Skip to main content

Cost Averaging for a Period VS. Buying Low-Sell High Strategy

 

I think it can be a heated debate at times between (1) cost averaging and (2) buying low and then selling high strategies. I was looking at what Warren Buffett said with this:

If you like spending six to eight hours per week working on investments, do it. If you don’t, then dollar-cost average into index funds.

I prefer to call it simply cost averaging. It's where one puts the same amount of money per month for a selected period. It's like the PHP 8,000.00 rule where one may choose to invest PHP 1,000.00 for eight months or PHP 2,000.00 for four months in buying stocks. Meanwhile, Buffett advises that most people should buy index funds instead. I decided to get the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund via cost averaging and did some lump sums during the crash. 

Cost averaging is pretty much a safer way to avoid timing the market. The market moves not just during the opening but also during the closing. That's why I pretty much want to avoid playing casino with daily stock trading (read here). I decided to try a day trading simulator and found out how stressful it can get. It's like playing at the casino. Charlie Munger even called it a speculative orgy. Vulgar language but I can't help but agree with it. As Buffett also says:

If you aren't willing to own a stock for ten years, don't even think about owning it for ten minutes

Timing the market means waiting for the next crash or the next rise. I'm not saying timing the market is bad per se. Some people prefer to wait for stock prices to go down before they buy. It's because some prefer the advantage of lump sum investing. Meanwhile, risk-averse people are better off cost averaging such as putting PHP 1,000.00-PHP 2,000.00 per month in a stock index fund. It might be better to invest a reasonably small amount per month and a lump sum invest during a crash. The rule that follows is, "Invest only what you don't need now."

In my case, I'm pretty much an emotional investor for some time. I've made bad mistakes due to a bad temperament. I even allowed someone to buy in credit thinking only about the returns and not the risks. I nearly entered pyramid scams because of emotions. I decided that cost averaging might be the best for me. Besides, my horizon might be either two years, three years, five years, or even ten years. Buffett's strategy is pretty much in the long term. That is, never expect to get rich quick. Having my MBA is useless if I've got a bad temperament. As Buffett says, temperament wins over intelligence. Nobody should get the pleasure of being for the crowd or against it. Follow the right, not the crowd or those against the crowd. I need to be careful not to prematurely sell any funds just because of a slight increase. 

Some people manage to time the buying low and selling high strategy. They may have learned to time the market well. I guess such people aren't that emotionally carried. Still, I think there's wisdom in setting a reasonably small sum of money for a monthly investment and doing a lump sum during a crash. It would be like investing PHP 1,000.00 per month on a regular then getting PHP 5,000.00 for the crash, and then when prices rise up a bit, investing PHP 1,000.00 again every month. It's value-cost averaging. Invest the money that's not needed for now. But a beginner may want to think, "Invest only what you can afford to lose." because mistakes are bound to happen. These mistakes can happen such as impulse selling. Instead, investing by cost averaging (for a set period) would mean reducing losses. However, I'd believe that saying to invest only what you can afford to lose can be very self-defeating (read here). I used to believe that back then while ironically getting defeated by bad credit

Right now, I'm not going to argue too much about it. Some people have better risk management styles. In my case, cost averaging might be the best way for the more risk-averse and emotional type. I want to invest in the long term. I do lump sum only when prices are super low. However, I do cost averaging as much as possible to reduce the risk due to daily fluctuations. Hopefully, I can take Buffett's advice to heart and practice it consistently. 

References

Websites

"Buying the dip: Is this a good strategy when markets are falling?" by James Royal (May 26, 2022)

"Day Trading Definition: Why It Differs From Investing" by Sam Swenson, CFA, CPA (Updated: June 28, 2022)

"Warren Buffett: Why This Bear Market Could Be an Investor's Best Friend" by Catherine Brock (July 9, 2022)

Popular posts from this blog

Honoring the Recently Deceased Jose de Venecia Jr. in a Business/Economics Perspective

That's right. Jose de Venecia  recently passed away yesterday. As an advocate for reform, it's sad but true that de Venecia didn't win because he was boring . It was easy to think of him as a boring guy. I remember the time when he was called in ISPUP as Yoda De Venecia (after the Star Wars character). I was just a clueless college student at that time when the ISPUP episode was shown. I was only 13 years old when de Venecia ran for president. It was also that era when Joseph Estrada (who's now 88 years old) ran for president, and it was that time when Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who turned 90 last year) became the chief justice.  Just recently, I found this eulogy   for JDV. I will not post the whole eulogy, but only the one from the one that would "fit better" for a business-economics blog: He helped advance policies that enabled major infrastructure projects through public private partnerships, converted former military bases into thriving economic centers...

Yes to Filipinas Marrying Foreign Men, No to 100% FDI Shares Ownership?!

Today is Valentine's Day. I feel Valentine's Day is plain overrated. Some people just get a date for the sake of it--even if it means enduring that materialistic girlfriend or abusive boyfriend! Isn't romance a year-round thing? A few Valentine's Day ago, I wrote about Filipinas marrying foreigners and that FDI doesn't include Filipinas dating foreigners . This time to add some comedy, I wrote this post. It's something to say, "Yes! Somebody is married to a foreigner!" It's the hype to get job opportunities abroad or to marry a foreigner. Blossoms Why do Filipinos want to marry foreigners? The Blossoms blog writes down the following: Love and Affection: Love is often the primary reason for marriage, and Filipinas who marry foreigners may do so because they have fallen in love with someone from another country.  Financial Stability: Some Filipinas may marry foreigners because they believe a foreign husband can provide financial stability and secur...

Facts vs. Gossip: Did Vietnam (According to Filipino MARITESes) Develop from Its Own Treasury Before Opening Up to FDI?

Vietnam Youth Union It's been 80 years since Vietnam achieved its independence in 1945. Some time ago, I wrote about how Vietnam's Doi Moi actually disproves the Trust Me Bro School of Economics . I wasn't too accustomed to researching Vietnam's ironic economic miracle . Vietnam is a one-party state ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam. The word Communism would evoke fear and terror. What I find funny is that some people are using Vietnam as an excuse not to open up the Philippine economy (read here ). Such misinformed  people think that Vietnam "won this revolution," supposedly self-industrialized from its own treasury before opening up to FDI. In short, some people either believe that (1) Vietnam is an example of how a highly protectionist economy works, or (2) that Vietnam made itself rich before opening to FDI. Both of them are lies. I'll focus on the second point for this new blog post!  Right now, some people say that I'm just another marites...

China's Real Great Leap Forward and Economic Cultural Revolution Under Deng Xiaoping

Nobody can dare deny that China has become a big superpower. I remembered I went to China last 2007 (which would be more than 10 years ago). China had become such a huge metropolis of power that I'm amazed at it. I was thinking about how Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing were truly magnificent cities before the pollution problem (which should call for eco-capitalist measures). I was thinking about how I never realized China was once dirt poor.  Did you know China used to be so dirt-poor? The "economic legacy" of Mao Zedong was a disaster with the so-called "Great Leap Forward". It was a great leap forward all right--a great leap forward to ruin. Mao seeking to avoid the use of foreign resources to launch China proved disastrous. The 1970s would see a dramatic change when Deng Xiaoping finally took over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The beginning of the rise of Communist China under Deng's new political policy would pave the way to China becoming a great s...

Ironically, COMMUNIST Vietnam Continues Improving FDI Conditions, Compared to DEMOCRATIC Philippines

Vietnam National University It's crazy how people don't realize the bigger picture between Communist Vietnam and the democratic Philippines (read here ). It's really crazy how Senator Joseph Victor Gomez Ejercito apparently thinks that delayed proceedings to Vice President Sara Duterte-Carpio's impeachment trial could scare away FDIs. Meanwhile, Atty. Renee Louise Co of Kabataan Partylist could talk about economics, all the while Kabataan Partylist is still against open FDI. It's amazing how Raoul Abellar Manuel, a cumlaude in applied mathematics, still believes in #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics! Meanwhile, the biggest picture is that Communist Vietnam , while it's under a One-Party State of the Communist Party of Vietnam, is has the better picture of how to invite FDIs. In fact, the Constitution of Vietnam  is rather silent on economic restrictions . The CPV chooses to impose economic restrictions through legislation rather than enshrining them in its Constit...