Skip to main content

Cost Averaging for a Period VS. Buying Low-Sell High Strategy

 

I think it can be a heated debate at times between (1) cost averaging and (2) buying low and then selling high strategies. I was looking at what Warren Buffett said with this:

If you like spending six to eight hours per week working on investments, do it. If you don’t, then dollar-cost average into index funds.

I prefer to call it simply cost averaging. It's where one puts the same amount of money per month for a selected period. It's like the PHP 8,000.00 rule where one may choose to invest PHP 1,000.00 for eight months or PHP 2,000.00 for four months in buying stocks. Meanwhile, Buffett advises that most people should buy index funds instead. I decided to get the Philippine Equity Smart Index Fund via cost averaging and did some lump sums during the crash. 

Cost averaging is pretty much a safer way to avoid timing the market. The market moves not just during the opening but also during the closing. That's why I pretty much want to avoid playing casino with daily stock trading (read here). I decided to try a day trading simulator and found out how stressful it can get. It's like playing at the casino. Charlie Munger even called it a speculative orgy. Vulgar language but I can't help but agree with it. As Buffett also says:

If you aren't willing to own a stock for ten years, don't even think about owning it for ten minutes

Timing the market means waiting for the next crash or the next rise. I'm not saying timing the market is bad per se. Some people prefer to wait for stock prices to go down before they buy. It's because some prefer the advantage of lump sum investing. Meanwhile, risk-averse people are better off cost averaging such as putting PHP 1,000.00-PHP 2,000.00 per month in a stock index fund. It might be better to invest a reasonably small amount per month and a lump sum invest during a crash. The rule that follows is, "Invest only what you don't need now."

In my case, I'm pretty much an emotional investor for some time. I've made bad mistakes due to a bad temperament. I even allowed someone to buy in credit thinking only about the returns and not the risks. I nearly entered pyramid scams because of emotions. I decided that cost averaging might be the best for me. Besides, my horizon might be either two years, three years, five years, or even ten years. Buffett's strategy is pretty much in the long term. That is, never expect to get rich quick. Having my MBA is useless if I've got a bad temperament. As Buffett says, temperament wins over intelligence. Nobody should get the pleasure of being for the crowd or against it. Follow the right, not the crowd or those against the crowd. I need to be careful not to prematurely sell any funds just because of a slight increase. 

Some people manage to time the buying low and selling high strategy. They may have learned to time the market well. I guess such people aren't that emotionally carried. Still, I think there's wisdom in setting a reasonably small sum of money for a monthly investment and doing a lump sum during a crash. It would be like investing PHP 1,000.00 per month on a regular then getting PHP 5,000.00 for the crash, and then when prices rise up a bit, investing PHP 1,000.00 again every month. It's value-cost averaging. Invest the money that's not needed for now. But a beginner may want to think, "Invest only what you can afford to lose." because mistakes are bound to happen. These mistakes can happen such as impulse selling. Instead, investing by cost averaging (for a set period) would mean reducing losses. However, I'd believe that saying to invest only what you can afford to lose can be very self-defeating (read here). I used to believe that back then while ironically getting defeated by bad credit

Right now, I'm not going to argue too much about it. Some people have better risk management styles. In my case, cost averaging might be the best way for the more risk-averse and emotional type. I want to invest in the long term. I do lump sum only when prices are super low. However, I do cost averaging as much as possible to reduce the risk due to daily fluctuations. Hopefully, I can take Buffett's advice to heart and practice it consistently. 

References

Websites

"Buying the dip: Is this a good strategy when markets are falling?" by James Royal (May 26, 2022)

"Day Trading Definition: Why It Differs From Investing" by Sam Swenson, CFA, CPA (Updated: June 28, 2022)

"Warren Buffett: Why This Bear Market Could Be an Investor's Best Friend" by Catherine Brock (July 9, 2022)

Popular posts from this blog

Pinoy Pride Economics Helps in Drug Mule Recruitment

Al Jazeera Who can remember the execution of three drug mules in China on March 30, 2011 ? These were three separate cases where the three convicts were  Sally Villanueva , Ramon Credo (who was cremated before his remains were brought home, and Elizabeth Batain (whose face was never shown). Sally had an episode in the GMA-7 TV show Magpakailanman,  where her husband was personally interviewed by Mel Tiangco. We never got Sally on the big screen. The husband's side of the story said that his wife was guilty of a frame-up, while Mel herself said, "If the offer is too good to be true, don't take it, or you could end up in the same pickle." Take note that I'm just paraphrasing Mel's words, not saying the words she said.  Reviewing the three drug mules who got arrested, based only on what's available for public viewing on the Internet If we read through the circumstances , this is how they were arrested, proving they weren't a trio: China has brushed aside...

New Study Confirms Oil Degulation Law is Bad, Oil Nationalization is Better

Yes, you found that right. Did you know that the Filipino First Policy caused the Philippines to succeed and Carlos P. Garcia was the best president ever? Today, because of the Iranian War crisis, we need to talk about a new important discovery. What I realized is that the oil deregulation policy is bad . Do you want the oil prices to fall under control? Then read this new blog to find out.  A new audit was revealed in the world's greatest economic forum. The Trust Me Bro School of Economics invited the trustworthy IBON Foundation to speak at Intrigador Financials . I was so wrong not to notice the genius behind the likes of Makabayan Bloc.  What have I done compared to the youths  of Kabataan Partylist ? I even discovered that  the IBON Foundation is the most credible economic think tank . As I realized that  Filipinos should only listen to Filipino economists ,  I have found that there are literally  tons of studies  from the famous Trust Me Br...

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...

The WORLDWIDE Great Depression Was Worsened, NOT Relieved, by Economic Protectionism

I feel like doing a study with history right now. People tell me to study history when they try to defend how protectionism made first-world countries a powerhouse. However, a flick on the pages of Lee Kuan Yew's classic From Third World to First  will tell you that's a big fat lie. I feel like talking about the Great Depression from 1929 to 1939 which also involved the Stock Market Crash of 1929. These events can be rooted in economic protectionism . Economic protectionism is defined by the Investopedia as follows: Protectionism refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns. The dumb legislation that made it worse I remembered reading about the Stock Market Crash of 1929. The causes of it were linked to people buying too many stocks. Local companies overprod...

It's More Fun In The Philippines Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

I guess it can be called a day, right? This April 1, 2023 , I'm finally calling it quits with fighting for economic liberalization! Yes, that's right! All the advocacy for economic liberalization is just garbage. Why did I even spend so much time writing this blog only to find out that I've been duped? I hereby renounce everything I wrote here. I finally saw how brilliant the Filipino First Policy is. Man, what have I done? How much damage have I caused in advocating for economic liberalization?  The greatest president we ever had was... High School Philippine History Movement It's time to listen to the economic genius known as the late Carlos P. Garcia. Yes, he has to be one of the greatest presidents that ever existed.  I took this note from the Bohol Provincial Library and found this about CPG's Filipino First Policy ; CPG adopted the “Filipino First” Policy to promote greater Filipino participation in business, and to put the Filipinos in control of the economy...