Skip to main content

The Stupidity of Quitting Investments for Get Rich Quick Schemes

I ended up preferring to do index funds such as AXA's Chinese Tycoon Fund (worth PHP 3,000.2 per month which did a good job in curbing my extravagant lifestyle), I decided to buy some more index funds on GInvest to extend the inventory (powered by Seedbox and ATRAM, both reliable and also awarded sources), and any other indirect way. I feel like my attention deficit disorder (ADD) can be a serious disadvantage if I decide to directly trade stocks. However, with some studies, I could do some minimal stock trading as to reduce the risk. I did get into the Retail Treasury Bond (RTB) and the Long Term Negotiable Certificate of Deposit (LTNCD) as a start due to a lower risk appetite. My appetite is moderately risky so I decided to use AXA and GInvest to help regulate it. 

I remembered being told someone (never knew the person) borrowed PHP 1 Million (or I think even higher) to invest in the stock market. The person may have decided to put the PHP 1 Million in stocks hoping to get rich quick. I think the reason behind the attempted suicide was that the values went down. I think the person thought that stocks would make him rich fast. What the person may have ignored is that investing money should hold this rule--invest what you don't need now. 

One of the most foolish moves people have done is to buy high and sell low during a crash (read here). It would be like buying excessive stocks when everything is green and selling when it's red thinking it wouldn't recover. However, Warren Buffett's advice is to buy devalued stocks from good companies. Others suggest to do cost averaging where you invest the same amount of money regardless of market conditions. I prefer to do value cost averaging should the market go down but not to invest too much either. It's like I'd allocate PHP 1,000.00 per month by default (especially during a bull market) then I allocate PHP 2,000.00 to PHP 3,000.00 per month during a bear market.

Are people dropping out of legitimate investments because the investment didn't get them to get rich quick?

Maybe, someone bought the Variable Universal Life (VUL) insurance from AXA and said it's all a scam because the money got "lower and lower". However, VUL insurance is meant as a security and not to increase personal spending. Maybe, someone went to check their AXA funds involving stocks and found out it got lower. I checked one time during an all-time low and the Total Fund Value (TFV) got so low. The reason has to be the stock market being at a low at this point. I saw my TFV of the AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund got high during a stock market high. It's because the Net Asset Value Per Unit (NAVPU) is dependent on the overall stock market performance. So, I guess the person decides to say, "AXA is cheating! It's robbery in broad daylight!" 

This makes me think maybe that's why some people have the problem of not investing and doing gambling instead (read here). It even reminded me of one of the articles I wrote was about was the irony of saying AXA is "a scam" while playing Axie Infinity thinking that it's an "investment". I guess they just wnat to get rich quick and the investments didn't give it to them. This makes me think of why some people may even want to pull out their indexes (resulting in making their paper loss actual losses) so they can start buying Axies. Just hearing about how Axie Infinity was supposedly a life-changing encounter for Filipinos. Yet, Axie Infinity has been known for its poor security (which is why I wrote about why I'm not "investing" in it) and it's really just gambling. Why would I want to play games where I earn and lose money for winning and losing? Games are just supposed to be recreational whether online or offline. Sure, there's the need to pay to play online these days (due to maintenance) but any promise to pay you to play is absurd.

After watching Trust No One: Hunt for the Crypto King (read my review here)--I really felt one of the reasons why people get into cryptocurrency is the promise for fast returns. Initially, it may work such as what if PHP 5,000.00 I invested into cryptocurrency will become PHP 15,000.00 in just a short amount of time? However, one should be alarmed if the money goes up or goes low too fast. That's what also happened during the Stock Market Crash of 1929. The stock market fell down because of a lack of regulation. Until cryptocurrency can be regulated--I'm really not going to get into it. Chinese-Canadian Tong Zou even shared his experience he lost his life savings due to cryptocurrency. However, Tong Zou managed to recover (somehow) even if that sum of money was lost forever

I'd say it's a lack of patience that really caused it. I can get pretty impatient which was why I fell for a bad customer 10 years ago. Common sense is lost during times of impatience and greed. That's what I keep in mind when I have my AXA Chinese Tycoon Fund or my GInvest funds--I don't expect instant millions. As Proverbs 13:11 says that wealth that's gained dishonestly will dwindle. There's nothing honest about get rich quick schemes. After all, Ponzi schemes will always be, "You steal from X to pay Y. You steal from Y to pay Z." In short, any gains you get momentarily from a get rich quick scheme was based on somebody getting swindled to make you get that gain. 

Maybe, I can share this quote by the late John Gokongwei whose companies are still in the Philippine-based index funds:

Success is not necessarily about connections, or cutting corners, or chamba (chance)--the three Cs of bad business. Call it trite, but believe me: success can be achieved through hard work, frugality, integrity, responsiveness ot change, and most of all, boldness to dream. 

References

Documentaries

"Trust No One: The Hunt for the Crypto King", Directed by Luke Seewell, Distributed by Netflix 

Websites


"Axie Infinity sees 'no signs of buyers' as AXS price tumbles 30% in two weeks" by Yashu Gola (April 11, 2022)

"'Bitcoin widow' reveals how she fell victim to her own husband's $215m scam after his mysterious death" by John Marcus (April 15, 2022)

"Hackers steal more than $600 million from maker of Axie Infinity" by David Ingram and Jason Abbruzzese (March 30, 2022)

"'Life-changing' or scam? Axie Infinity helps Philippines' poor earn"

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...