Skip to main content

Were Econ Cha-Cha Opponents Forced to Buy Luxury Products When They Have the FREEDOM to Buy More Affordable Products?

Do econ cha-cha opponents have no choice because FDIs "unfairly" own the means of production (read here)? There's always the tendency to say that they participate in capitalism because they have "no choice" but to participate in it to survive. The screenshot above is of Rosario Guzman of the IBON Foundation. They say that the business owners "unfairly" own the means of production (read here). The photo above makes me laugh because why in the world are they using a MacPro? I ask, "If you hate capitalism, why use Apple?" They have their usual rhetoric that it's because the workers should own the means of production as if workers were the ones who bought the equipment. It's as if the workers become the most liable for bad business decisions. One wrong check mark and the company may go south. Another question to fire is, "Did society force you to buy Apple products which you know for well, is rather expensive?" 

This may make one ask, "Did you think the expensive was always the best?" If so, they may think they can spread their message better with more expensive stuff. Investopedia also sheds light on why people are prone to buying luxury goods.

Are Higher-Priced Goods Really of Higher Quality?
One possible explanation for this is the human tendency to overemphasize the positive elements of a product and ignore its disadvantages. For example, in the case of Apple Inc. (AAPL), consumers wait overnight for new releases of iPhones, iPads, and Mac computers. This despite the fact that Apple products are not technologically unique or superior.

In fact, Samsung makes phones with better features (compared to most models of the iPhone), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Xiaomi make phones that typically have a cheaper price point. Nevertheless, Apple experiences a high degree of brand loyalty and seems to break sales records year after year.

Because some people perceive non-luxury goods as inferior simply by virtue of them being non-luxury (and not on the basis of their characteristics or qualities), they also come to the irrational conclusion that higher priced goods are of better quality. Contrary to the evidence, they may believe that you get what you pay for, regardless of whether the goods are actually better than their more affordable counterparts.

If they did better research on finances, they could buy laptops from Samsung and Xiaomi at a lower price. In the free market, there's the choice of whether one wants to buy an Apple product or if they want to buy the more affordable alternative. For example, I might buy the "Communist" Xiaomi phone over an iPhone for a lower price and better battery life. I might buy an HP laptop instead. They should've done some research on gadgets that cause. In finances, the principle is never to buy a bag worth USD 500.00 with nothing inside it. Instead, buy a USD 75.00 bag with PHP USD 425.00 on it. They had their free choice and it had consequences to follow. 

Their purchasing habits may prove their financial illiteracy. If one thinks that more expensive is always better--I can expect them not to know basic economics. That's why discussing economics with an overspender can be a futile exercise (read here). An overspender only knows how to spend--not how to budget. Even more ironic is overspending on imported luxury goods while supporting policies discouraging FDI (read here). The person can buy a Gucci bag, an iPhone, and all branded goods but goes to rally against FDI. When asked, "You hate FDI but why buy imported luxury stuff?" Again, if they say they're just forced to participate, were they forced to buy the iPhone, the MacPro, or the Gucci bag when they had a choice for more affordable goods--local or imported? 

They don't see the real beauty of the free market. In a free market, even in a Communist country like Vietnam, there's the choice between luxury goods and non-luxury goods. If I were in Vietnam, I could choose whether or not I'd like to eat gold-leaf steak or I could choose to eat more affordable steaks. I could choose to eat more affordable chocolates or high-class chocolates. Vietnam's current president To Lam ate a golden steak after laying flowers on Karl Marx's grave. To Lam could've chosen to eat at the Sichuan Restaurant instead of Salt Bae's Nusr-Et Steakhouse. Nobody forced To Lam to eat at Nur-Et Steakhouse. To Lam ate that golden steak of his own free will. 

I'm laughing at people who buy luxury products while saying they're just forced to participate in capitalism. It's not like capitalism doesn't give people a choice between different products under fair government regulations. I can buy a luxury or a non-luxury product because I have that choice. I can criticize capitalism under the Customer Protection Act or my right to review businesses. I can complain if a business establishment fails to meet the required safety standards. That's why we still need government to regulate all forms of economic activity. Even Communist countries like China and Vietnam can now enjoy the free market's choices to a certain extent. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...
Read more

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...
Read more

No Hard-to-Earn Economics Degree is Required to Know That a Welfare, Anti-FDI Philippines is Destined to FAIL

GMA News When it comes to constitutional reform, I'm afraid one of the worst sources quoted would come from the Makabayan Bloc. Some people I face who are so against FDI also want to end the OFW program. The solution comes out rather absurd, as the Philippines must have its own state where it's all beg and beg . It would be like: "Free education for all! No to FDI for schools!"  "Free lunch in school!" "No to open FDI! The government must fund our local production!"  " Increase the salaries, lower the prices of goods! " (which is just plain bad accounting ) That's just a few of the crazy demands that have been given! My favorite question has always been, "Where will you get the funding?" The usual answers can be: " Print more money! " "The government should just make it a law!" "Tax the rich all the more!" which can often be accompanied by, " After all, it's the fault of the rich that p...
Read more

How Foreign Direct Investments Can Also Help in Local Philippine Agriculture

I must admit that I'm getting tired of all the misrepresentations of foreign direct investment (FDI) on Facebook. Such misrepresentations can come from "think-tanks" such as IBON Foundation, Bayan Muna, and the Philippine Anti-Fascist League. That's why I wrote a couple of posts such as (1) how we need to focus on environmentally-friendly business practices (read here ), (2) that FDIs don't always lead to environmental degradation (read here ), and (3) asking the question if you're willing to support local businesses that destroy the environment (read here ). Besides, economic protectionism isn't a guarantee that environment will be friendly. Both North Korea and Venezuela are known to have very bad environmental practices. Just reading about them can make you dizzy. Protectionism ended up destroying agriculture than protecting it Mao Zedong's "great leap forward" was evidence In contrast to what those "think tanks" want us to belie...
Read more

Why I'm Not in Favor of Nationalization of Utilities Mixed with Protectionism

ToonPool There's the call of leftist fools to stop privatization. Many still believe that utilities should be run by nationalization rather than privatization . I've been reading on Facebook where some fools believe that allowing foreign telecommunications companies (telcos) to invest in the Philippines will "risk security". Any telco will risk security if there are no laws to regulate it like the Data Privacy Law. Just because I support private enterprises doesn't mean that I say the government is hands-off. On the other hand, the government has the duty to set rules such as fair compensation, proper employee treatment, safety measures, and the like to make sure that we remain in healthy competition. Some people who keep protesting against the privatization of industries I believe (1) want the government to provide for all the needs of the people (which leads to dictatorship, eventually), (2) have some agenda as to why they're doing it, or (3) these people ar...
Read more