Skip to main content

Yes to Filipinas Marrying Foreign Men, No to 100% FDI Shares Ownership?!


Today is Valentine's Day. I feel Valentine's Day is plain overrated. Some people just get a date for the sake of it--even if it means enduring that materialistic girlfriend or abusive boyfriend! Isn't romance a year-round thing? A few Valentine's Day ago, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners and that FDI doesn't include Filipinas dating foreigners. This time to add some comedy, I wrote this post. It's something to say, "Yes! Somebody is married to a foreigner!" It's the hype to get job opportunities abroad or to marry a foreigner.

Blossoms

Why do Filipinos want to marry foreigners? The Blossoms blog writes down the following:
  • Love and Affection: Love is often the primary reason for marriage, and Filipinas who marry foreigners may do so because they have fallen in love with someone from another country. 
  • Financial Stability: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners because they believe a foreign husband can provide financial stability and security. In the Philippines, a high percentage of the population lives in poverty. Many women see marriage to a foreign national as a way to escape poverty and improve their financial situation.
  • Educational and Career Opportunities: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners to pursue better educational and career opportunities. Marrying a foreign national may provide access to a more advanced education system and ample employment opportunities.
  • Change in Environment: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners to experience a change in environment and culture. The Philippines is predominantly Catholic, and some women may find the cultural differences between their home country and their foreign spouse attractive.
  • Better Life: Finally, some Filipinas may marry foreigners hoping for a better life: better living conditions, improved health care, and greater personal freedoms.

It's easy to say, "Hip! Hip! Horray!" am I right? Back in the civics and culture classes, I remember how often we talked about famous Filipinas who married foreigners. They often brag about how Filipina women are sought out by foreign men. I don't really mind Filipinas marrying foreigners if it's done out of true love and affection. Some Filipina-foreigner marriages may be working better than Filipinas who marry worthless fellow Filipinos. Some Chinese marrying outside their ethnicity may be doing better than Chinese who married a bad Chinese partner. 

However, things can take a tide when I tell people, "If you can rejoice over Filipinas marrying foreigners, why not allow foreigners to own 100% of their shares in business?" It can get chaotic whenever I talk about that need. Responses like that 60-40 is necessary to protect the Philippines from exploitation are common to hear (read here). The rationale behind 60-40 is based on confusing profits for revenues (read here).

Do they think that Filipinas marrying foreigners is yet "another form of conquest"? Filipinas can marry foreigners for all I care, as long as it's a loving relationship. However, a Filipina is more of the "object of conquest" since she's brought to the foreigner's homeland. Let's say that a Taiwanese man marries a Filipina. The Filipina will be brought to Taiwan and she may have to apply for Taiwanese citizenship. A Filipina marries a white man and she must apply for citizenship in the white man's country. A Filipina woman marrying a foreigner may have to change their citizenship. They may still stay Filipina if dual citizenship is allowed in that country. Otherwise, they may cease to become Filipina in terms of citizenship.

Indeed, simply another form of economic ignorance born out of the Filipino First Policy's primitive thinking!

Popular posts from this blog

Should Noynoy Aquino be a Valid Excuse to Reject Econ Cha Cha?

Philippine Star   Updated January 25, 2025 This may be a touchy post. Politics is often a source of fights during parties. That's why we're told not to talk about politics during parties. Unfortunately, some people on Facebook are now using the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino Jr. as an excuse not to execute even economic charter change. Never mind that blatant supporter of Atty. Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo, Andrew James Masigan, supports economic charter change . The late Charles Edward P. Celdran was also an anti-Duterte critic. As I looked at some okay boomer posts, I'm not surprised at people who still use Noynoy as an excuse to shout with all their might, "No to economic charter change!" Somebody posted on Facebook the following. As always, I won't publicly shame anyone. If possible, I will only refer to them by codenames or use the name Anonymous. I want to remain as professional as possible. This person said that under N...

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

Opening #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Stores Nationwide Increases POGO-Related Risks (NOT FDI)

Alice Guo aka Guo Hua-Ping may be in jail now . However, I believe the saga is far from over . It reminds me that I actually wrote about how several idiots on Facebook go so far as to say, " Alice Guo should be a warning about open FDI! " Some have even gone as far as to say that POGO and Chinese spies should "justify" the Filipino First Policy . However, the harsher reality is that the Filipino First Policy may actually be encouraging dummy investors instead ! As the saga continues, I've decided to write what I might call my harshest entry yet. It's going to be Chinese New Year this year. This might be an entry that may need to be shared before the Lunar New Year! My grievances are  still ongoing because some people still demand #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, no matter how destructive it  will be . That's why I use Venezuela as an example, especially during Nicolas Maduro's downfall . Back to the topic, I remember writing a joke post where I said, "Wh...

An Interesting Mental Exercise for Chinese as Second Language Class

Back in my day, I remember we kept memorizing what was called bon toi (written as 问题, Wèntí in Mandarin) without understanding them. I hated memorizing those. I guess another reason was to parrot what one can't understand. We had the biak diam too which is Hokkien for oral recitation. Memorizing the question and answer (written as 问题和答案, Wèntí hé dá'àn in Mandarin) would actually not be so tedious if Chinese was taught as a second language. My bizarre idea is to think about having only one bon toi but there are five answers to memorize.  Memorizing (and understanding) why some don't want to learn Chinese These five reasons (above) have to be memorized in both Chinese and English. The teacher (老师, Lǎoshī) would say the question,  "不学中文的最大借口是什么?" (Bù xué zhōngwén de zuìdà jièkǒu shì shénme?). The question can't be answered  until  the student actually translated it as, "What are the top excuses not to learn Chinese?"  The student will eval...