Skip to main content

It's NOT More Fun Discussing Business and Economics in the Philippines

 

It's September and the -ber months are here. It's already known that the Philippines has the longest Christmas celebration in the world. Christmas can be the most expensive time of the year. In the Philippines, Christmas decorations tend to be out earlier. With Christmas in mind, the keywords and key phrases that come to my mind are "overspending", "last-minute shopping", "buried in debt", "spending beyond your means", "feasting over finances", "just add sugar if it's bitter"--just to name a few of the many financial stupidities during Christmas. Such phrases can be linked to the Filipino's typical lack of financial literacy. That's why discussing business and economics isn't more fun in the Philippines! It's not just because of financial illiteracy but also due to economic illiteracy. Even worse, some people still adhere to what the late Lee Kuan Yew would call a third-world mentality.

Such people ignore basic accounting in favor of #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics (which is, to increase salaries while lowering the prices of goods)

A lot of arguments are made by idiots both in person and on social media--lack accounting sense! I may be no accountant but I know basic accounting concepts. What I'm going to discuss right now focuses on arguments that don't make any accounting sense. Accounting and finance are important because one must know the profit and loss statement of the company. I didn't excel in my first two accounting subjects. However, I found cost accounting and management accounting to be fun subjects. I was also glad that I was under a very strict accounting professor!

How do several people in the Philippines define profit? It's pretty much operating on the merkado (marketplace) or sari-sari store mindset. One of the many things worth noting is how such people define the profits. Typically, somebody says, "My sales for the day is PHP 10,000 so my profit is PHP 10,000." It's a problem when people equate sales with profits. Never mind that in accounting, Investopedia gives this definition of the different types of profits:

Gross, Operating, and Net Profit

The first level of profitability is gross profit, which is sales minus the cost of goods sold. Sales are the first line item on the income statement, and the cost of goods sold (COGS) is generally listed just below it:

Gross Profit = Revenues - COGS

For example, if Company A has $100,000 in sales and a COGS of $60,000, it means the gross profit is $40,000, or $100,000 minus $60,000. Divide gross profit by sales for the gross profit margin, which is 40%, or $40,000 divided by $100,000.

Operating profit removes operating expenses like overhead and other indirect costs as well as accounting costs like depreciation and amortization. It is sometimes referred to as earnings before interest and taxes, or EBIT.

Operating Profit = Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) - Operating Expenses - Depreciation & Amortization

Net profit furthermore removes the costs of interest and taxes paid by the business. Because it falls at the bottom of the income statement, it is sometimes referred to as the firm's "bottom line."

Net Profit = EBIT - Interest Expense - Taxes

The bottom line tells a company how profitable it was during a period and how much it has available for dividends and retained earnings. What's retained can be used to pay off debts, fund projects, or reinvest in the company.

Image by Sabrina Jiang © Investopedia 2020

In short, believing in #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics is plain stupid. If we take a look at the sample income statement--the revenue isn't the profit. Instead, we have to deduct it from the COGS. After that, we have to deduct from all expenses which includes salaries. In short, the cost includes the salaries. If they insist that #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba works, they must be confusing revenues with profits. That's why I wrote two articles namely (1) opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbabaStores and (2) why the #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba business model is destined for failure.

Let's talk about plain common sense. Let's say somebody opens a business that sells eggs at PHP 10.00 per piece and rice at PHP 20.00 per kilo. The same establishment gives a salary of PHP 750.00 per day to their customers. Chances are that they might even put in air conditioners (which causes the electricity to go up), buy MacPROs when they could purchase "working class" laptops, open 24 hours a day, etc. without considering the cost. It reminds me that Tealive at Ayala Central Bloc had some increase in prices. After all, the establishment is now open 24/7 meaning that the operations costs have increased. Coffee shops sell at a higher price because of their operating costs and raw materials costs. For them, they want to introduce that "price advantage"--never mind they can't recover the costs at that rate! 

Let's say that one sack of rice (worth 50 kilos) is PHP 2,930.00 since it's Ganador. Let's divide the price by 50 kilos to get the price per kilo is PHP 58.60. If they sell the Ganador at PHP 20.00 per kilo--they're selling at a loss of PHP 38.60. If they sold 500 kilos of Ganador (for that day) at that price--they may get a revenue of PHP 10,000.00. However, they suffer a loss of PHP 19,300.00. They should've been selling their rice at the Suggested Retail Price (SRP) of PHP 64.00. They may not get 500 kilos sold for that day. However, it will accumulate revenue over time. This is just one product. This hasn't accounted for the other products, which are sold at ridiculously low prices. That's why the amount of customers may not always be the best indicator of profits. People may prefer a cheaper price. However, some people are willing to pay more for quality.

Graph taken from CFI


It also means that a sudden wage increase isn't advisable. Such people will mockingly say on Facebook, "Muh supply and demand conspiracy theory!" However, we can't change the laws of supply and demand. That's why we must look into the supply and demand in the job market (read here). If we look at the graph above, we must understand that even salaries are subject to supply and demand. If there's too little demand for labor and too much supply of labor--why would salaries go up? Salaries are part of the whole cost accounting procedure. If there are too few customers for companies--can they really even afford to increase the wages? By refusing to take into account that profits aren't revenues, fools will continue to think that wage increase is "magic". Unfortunately, any sudden wage increase only leads to sudden inflation. For the nth time, salaries can't be separated from the operating costs, which add to the overall value of the finished product!

Their poor understanding of profits, company share ownership, and the word "investment" when it comes to talking about FDI

Decades of the Filipino First Policy (or what I alternatively call Pinoy Pride Economics) is prevalent in the Philippines. I want to recall those times in schools where Filipino First Policy was taught in character building. People tend to have the mentality that we "learn everything in school". Guess what? I didn't learn to invest in the stock market using equity funds in school. Instead, I learned it through self-study during the pandemic. Right now, I even wonder if I should still be proud of my MBA degree. These days, I feel like I don't even feel like teaching at all in any school because of how the Philippine education system is really that terrible. 

We have people who believe in the likes of Atty. Neri Colmenares and Atty Teodoro A. Casiño of Bayan Muna. One of the dumbest things that Casiño wrote on Rappler was this:

Without definite limits on foreign ownership and with no preference for Filipino citizens and corporations, the Constitutional provisions on the national economy and patrimony would become a tabula rasa. It would now be up to the Federal Assembly to determine policies on foreign equity sharing and just about anything there is about the economy and our natural resources. This, of course, creates an entirely new window for corporate lobbying, putting small, underfunded Filipino citizens and corporations at a great disadvantage.

Worse, by totally removing the State’s role in developing an industrialized, self-reliant economy, in implementing agrarian reform, in promoting and protecting Filipino enterprises and producers, and in reserving our natural resources for Filipinos, Duterte’s Cha-Cha will leave small enterprises, workers and farmers having to fend for themselves from the onslaught of even more globalization.

These amendments are the culmination of 3 decades of “economic reforms” toward a totally free market, neoliberal economy. Combined with the existing policies of economic liberalization, deregulation and privatization, the amendments remove the last impediments to the total domination, control and plunder of our economy and natural resources by foreign corporations and banks.

It was written during the term of former president Atty. Rodrigo R. Duterte. Colmenares even opposed ASEAN integration, claiming that letting FDIs into the Philippines, means destroying the local industries. The claim is baloney at its finest. If I'm not wrong, Casiño even claimed that Singapore only opened to FDI because of its lack of natural resources. Others claim that Singapore only opened to FDIs after it became a first-world country. However, reading the book From Third World to First disproved their claims. However, some people still dismiss it presumably because of sentimentalism with the late Flor Contemplacion (read here). That's why I even suspect that the uploading of The Flor Contemplacion Story movie on YouTube is an anti-reform move (read here). That would be ironic if they were actually using Apple devices to write such content! Of course, I expect them to say that they have "no choice" because foreigners unfairly own the means of producing equipment (read here).

Their claim can be like, "Of course, we need 60-40 for security reasons." However, I wrote a refute against such a ridiculous claim. If we look into the details, 60-40 is nothing more than overpriced rent (read here) or trying to earn a fast buck. Money that's easy come is easy go. Let's talk about two types of auto repair shops. One cheats on their customers by sabotaging. The other gives honest services. Sure, the one who sabotages can get fast money, for now. However, when customers discover the sabotage, they would quit and go to an honest auto repair shop. One may make a quick buck but it's not sustainable. The life of Charles Ponzi should prove that. Ponzi schemes may get one rich fast but they're not sustainable. An easy buck is nothing compared to revenue built on trust and treating employees right. 

Malaya Business Insight

This goes back to basic accounting. When they say, "But all the investment goes to the foreign investors, none for the Philippines! Boo hoo!" The statement is made out of ignorance. First, FDIs get rich based on net income after taxes (read here). The caricature made by the late Neil Doloricon (from the IBON Foundation, which I can't really rely on due to its protectionist views) reeks of economic ignorance. Based on the example of accounting, the Philippines must collect taxable income per month. Companies must deduct their revenues from the costs. It goes from the gross profit to the net profit before taxes. Deductibles include all sorts of operating costs, both direct and indirect. There would still be accounts payable to deduct. In taxation, these are called deductibles for tax avoidance. If these people knew the definition of profits--it's anything after taxes. FDIs will have to pay their taxes if they expect to keep their profits. One must question if Doloricon understood basic accounting when he made that caricature!

Do people even understand what business ownership or equity means? Business equity is different from land ownership. Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their businesses is different from selling foreigners to the Philippines! Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their business means that they don't need to find a Filipino partner, only for them to own 40% (or even lower). Nobody would want to rent in my space if they had to part with 60% of their profit with me. It's one thing for the tenant to owe me the monthly rental. It's another thing if I demand 60% of their profit. Profits are meant for the businesses to keep. As said for the nth time, the net profit after taxes is what businesses keep! Profits and revenues aren't the same thing! Why would an MNC want to part 60% of its net profits after taxes to a local partner? That's different from an MNC paying monthly rentals to the Filipino landowner and required taxes to the Philippine government!

Ad Homimens and credentials fallacy prove why it's not more fun to discuss economics in the Philippines

Some time ago, I remember reading about the poor Filipino logic. It's no surprise since the majority of Filipinos have terrible reading comprehension! That's probably why they mistake profits for revenues or they mistake 100% share ownership with land ownership! When it comes to poor reading comprehension--I can't expect a mind that knows a lot! Some of these people even enjoy high-cholesterol food. If the heart can't work well then the brain can't work well. It means that the brain can't work properly. That may explain why that fat guy I dubbed Porky Madugo (I believe he blocked me already) thinks the way he thinks. Porky writes one crazy claim after the other, such as the workers owning the profit and the means of production. If the guy knew basic accounting--the workers own the salaries, not the profit. There's a difference between profits and salaries. I try to discuss it and all he does is insult me--proving he's got nothing to back his arguments!

If one thinks about it-- Ad Homimen is often mixed with the credentialist fallacy. I try to speak against the IBON Foundation. They are quick to tell me, "Shut up! You're not an economist!" They will raise up that Jose Enrique Africa is a graduate of the London School of Economics (LSE). Take note that Ferdinand Alexander A. Marcos is also a graduate of that same school--the same guy who blamed the U.S. dollar as to why the Philippine peso is weaker! They may say that Rosario Bella Guzman is a graduate of Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU) but I'm not. They may also fire out more and more credentialist fallacies like naming the Monsod couple and Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. I respect the credentials of the Monsods or Davide. Unfortunately, other people with credentials can easily dismiss what they have to say. I can cite other people with better credentials as my source. I can only expect them to say I'm "too stupid" to understand it. Never mind that being intellectually stupid is different from foolishness! I can have a room temperature IQ and be right. A person can be a summa cum laude and be dead wrong. 

When I name my sources, of course, they will still fire insults at me. I can go ahead and mention the names of people like Kishore Mahbubani, to counter Davide's arguments. I may even quote former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. They may fire comments like, "Why are you favoring the foreigner over the Filipino. Why won't you listen to your fellow Filipino?" When I ask for evidence of success, they start hurling insults instead of the evidence I demand. It reminds me of how some people who insisted in the Marcos Years "parliament" preferred to call me crazy or foolish when I requested their evidence. I even present evidence as to why it can't be a parliamentary system. Instead of listening, they choose to hurl insults. The same is true when I cite credible sources that they don't want to listen to. Hypocritically, there are times they go for foreign validation from organizations like the International Criminal Court (ICC), Human Rights Watch (HRW), European Union (EU), etc. I wonder how they'll respond if these same organizations will say, "Sorry but your economy is too restrictive." Chances are they'll declare persona non-grata to the exact same organizations. 

Overall, it's nothing more than a cognitive dissonance. It means that people get uncomfortable when they're faced with something that contradicts their cherished beliefs. Some people will still believe that certain innocent people are the ones who did the crime because it was what was "established as fact". That means not even new evidence such as the wrongly accused's impossibility of doing the crime can convince them. Some are still convinced that Francisco Juan G. Larrañaga and Hubert Jeffry P. Webb were the ones who did the crime--never mind the pieces of evidence that refute such claims! Some people even refuse to examine the evidence, deciding it was "surely tampered with" without having it examined. There's always some discomfort when one's cherished beliefs are challenged. Business and economics are no different in that field! 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Bad Accounting

I would like to apologize in advance to my readers. The picture I'm presenting is in Tagalog, and not all my readers speak Tagalog. I would translate the picture's text into English for convenience. It says:   "Ano ang bumubuo sa mga presyo?" means "What comprises the price?" "Gastos ng materyales" means materials expense "Gastos sa kasangkapan" means depreciation expense ""Gaston sa pasahod" means salary expense "Kapitalista" means capitalist Renta is well, rent "Kayang pababain ang presyo" means "Prices can be lowered". It says that capitalists (industrialists, landlords, bankers) and elitist governments are part in the gross profit. Get rid of excise taxes (either permanently or temporarily) for the prices of goods and services. In the times of crisis, in the burden of sacrifices, we need to be watchful for capacity. Whatever savings for times of difficulty by the workers and countrymen, the...
Read more

Past Chinese School Education in the Philippines was Based on "Sǐ Jì Yìng Bèi"

  Chinoys of my age (and older) may remember these textbooks. I called them as the "symbol of trauma". It was memorizing something without understanding it . One would just memorize (without understanding it) because it was typical. Not being able to memorize what was assigned? Get a bad grade? One can expect physical punishment like hitting the hand with a ruler or chili in the mouth. Chinese language teachers are stereotypically strict . The language textbooks (above) are what were used during the 1990s to the early 2000s. As I wrote it, the Sinjiang textbooks aren't effective in teaching Mandarin , in a world where Mandarin has over a billion speakers!  There's a Chinese proverb that says, "死記硬背 sǐ jì yìng bèi" or "Memorize to the point of death". That's exactly what those textbooks are. Memorize to the point of death! Okay, it may sound exaggerated. However, that's how Chinese language teachers in the Philippines were made to teach the ...
Read more

Migrante International's Really Bad Economic Literacy

March 17 (which is tomorrow) seems to be an unofficial holiday for some people, right? I'm sickened that the late Flor Contemplacion has been treated like she's some national heroine (and thankfully, tomorrow isn't a  holiday) even after Singapore had proven her guilt. A movie was made by Joel Lamangan called The Flor Contemplacion Story . The call for Migrante (Migrant) International has been to remember Flor even after several years. What's not too surprising was to learn that Flor's sons were all arrested for drug-related charges. Even her eldest son died while in prison. You have Migrante International wanting to end the labor export policy. However, a post by Migrante really shows how this group fails basic economics. I will not post the whole press statement but one part that made my eyes roll. >> Further opening the country’s economy to foreign ownership and control will worsen the exploitation of our people and the environment without creating a susta...
Read more

"Filipino First Policy" Has NO PLACE in the Rising Asian 21st Century

I guess nobody saw the Asian 21st Century coming, right? China was once a poor nation but look at it now. Vietnam was once a poor nation but look at it now. Singapore was once a poor nation but look at it now. The late great Lee Kuan Yew wrote his book From Third World to First . I'm afraid some people have been using it to go against the presidency of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. while ignoring what else Lee Kuan Yew had to say. Lee Kuan Yew described the Filipino press to be rambunctious on pages 304-305 which I agree. I'm afraid that the Filipino press may have had a hand in getting rid of any economic or political reforms that could help the Philippines. Yet, one policy has been holding back the Philippines for decades and yes, it's the Filipino First Policy .  Reviewing the Filipino First Policy and why it has no place in the rising Asian 21st century I remembered how the values education subject taught Carlos P. Garcia's stupid Filipino First Policy as a Filipino value...
Read more

Remembering the Late Jesse Robredo's Quote on Systems That Force People to be Good

It's been some time since Jesse M. Robredo died too soon. Hopefully, his wife Atty. Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo is true to her word, in her willingness to amend the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, for the sake of foreign investments. It's a shame I never wrote about the late great man. The CoRRECT Movement on Facebook gave this important note on Robredo's life. Robredo said, "It's not enough for an official to be good. There has to be a system that forces them to be good." Whether or not Robredo was for charter change or a few constitutional amendments, I can't tell. For some racists, let me remind them that Robredo's real surname is Lim  and his paternal grandfather is the late Lim Pay Co.  In terms of Robredo's credentials (and I tend to sometimes brag about the credentials of those I quote), here's what the City Government of Naga website says: He is an Edward Mason Fellow and a graduate of Masters in Public Administration at the John...
Read more

Filipino First Education Created the Fixed Mindset Over Growth Mindset Mentality

Tomorrow is Bonifacio Day. It's effortless to say that Filipino First Policy works. I wouldn't be surprised if Andres Bonifacio gets used as a poster boy. However, Bonifacio worked for British and German investors . I'd like to talk about how decades of Filipino First Policy compromised our education system. Some idiot on Facebook said which I'll paraphrase to avoid getting personal. The idiot said, "If you let foreigners invest here, can Filipinos afford it?" The same idiot also scorns the law of supply and demand (read my post discussing why that's plain silly  here ). People who believe in #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba must first prove it works by opening such stores nationwide, to show that the Philippines doesn't need FDI to succeed (read here ). Of course, I can expect them to say "It's the government's responsibility to raise salaries without raising the prices of goods." That's just plain bad accounting and finance too! Andrew Ja...
Read more

Refuse to Do Business with a Person Who Looks Down on Menial Work

If there's any reason why some people are angry with the rich--it's because of rich people who look down on the poor. Some people are born rich without knowing the struggles of the one who originally acquired the wealth. Some rich parents make the fatal mistake of making their children feel entitled. Meanwhile, some rich parents make their children do the right thing by not waiting until things get too far. Some rich parents end up making their children attend middle-class schools, do summer jobs, work as employees in their own businesses, and teach them the value of wealth, especially by narrating the struggles before they got wealthy. In looking for a business partner, I feel it's very important to look at the attitude of these people. How do they treat people who do menial work? I could imagine looking forward to a business contract. However, it turns out that the potential business partner is a spoiled brat . Maybe, it's already a red alarm if I'm invited to an ...
Read more

Dayang Daya: The Case of Five-Six Lending Services Roaming to Collect Christmas/New Year Debts by January

I remember during the late 1990s when the song "Dayang Dayang" (Princess of the First Degree) was played on the radio. The origins are often debated whether or not it was from Muslim Mindanao or from the other neighboring countries. The Philippines has had settlers also from Malaysia and Indonesia. A parody cover by the late Yoyoy Villame was called Dayang Daya or Cheating Cheating. It was probably making fun of the Indian five-six lending business. Indians tend to be called Bombay because of the location known as Mumbai. I even made the mistake of referring to Indians as "Bombays" more than once. The song "Dayang Daya" does talk about the five-six lending services. It does target a lot of gullible people. I even became nearly distrustful of Indians in college for quite some time.  I wrote how a Merry Christmas may lead to an Unhappy New Year due to debt burden (read here ). I tend to say to myself, "Somebody hasn't paid their debt!" every ti...
Read more

Will Opening the Philippines to 100% FDI Lead to Foreign Monopoly?

Monopoly - Hasbro I was looking at the CoRRECT Movement Moderated Public Forum on Facebook. I found more illogical arguments by a certain troll in the forum named Juan Dalisay Jr.--the writer of the Superphysics One website. However, this isn't the first argument I ran into as I've seen arguments from Kabataan Partylist and the League of Filipino Students on Facebook. They have claimed that foreign direct investments (FDIs) will lead to exploitation, only they will get rich, that they will rape resources, and an even funnier claim is that they will lead to monopolies . Some people, even fools, should be allowed to defend themselves at CoRRECT Moderated Public Forum than just live in their echo chamber of Facebook pages. However, Kishore Mahbubani and the late Lee Kuan Yew had long disproven that . The testimony is in the book From Third World to First by Lee himself. Mahbubani said foreign investors create jobs, bring capital, and teach new skills. I wonder if protectionist adv...
Read more