Skip to main content

Were Econ Cha-Cha Opponents Forced to Buy Luxury Products When They Have the FREEDOM to Buy More Affordable Products?

Do econ cha-cha opponents have no choice because FDIs "unfairly" own the means of production (read here)? There's always the tendency to say that they participate in capitalism because they have "no choice" but to participate in it to survive. The screenshot above is of Rosario Guzman of the IBON Foundation. They say that the business owners "unfairly" own the means of production (read here). The photo above makes me laugh because why in the world are they using a MacPro? I ask, "If you hate capitalism, why use Apple?" They have their usual rhetoric that it's because the workers should own the means of production as if workers were the ones who bought the equipment. It's as if the workers become the most liable for bad business decisions. One wrong check mark and the company may go south. Another question to fire is, "Did society force you to buy Apple products which you know for well, is rather expensive?" 

This may make one ask, "Did you think the expensive was always the best?" If so, they may think they can spread their message better with more expensive stuff. Investopedia also sheds light on why people are prone to buying luxury goods.

Are Higher-Priced Goods Really of Higher Quality?
One possible explanation for this is the human tendency to overemphasize the positive elements of a product and ignore its disadvantages. For example, in the case of Apple Inc. (AAPL), consumers wait overnight for new releases of iPhones, iPads, and Mac computers. This despite the fact that Apple products are not technologically unique or superior.

In fact, Samsung makes phones with better features (compared to most models of the iPhone), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Xiaomi make phones that typically have a cheaper price point. Nevertheless, Apple experiences a high degree of brand loyalty and seems to break sales records year after year.

Because some people perceive non-luxury goods as inferior simply by virtue of them being non-luxury (and not on the basis of their characteristics or qualities), they also come to the irrational conclusion that higher priced goods are of better quality. Contrary to the evidence, they may believe that you get what you pay for, regardless of whether the goods are actually better than their more affordable counterparts.

If they did better research on finances, they could buy laptops from Samsung and Xiaomi at a lower price. In the free market, there's the choice of whether one wants to buy an Apple product or if they want to buy the more affordable alternative. For example, I might buy the "Communist" Xiaomi phone over an iPhone for a lower price and better battery life. I might buy an HP laptop instead. They should've done some research on gadgets that cause. In finances, the principle is never to buy a bag worth USD 500.00 with nothing inside it. Instead, buy a USD 75.00 bag with PHP USD 425.00 on it. They had their free choice and it had consequences to follow. 

Their purchasing habits may prove their financial illiteracy. If one thinks that more expensive is always better--I can expect them not to know basic economics. That's why discussing economics with an overspender can be a futile exercise (read here). An overspender only knows how to spend--not how to budget. Even more ironic is overspending on imported luxury goods while supporting policies discouraging FDI (read here). The person can buy a Gucci bag, an iPhone, and all branded goods but goes to rally against FDI. When asked, "You hate FDI but why buy imported luxury stuff?" Again, if they say they're just forced to participate, were they forced to buy the iPhone, the MacPro, or the Gucci bag when they had a choice for more affordable goods--local or imported? 

They don't see the real beauty of the free market. In a free market, even in a Communist country like Vietnam, there's the choice between luxury goods and non-luxury goods. If I were in Vietnam, I could choose whether or not I'd like to eat gold-leaf steak or I could choose to eat more affordable steaks. I could choose to eat more affordable chocolates or high-class chocolates. Vietnam's current president To Lam ate a golden steak after laying flowers on Karl Marx's grave. To Lam could've chosen to eat at the Sichuan Restaurant instead of Salt Bae's Nusr-Et Steakhouse. Nobody forced To Lam to eat at Nur-Et Steakhouse. To Lam ate that golden steak of his own free will. 

I'm laughing at people who buy luxury products while saying they're just forced to participate in capitalism. It's not like capitalism doesn't give people a choice between different products under fair government regulations. I can buy a luxury or a non-luxury product because I have that choice. I can criticize capitalism under the Customer Protection Act or my right to review businesses. I can complain if a business establishment fails to meet the required safety standards. That's why we still need government to regulate all forms of economic activity. Even Communist countries like China and Vietnam can now enjoy the free market's choices to a certain extent. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Irony the Philippines Starts the Christmas Season in September BUT Many Filipinos Love Last-Minute Christmas Shopping

  Uproxx As Christmas is just around the corner--I feel more stress coming in! It doesn't help when people try to use the late Andy Williams' "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" to try and skip the problem. It's already known that most Filipinos love to start Christmas in September . However, the irony is that Filipinos start Christmas early but do their Christmas shopping late. If they began the Christmas Season early, shouldn't they think about what to do before December strikes?  Two years ago, I wrote a post discussing last-minute Christmas shopping . Many Filipinos tend to do last-minute Christmas shopping. They had all of November (when the Christmas sale usually begins) but why do the Christmas shopping in December ? One of the things I blame is the one-day paycheck lifestyle (see here ). It can be observed that many Filipinos never learn to prioritize more important things . One can get their stars when they see their paychecks. However, the...
Read more

Is Christmas Toxic Positivity a Cause or an Effect of the Philippines' Lack of Progress?

Lessandra When it's Christmas, it's so easy to think of the song of the late Andy Williams, "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year". The music itself reeks of toxic positivity,  whether one likes it or not. It's a shame, really, because December 20 was also the anniversary of Asia's Titanic, the sinking of the Doña Paz ! We live in a society that somehow never learns from its mistakes, like a person who's stuck in gambling debt, is still hoping to get rich gambling . Despite all that, Christmas toxic positivity still abounds in the Philippines. We still have a lot of ongoing bad habits, such as starting Christmas in September and then doing last-minute Christmas shopping during the week of Christmas. That's why every time I drive on the road on Christmas, I tend to shout, "Isn't it any wonder why the Philippines never improves?" The term Noche Buena has evolved over time . For some, it's simply the Christmas dinner. However, so...
Read more

Christmas Toxic Positivity May Be Your Biggest Holiday Financial Killer

Christmas is just around the corner, isn't it? It's easy to tell me, "Stop being a Scrooge! Lighten up! It's Christmas!" Some people can't tell the difference between positivity and when positivity becomes toxic . If you think about it, toxic positivity is defined as: ...the belief that people should maintain a positive mindset no matter how dire or difficult a situation is. While there are benefits to being optimistic and engaging in positive thinking, toxic positivity rejects all difficult emotions in favor of a cheerful and often falsely positive façade . Every time I talk about Christmas foolishness (read here ), it's always pointed out that I love being negative. Honestly, there are times I'd rather be negative than to be overly positive. I always talk about mentioning the silly notions that my countrymen have like, "If the situation is bitter, just add sugar (read here )." In Cebuano, it's said, "Kung pait, butangi lang ug asu...
Read more

Can Anti-FDI Proponents Prove Their Claim That Economic Liberalization Will Just Benefit the Filipino Oligarchs?

The same old narration has been made over and over again . I'd dare say that the narration out the Facebook pages of the likes of Atty. Teddy Casiño, Atty. Neri Colmenares, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, Migrante International, IBON Foundation, etc. are more or less the same. It's already a broken record based on the facts that they've been refuted. I've read the book From Third World to First . I guess Migrante International hates that book because Singapore is often associated with the execution of Flor Contemplacion, at least on their watch. What they're doing is nothing more than still hating Japan, Germany, and Italy because of the Second World War. I'm not surprised at another lie that's often repeated--economic liberalization (or 100% FDI shares ownership) will only  benefit the oligarchs . I guess it'll be easy to nail on me because I'm not a summa cum laude and Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel is and he's a graduate of the Uni...
Read more

It's UTTER IGNORANCE to Say that the Philippines Needs to Self-Industrialize First Before Allowing FDIs to Own 100% Equity

It's often said by idiots on Facebook that allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares is just going to leave the Philippines with nothing. I don't know how long I can keep my patience with such fools. To explain it, FDIs get rich based on net profits after taxes (read here ). FDIs will still end up paying VAT and income taxes if they want to continue investing in the Philippines. It's like if you want to continue doing business in the commercial space--you need to pay the rental fee to your lessor. The idea of 100% FDI ownership should be spelled out as, "Allowing FDIs to own 100% of their shares." They wouldn't need to find a Filipino partner before they can do business in the Philippines. They may not be allowed to own land  but they can operate without a Filipino partner. The even bigger stupidity is when FDIs are required to split 60-40 of the partnership. Meaning, that they must split 60% of the net income after taxes with the local Filipino partner. That...
Read more