Skip to main content

If You Want to Make the Philippines Better, Study... HARDER?

I grew up complaining and complaining about stuff. I always looked at the Philippines as a hopeless case. I hated studying the Tagalog subject--which was mandatory by the DepEd. I was told, "Look lazy bum! If you want to make the Philippines a better place--study harder!" In college, I began to apply myself more seriously even if I didn't graduate summa cum laude. I felt a sense of achievement when I won a commerce award for making an outstanding difference. What I never thought was that during the practicum--it was working smart and not working hard. Sure, hard work is there but smart work allows more hard work to be done at a better pace. Not long after, I took my MBA course but it was also at that time, I was scammed. I discovered I wasn't alone in being scammed--many MBA students were scammed during the same time I was scammed!

However, what I discovered was the problem of saying, "Your grades will determine your future!" It was typical in Philippine schools where teachers would say it either in English, Tagalog, or the local dialect, "With grades like those, why don't you just take HRM?" HRM means hotel and restaurant management. Today, it's called hospitality management. It was a course I dreaded taking back in high school. Today, I still feel the burden I never took that course. I started befriending people in the HRM course, known today as Hospitality Management. Even back then, one classmate of mine said, "The chef's salary is not a small thing!" However, is it or is there a toxic mindset against menial workers here in the Philippines (read here)? 

There's one question--is education really the solution that Filipinos need? During the pandemic, I started looking back at education. Was the education really worth it? I wanted to take a doctorate but decided not to. I started reading Warren Buffett out of boredom. I opened a GCash account to buy shawarma from Shawarma Gourmet. I discovered GInvest and found several funds I could invest. I remember having a financial conference during my MBA days. What wasn't really taught was that anybody can invest in stocks through an index fund or any equity fund. I used GCash to invest in GInvest. Now, I'm currently invested in the world market via GInvest. Filipinos can now invest in the world market, such as the use of the ATRAM Global Equity Feeder Fund or other related funds on GInvest. 

Study hard, right? Above is a diagram that shows the problem of the education system. Unfortunately, this is the truth about education. It's not the fault of the teachers but the system. The education system can be described as dull and boring. There's the mentality people have, "If you're having fun, you're not learning." Schools can be described as outdated as ever. Recalling my student life, I wrote asking the question if the Philippines is automating or educating students. In Chinese-Filipino schools (where Chinese education became so robotic for some time), a Chinese language teacher (often called siansi, Hokkien for teacher) would often talk about Mencius and Li Bai. I still remember how a Chinese language teacher even asked, "So what did your mother say that you don't want to go to school anymore?" It was during those times I kept getting mad and wanted to quit school. Fortunately, I had a Miriam Defensor-Santiago-type teacher riding on my back during that time. This teacher, stern as she was, wanted to see even the worst students make it. 

As I discussed this and that with people after the pandemic, I said, "The teachers just do what's assigned to them." How often is it that the system is blamed (read here)? I remember how often my MDS-style teacher got blamed, how often my Margaret Thatcher-type teacher got blamed, never mind that they were just doing their job. When I mentioned I refused to apologize to the teacher because I hated mathematics back then. I was told that the teacher didn't invent mathematics but she was just doing her job. All of that traces back to the system itself. Schools in the Philippines are required to follow what the DepEd (known as DECS back then) says. Sadly, the Philippines also bought the Prussian education system, and Johann Gottlieb Fitche even said that the aim of education is to destroy free will. Worse, you've got parents getting mad that their children are like robots. Well, isn't it that the school is teaching children to be robots? A good example is mathematics class where students are working with numbers, without knowing their application. That's why it's typical in mathematics class to say, "When am I going to use this?" The teacher is often made to say, "Well, it's required and just study it." Even my good mathematics teacher was powerless against the system she had to follow.

Can we really expect Filipino students to do better by studying harder? The more I read of the discouraging news of Filipino students' low literacy (and social media and blog comments show it a lot)--the more I'm convinced that something is wrong! The Philippines should've entered K+12 decades ago--not just during the late former president Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's term! What I remember was how often the Filipino First Policy was taught in Values Education (read here). Never mind that the classroom was full of imported equipment, that none of the PCs used during computer class were imported, and that international economics is part of life! We're often told that buying imported products will just benefit foreigners--never mind that the schools were built using foreign equipment. Never mind that the propaganda films were filmed using imported equipment. Then again, I can expect them to say, "Well, we have no choice but to use imported equipment, because foreigners own the means to produce them! (read here)." 

What even bothers me is that even honor students from hard-to-enter schools, can be that foolish with real life (read here)! Take Rep. Raoul Manuel of Kabataan (Youth) Partylist who says untrue things about FDI. Can Manuel even prove with studies that FDI will only benefit the oligarchs? The same goes for several economic graduates from schools like Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU) and the University of the Philippines (UP). I'm getting disappointed looking at how some people who studied hard to get good grades, are now giving nonsense statements that should deserve a failing grade in economics. However, with our current system, can we really trust the education system that puts more emphasis on grades over learning (read here)? Even worse, they haven't truly addressed how our current Filipino First Policy is doing badly in job creation for Filipinos. 

This would also be a consequence of the protectionist education system. People can say that poor people can't afford the schools. That's why I always stressed the need for easing excessive equity restrictions on FDI. The Philippines may not ban FDI completely but certain provisions in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, need to be corrected. The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines may not be the worst but it's certainly not the best. Believing it to be "the best constitution" has only allowed errors to persist. If there were more jobs then salaries are bound to increase (read here). It's because when the demand for labor goes up (due to more job providers)--the supply for labor (which is the workers) will eventually go down. When supply is down and demand is up--the cost of labor has to go up! That's why first-world countries have higher salaries. It's because there are more job opportunities. In turn, more people can afford to enroll in foreign-owned schools if more people have jobs. Local schools will either need to evolve or to perish. If there will be joblessness due to local companies closing down--it's not the fault of FDIs but their refusal to evolve. 

If the Philippines wants better education--it should discard Pinoy Pride Economics or the Filipino First Policy out of the window. Instead, the Philippines should learn from other countries' success in their education system. Please, the Philippines is never meant to be isolated from the rest of the world, as a "unique and special nation". Instead, the Philippines is meant to be a global player. People who still think like that should prepare to apply citizenship for either North Korea or Venezuela.  

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela's Pride and Protectionism

The Telegraph Venezuela is an oil-rich country yet it's a very poor country. Somebody could go ahead and give every unthinkable reason such as "foreign investments caused it" (a blatant lie) and "It's because America had economic sanctions in Venezuela". Yet, the answer can be found in several causes such as corruption. Yet, China and Vietnam, which can be seen to still have a good amount of corruption, are far more successful. The answer also lies in one policy--economic protectionism . The very idea that a country that first world countries used "protectionism" to succeed is a lie as proven by Venezuela's ongoing crisis. A common-sense examination of one root cause of Venezuela's continuing crisis Forbes magazine mentions this in "What Do Investors Need To Understand About Venezuela's Economic Crisis?" by Nathaniel Parish Flannery on December 21, 2016: Venezuela is far and away the worst-managed economy in the Americas . Ad...

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

Filipino Manufacturing's Golden Age ENDED Because of the Filipino First Policy

Here's a picture from the Dose of Disbelief Page on Facebook. Here's something that it wrote: Filipinos once trusted locally made products more than imports. Before World War II, the label "Made in the Philippines" carried prestige, not stigma, reflecting a strong sense of national confidence in domestic production. Local products such as shoes, cigars, textiles, furniture, and food were often preferred over imports. This preference was rooted in the belief that local goods were better adapted to local conditions, tastes, and were often of comparable, if not superior, quality. This period showcases a strong historical era of consumer nationalism and thriving local industries. We need to look into the context of Filipino history  If we look at the Philippine history timeline , we must account for 1935-1940, during which the Philippines was under the Commonwealth government. Independence was declared from Spain on June 12, 1898. However, there was a transition period w...

Confusing Foreign Direct Investment for Foreign Imperialism for the Bajillionth Time

I guess those fools of the Philippine Anti-Fascist League (and many of its deluded supporters) either refuse to get it or are blatantly lying. Almost every rally held by what many believe are CPP-NPA legal fronts also confuses foreign investors for foreign invasion or even foreign imperialism . Once again, do I need to say that 100% FDI ownership is all about the shares and not land ownership ? What makes it even more hypocritical is that they are actually recording these things on imported media . They're sharing their anti-FDI rants using imported devices, imported platforms, and imported social media (read here ). When I do ask them on Facebook, they say how can they take them seriously and that they're "simply forced to participate in capitalism". Did anybody (especially those they call "evil capitalists") force them to buy the expensive Apple equipment when they could've settled for Xiaomi or Huawei?  A simple research on the dictionary will tell us...