Is Anybody Willing to Prove Filipino First Policy Has a Place in the Rising Asian Century for a Million Pesos, Tax Free?

Yesterday was the birthday of former president Carlos P. Garcia, who died in 1971. Garcia is often associated with the Filipino First Policy. Back in the 1990s, I remember how Filipino First Policy was taught in values education classes--never mind the glaring contradictions. The contradictions are that imported equipment was used, or that we can literally never escape the use of imported equipment. I wrote an article discussing why Garcia's Filipino First Policy has no place in the rising Asian Century. I haven't done academic work right now, having been disgruntled by the Filipino education system. Sadly, not even graduate school taught me the basics of stock market investment (such as equity funds) or how Cash 2 Go works. That's why some people say, "It's just a degree!" I often said, "Well your doctor went to college, your lawyer went to college, etc." However, it looks like a college degree may not be for everyone, under K+12!

Some people are saying that Filipino First Policy works. One of the sources mentioned is the late Alejandro Lichauco, who died in 2015. The Bohol Provincial Library cites this of Lichauco and Garcia:

CPG adopted the “Filipino First” Policy to promote greater Filipino participation in business, and to put the Filipinos in control of the economy. After which, according to the economist Alejandro Lichauco’s book (1988) “Nationalist Economics,” during CPG’s time, the Philippines was the Tiger Economy in Asia. And by the end of his term, the Philippines was the only leading economy of Southeast Asia.

Where's the proof of Lichauco's claim in his book then? You can write a book all you want. However, if the data is faulty then the book is just a book. A thesis is just a thesis and it can be full of misinformation. Andrew J. Wakefield wrote several studies to cite vaccines cause autism. Wakefield's studies were refuted. There's a statement in English that says, "Words are like leaves. It's rare to find fruit among them." Take note that Lichauco was also part of IBON Foundation--the favorite source of many anti-reform people, aside from Hilario G. Davide Jr. and the Monsod couple. When I quote a foreigner, these people hypocritically say, "Why are you quoting a foreigner instead of a Filipino." However, they may be rejoicing when a foreigner arrives such as the incumbent Pope of Catholicism, a delegate from another country looking at the human rights situations, etc. Why would they oppose FDIs but welcome the ICC or EU delegate? IBON is still used as a source by anti-reforms like Wakefield is used as a source by the anti-vaccine movement. They wouldn't accept any sources except from within their circle.

The big problem with Lichauco's claims is the lacking evidence. When did the Philippines become a tiger economy thanks to protectionism? An irony when you think that Lichauco has Chinese ancestry. The one who helped Garcia's Filipino First Policy was a Chinese Filipino. One anti-FDI idiot I met on Facebook was surnamed Lao, admitting he was also Chinese by blood. In short, they have foreign blood. Today, the stupidity even goes further when you've got xenophobic Filipinos ranting stupidity on American-based platforms like Facebook. When I raised the issue, "Are all your stuff made in the Philippines?" They would mockingly answer, "Not that question again!" They may even say that they have no choice because foreigners "unfairly" own the means of producing equipment (read here). Even funnier is when they're ranting for Filipino First recording it with an iPhone or iPad. That's why I wrote asking if they were forced to buy the luxury products went they could buy non-luxury products.

The quest to prove Filipino First Policy works... but there's a catch!

I wrote an article where I dared people to prove that systems don't matter, only people do. Some people literally take pride that they could recite the preamble of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. What's the use of reciting it if one can't even understand that the constitution wasn't even meant to be set in stone? This time, the challenge is to prove that Filipino First Policy has a place in the rising Asian Century. It's getting evident that the Philippines is still left behind by the ASEAN. Sure, there was some economic improvement during the time of the late Benigno Simeon "Noynoy" C. Aquino III. However, certain factors (such as term limits) prevented Noynoy from doing a better job. In short, systems shape behavior and will either be, do better or better off without that person.

I cited Lichauco earlier because he's the favorite source of such people. There's also the IBON Foundation. However, to have this challenge to prove that the Filipino First Policy works--one must have a wide range of sources. One must learn to think outside the box, get sources that are both Filipino and foreign. One can't rely on just, "Well IBON Foundation is a Filipino foundation, therefore it must know better than foreigners." If the late Lee Kuan Yew had that nonsense, he would've never hired the late Albert Winsemius to check what could be done for Singapore. LKY's ideals soon got copied even by two Communist countries--China and Vietnam. The late Nguyen Duy Cong established Doi Moi in the 1980s. Deng Xiaoping established Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in the 1970s. The results were vastly different compared to the Filipino First Policy. Nguyen aka Do Moui studied foreign literature in remaking and reshaping the policies of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV).

These people should go beyond their circle of sources, such as Davide, the Monsods, Bayan Muna members (like Atty. Teodoro A. Casiño and Atty. Neri J. Colmenares) and the staff of the IBON Foundation. Instead, they should search for other sources, beyond their circle, that can help validate their sources. They need to cite economists from first-world countries. They could start off with the National University of Singapore (NUS) and look for its current dean or its former dean. That's why I even dared them to look for Kishore Mahbubani. Speaking of which, I wrote an article what a "bumbay" can teach Filipinos this Asian Century.

This would involve them trying to prove their claims with evidence. Those holding a leftist ideology may want to present their studies to schools in Vietnam--like the University of Economics-Ho Chi Minh City (UEH) or the Foreign Trade University (FTU). Some people who still quote LKY on the Marcoses but not on economics, need to go to the NUS (or any related university) to prove that Filipino First Policy works. I wonder if Davide still has the strength to prove to Mahbubani his claims? Both Davide and Mahbubani are former UN diplomats too. They should show that Filipino First Policy works to the nations doing better than the Philippines.

If they can do it, they deserve a million pesos, tax free. However if not, they don't deserve that money!

The Problem with the Philippine Education System is That It Inadvertently Tends to Make One Stroke One's Ego

What happens is that the traditional Philippine education system focuses too much on monuments of fame rather than learning milestones . It reminds me of the incident where Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel stressed out he was a cum laude, and that he's not stupid. I feel this is a microcosm of a much bigger problem that happens with the education system. I'm not going to deny that going to the University of the Philippines and graduating summa cum laude isn't an easy feat. However, I wrote an article on what's the use of being a summa cum laude when one opposes badly needed reforms . It's because whether we want to admit it or not, schools focus too much on the ability to memorize without also focusing on the ability to understand . Memory is also the least reliable tool. It would be time to continuously attack the problems of the education system. I felt shamed back then because students were often told, "Your grades will determine your future!" In college, I

What's the Use of Complaining About Jollibee Acquiring Companies BUT Not Accepting Open FDI to Bring in COMPETITION to the Philippines?

Anti-Snowflake Squad Facebook Page I was checking across Facebook and noticed some idiots complaining about Jollibee acquiring companies. The same idiots turned out to be anti-FDI--the same group that converses with Porky Madugo and Mukhang Adik. As usual, I will not directly link the idiots (or even reveal them directly, they will reveal themselves) to avoid giving them clout. Here's a statement by Porky that may make anyone wonder if (1) he knows he's lying (which I think he is for some self-serving reason ), or (2) he doesn't know what he's talking about: The monopolization of business ruins the business. It degrades the quality of the business of a product. If you think monopolization is good, that's stupidity. It kills the competition and it kills the business. Well, as old saying goes: "capitalists are the only one will destroy themselves." Since when did capitalism mean killing competition? Isn't Porky supposedly a die-hard Communist? In the

The Philippines' Decades-Long OUTDATED Education System

As a child born in the 1980s, I would say I was born during the Marcos Years and I was about a year old when the EDSA Revolution happened. That means I've passed through a lot of stuff rendered obsolete today such as dial-up Internet (which my parents refused to get due to how it interrupted the phone lines unlike the Digital Subscriber Line), cassette players, VHS players, and may I mention the education system . It might be fun to think of times when people of my age group watched The Flintstones or The Flintstone Kids (picture above) during the 1990s imagining school during the stone age. However, these photos today may make me cringe to think about how I grew up in an outdated education system. My recollection of the outdated education system in my eyes from the 1990s before K+12 got implemented My current readings through the book From Third World to First by the late Lee Kuan Yew made me want to write this. The recent chapters I'm in are "Deng Xiaoping's China&qu

The Insanity of Quoting the Late Lee Kuan Yew About the Marcoses While Ignorning the Rest of His Helpful Advice for the Philippines

It may not be Singapore day yet, it's still July and that event is in August. However, some people are now raising placards all over again because the 17th Philippine president is none other than Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. Som people tend to quote from the book From Third World to First . I did buy the book last year and started reading it slowly. I did get a slow read when it came to the late Lee Kuan Yew meeting the late Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. The description of Marcos was anything but flattering. I read the book and LKY mentioned that he was not confident that Marcos Sr. could pay back the money. The Philippines wasn't in the "golden years" as some would like to make it out. Yet, it seems that the only time LKY is ever mentioned is whenenver it's about the Marcoses and tends to be ignored when it's about how the Philippines can improve. Parliamentary system is often viewed in the wrong way Whenever Singapore is mentioned, I tend to talk about the parliamenta

The Economic Ignorance of Saying Landlords and Stock Traders Contribute Nothing to Society

Finding anti-capitalist (or better said, anti-business) wokes on Facebook (of all places) is just plain funny. Maybe, the term socialist isn't so negative since the late Lee Kuan Yew considered himself a socialist, the late Deng Xiaoping is the author of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, and Vietnam still considers itself as a socialist country. The picture above this paragraph says that landlords and stock traders allegedly "contribute absolutely nothing to society". I feel compelled to write a bit of a post since, as a business graduate, I do feel insulted. Then again even if I didn't get an MBA--I do still feel insulted myself! How good landlords contribute to society Landlords are often said to be a blight. Some say that it's the "easiest job in the world". However, managing real estate (especially rentals ) isn't as easy as some think. I wrote an essay as to why being a landowner isn't as easy as some people think . I would like to d

Pinoy Pride Economics' Filipino vs. Foreigner False Dichotomy

Two years ago, I wrote about the socio-economic cost of Pinoy Pride Economics . It might be better to call it Pinoy Fried Economics because such mentalities have caused the Philippines to fail. Pinoy Pride Economics has fried up any potential for the Philippines to improve. As it's August, the month is commonly called Buwan Ng Wika (month of the language), the celebrations tend to focus more on the celebration of Filipino Culture instead of Tagalog. I remember Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to showcase how cultural exchange evolved the Filipino Culture--such as showing the Chinese traders and Americans in their interaction with Filipinos. On this very first day of August, I'll discuss the problem of the Filipino vs. Foreigner dichotomy. Last I re-studied Filipino History, I never saw it as once free from foreign influence. The Chinese traded with the Philippines--way before the Chinese Communist of China (CCP) caused trouble because of their country's terrible leadership .

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at

#ThrowbackThursdays: When Values Education Tend to Teach Children to Patronize Local Products First Because They're Local

High School Philippine History Movement I was afraid I would be running out of ideas. I wanted to recall some businesses that closed down such as Nova Fontana (my once favorite toy store), Alyssa Caramel (my favorite candy store), El Loco (which used to open at IT Park), etc. Now, I decided to focus on remembering my childhood and values education. Values education is supposed to teach proper manners and good conduct. However, values education tends to become a propaganda tool of the National Economic Protectionist Association (NEPA) to justify Carlos P. Garcia's erroneous Filipino First Policy. However, the whole policy really helped cause the Philippines to fail. Its very idea of Garcia is that majority of the economic participants had to be Filipinos. It might sound good in theory but it wouldn't work with how the late Lee Kuan Yew would put it. Apparently, Garcia has never learned the consequences of protectionism from history--whether it'd be the Stock Market Crash of

Trying to Discipline EVERY SINGLE FILIPINO Isn't a Sound Economic Plan

CoRRECT Movement It's the -ber months and it's only 90+ days before Christmas . I feel like every year, Christmas gets worse . Just Google "Christmas Day disasters" and let's stop thinking Christmas is some magical special time where the world is at peace with love. At this point, I feel like always complaining about last-minute Christmas shopping (read here ). It's been a leading cause of traffic. Some people even plan to do their shopping on December 24th. Some argue that some people are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Some are still waiting for their Christmas bonuses. However. one must question why they don't have money left. Think every dumb way possible to drain that paycheck (read here ). One can take a look at poor money habits such as putting your wants over needs. People living paycheck-to-paycheck should focus on their needs, maybe avoid payday blowouts as much as possible, and focus on trying to make ends meet first before anything. Yet, we know

Can Diehard 1987 Constitution Defenders Prove Their Claims to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy?

It's not enough to say something. The question is, "Where's the substance or the empirical evidence?" When I start quoting from the late Lee Kuan Yew, these diehard 1987 Constitution of the Philippines defenders start diverting the topic by pointing out my errors to spite me than to correct me. They would ask if I know the Deming Theory of Management which talks about quality management in the company culture. Okay, that was something worth asking but as said, can these people really understand the problem of the Philippines has been more systemic (that is, within the system ) than just the people running the system? What allowed the legislative to be filled with people who know-nothing anyway? That's why I didn't want to vote for Senator Robin Padilla (who ironically understands the need for reforms, read here ). Unfortunately, so many Ad Hominem attacks have been done. A past article I wrote was Should you listen to either Davide Jr. or Kishore Mahbubani

Shaun T. Dy's Business & Economics Perspective Blog

Search This Blog