Skip to main content

It's Not Enough to Have a Good Teacher, You Must Have a System That Encourages Teachers To Do BETTER


It's been some time since Miriam Defensor-Santiago (or MDS for short) died in 2016. It's hard to forget the time she grilled former PNP chief Alan LM Purisima over the demise of SAF-44. While listening to her sermon, I remember the teacher I fondly called "My MDS style teacher!" I still owe a debt of gratitude to her for helping me become better. Yes, she was feisty, and not so many parents liked her temper. However, she was better than that elementary mathematics teacher. I may have not done well in high school but I say she was a good teacher. I failed to think outside the box. She always made us think outside the box. It's easy to say, "Well, we just need good teachers and there's no problem with the system."

However, like MDS, I'd react to that and say, "Really?" That was MDS' reaction when Purisima tried to play with words. Purisima was infamous for saying that he didn't give an order and only advice. Even funnier was when Purisima said, "When I delegated the responsibility, I did not delegate the accountability." It's because whether we want to admit it or not--systems shape the behavior of people! That's why I advocate for reforming the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines' weaknesses or even going for a parliamentary constitution. 

School can be taxing and stressful. It didn't matter how good the teachers were--the system always held them back. My mathematics teacher was good but I hated mathematics. As my classmate said, the mathematics teacher was just doing her job. Recalling the incident from the past, I was encouraged to write whether or not grades-over-learning approach makes mathematics that hated. My high school economics teacher was good. However, that same high school economics teacher was held back because the education system cared more about grades than learning (read here).


We must ask if our education system educates or automates students (read here). I will bring up mathematics yet again. The problem with mathematics is how often teachers are forced to teach students to become calculators. Mathematics textbooks can be as boring as cardboard. The mathematician  Paul Lockart gave this lament on the way mathematics is taught:
Lockhart begins with a vivid parable in which a musician has a nightmare in which music is taught to children by rote memorization of sheet music and formal rules for manipulating notes. In the nightmare, students never actually listen to music, at least not until advanced college classes or graduate school. 

The problem is that this abstract memorization and formal-method-based "music" education closely resembles the "math" education that most students receive. Formulas and algorithms are delivered with no context or motivation, with students made to simply memorize and apply them

Part of why many students end up disliking math, or convincing themselves that they are bad at math, comes from this emphasis on formulas and notation and methods at the expense of actually deep understanding of the naturally fascinating things mathematicians explore. It's understandable that many students (and adults) get frustrated at memorizing context-free strings of symbols and methods to manipulate them. 

This goes against what math is really about. The essence of mathematics is recognizing interesting patterns in interesting abstractions of reality and finding properties of those patterns and abstractions. This is inherently a much more creative field than the dry symbol manipulation taught conventionally. 
As somebody who used to hate math, I can understand why I hated it that much. How often do we discuss mathematics' wonderful applications? Putting aside my idiotic math teacher, I had some good math teachers. A math teacher tried to get me to like math by explaining things. However, how often does mathematics deal with real-life examples in the classroom? It didn't matter how good the teacher was if they were bound by a lousy system. Even the best teacher can expect more hostility with mathematics, not especially because education is viewed as a competition rather than a cooperation. I'd dare say my hatred for one of my former enemies was because he was better in math than me. With that logic, he should hate me too because I was better in the English subject than him!


Whether we want to admit it or not--a bad system will beat a good person every time, in one form or another. Every teacher, good or not, is confined to the same system. It didn't matter if my high school math teacher was good. The problem was the system made her teach math the same way as the bad math teachers! Math is taught without context or application. It's often said, "What am I going to do with this anyway?" Should students wait until they take the wrong course (like taking a computer course or engineering course when they're not qualified for it) to know the applications of mathematics? I never even knew the applications of trigonometry until I took a two-year computer course. I had a good teacher but she was still beaten by the same lousy system. I don't blame her for being strict. It's because mathematics requires extreme precision in real-life applications! Do we need to wait until college before we know why we have to learn math? Unfortunately, a good math teacher may want to explain the applications but it's barely taught! 

As Pritika Nair mentions, this is how the education system is doing education:

1. Children are treated like robots or machines

The amount of homework, notes to be copied, coupled with home assignments and related activities can get overwhelming for both children and parents. And this trend starts as early as Grade 1! When children would go to school, the only exception (and relief) was that notes were made to be completed inside the classroom. Now with online schooling, this load has also been thrust on their backs (more on the parents’ shoulders though).

I don’t say that any of the above is unimportant or unnecessary for the child. I and other parents like me aren’t able to comprehend why children as small as First Graders are subjected to “undue pressure” from the schools in terms of homework and notes completion? Do the schools perceive kids to be robot-like machines that can keep performing tasks one after the other and finish them in a jiffy?

You ask the school and they say: These notes can be completed by the child in their own time. But where do they give the time? Every day, there’s a new subject to study as per the time table, not to forget the homework and notes to be completed for the same too. This would inevitably pile up the previous day’s load on the child.

2. Children are encouraged to parrot what they learn

Mugging up concepts without really understanding their core meaning is an issue that’s existed in schools since forever. Most of us would agree and reminisce having experienced the same at some point of time in their respective schooling life. The same is being continued even today.

And now that we are parents, we hate our kids being turned into parrots too. They’re expected to score high (both from schools and parents) in the course of which, they will eventually learn well and parrot or write the same to score good marks but they would never be clear on what those concepts mean or be able to explain the same to their children in future.

3. Children feel bogged down and become disinterested

This is the most important and if not addressed promptly, may become unfavorable to all parties involved in this. Children, when laden with study pressure, may soon start losing interest in the very concept of learning - the ultimate aim for why we send kids to school in the first place. If that aim gets lost in the mind of the child, it’s the end of the story for both them and their parents - children might still study under pressure but we aren’t turning them into bright young minds for the future.

Should we ever start to wonder why people are becoming robotic? What's the use of demanding children to do good in school and then complaining about why they're acting like robots? I became robotic and students are becoming robotic. People are people and robots and robots.  That's why I wanted to become a robot back when I was in elementary--so I could memorize faster. The problem is worse when there's nonstop homework. I believe teachers are forced to give homework over the weekend. It doesn't only increase the stress of students to unreasonable levels--also the teachers themselves. That may explain why teachers tend to become tormentors instead of mentors. Treat it as a programming error that needs to be rectified! 


Faculty of Medicine

Let's think if the education system focused more on learning over grades. Grades probably won't disappear any time soon. However, we tend to focus so much on grades that I even wanted to mockingly say, "If grades were more important than learning then let's allow students to cheat! Let's legalize bribery!" However, I don't want students to cheat nor do I want to legalize bribery. As Professor Neil DeGrasse rightfully said, "Students cheat because the education system values grades over learning." I don't think he's the first one to say it nor the last. However, it's true and I hated school way back because of it. I was an eager learner but school cared more about monotonous memorizations and grading, instead of application. At first, I viewed school that way. But the more I wanted to learn, the more I realized that there was something really wrong.

Meanwhile, the Singaporean education system is different. People just don't realize the big problem of the education system. Here's what makes me think will encourage teachers to do better:

World Education Forum recently published an article saying that Singapore takes different approach for Singaporean children in term of education. Starting in 2019, exams for primary years 1 and 2 students will be abolished. This approach is to make education environment better. Primary and secondary students can study in less competitive environment.

As Singapore’s Education Minster said, “Learning is not a competition”, so that student in Singapore can experience study in less discouraging comparison between peer issues. In this situation student can have more concentration and explore their self.

Primary and secondary school report books will also no longer indicate whether a pupil finishes top or bottom of the class, while subject and group averages. Singapore’s new approach to education is in stark contrast to the neighbouring states that crowd the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) education rankings.

Teachers will no longer be prone to shaming bottom students--which often happens. As I was looking at the view, "Learning is not a competition." I feel math classes will no longer focus on people competing to solve the problem first. I'm still in favor of math quiz bowls and contests in math classes. However, the focus should be on cooperation. Math quiz bowls are done by a group of students. If students were learning math as a class--it would mean those better in math are required to help those weaker in math. I recall how often I fought several people in math class back in the final year of K+10. I had that increasing hatred for people good in math. I believe that the system encouraged such behavior. It would mean that students as a class, will be less competitive with each other. They will be trained to work together. Sure, competition between classes will remain. However, the end of it would be to simply see what can be done to improve performance. 

I believe that decades of Filipino First Policy ruined the education system. The Philippines is still stuck with obsolete education methods--not knowing how the neighboring countries are doing better. Pinoy Pride is often taught in school, such as telling people to prefer local as much as possible. Ironically, those books that teach students to buy local first, are produced with imported stuff. Of course, I expect mockers to say, "Oh no! Not that question on imported stuff again!" They will probably say that foreigners "unfairly" own the means of production (read here). I wonder what's their roadmap of creating a Philippines that's run only on purely Filipino-made stuff. That roadmap may end up in the same disaster as Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward. If anything, it's more than time to declare Pinoy Pride or Filipino First Policy out of the values education books. It's because Pinoy Pride has never helped the education system, to begin with. 

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem with the Philippine Education System is That It Inadvertently Tends to Make One Stroke One's Ego

What happens is that the traditional Philippine education system focuses too much on  monuments of fame rather  than learning milestones . It reminds me of the incident where Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel stressed out he was a cum laude, and that he's not stupid. I feel this is a microcosm of a much bigger problem that happens with the education system. I'm not going to deny that going to the University of the Philippines and graduating summa cum laude isn't an easy feat. However, I wrote an article on what's the use of being a summa cum laude when one opposes badly needed reforms . It's because whether we want to admit it or not, schools focus too much on the ability to memorize without also focusing on the ability to understand . Memory is also the least reliable tool.  It would be time to continuously attack the problems of the education system. I felt shamed back then because students were often told, "Your grades will determine your future!" In college, I

What's the Use of Complaining About Jollibee Acquiring Companies BUT Not Accepting Open FDI to Bring in COMPETITION to the Philippines?

Anti-Snowflake Squad Facebook Page I was checking across Facebook and noticed some idiots complaining about Jollibee acquiring companies. The same idiots turned out to be anti-FDI--the same group that converses with Porky Madugo and Mukhang Adik. As usual, I will not directly link the idiots (or even reveal them directly, they will reveal themselves) to avoid giving them clout. Here's a statement by Porky that may make anyone wonder if (1) he knows he's lying (which I think he is for some self-serving reason ), or (2) he doesn't know what he's talking about: The monopolization of business ruins the business. It degrades the quality of the business of a product.   If you think monopolization is good, that's stupidity. It kills the competition and it kills the business.   Well, as old saying goes: "capitalists are the only one will destroy themselves." Since when did capitalism mean killing competition? Isn't Porky supposedly a die-hard Communist? In the

The Philippines' Decades-Long OUTDATED Education System

As a child born in the 1980s, I would say I was born during the Marcos Years and I was about a year old when the EDSA Revolution happened. That means I've passed through a lot of stuff rendered obsolete today such as dial-up Internet (which my parents refused to get due to how it interrupted the phone lines unlike the Digital Subscriber Line), cassette players, VHS players, and may I mention the education system . It might be fun to think of times when people of my age group watched The Flintstones or The Flintstone Kids (picture above) during the 1990s imagining school during the stone age. However, these photos today may make me cringe to think about how I grew up in an outdated education system. My recollection of the outdated education system in my eyes from the 1990s before K+12 got implemented My current readings through the book From Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew made me want to write this. The recent chapters I'm in are "Deng Xiaoping's China&qu

The Insanity of Quoting the Late Lee Kuan Yew About the Marcoses While Ignorning the Rest of His Helpful Advice for the Philippines

It may not be Singapore day yet, it's still July and that event is in August. However, some people are now raising placards all over again because the 17th Philippine president is none other than Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. Som people tend to quote from the book  From Third World to First . I did buy the book last year and started reading it slowly. I did get a slow read when it came to the late Lee Kuan Yew meeting the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. The description of Marcos was anything but flattering. I read the book and LKY mentioned that he was not confident that Marcos Sr. could pay back the money. The Philippines wasn't in the "golden years" as some would like to make it out. Yet, it seems that the only time LKY is ever mentioned is whenenver it's about the Marcoses and tends to be ignored when it's about how the Philippines can improve. Parliamentary system is often viewed in the wrong way Whenever Singapore is mentioned, I tend to talk about the parliamenta

The Economic Ignorance of Saying Landlords and Stock Traders Contribute Nothing to Society

Finding anti-capitalist (or better said, anti-business) wokes on Facebook (of all places) is just plain funny. Maybe, the term socialist isn't so negative since the late Lee Kuan Yew considered himself a socialist, the late Deng Xiaoping is the author of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, and Vietnam still considers itself as a socialist country. The picture above this paragraph says that landlords and stock traders allegedly "contribute absolutely nothing to society". I feel compelled to write a bit of a post since, as a business graduate, I do feel insulted. Then again even if I didn't get an MBA--I do still feel insulted myself! How good landlords contribute to society   Landlords are often said to be a blight. Some say that it's the "easiest job in the world". However, managing real estate (especially rentals ) isn't as easy as some think. I wrote an essay as to why being a landowner isn't as easy as some people think . I would like to d

Pinoy Pride Economics' Filipino vs. Foreigner False Dichotomy

Two years ago, I wrote about the socio-economic cost of Pinoy Pride Economics . It might be better to call it Pinoy Fried Economics because such mentalities have caused the Philippines to fail. Pinoy Pride Economics  has  fried  up any potential for the Philippines to improve. As it's August, the month is commonly called Buwan Ng Wika (month of the language), the celebrations tend to focus more on the celebration of Filipino Culture instead of Tagalog. I remember Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to showcase how cultural exchange evolved the Filipino Culture--such as showing the Chinese traders and Americans in their interaction with Filipinos. On this very first day of August, I'll discuss the problem of the Filipino vs. Foreigner dichotomy. Last I re-studied Filipino History, I never saw it as once free from foreign influence. The Chinese traded with the Philippines--way before the Chinese Communist of China (CCP) caused trouble because of their country's terrible leadership .

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at

#ThrowbackThursdays: When Values Education Tend to Teach Children to Patronize Local Products First Because They're Local

High School Philippine History Movement I was afraid I would be running out of ideas. I wanted to recall some businesses that closed down such as Nova Fontana (my once favorite toy store), Alyssa Caramel (my favorite candy store), El Loco (which used to open at IT Park), etc. Now, I decided to focus on remembering my childhood and values education. Values education is supposed to teach proper manners and good conduct. However, values education tends to become a propaganda tool of the National Economic Protectionist Association (NEPA) to justify Carlos P. Garcia's erroneous Filipino First Policy. However, the whole policy really helped cause the Philippines to fail. Its very idea of Garcia is that majority of the economic participants had to be Filipinos. It might sound good in theory but it wouldn't work with how the late Lee Kuan Yew would put it.  Apparently, Garcia has never learned the consequences of protectionism from history--whether it'd be the Stock Market Crash of

Trying to Discipline EVERY SINGLE FILIPINO Isn't a Sound Economic Plan

CoRRECT Movement It's the -ber months and it's only 90+ days before Christmas . I feel like every year, Christmas gets worse . Just Google "Christmas Day disasters" and let's stop thinking Christmas is some magical special time where the world is at peace with love. At this point, I feel like always complaining about last-minute Christmas shopping (read here ). It's been a leading cause of traffic. Some people even plan to do their shopping on December 24th. Some argue that some people are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Some are still waiting for their Christmas bonuses. However. one must question why they don't have money left. Think every dumb way possible to drain that paycheck (read here ). One can take a look at  poor money habits such as putting your wants over needs. People living paycheck-to-paycheck should focus on their needs, maybe avoid payday blowouts as much as possible, and focus on trying to make ends meet first before anything. Yet, we know

Can Diehard 1987 Constitution Defenders Prove Their Claims to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy?

It's not enough to say something. The question is, "Where's the substance or the empirical evidence?" When I start quoting from the late Lee Kuan Yew, these diehard 1987 Constitution of the Philippines defenders start diverting the topic by pointing out my errors to spite me than to correct me. They would ask if I know the Deming Theory of Management which talks about quality management in the company culture. Okay, that was something worth asking but as said, can these people really understand the problem of the Philippines has been more systemic (that is, within the system ) than just the people running the system? What allowed the legislative to be filled with people who know-nothing anyway? That's why I didn't want to vote for Senator Robin Padilla (who ironically understands the need for reforms, read here ). Unfortunately, so many Ad Hominem attacks have been done.  A past article I wrote was Should you  listen to either Davide Jr. or Kishore Mahbubani