Skip to main content

Try Convincing Me 60-40 Isn't a Problem Because I'm STILL NOT CONVINCED


I saw this post shared on Facebook. Fortunately, the person's name has been cropped out, so I don't have to censor it using MS Paint or Affinity Photo. I would like to address why 60-40 is a huge issue. I don't like relying on ChatGPT or any AI for the answers. I would only use AI to help me find the source. Now, I would like to do some common-sense refuting with this. Of course, I'm expecting more people to still be 60-40 apologists. I'm going to present my argument.

First and foremost, whoever this person is (and it's best that I censor his/her name out) has no idea about different types of FDI restrictions

We're already in the Internet age or the digital age. Should we only rely on gossip from a limited group instead of searching for other sources? Are we still stuck with the favorite sources such as the 1987 Constitution framers, faulty DepEd textbooks, biopics, etc.? The person, whoever he/she is, has no idea about the different restrictions in the countries he/she mentioned. Let's think about China, Vietnam, and Indonesia for a start.

Some time ago, I wrote about why FDIs prefer to invest in Communist Vietnam over the more democratic Philippines. One of the things I mentioned is how Vietnam's equity restrictions are rather short. It should be noted that the Vietnamese constitution is rather silent on equity restrictions! Read the link for yourself and tell me if there's even the slightest hint of foreign equity ownership. Instead, Vietnam puts its protectionist measures only in legislation, making it easier to adjust the economy. For example, the banking sector is still restricted in Vietnam to 30% foreign equity. However, it may only be a matter of time before it goes above 49% or even goes to the maximum 70% rule, like a few sectors!

Now, let's go to China's constitution. Any FDI restriction is, again, no surprise, only within legislation. The foreign investment law in China isn't enshrined within their Communist manifesto! China doesn't have that ridiculous 60-40 policy or severe equity restrictions, as long as the Philippines. Isn't it about time for Filipinos to ask themselves how they can pride themselves as a democratic country, while China (and in extension, Vietnam) are Communist countries, who are more FDI friendly? Why do you think more firms decided to invest during Deng Xiaoping rules in China? Not even the Tiananmen Square Massacre (which was a failed attempt to replicate EDSA 1986 in China) stopped China from growing. The Philippines could brag about EDSA 1986, but it still keptthe  Filipino First Policy!

In mentioning Indonesia, the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia (which received several amendments, by the way, and the last amendment was in 2002) doesn't have economic restrictions within its constitution. It's been amended more times than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, which is "proudly" unamended.

Does this person know how to Google and look at the ease of doing business? I wonder if this person has been told by that "reliable source"? Who is this "reliable source"? The open-close quotation marks are obvious sarcasm, just in case someone fails to detect it. Would this reliable source be Makabayan bloc members, such as Atty. Neri Colmenares, Teodoro A. Casiño, Raoul A. Manuel, Atty. Renee Co ( and I may not even think of hiring her as my lawyer), Sarah Jane I. Elago, Arlene Brosas, etc.? Would it be from the mouth of any Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philppines member, such as from Archbishop Socrates Villegas' mouth? Would it be from Raissa Espinosa-Robles' mouth? Either way, if their sources are so limited and nothing to back it up, I have no reason to believe them! What's the use of badmouthing my blog, but the sources used to refute it are questionable? That's why I put links in this blog! It's to show where I get my sources!

Second and last, isn't it a hassle for FDIs needing to find two Filipino partners so an FDI can be the "majority" shareholder?

I laughed hard at the statement made by this person. Why should FDIs need to find two Filipino partners to become the majority shareholder? I wrote about how the 60-40 policy is already considered overpriced rent. Why would I want to rent a space in a place where my lessor will ask for 60% of my net income? That would be overpriced rent. The profits are barely half of the revenues! Hasn't anyone seen a sample income statement? 

We need to look into the problem of having to find two Filipino partners. It's already hard enough to find a partner just to do business in the Philippines. How much more two Filipino partners who may presumably own 30-30 each share. To call the 40% the majority shareholder can be problematic. There's a difference between plurality and majority. In the Philippines, most presidents win by plurality, not by majority. An FDI has 40% shares, meaning it's just plurality shares. Why not give them the option to own 100% of the shares (without the ability to buy land, though) or choose to partner with local Filipino partners, as two viable options?!

Whoever made this comment may want to try renting it this way. Let's say I own a building but I'm renting the land. Some malls are built on rented space. I heard Banilad Town Centre (BTC) is renting on somebody else's land. Now, let's say that I decide to rent a space at BTC. Let's say that the owner of BTC (MRO Development Corpiration) and BTC's owner, decide to give me this hypothetical scenario. Let's say BTC says that I must give 30% of my net profit to MRO, 30% of my net profit to BTC, and I keep 40% of my net profit. I only own most of the profit but not majority of the profit! The person's logic is absolutely absurd in so many levels!

Whoever made that comment might want to try that arrangement with the mall and the lot owner, assuming that the mall is built on leased land. He/she should try keeping only 40% of the net income, because 30% had to go to the mall owner, and another 30% had to go to the lot owner. The whole arrangement would be stupid. The mall pays the landowner, not the tenants. The tenants pay the mall owner. The mall deducts what they pay to the lessor from the revenues. The tenant deducts the rent from the revenues. I wonder if this person, whoever he/she is will eventually not complain, because he/she couldn't keep 100% of the net profit after taxes! 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

The Myth of "Invading" Other Countries Through Foreign Investors and Overseas Filipino Workers

BoardGameGeek Years ago, I could remember how "Filipino pride" seems to be required by the DECS. Some songs in the Filipino subject (or called Tagalog) tend to glorify it. One of the songs was called "Ako'y Isang Pinoy" (or "I'm Pinoy") feels ironic since it was played on an imported music player. We had discussions for years about how Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) are often the unsung heroes or the new heroes. The mentality kept going on with how people desired to take a particular course not because they wanted to--it's because they wanted to go abroad. Why I wanted to take Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) was not just to impress people but also to go abroad . However, more people shifted away from BSIT either because they were eliminated (common cause) or because it was too hard for them. Some of them flat out admitted that they took BSIT in hopes of going abroad. Some were taking nursing in hopes of again-- going abro...
Read more

Learning from the Late Lee Kuan Yew's Proving Protectionist-Driven Economists Wrong About Multinational Corporations

Reading the book From Third World to First is really a must. The late Lee Kuan Yew was faced with the mentality of the development economists of his day. Here's an excerpt from "Chapter 4--Surviving Without a Hinterland" which I'd like to share from Pages 57-58: After several years of disheartening trial and error, we concluded that Singapore's best hope lay with the American multinational corporations (MNCs). When the Taiwanese and Hong Kong entrepreneurs came in the 1960s, they brought low technology such as textile and toy manufacturing, labor-intensive but not large-scale. American MNCs brought higher technology in large-scale operations, creating many jobs. They had weight and confidence. They believed that their government was going to stay in Southeast Asia and their businesses were safe from confiscation or war loss. I gradually crystallized my thoughts and settled on a two-pronged strategy to overcome our disadvantages. The first was to leapfrog the reg...
Read more