Skip to main content

Amending the 1987 Constitutions is NECESSARY for Economic Restoration

Yesterday, I decided to write against the Facebook page, Silent No More PH, as well as other similar pages. I just found another page called iMPACT Leadership which I wonder, what impact do they plan anyway? I even wonder if the Liberal Party of the Philippines could've seen this that if we were in a parliamentary system--they would be able to act as the direct Opposition against the Government led by Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. We would be having weekly debates between Prime Minister Marcos Jr. and Opposition Leader Maria Leonor Gerona-Robredo. Mrs. Robredo would have her own cabinet which she will have Shadow Ministers to help hold the Marcos Jr.-led Government accountable. 

I decided to select from pictures from iMPACT Leadership. I would give some of my own common sense feedback as to why I beg to disagree...

Thoughts on what Representative Gabriel Hidalgo Bordado Jr. said about his vote


Is it me or do the boomers have the tendency to be stuck on the status quo? If so, why did they not choose to keep the 1973 Constitution of the Philippines and a 1987 Constitution of the Philippines had to be made? I could agree that amending the constitution is a huge responsibility. I can't deny that much of what the late Benigno Simeon A. Aquino Jr. spoke in his Los Angeles speech was true. The whole constitutional convention during Aquino Jr.'s time was a shame. 

As a lawmaker, has Bordado kept in mind that the economic polices are part of the constitution? If he's so serious about restoring the economy of the Philippines then here's what. He needs to see the defect namely Article XII of the 1987 Constitution. I really wonder if Bordado Jr., who I heard took non-degree short courses at the National University of Singapore (NUS) ever realized the bigger mistakes. If he doesn't see it as a problem then I wonder what kind of lawmaker he is? 

The problem with the economic matters would be summarized as follows:

Section 10. The Congress shall, upon recommendation of the economic and planning agency, when the national interest dictates, reserve to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress may prescribe, certain areas of investments. The Congress shall enact measures that will encourage the formation and operation of enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipinos.

In the grant of rights, privileges, and concessions covering the national economy and patrimony, the State shall give preference to qualified Filipinos.

The State shall regulate and exercise authority over foreign investments within its national jurisdiction and in accordance with its national goals and priorities.

Section 11. No franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations organized under the laws of the Philippines, at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens; nor shall such franchise, certificate, or authorization be exclusive in character or for a longer period than fifty years. Neither shall any such franchise or right be granted except under the condition that it shall be subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the Congress when the common good so requires. The State shall encourage equity participation in public utilities by the general public. The participation of foreign investors in the governing body of any public utility enterprise shall be limited to their proportionate share in its capital, and all the executive and managing officers of such corporation or association must be citizens of the Philippines.

Section 12. The State shall promote the preferential use of Filipino labor, domestic materials and locally produced goods, and adopt measures that help make them competitive.

If he's really serious about the economy, why not raise it up in the constitutional convention that the amendments should focus on removing unnecessary restrictions. Once again, 100% share ownership is different from land ownership. It means that FDIs aren't required to find a Filipino partner with whom they can only own up to 40% in certain fields. Right now, the Public Services Act of 2022 has allowed Starlink to establish a base in the Philippines. I'd say that the constitutional convention should work in getting rid of all excessive restrictions.

Now, we can talk about Edcel C. Lagman Sr,


I would really say that this is an unexpected statement from a political science graduate who is also a law student. Even Mrs. Robredo was open to amendments. I would like to tell him my stand on the matter that I don't think charter change (or constitutional reform) is a panacea. No solution is a panacea. There's no such thing as a cure-all drug. You take Biogestic for headaches and fever. You take Neozep for runny nose. You take cough medicine for cough medicine. You have different types of surgery performed for different problems. My cataract was removed via laser surgery. My right eye was fixed via SMILE corneal surgery. I could agree with Lagman Sr. that it's not a magic wand. 

However, what Lagman isn't seeing that the constitution can be both a problem and a solution. Why do you think that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines has  Article XVII which also writes the following?
Section 2. Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly proposed by the people through initiative upon a petition of at least twelve per centum of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters therein. No amendment under this section shall be authorized within five years following the ratification of this Constitution nor oftener than once every five years thereafter.

The problem with fully implementing Article XII of the 1987 Constitution is all about excessive restrictions. Why do you think the late Fidel V. Ramos, Joseph Marcelo Ejercito aka Joseph Estrada, Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino Jr., and Rodrigo Roa Duterte, all former Philippine presidents, had amended the Negative List during their terms? Duterte was also involved in signing the Public Services Act of 2022. Economist Andrew James Masigan even boldly wrote this in the Philippine Star last 2022:

Unfortunately, the Philippines is rated the most restrictive in the whole of ASEAN as far as accepting foreign capital is concerned. No surprise, our FDI to GDP ratio is the second lowest among the region’s ten economies. From our peak intake of $10.256 billion in 2017, FDIs declined to $9.9 billion in 2018, $8.7 billion in 2019 and $6.4 billion in 2020. Our FDI intake is only half of that of Vietnam and a third of Indonesia’s.

The main impediments to the flow of FDIs in the country are the economic provisions of the 1987 ConstitutionThe Constitution was written to protect industries for Filipinos, but it backfired. It has instead starved us of capital, jobs, export revenues and taxes. It created oligopolies made up of conglomerates owned by just a handful of families. These conglomerates control every aspect of the economy – from infrastructure to public utilities to retail. The few families that own these conglomerates earn scandalous profits even though they are inefficient.

Simply put, the 1987 Constitution is the reason why we have become the economic laggard in the region and why our income inequality is the worst among ASEAN’s major economies.

Has Lagman Sr. ever considered the big problem of Article XII? What's even funnier is that  he says an ICC probe on Duterte's alleged crimes can increase FDI. Whether you are pro-Duterte or anti-Duterte, I guess I can agree with you that will not change anything unless Article XII of the 1987 Constitution were massively revised. The real problem is all about excessive restrictions. I wonder if Lagman even realizes that more investors are going to Communist Vietnam where censorship is far stricter than the Philippines? Does he think Vietnam has excessive restrictions in terms of ownership? 

Closing words

I guess being highly educated is no guarantee, right? Back then, I wanted to study at the Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU) in order to silence my critics. I even took an MBA degree to attain some prestige. Eventually, I just felt that being educated is not the same as being learned. If these people feel that constitutional amendments are necessary, I wonder what did they ever do with their education? 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

How Many MORE Unmitigated Typhoon Disasters Before Filipinos Realize That the Filipino First Policy is FAILING Them?!

GMA Network I remember surviving through Typhoon Odette last 2022. Tino happened on November 6, 2025, which also reminds me that Yolanda's anniversary came two days later . Yolanda was even worse than Odette! Thankfully, Cebu City's impact wasn't as bad, and power didn't take too long to return, unlike Yolanda. However, seeing news reports such as an investigation done against Slater Young's project in Monterazzas de Cebu should highlight a bigger problem. Looking at the photos of floods on Facebook makes me think, "How many more unmitigated typhoon disasters until Filipinos realize that the Filipino First Policy is failing them and that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines  badly needs updates?"  For die-hard defenders like Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who will turn 90 this December 20) or Atty. Christian Monsod (who's 89 this year), they're prone to saying that it's just a matter of implementation . However, whether we want to admit it...

Would You Rather Die of Thirst and/or Heatstroke This Summer Than Accept Quality Water and Electricity Services from MNCs?

Looking at the IBON Foundation's page can be laughable . One may notice Atty. Neri Colmenares, someone who fortunately lost the senatorial race twice . I remember arguing about people who'd believe in the lies that Colmenares would propagate about FDIs. There's the call to stop water privatization (the call for the nationalization of the water industry) and the constant opposition to allowing foreigners to own 100%. Do they even get that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership and not land ownership ? As the summer heat intensifies due to the El NiƱo, I decided to write this entry. A good question to ask now is, "Would you rather die of thirst or a heatstroke than accept quality water and electricity services from MNCs?"  What organizations like the IBON Foundation and Migrante International insist is on national industrialization over the acceptance of FDIs. The question is how do they expect to industrialize the nation based on doing everything on their ...