Skip to main content

Piracy is Almost Impossible to Defeat Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

Disney

Let's face it piracy is hard to combat, right? For Filipinos, it's time to be honest that people have been engaged in piracy in some form. It may be pirated video games, CDs, VCDs, DVDs, etc. There are laws passed against piracy. However, one must ask why piracy is so hard to combat. Piracy bypasses through legalities. It's a common practice to have a pirated version of this and that application, because of the price. Installing MS Office and Windows 11 can be costly. It can cost PHP 7,000.00 for Windows 11 Home and PHP 5,400.00 for MS Office. Back in college, people would do anything to get the MS Office and Windows 11 because they needed it for their projects. It doesn't help that some well-to-do boomer are stingy instead of thrifty. It doesn't help either that some people just can't afford to buy the original software--given their income bracket. 

It's easy to raise the Filipino First Policy by saying, "Tangkilikin ang sariling atin!" or "Enjoy our very own!" In the 1990s, I remember how Values Education class even talked about patronizing local products because they're local (read here). Civics textbooks even try to glorify Carlos P. Garcia as if he was a hero because of the Filipino First Policy. In a chilling irony, Garcia's body is now beside Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr.'s body at the Libingan Ng Mga Bayani (Graveyard of the Heroes). What's the use of hating Marcos' protectionist government while loving Garcia? That's why I even wrote an article debunking the idea that Marcos was a "neo-liberal" when he was running a protectionist-based government.

If we take a look at the Filipino First Policy, we can read these words by Garcia:
The ”Filipino First” policy of this administration re­ceived a resounding popular indorsement in the last election. Politically we became independent since 1946, but econom­ically we are still semi-colonial. This is especially true in our foreign trade. This policy is therefore designed to regain economic independence. It is a national effort to the end that Filipinos obtain major and dominant participa­tion in their own national economy. This we will achieve with malice towards none and with fairness to all. We will accomplish this with full understanding of our inter­national obligations towards our friends of the Free World. We will carry this out within the framework of our special relations with the United States to whose citizens we granted until 1974, by Constitutional provision, equal rights as Filipinos in the exploitation of our natural resources and public utilities, and to whom we also granted trading parity rights under the Laurel-Langley Agreement. Under this policy we will welcome friendly and understanding foreign capital willing to collaborate with us in the exploitation of our vast natural resources preferably on joint venture basis.

There are noble intentions. However, aiming that Filipinos should be the majority holders of businesses. The result is that while the Filipino First Policy doesn't prohibit FDI per se--it's still discouraging them from entering the country (read here). Who in the right mind would want to rent a space but they have to give up 60% of their ownership (and therefore, 60% of their net profits) to their lessor (read here)? Some say it's because the profits will go to the FDI. Please, simple accounting will show that the only profits FDIs will keep are from net profit after taxes. I'm afraid that Pinoy Pride Economics is confusing revenues for profits (read here).

The real problem with the Filipino First Policy is that in aiming that Filipino businesses will be the "major and dominant participants, has limited job production. In limiting the job production, one can see the consequences. Some people rally every day asking for #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba--meaning to raise salaries while lowering the prices of goods. I don't need a PhD in economics or business management to understand salaries are part of the cost of production. 

Graph taken from CFI

As we look further into the consequence of Filipino First Policy--it shouldn't require a PhD in economics or business management from Ateneo De Manila or the University of the Philippines, to understand the fundamentals. I wrote an article on the relationship between the supply/demand in the job market with salary rates. If we're going to get into basic details (and this can be taught in middle school and high school), the Corporate Finance Institute gives this detail on salary rates:

Supply and Demand in the Job Market

Similar to the markets of goods and services, job markets also follow the supply-demand mechanism. When the quantity of workers demanded is equal to the labor force available (the quantity of supply), the job market reaches its equilibrium point, and wages can be determined.

The wage level rises when the demand is greater than the supply and lowers when the supply exceeds the demand for workers. However,wages cannot always move freely. There is often a floor determined by the government, which is known as the minimum wage.

When the equilibrium wage is above the minimum wage level, introducing a minimum wage will not lead to a major impact on the job market. When a minimum wage is established at a level higher than the equilibrium wage, the quantity of demand will fall as businesses will instead try to control their labor costs by reducing the number of employees.

The quantity of supply increases as there are more active job seekers motivated by the higher wage level. It forms a gap between supply and demand and thus, leads to unemployment. Despite this drawback, the minimum wage policy can provide both economic and social benefits. By increasing the wages of low-income workers, the government can reduce its spending on social programs to support these individuals and relieve the economic inequality at the same time.

Since the Filipino First Policy has reduced the number of jobs, we can expect the demand for workers to decrease. Workers are also subject to supply and demand. There's more supply of laborers than there is a demand for labor. How can we have a demand for labor? Not all Filipinos are business-inclined. If we say, "Filipinos should just try on their own to establish their own businesses." Can that kind of thinking be done? The late Lee Kuan Yew even stressed that if he waited for Singaporeans to "straighten up" then they would've already starved even further. In short, we can't really just raise or decrease salaries at a whim. Salaries are dictated by the supply and demand in the labor market. People can't change the fundamental laws of economics by insulting others (read here).

The result is that salaries will be low because the supply of labor is high and the demand for labor is low. Let me stress it again how can you expect a higher demand for labor of there are barely any employers? How long will it take for Filipinos to build their own businesses to sustain the Philippines? Even worse, some people are saying that opening the Philippines to FDI will make more Filipinos look for jobs abroad, that foreigners will buy the country, and whatever paranoid claim might suit their fancy. Did what they say happen to the neighboring ASEAN countries? Please, Singapore opened its doors to FDI and got it out of poverty. Some Singaporeans only moved out and went to Malaysia because housing in Malaysia is cheaper. Housing in Singapore is expensive because it's a small city-state! Again, where's the analysis of supply and demand there? Malaysia has a bigger supply of housing because it's a bigger country. Singaporeans aren't moving out because of FDI, as some person I'll dub as Madame Whale. Madame Whale has been interacting with that fat person I dub as Porky Madugo. Porky is too self-absorbed to even look into basic economics

As a result, lower-income people end up buying pirated goods because it's much cheaper. If they bought the original goods--it may rob them of eating three meals a day or their ability to pay rent. Even more, some people are breadwinners who barely can make money. Talk about people who are working for probably 18 hours (or more) just to make ends meet. With piracy being hard to combat, it's time to ask, "Do people really have the money to buy the original goods?" 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

What's the Use of Complaining About Jollibee Acquiring Companies BUT Not Accepting Open FDI to Bring in COMPETITION to the Philippines?

Anti-Snowflake Squad Facebook Page I was checking across Facebook and noticed some idiots complaining about Jollibee acquiring companies. The same idiots turned out to be anti-FDI--the same group that converses with Porky Madugo and Mukhang Adik. As usual, I will not directly link the idiots (or even reveal them directly, they will reveal themselves) to avoid giving them clout. Here's a statement by Porky that may make anyone wonder if (1) he knows he's lying (which I think he is for some self-serving reason ), or (2) he doesn't know what he's talking about: The monopolization of business ruins the business. It degrades the quality of the business of a product.   If you think monopolization is good, that's stupidity. It kills the competition and it kills the business.   Well, as old saying goes: "capitalists are the only one will destroy themselves." Since when did capitalism mean killing competition? Isn't Porky supposedly a die-hard Communist? In the
Read more

The Insanity of Quoting the Late Lee Kuan Yew About the Marcoses While Ignorning the Rest of His Helpful Advice for the Philippines

It may not be Singapore day yet, it's still July and that event is in August. However, some people are now raising placards all over again because the 17th Philippine president is none other than Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. Som people tend to quote from the book  From Third World to First . I did buy the book last year and started reading it slowly. I did get a slow read when it came to the late Lee Kuan Yew meeting the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. The description of Marcos was anything but flattering. I read the book and LKY mentioned that he was not confident that Marcos Sr. could pay back the money. The Philippines wasn't in the "golden years" as some would like to make it out. Yet, it seems that the only time LKY is ever mentioned is whenenver it's about the Marcoses and tends to be ignored when it's about how the Philippines can improve. Parliamentary system is often viewed in the wrong way Whenever Singapore is mentioned, I tend to talk about the parliamenta
Read more

The Economic Ignorance of Saying Landlords and Stock Traders Contribute Nothing to Society

Finding anti-capitalist (or better said, anti-business) wokes on Facebook (of all places) is just plain funny. Maybe, the term socialist isn't so negative since the late Lee Kuan Yew considered himself a socialist, the late Deng Xiaoping is the author of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, and Vietnam still considers itself as a socialist country. The picture above this paragraph says that landlords and stock traders allegedly "contribute absolutely nothing to society". I feel compelled to write a bit of a post since, as a business graduate, I do feel insulted. Then again even if I didn't get an MBA--I do still feel insulted myself! How good landlords contribute to society   Landlords are often said to be a blight. Some say that it's the "easiest job in the world". However, managing real estate (especially rentals ) isn't as easy as some think. I wrote an essay as to why being a landowner isn't as easy as some people think . I would like to d
Read more

The Problem with the Philippine Education System is That It Inadvertently Tends to Make One Stroke One's Ego

What happens is that the traditional Philippine education system focuses too much on  monuments of fame rather  than learning milestones . It reminds me of the incident where Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel stressed out he was a cum laude, and that he's not stupid. I feel this is a microcosm of a much bigger problem that happens with the education system. I'm not going to deny that going to the University of the Philippines and graduating summa cum laude isn't an easy feat. However, I wrote an article on what's the use of being a summa cum laude when one opposes badly needed reforms . It's because whether we want to admit it or not, schools focus too much on the ability to memorize without also focusing on the ability to understand . Memory is also the least reliable tool.  It would be time to continuously attack the problems of the education system. I felt shamed back then because students were often told, "Your grades will determine your future!" In college, I
Read more

Pinoy Pride Economics' Filipino vs. Foreigner False Dichotomy

Two years ago, I wrote about the socio-economic cost of Pinoy Pride Economics . It might be better to call it Pinoy Fried Economics because such mentalities have caused the Philippines to fail. Pinoy Pride Economics  has  fried  up any potential for the Philippines to improve. As it's August, the month is commonly called Buwan Ng Wika (month of the language), the celebrations tend to focus more on the celebration of Filipino Culture instead of Tagalog. I remember Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to showcase how cultural exchange evolved the Filipino Culture--such as showing the Chinese traders and Americans in their interaction with Filipinos. On this very first day of August, I'll discuss the problem of the Filipino vs. Foreigner dichotomy. Last I re-studied Filipino History, I never saw it as once free from foreign influence. The Chinese traded with the Philippines--way before the Chinese Communist of China (CCP) caused trouble because of their country's terrible leadership .
Read more

Can Diehard 1987 Constitution Defenders Prove Their Claims to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy?

It's not enough to say something. The question is, "Where's the substance or the empirical evidence?" When I start quoting from the late Lee Kuan Yew, these diehard 1987 Constitution of the Philippines defenders start diverting the topic by pointing out my errors to spite me than to correct me. They would ask if I know the Deming Theory of Management which talks about quality management in the company culture. Okay, that was something worth asking but as said, can these people really understand the problem of the Philippines has been more systemic (that is, within the system ) than just the people running the system? What allowed the legislative to be filled with people who know-nothing anyway? That's why I didn't want to vote for Senator Robin Padilla (who ironically understands the need for reforms, read here ). Unfortunately, so many Ad Hominem attacks have been done.  A past article I wrote was Should you  listen to either Davide Jr. or Kishore Mahbubani
Read more

Where's One's Priorities in Complaining About Rising Prices?!

I found this meme on Facebook. For the sake of non-Tagalog speakers, it means: For each one that costs PHP 75.00 no complaints. PHP 50.00 per kilo, always complaining! Last year, I wrote about what's dubbed as pera-normal activities . I would like to write about another cause behind these pera-normal activities. People tend to complain that the prices of goods and services have risen. However, they have no complaints about the rising prices of things they don't need. The meme on Facebook shows two things--the gin and the kilo of rice. I was skeptical about President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr.'s promise of PHP 20.00 per kilo of rice. The promise is ridiculous but he won anyway . We can thank the presidential system and the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines for that! Now, critics of Bongbong are demanding PHP 20.00 per kilo of rice. Shouldn't the critics show why it's impossible given the current circumstances? This editorial cartoon from The Mani
Read more