refusing to ban me because I was a customer, would hurt the good customers. If that customer is notorious for buying things on credit and not paying back the company, isn't it high time not to add credit to credit? That was a mistake I made back in my younger days. 

As I was looking for more reasons why the customer isn't always right, I ran into these reasons why it's just plain stupid:

1. It Puts Undo Stress on Employees

No matter your clientele base, you are going to invariably come across at least a few unreasonable, belligerent ones. There are plenty of examples of employees providing subpar customer service. Know how to differentiate between this and an unreasonable customer. Try your best to resolve the conflict, but if it comes to either taking the side of a customer or that of your employee, it is best to choose that of your employee. Supporting your employees will always pay off for your business in the long run. Happy employees will go the extra mile to provide good service and make your customers happy.

Gordon Bethune is a brash Texan who is best known for revamping Continental Airlines. In his book, he discussed this topic.

He said, ā€œYou canā€™t treat your employees like serfs. You have to value them. If they think that you wonā€™t support them when a customer is out of line, even the smallest problem can cause resentment.ā€

This viewpoint balances the employee and customer relationship. When you consistently value the customer over the employee, it causes resentment among employees. Your customers must understand that while they are valued and appreciated, the business and your employees come first. How your customer feels cannot always come before your team.

2. It Strains the Management-Employee Relationship

If a business owner consistently sides with the customer in times of conflict without giving the employee a chance to provide their input, it demoralizes the employee and can result in hard feelings. The employee often ends up resenting management and becomes bitter. This can affect their job performance, ultimately ending in poorer customer service to other customers.

It might be worth remembering the old popular Latin phrase: caveat emptor ā€“ buyer beware. Sometimes the customer may bear some responsibility. Continually taking the customerā€™s side over your employeeā€™s can also convey to your employee that you do not trust their judgment or ability to address situations themselves. This is a recipe for disaster in any business model.

Amazon, though one of the largest retailers in the world according to Forbes, has suffered many complaints from its workforce. One might attribute that to Jeff Bezosā€™s long-standing emphasis on customer satisfaction over everything.

3. Some Customers Will Hurt Your Business

It is somewhat logical to assume that in business, the more customers you have, the better. However, holding on to some customers can be bad for your business. Customers who are consistently abusive and rude to your employees ā€“ despite the amount of money they contribute to your business ā€“ will only end up causing problems and more stress for your employees.

Sometimes, customer complaints might be completely fabricated due to a personal vendetta against the company overall, or one of your workers.

At a certain point, you need to decide if it is better to lose one customer than the loyalty and support of your workforce. It is merely a matter of respecting your employees and treating them with dignity.

Founder of bookbyslot.com, Anubhav Agarwal, believes: ā€œTo stay in business for a long time, entrepreneurs need to avoid unreasonably disgruntled customers. Getting rid of bad customers might cost a little profit, but itā€™s healthier in the long-term goals of the business.ā€ 

4. It Results in Poorer Customer Service

Employees are much happier and satisfied at work if you put them first. When your workforce is happy, they are much more likely to put your customers first. They will be more energetic, motivated, and more willing to interact with customers. This creates a pleasant environment for both the employee and the customer.  

5. Some Customers Are Wrong

The customer often thinks they know better than employees or share an opinion or advice on how the business should operate or how a product should work. Some can be quite insistent and belligerent. The owner of a company, management, and properly-trained staff know the most about the product or service they provide. It is, after all, their job to know.

Many times, when a product or service does not work as they expect, a customer can become entirely unrealistic or demand ridiculous solutions. The goal should be to stress to these customers professionally that the makers of the product or service are the final authority on its operations and services.

The bottom line: business has changed significantly over the past few decades and many are putting more of an emphasis on employee happiness. It has proven to be an effective method to increase sales and improve customer loyalty. Happy employees = happy customers. While it may be hard to adopt this new mindset, it can be incredibly beneficial to your business both in the short and long term.

Besides, the company has the right to refuse anything not on the menu or not offered. I'd like to give some examples that there's the right to politely refuse the customer if they ask for anything not on the menu or not offered at all. If it isn't on the menu then don't ask for it. If the company doesn't offer it, don't demand it. Customers have the right to look for someone else. If Baker A refuses to do the job then why not go to Baker B? Unfortunately, the customer is always right policy has allowed for some utterly ridiculous lawsuits. Some people even play the victim even if the service provider exercised his or her freedom to refuse something not on the menu. Going to the Supreme Court over a cake? Why didn't the customer just go somewhere else? If I'm looking for pork curry, wouldn't it be best if I go to an Indian restaurant that serves pork because Middle Eastern restaurants don't serve it?

There's even a difference between discrimination and refusal of something not on the menu. Discrimination is if I don't allow Africans, Mexicans, etc. into my store because they're not of my people. It's like if I establish a store and only allow ethnic Chinese to dine in and I throw discrimination against non-ethnic Chinese. It's like if I refuse people of African descent, white descent, or Latin American descent to enter assuming they're all hoodlums and crooks, when they aren't. However, it's not discrimination if I refuse to serve anything not on the menu or that goes against company principles. It's like if I refuse to let my attractive employees do a striptease for the customers, it's because it's against company principles. Sadly, some customers will cry discrimination even if the service was politely declined. They may even want to throw in a show because they're spoiled brats, even if the employees did their best to serve the customers with utmost respect

It can also go the same with the real estate business. Renting out spaces can be very tricky in the long run. It might also mean sacrificing momentary income because the lessor who pays good money, may have been involved with human trafficking or by negligence, inadvertently allowed human trafficking to happen in his or her space. Even if a tenant pays well, if they're violating rules on laws and morals, that person has already breached the contract. It may also mean becoming an enabler of immoral activity if the lessor refuses to fire the lessee. The lessor is the customer. The lessor has no freedom to break the rules or the law. 

There are always rules above the customer and the service provider. With all the rules, no rule should ever put customers exempt from following them. 

Popular posts from this blog

When the Education Cares TOO MUCH About Grades, Schools Produce Idiots Instead of Intellectuals

During the pandemic, I was left in limbo thinking about my poor performance under K+10. It was something to think about that a classmate of mine who was both a summa cum laude and an honor student, ended up posting on his wall, "Students cheat because the education system cares more about grades instead of learning." The class salutatorian of our batch even commented about the good old days. I always had that feeling of insecurity and envy towards people better than me. But as Warren Edward Buffet would say, "Don't hate successful people. Learn from them instead." One of them is currently a teacher and the other is in Canada. I thought about my insecurities especially when I used to believe I was descended from a fine scholar and my family was a family of scholars.  I remembered the time I was taking MBA and got conned. I was asked, "Is that what MBA taught you?" I got touchy and ended up admitting, eventually, that I was only taking MBA for the presti...

Piracy is Almost Impossible to Defeat Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

Disney Let's face it piracy is hard to combat, right? For Filipinos, it's time to be honest that people have been engaged in piracy in some form. It may be pirated video games, CDs, VCDs, DVDs, etc. There are laws passed against piracy. However, one must ask why piracy is so hard to combat. Piracy bypasses through legalities. It's a common practice to have a pirated version of this and that application, because of the price . Installing MS Office and Windows 11 can be costly. It can cost PHP 7,000.00 for Windows 11 Home and PHP 5,400.00 for MS Office. Back in college, people would do anything to get the MS Office and Windows 11 because they needed it for their projects . It doesn't help that some well-to-do boomer are stingy instead of thrifty. It doesn't help either that some people just can't afford to buy the original software--given their income bracket .  It's easy to raise the Filipino First Policy by saying, "Tangkilikin ang sariling atin!" ...

My Thoughts on the NOT So Surprising Downfall of "Axie Infinity"

llustration: Daniel Guerrero Fernandez for Bloomberg Businessweek I remembered some time ago when I wrote about Axie Infinity . One article I wrote about why I never bothered to enter the Axie Infinity arena was the poor security . I compared it to a cockfighting game--a game where so few win and so many lose. A previous article I wrote was all about why play-to-earn games are too good to be true . What's not too surprising is the collapse of Axie Infinity . It's pretty much too good to be true. A casual gamer can testify that they buy online passes not to earn but to play . It's like buying a Playstation Plus card to play online for an entire year. You buy games out of the money you earn. You don't earn money out of gaming.  What truly never surprised me was how Axie Infinity crashed. It promised riches but onoy resulted to disaster. I even wrote that there could be an ironic moment somebody says that AXA is a scam while playing Axie Infinity thinking that it's an...

The STUPIDITY of Insisting that Equity Restrictions in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines Exist for "National Security"

As the call for economic charter change goes on, I feel the need to educate some people with common sense . I'm reading comments on Facebook that 60-40 (or any similar ownership restrictions) is for the "security of the Philippines" or that certain sectors can't be allowed 100% ownership on the part of the MNC. Once again, do I need to remind people for the nth time that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership ? Sadly, many Filipinos misunderstand what 100% FDI means (read here ). What 100% FDI ownership means is that MNCs don't need to look for a Filipino partner, only to be burdened with having to give up 60% (or more) of the net profits after taxes  and they only keep 40% (or less). That's why I called such an arrangement as overpriced rent (read here ). Some of these people I ran into on Facebook (of all places) are too beholden to Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. It was last 2018 when Davide Jr. also said that the Philippines may become a "colony ...

Refuting the BOGUS Claim That Wage Increase Alone, Not FDI, is the Key to Long-Term National Development

This is yet another stupid claim from Kabataan (Youth) Partylist. I wonder if the organization is linked to that joke of a Facebook page called the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa). You have had other similar organizations such as Anakbayan (Children of the Nation), Bayan Muna (Nation First), IBON Foundation, Kilusang Mayo Uno (May 1 Movement), and the League of Filipino Students that insist on the unsustainable demand for higher salaries, lowering the prices of commodities, and handouts for everyone. The idea itself is already not feasible  (read  here ) yet they keep demanding it. One must wonder are they a group of economic idiots or do they have ulterior motives? Do these groups understand what FDI really means? I noticed that people coming from like-minded groups (such as Teodoro CasiƱo of Bayan Muna) have their own bizarre ideas. I could still remember his Rappler article which he also wrote about FDI. If the likes of CasiƱo are linked with the likes of Kabata...

How I Believe the Public Service Act of 2022 Will Benefit the Philippine Business and Economic Environment

One of the greatest news for the Philippines is the Public Service Act of 2022. The following can be read from the Philippine News Agency regarding President Rodrigo R. Duterte's signing of the new law into action: President Rodrigo Roa Duterte on Monday signed into law a measure amending the Public Service Act (PSA), allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership of public services in the country. Republic Act (RA) No. 11659 or "An Act Amending Commonwealth Act No. 146 otherwise known as the Public Service Actā€ as amended was signed by Duterte in a ceremony at the Rizal Hall, MalacaƱan Palace in the presence of lawmakers and other officials. Under the amended PSA, the telecommunications, railways, expressways, airports, and shipping industries will be considered public services, allowing up to 100 percent foreign ownership in these sectors. Duterte also led the ceremonial presentation of newly enacted laws namely RA 11647 which amends the Foreign Investments Act; RA 11650, whic...

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...

Singapore Proves That FDIs Aren't There to "Take Jobs Away" from Locals

I'm amazed at the same lies that are still said by similar "thought leaders" such as the members of groups such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, and League of Filipino Students making their lies about foreign direct investments (FDIs). One of the lies that they made is that foreign investors are there to invade, exploit, and steal away jobs from the locals. We have the Filipino First Policy by Carlos P. Garcia which sadly caused the Philippines to fail . The aim was to make sure that majority of those who own the businesses are Filipinos. However, a big challenging question is if there are enough Filipino businessmen to fill in the supply and demand. I'm amazed some people quote from portions of the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First . Yes, it's often quoted but only if they want to make the current incumbent president, Ferdinand R. Marcos Sr., look bad. I'm still one of the peop...

The Philippines 60-40 Equity Scheme Doesn't Prohibit FDIs But It's Still VERY DISCOURAGING for International Business

First and foremost, I'd like to tell people that I don't believe that the Marcos Years were the "golden years". I still agree with economist Cielo Magno that land ownership isn't a factor, since some countries without equity restrictions, don't allow foreigners to buy land. In contrast, inflation and the like were rampant during that time. However, we need to realize that any gains after EDSA 1986 weren't realized. As I was looking at Facebook, a page called Punch the Lies by Atty. Mike Navallo stated this:  FACT: The 1987 Constitution does not prohibit entry of global investors into PH. What it regulates is foreign investment in areas deemed critical such as public utilities; exploration, devt and use of natural resources; and certain investments as determined by Congress. (Art XII)   Public utilities (water, electricity, petroleum distribution, seaports, PUVs) are considered vital to socio-economic devt that's why they're subject to foreign owner...

The Filipino First Policy Caused the Philippines to Succeed!

High School Philippine History Movement Yes, you read it right! I found a hidden gem that I should've read years ago! It's the book Nationalist Economics by the late Alejandro Lichauco, who is part of the magnificent IBON Foundation. It's a shame I refused to read it. I should've read Lichauco's book instead of the late Lee Kuan Yew's book From Third World to First . What a shame that I didn't look into the details that LKY was a dictator, that Flor Contemplacion was indeed innocent, and that Singapore is a state comparable to Nazi Germany. As I bought my copy of Nationalist Economics from the Trust Me Bro School of Economics--I'm now convinced that the Filipino First Policy caused us to succeed! LKY ruled Singapore for 31 years, meaning it's a frightening thing indeed! Six years is the magic number ot establish a benevolent rule!  Who should we all listen to? Should we listen to foreigners or should we listen to our fellow Filipino? We must think st...