Skip to main content

Cost Averaging for a Period VS. Buying Low-Sell High Strategy

 

I think it can be a heated debate at times between (1) cost averaging and (2) buying low and then selling high strategies. I was looking at what Warren Buffett said with this:

If you like spending six to eight hours per week working on investments, do it. If you don’t, then dollar-cost average into index funds.

I prefer to call it simply cost averaging. It's where one puts the same amount of money per month for a selected period. It's like the PHP 8,000.00 rule where one may choose to invest PHP 1,000.00 for eight months or PHP 2,000.00 for four months in buying stocks. Meanwhile, Buffett advises that most people should buy index funds instead. I decided to get the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund via cost averaging and did some lump sums during the crash. 

Cost averaging is pretty much a safer way to avoid timing the market. The market moves not just during the opening but also during the closing. That's why I pretty much want to avoid playing casino with daily stock trading (read here). I decided to try a day trading simulator and found out how stressful it can get. It's like playing at the casino. Charlie Munger even called it a speculative orgy. Vulgar language but I can't help but agree with it. As Buffett also says:

If you aren't willing to own a stock for ten years, don't even think about owning it for ten minutes

Timing the market means waiting for the next crash or the next rise. I'm not saying timing the market is bad per se. Some people prefer to wait for stock prices to go down before they buy. It's because some prefer the advantage of lump sum investing. Meanwhile, risk-averse people are better off cost averaging such as putting PHP 1,000.00-PHP 2,000.00 per month in a stock index fund. It might be better to invest a reasonably small amount per month and a lump sum invest during a crash. The rule that follows is, "Invest only what you don't need now."

In my case, I'm pretty much an emotional investor for some time. I've made bad mistakes due to a bad temperament. I even allowed someone to buy in credit thinking only about the returns and not the risks. I nearly entered pyramid scams because of emotions. I decided that cost averaging might be the best for me. Besides, my horizon might be either two years, three years, five years, or even ten years. Buffett's strategy is pretty much in the long term. That is, never expect to get rich quick. Having my MBA is useless if I've got a bad temperament. As Buffett says, temperament wins over intelligence. Nobody should get the pleasure of being for the crowd or against it. Follow the right, not the crowd or those against the crowd. I need to be careful not to prematurely sell any funds just because of a slight increase. 

Some people manage to time the buying low and selling high strategy. They may have learned to time the market well. I guess such people aren't that emotionally carried. Still, I think there's wisdom in setting a reasonably small sum of money for a monthly investment and doing a lump sum during a crash. It would be like investing PHP 1,000.00 per month on a regular then getting PHP 5,000.00 for the crash, and then when prices rise up a bit, investing PHP 1,000.00 again every month. It's value-cost averaging. Invest the money that's not needed for now. But a beginner may want to think, "Invest only what you can afford to lose." because mistakes are bound to happen. These mistakes can happen such as impulse selling. Instead, investing by cost averaging (for a set period) would mean reducing losses. However, I'd believe that saying to invest only what you can afford to lose can be very self-defeating (read here). I used to believe that back then while ironically getting defeated by bad credit

Right now, I'm not going to argue too much about it. Some people have better risk management styles. In my case, cost averaging might be the best way for the more risk-averse and emotional type. I want to invest in the long term. I do lump sum only when prices are super low. However, I do cost averaging as much as possible to reduce the risk due to daily fluctuations. Hopefully, I can take Buffett's advice to heart and practice it consistently. 

References

Websites

"Buying the dip: Is this a good strategy when markets are falling?" by James Royal (May 26, 2022)

"Day Trading Definition: Why It Differs From Investing" by Sam Swenson, CFA, CPA (Updated: June 28, 2022)

"Warren Buffett: Why This Bear Market Could Be an Investor's Best Friend" by Catherine Brock (July 9, 2022)

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...