Skip to main content

What's the Use of Filipino Athletes Scoring Medals in the 2024 Olympics When Economic Charter Change isn't Prioritized?

Tatler Asia

In elementary, I remember how the Sibika at Kultura (Civics and Culture) subject talked about Filipino achievements abroad. Some great Filipinos mentioned in our classes are the late Lydia De Vega,  Lea Salonga-Chien, the late architect Leandro Locsin, Regine Velasquez-Alcasid, Raphael "Paeng" Nepomuceno, and Eugene Torre. It's effortless to gloat about Filipinos achieving this and that. One may even notice that these names get mentioned in a Buwan Ng Wika program. By the way, I think Buwan Ng Wika feels more like it should be renamed as Buwan Ng Filipino instead. I mean, the programs tend to raise awareness of one's Filipino heritage and history, more than the Filipino language!

The recent wins of athlete Carlos Yulo should be something to be proud of. I see it on my Facebook feed and I feel happy for Carlos, even if I don't know him personally. These days, I've already accepted that I'm a Filipino. Sadly, some Filipino "natives" still think I'd naturally side with China, all the while they're probably still shouting "Pinoy pride!" for Jollibee. I have nothing against Filipinos winning and I can feel pride for it, even if most of my grandparents were Chinese immigrants. I've been assimilated into the Philippines. Who are those racists to say that I'm not "truly Filipino"? For Carlos himself, it's my first time to hear of him. I'm no sports enthusiast. I prefer to do basic exercises for maintenance. It's not wrong to be happy with Carlos' achievements in sports. After all, the contestants represent their respective countries. Carlos' win is a win for the Philippines in the sports arena. 

However, here's my problem. It's already 2024 and why isn't economic charter change even done yet? It doesn't matter if Filipinos will even win all the gold medals in a sports event. Why am I saying that? This isn't to drag down my fellow Filipinos or say, "Well, you don't deserve it." Instead, what I'm addressing is the uselessness of Filipinos winning gold medals, if the Philippines still suffers from a jobless problem. What's the use of rejoicing at Filipinos winning competitions abroad if these wins don't translate into wins? A Filipino woman can win the Miss Universe but can that crown produce jobs that Filipinos need? Can the medals, trophies, and crowns produce local jobs so more Filipinos don't have to become OFWs? The answer is really no. It can be a source of pride but not a source of job production. 

Several Filipinos still misunderstand what allowing 100% FDI share ownership means (read here). Some people even confuse FDI with borrowing money from abroad (read rebuttal here). Even worse, when I talk about the late Lee Kuan Yew on Facebook, someone is prone to say, "Why don't you follow him to the grave?" or "Never forget Flor Contemplacion." arguments. I bet Joel Torre's business might get boycotted by anti-Singapore Filipinos, for simply opening in Singapore! It's full of logical fallacies such as Ad Hominem, Guilt by Association, Red Herring, and Non-Sequitur arguments just to make a point. They have done it to Senator Robin Padilla more than once. I didn't vote for Senator Padilla but he's doing better in pushing badly-needed reforms. They probably think that Jollibee's opening in other countries means conquering other countries. For the nth time, we seriously need to abandon the concept of FDIs and OFWs as invaders (read here)! Even worse, some even operate with the Filipino vs. foreigner dichotomy or false dilemma (read here). What's more hypocritical is that I read such stupidity on my Facebook feed!

The Philippines has become a venue for foreign events more than once. Did the countries where the foreign events get rid of sovereignty? Why wasn't a 60-40 rule applied in any Miss Universe events held in the Philippines when it came to the judges? When a non-Filipino won in the Philippines, did it shake the national sovereignty? The same goes for FDIs in the Philippines, which aren't restricted by ridiculous equity limits. These foreign businesses are hiring Filipino workers. Grab and FoodPanda in the Philippines, are hiring Filipino drivers. Has the presence of foreign companies stolen jobs away from Filipinos or given them more job opportunities? The Philippines is open to FDI but it's not as open as its other ASEAN countries. 

Filipinos can go ahead and join foreign competitions. They can go ahead and win in these events. However, what must be kept in mind is that, as said earlier, their wins don't translate into badly needed work for Filipinos. What will produce jobs are businesses. It's not enough to rely on Filipino business owners alone. People say that the restrictions are for "security reasons" (read rebuttal here). However, it's not as if the Philippines can legislate or amend the constitution in things like national security, fair competition acts, or any laws to protect institutions doing business in the Philippines. When the Philippines opens more of its doors to FDI like Vietnam did, it can expect to have a huge demand for jobs. In turn, a huge demand for jobs will fill the supply-demand gap, which in turn will cause salaries to increase in the process (read job market discussion here). 

What Filipinos need is real economics, not Pinoy Pride Economics. Pinoy Pride Economics is a term I made to describe viewing economic activities only through the lens of Pinoy Pride. The Filipino First Policy should be viewed as the foundation of Pinoy Pride Economics. In real economics, it doesn't matter if the source is local or foreign, what matters is that it helps build economic foundations. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...
Read more

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...
Read more

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...
Read more

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...
Read more

Social Media Gossipers' Ad Hominems Against Actor Robin Padilla Regarding His Proposal to Remove 60-40

Make no mistake that I didn't vote for Robin Padilla. I feel like I've had enough of voting for celebrities, athletes, and those who I felt are know-nothings in the legislative. However, Padilla recently had his proposal to remove the 60-40 restrictions regarding foreign direct investments (FDIs) . Former Philippine Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Gerona-Robredo was even in favor of that amendment. I guess that's why Philippine economist Andrew James Masigan endorsed Robredo. I may have not endorsed Robredo while Masigan remains to be one of my favorite local sources. The news from GMA News Online reveals these plans by Padilla himself: Senator Robin Padilla said he wanted to revise the Constitution to scrap the 60-40 rule on foreign ownership of businesses to accelerate job creation and competition among industries . In a Monday interview, Padilla said the move would attract more foreign investments to support the country’s economic recovery. “Para sa akin mas...
Read more