Skip to main content

The "Kahit Konting Awa" Attitude Wouldn't Help Alleviate Anyone from Poverty

 

As the countdown to Christmas continues--it's easy to expect the toxic Filipino trait that I'll dub as "Kahit Konting Awa". The literal meaning is "Just a Little Pity". I named it after that song by Nora Aunor, the theme song of The Flor Contemplacion Story. I wasn't a bit surprised when the hit movie was uploaded on VIVA Films' YouTube page last 2013 (read here). Back on the topic, I noticed it's easy for people to desire to reconcile because it's the Christmas season. The Philippines has the longest Christmas season. However, people love to do last-minute Christmas shopping presumably due to their poor budgetary habits. Ever heard of the one-day paycheck pandemic in the Philippines?

It's a common abusive trait in the Philippines to have that "Kahit Konting Awa" attitude. There's the problem of "Utang (debt) is life." It's no surprise that financial literacy is that low in the Philippines. A not fun fact at all is that isn't more fun discussing business and economics in the Philippines (read here). It can be because of that "Kahit Konting Awa" attitude. I'm not even a bit surprised that the song is such a hit in the Philippines. I believe the song became popular because of the prevalent attitude among Filipinos. It was also that time when Hubert Jeffry P. Webb was wrongfully accused of a crime he didn't commit. A lot of Filipinos cried out for the blood of the wrongly accused while insisting Flor was innocent. 

Who composes these people with the "Kahit Konting Awa" attitude in the Philippines? We have tenants with huge delinquencies and did big damage to the area for lease. We have people who keep borrowing money from others but never pay it back. We have people who are addicted to gambling instead of investing. We have students who'd rather cut classes than attend them. We have workers who don't show up on time or do their work badly. In short, it's the crowd that just wants to have fun without having to work. It's one thing to deal with unfair business practices. It's another thing to be that abusive person, regardless of one's position. A lessor can be fair and a tenant can be abusive. An employer can be fair and an employee can be abusive. That's why some workers' rights organizations are nothing more than shams. 

The problem with the "Kahit Konting Awa" attitude is that people never learn. People will demand for mercy, even when the person isn't required to give it. They may even say, "Well, but you're rich! Why do you need the money?" That's really poor accounting sense. It may be confusing profits for revenues (read here). Entrepreneurs don't only have to collect revenues but they must also pay their expenses. For example, the lessor will need the money to pay for repairs. Money doesn't grow on trees or fall from the sky! Groceries need that money not just to replenish their inventory but to pay all their other expenses, salaries included. That's why workers don't get a share of the profit--because their wages are part of the expenses before the profit. Why should workers have profit shares unless they hold shares of stock in a corporation? If only they studied basic accounting--it's a give-and-take relationship!

Sure, it can be understood if people are allowed leeway. For example, medical expenses for a direct family member or one's own injury. However, a person is only given extra room to pay up the debt or rental. What's due isn't extinguished. There's also the contract of lease agreement where a person can be kicked out for two consecutive months of non-payment. Banks will still need the money back for their personal expenses. That's why banks have mortgage policies. Banks seize anything of value from the debtor to make up for the losses. Leeway is different from taking abuse. If business institutions kept taking abuse--we can expect a lot of working-class people, to lose their jobs. Eventually, there will be no employers for employees. If laid-off employees established a business and followed that kind of mindset--they too will have to close. 

After all, an old Chinese proverbs says, "Give a man fish and he will only have a meal for a day. Teach a man how to fish--he will have a meal for a lifetime." If people keep relying on "Kahit Konting Awa"--they only have a meal for a day. Beggars beg because they need that money to buy food. Give the beggar alms and that's his or her only meal for a day. However, give a poor person work and teach them home to work and manage finances properly, they can have a meal for a lifetime. 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...