Skip to main content

Were Econ Cha-Cha Opponents Forced to Buy Luxury Products When They Have the FREEDOM to Buy More Affordable Products?

Do econ cha-cha opponents have no choice because FDIs "unfairly" own the means of production (read here)? There's always the tendency to say that they participate in capitalism because they have "no choice" but to participate in it to survive. The screenshot above is of Rosario Guzman of the IBON Foundation. They say that the business owners "unfairly" own the means of production (read here). The photo above makes me laugh because why in the world are they using a MacPro? I ask, "If you hate capitalism, why use Apple?" They have their usual rhetoric that it's because the workers should own the means of production as if workers were the ones who bought the equipment. It's as if the workers become the most liable for bad business decisions. One wrong check mark and the company may go south. Another question to fire is, "Did society force you to buy Apple products which you know for well, is rather expensive?" 

This may make one ask, "Did you think the expensive was always the best?" If so, they may think they can spread their message better with more expensive stuff. Investopedia also sheds light on why people are prone to buying luxury goods.

Are Higher-Priced Goods Really of Higher Quality?
One possible explanation for this is the human tendency to overemphasize the positive elements of a product and ignore its disadvantages. For example, in the case of Apple Inc. (AAPL), consumers wait overnight for new releases of iPhones, iPads, and Mac computers. This despite the fact that Apple products are not technologically unique or superior.

In fact, Samsung makes phones with better features (compared to most models of the iPhone), and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Xiaomi make phones that typically have a cheaper price point. Nevertheless, Apple experiences a high degree of brand loyalty and seems to break sales records year after year.

Because some people perceive non-luxury goods as inferior simply by virtue of them being non-luxury (and not on the basis of their characteristics or qualities), they also come to the irrational conclusion that higher priced goods are of better quality. Contrary to the evidence, they may believe that you get what you pay for, regardless of whether the goods are actually better than their more affordable counterparts.

If they did better research on finances, they could buy laptops from Samsung and Xiaomi at a lower price. In the free market, there's the choice of whether one wants to buy an Apple product or if they want to buy the more affordable alternative. For example, I might buy the "Communist" Xiaomi phone over an iPhone for a lower price and better battery life. I might buy an HP laptop instead. They should've done some research on gadgets that cause. In finances, the principle is never to buy a bag worth USD 500.00 with nothing inside it. Instead, buy a USD 75.00 bag with PHP USD 425.00 on it. They had their free choice and it had consequences to follow. 

Their purchasing habits may prove their financial illiteracy. If one thinks that more expensive is always better--I can expect them not to know basic economics. That's why discussing economics with an overspender can be a futile exercise (read here). An overspender only knows how to spend--not how to budget. Even more ironic is overspending on imported luxury goods while supporting policies discouraging FDI (read here). The person can buy a Gucci bag, an iPhone, and all branded goods but goes to rally against FDI. When asked, "You hate FDI but why buy imported luxury stuff?" Again, if they say they're just forced to participate, were they forced to buy the iPhone, the MacPro, or the Gucci bag when they had a choice for more affordable goods--local or imported? 

They don't see the real beauty of the free market. In a free market, even in a Communist country like Vietnam, there's the choice between luxury goods and non-luxury goods. If I were in Vietnam, I could choose whether or not I'd like to eat gold-leaf steak or I could choose to eat more affordable steaks. I could choose to eat more affordable chocolates or high-class chocolates. Vietnam's current president To Lam ate a golden steak after laying flowers on Karl Marx's grave. To Lam could've chosen to eat at the Sichuan Restaurant instead of Salt Bae's Nusr-Et Steakhouse. Nobody forced To Lam to eat at Nur-Et Steakhouse. To Lam ate that golden steak of his own free will. 

I'm laughing at people who buy luxury products while saying they're just forced to participate in capitalism. It's not like capitalism doesn't give people a choice between different products under fair government regulations. I can buy a luxury or a non-luxury product because I have that choice. I can criticize capitalism under the Customer Protection Act or my right to review businesses. I can complain if a business establishment fails to meet the required safety standards. That's why we still need government to regulate all forms of economic activity. Even Communist countries like China and Vietnam can now enjoy the free market's choices to a certain extent. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Pinoy Pride Economics Helps in Drug Mule Recruitment

Al Jazeera Who can remember the execution of three drug mules in China on March 30, 2011 ? These were three separate cases where the three convicts were  Sally Villanueva , Ramon Credo (who was cremated before his remains were brought home, and Elizabeth Batain (whose face was never shown). Sally had an episode in the GMA-7 TV show Magpakailanman,  where her husband was personally interviewed by Mel Tiangco. We never got Sally on the big screen. The husband's side of the story said that his wife was guilty of a frame-up, while Mel herself said, "If the offer is too good to be true, don't take it, or you could end up in the same pickle." Take note that I'm just paraphrasing Mel's words, not saying the words she said.  Reviewing the three drug mules who got arrested, based only on what's available for public viewing on the Internet If we read through the circumstances , this is how they were arrested, proving they weren't a trio: China has brushed aside...
Read more

New Study Confirms Oil Degulation Law is Bad, Oil Nationalization is Better

Yes, you found that right. Did you know that the Filipino First Policy caused the Philippines to succeed and Carlos P. Garcia was the best president ever? Today, because of the Iranian War crisis, we need to talk about a new important discovery. What I realized is that the oil deregulation policy is bad . Do you want the oil prices to fall under control? Then read this new blog to find out.  A new audit was revealed in the world's greatest economic forum. The Trust Me Bro School of Economics invited the trustworthy IBON Foundation to speak at Intrigador Financials . I was so wrong not to notice the genius behind the likes of Makabayan Bloc.  What have I done compared to the youths  of Kabataan Partylist ? I even discovered that  the IBON Foundation is the most credible economic think tank . As I realized that  Filipinos should only listen to Filipino economists ,  I have found that there are literally  tons of studies  from the famous Trust Me Br...
Read more

The WORLDWIDE Great Depression Was Worsened, NOT Relieved, by Economic Protectionism

I feel like doing a study with history right now. People tell me to study history when they try to defend how protectionism made first-world countries a powerhouse. However, a flick on the pages of Lee Kuan Yew's classic From Third World to First  will tell you that's a big fat lie. I feel like talking about the Great Depression from 1929 to 1939 which also involved the Stock Market Crash of 1929. These events can be rooted in economic protectionism . Economic protectionism is defined by the Investopedia as follows: Protectionism refers to government policies that restrict international trade to help domestic industries. Protectionist policies are usually implemented with the goal to improve economic activity within a domestic economy but can also be implemented for safety or quality concerns. The dumb legislation that made it worse I remembered reading about the Stock Market Crash of 1929. The causes of it were linked to people buying too many stocks. Local companies overprod...
Read more

It's More Fun In The Philippines Thanks to the Filipino First Policy

I guess it can be called a day, right? This April 1, 2023 , I'm finally calling it quits with fighting for economic liberalization! Yes, that's right! All the advocacy for economic liberalization is just garbage. Why did I even spend so much time writing this blog only to find out that I've been duped? I hereby renounce everything I wrote here. I finally saw how brilliant the Filipino First Policy is. Man, what have I done? How much damage have I caused in advocating for economic liberalization?  The greatest president we ever had was... High School Philippine History Movement It's time to listen to the economic genius known as the late Carlos P. Garcia. Yes, he has to be one of the greatest presidents that ever existed.  I took this note from the Bohol Provincial Library and found this about CPG's Filipino First Policy ; CPG adopted the “Filipino First” Policy to promote greater Filipino participation in business, and to put the Filipinos in control of the economy...
Read more

Let's PERMANENTLY Abandon the Concept that Foreign Investors are Invaders

Philippine Anti-Fascist League Above is a meme found on Facebook that I'd dare say reflect epic levels of ignorance. The picture above represents the Spanish conquest of the Philippines. The Philippines was under the Spanish Empire for nearly 300 years. The Philippines gained independence from Spain on June 12, 1898, and from the United States of America (USA) on July 12, 1948. Basic Philippine history has proven that the natives of the Philippines (before being called Filipinos) have been trading with various foreigners before colonization. The Chinese traded with Filipino natives before they were dubbed Filipinos. Did the Chinese Emperor or the Chinese Empire ever have control over the Philippines because of trading? There is no history in China where the Philippines was once a colony of China before Spain took it over. The Chinese merchants were only interested in trading, not conquering, the 7,107 islands that were later collectively named the Philippines after King Philip of...
Read more