Skip to main content

Cost Averaging for a Period VS. Buying Low-Sell High Strategy

 

I think it can be a heated debate at times between (1) cost averaging and (2) buying low and then selling high strategies. I was looking at what Warren Buffett said with this:

If you like spending six to eight hours per week working on investments, do it. If you don’t, then dollar-cost average into index funds.

I prefer to call it simply cost averaging. It's where one puts the same amount of money per month for a selected period. It's like the PHP 8,000.00 rule where one may choose to invest PHP 1,000.00 for eight months or PHP 2,000.00 for four months in buying stocks. Meanwhile, Buffett advises that most people should buy index funds instead. I decided to get the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund via cost averaging and did some lump sums during the crash. 

Cost averaging is pretty much a safer way to avoid timing the market. The market moves not just during the opening but also during the closing. That's why I pretty much want to avoid playing casino with daily stock trading (read here). I decided to try a day trading simulator and found out how stressful it can get. It's like playing at the casino. Charlie Munger even called it a speculative orgy. Vulgar language but I can't help but agree with it. As Buffett also says:

If you aren't willing to own a stock for ten years, don't even think about owning it for ten minutes

Timing the market means waiting for the next crash or the next rise. I'm not saying timing the market is bad per se. Some people prefer to wait for stock prices to go down before they buy. It's because some prefer the advantage of lump sum investing. Meanwhile, risk-averse people are better off cost averaging such as putting PHP 1,000.00-PHP 2,000.00 per month in a stock index fund. It might be better to invest a reasonably small amount per month and a lump sum invest during a crash. The rule that follows is, "Invest only what you don't need now."

In my case, I'm pretty much an emotional investor for some time. I've made bad mistakes due to a bad temperament. I even allowed someone to buy in credit thinking only about the returns and not the risks. I nearly entered pyramid scams because of emotions. I decided that cost averaging might be the best for me. Besides, my horizon might be either two years, three years, five years, or even ten years. Buffett's strategy is pretty much in the long term. That is, never expect to get rich quick. Having my MBA is useless if I've got a bad temperament. As Buffett says, temperament wins over intelligence. Nobody should get the pleasure of being for the crowd or against it. Follow the right, not the crowd or those against the crowd. I need to be careful not to prematurely sell any funds just because of a slight increase. 

Some people manage to time the buying low and selling high strategy. They may have learned to time the market well. I guess such people aren't that emotionally carried. Still, I think there's wisdom in setting a reasonably small sum of money for a monthly investment and doing a lump sum during a crash. It would be like investing PHP 1,000.00 per month on a regular then getting PHP 5,000.00 for the crash, and then when prices rise up a bit, investing PHP 1,000.00 again every month. It's value-cost averaging. Invest the money that's not needed for now. But a beginner may want to think, "Invest only what you can afford to lose." because mistakes are bound to happen. These mistakes can happen such as impulse selling. Instead, investing by cost averaging (for a set period) would mean reducing losses. However, I'd believe that saying to invest only what you can afford to lose can be very self-defeating (read here). I used to believe that back then while ironically getting defeated by bad credit

Right now, I'm not going to argue too much about it. Some people have better risk management styles. In my case, cost averaging might be the best way for the more risk-averse and emotional type. I want to invest in the long term. I do lump sum only when prices are super low. However, I do cost averaging as much as possible to reduce the risk due to daily fluctuations. Hopefully, I can take Buffett's advice to heart and practice it consistently. 

References

Websites

"Buying the dip: Is this a good strategy when markets are falling?" by James Royal (May 26, 2022)

"Day Trading Definition: Why It Differs From Investing" by Sam Swenson, CFA, CPA (Updated: June 28, 2022)

"Warren Buffett: Why This Bear Market Could Be an Investor's Best Friend" by Catherine Brock (July 9, 2022)

Popular posts from this blog

Teaching Mandarin by Recalling How Much Chinoy School Students Complained, "Hay, Chinese!"

It's time for a bit of Chinese language Throwback Thursday. I remember how the Chinese school can be summarized as students  memorizing without understanding . The problem wasn't the Lǎoshīs (老師) but the system that ran them as persons . I decided to write this article to " bring up a trauma " associated with the Chinese education system. From Kiko Chinese, this picture shows the common complaints from children. Standard Chinese is so hard! The Chinese schools tend to lose students because they keep failing in Grade 2 or Grade 2 in Chinese. In fact, I remember someone failing Chinese four times back in the 1990s. Another one was three years in Grade 3 Chinese, where the Chinese teacher was even stricter than the Grade 2 Chinese teacher. The real issue was that there wasn't any real learning because the old traditional Chinese system wasn't doing anything right . People were treated as if Hokkien were their first language. However, we realize that people can...

Real Talk: No MNCs In Their Right Mind, Would Ever AGREE to That Ridiculous 60-40 Proposal

Here's another art I found on Facebook. Some time ago, I wrote about how the 60-40 policy may not prohibit, while still discouraging FDIs from entering . It's plain common sense, really, that nobody would want to rent a space if they had to part with 60% of their net profits to the lessor (read here ).  It annoys me to think that certain Netizens on Facebook are still blaming government corruption over the 60-40 policy. That can get annoying. I can link the 60-40 policy to government corruption . After all, corrupt officials want to perpetuate their stay in power through an ignorant and impoverished population. However, blaming corruption alone is really downright stupid. Some say investors are going to Communist Vietnam because the Communist Party of Vietnam-Vietnam People's Army is serious about cracking corruption. However, the reality is that, ironically, Communist Vietnam has more reasonable economic restrictions compared to the Philippines (read here ). Only a few sec...

Communist Vietnam's Great Leap Forward in Agricultural Production

I remember reading through Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew. It's very easy to use the book to badmouth the Marcoses but not to learn from the rest of it. The book also talks about Vietnam and LKY's encounter with the late Nguyen Duy Cong aka Do Muoi. It's often said that Singapore only opened because of its lack of natural resources. On the contrary, Do Muoi decided to learn from Singapore how to turn the Communist Party of Vietnam into a powerhouse. Do Muoi, though a communist , was impressed by Singapore during his October 1993 state visit. Vietnam, unlike Singapore, is a country rich in natural resources. The third-world mentality said that MNCs are there to rape the resources .  A very huge misconception especially if you know Singapore's history Some Filipinos on social media even say that FDIs will destroy agriculture and nature. This is a meme by the Philippine Anti-Fascist League on Facebook. They say that FDIs equals environmental degradation. Yet...

Kabataan Partylist Seriously Needs to Learn ECONOMICS from the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union

Vietnam National University, Hanoi Kabataan Partylist, is that you? No, it's actually the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union (Đoàn Thanh niên Cộng sản Hồ Chí Minh), or alternatively, it can be called the Vietnam Youth Union . The color blue may remind some of Kabataan Partylist. Both Kabataan Partylist and the Vietnam Youth Union are involved with recruiting youths into the organization. However, there's a crucial difference between Kabataan Partylist and the Youth Union in how they view economics. The  Kabataan Partylist Laguna's blog  even writes this: It believes that the Philippines, as a semi-colonial and semi-feudal country, is plagued by a system which allows foreign and big business interests to dominate, while the majority of our countrymen are left poor and hungry . We are living in a society where foreign subservience, peasant landlessness, and rampant corruption are the top three ills. To that end, Kabataan Party-list strives to galvanize the Filipino youth in u...

Indonesia's Masarang Foundation Proves that FDI Can Greatly Help Local Philippine Agriculture

As I've sipped two glasses of Tealive's Aren Caramel (read here )--I was tempted to research more on palm sugar from the Arenga tree. Arenga bears the fruit that Filipinos call kaong and Indonesians call kolang kaling. As a Filipino, I prefer to call it the Kaong Tree or Punuan ng Kaong. This video is from Masarang, Indonesia. Masarang in Tagalog means strong. If the Indonesian word means strong as well--this is a very strong foundation. The research on palm sugar landed me in the organization called Yayasan Masarang or Masarang Foundation. The video I just shared shows the struggle of palm tappers and how FDI can help in learning environmentally-friendly practices.  The late Lee Kuan Yew even published in his book From Third World to First about greening Singapore. The pernicious myth that's spread around is that Singapore supposedly only opened to FDI due to lack of natural resources . However, other countries rich in natural resources like Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, Chi...