Skip to main content

Rejoicing Over Filipino Businesses Getting 100% Ownership Abroad While Crying Over FDIs Getting Allowed to Own 100% Ownership

The Philippine senatorial elections are on, right? One of the many things candidates (regardless of party) need to hold is the need for economic reform. As  I continue discussing economic charter change, several objections are held. One of the objections is allowing 100% FDI--a subject often subjected to mockery. These mockeries can range from promoting colonial mentality, selling the Filipino to foreigners, borrowing money from abroad (which is definitely not investment, read here), or even the ridiculous notion that FDI includes Filipino women dating foreigners (read here). This time, I would like to address another hypocrisy. This time, it's all about Filipinos who rejoice that Filipino businesses are investing with 100% FDI ownership. All the while, this is crying foul when there's a law passed that will allow foreigners to own 100% FDI ownership, in the Philippines.


This is a meme to expose the hypocrisy. Jollibee has 158 branches in Vietnam, which I assume happened because of franchising. The silly girl above is rejoicing because there are 150 (actually 158 now and may go to 160+ soon) branches of Jollibee in Vietnam. She's saying, "The Philippines has captured Vietnam." However, the silly girl hears the news that Cong Caphe is opening just one branch in Quezon City and she cries, "Waaaaaah Vietnam captured the Philippines." It shows a lack of understanding of what FDI really means.

Last 2022, I wrote an article about the myth of invading other countries through FDIs and OFWs. Do these idiots think that working for other countries mean conquering other countries? Please, working for other countries doesn't mean stealing jobs from their locals. Instead, it's having to work with their locals. If you get the job, by default, you must obey your boss. If you work at Apple in Vietnam, you need to follow what your boss in Apple Vietnam tells you to do. The same goes for Apple investing in Vietnam. Apple must follow the rules and regulations set by the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) if it expects to continue doing business in Vietnam. 

When a country allows FDIs to own 100% ownership of their business shares--it's not selling the country. It's all about allowing FDIs to own up to 100% of their shares ownership. It's all about not requiring foreigners to find a Filipino partner before they can do business. Jollibee most likely used franchising to expand worldwide. Chances are Vietnamese businesses or the CPV franchised Jollibee. Franchising means allowing a business to make money under the the franchisor's business name. That's different from looking for a local partner to split 60% shares of stock. 

Crying foul over foreigners owning 100% of their profits and rejoicing over Filipino MNCs keeping 100% of theirs, sis poor understanding. What's their definition of profits anyway? Do they think that when Jollibee gets profits for its 158 branches, that Jollibee leaves nothing to Vietnam. Meanwhile, in this hypothetical scenario, are they assuming that Cong Caphe getting its profits, means it leaves nothing for the Philippines? 

Business & Plans

It may be because people are confusing profits for revenues (read here). If you think about it, such people may think that profits are the sales for the day. Profits don't belong to the workers, the salary belongs to the workers. It's because profits are basically what's left after the sales have been deducted from all expenses (which includes salaries) and taxes. We have the net profits after taxes. THe sample income statement above shows that sales are deducted from the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and then we have all expenses. SG&A would mean Selling, General, and Administrative expenses, which includes all salaries. We have to spend for interest expenses (borrowing money is inevitable), and then when everything is deducted, we have pre-tax income. The taxable income means taxing what's left of income minus all expenses. The result is the net income after taxes, is barely half of the revenues made! That's why the profit doesn't go to the workers but to those paying the workers!

Those on top were the ones managing the money, so they are the ones who keep the profit. Why would employees be entitled to the profit when they receive money from the SG&A expenses? Of course, when employers refuse to pay the employees properly, work quality suffers in return. The agreement is to pay the workers accordingly. Healthy work environment creates healthy workers. Healthy workers are entitled to their salaries, which is part of expense. They don't get any profit-sharing. However, employee shareholders are entitled to dividends during good times. If those on top mismanage the money, they're the ones who get the biggest blame when the company goes south.

It must be understood that allowing Filipino MNCs to invest 100% abroad and 100% FDIs in the Philippines, is a win-win situation. Filipino MNCs are still subjected to foreign laws, even if they aren't required to find a local partner abroad. The same goes for MNCs who invest in the Philippines--they still follow laws even without a Filipino partner. Filipino MNCs will keep 100% of the net profits after taxes when they invest abroad. Letting FDIs do the same in the Philippines is the same thing. Not having too many restrictions will encourage more FDIs, which will in turn mean more taxable income, more employment generated, and filling in the supply/demand gap. 

Popular posts from this blog

Venezuela as a Cautionary Tale on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba, Nationalistic Pride, Welfare State Economics

The Sunday Guardian Years ago, I wrote about Venezuela's pride and protectionism , under a more "formal" style of writing compared to my latest posts. I decided to use an even "less formal" and "less academic" tone since I'm not writing a term paper. Instead, it's like how a professor and a student discuss the thesis using first person over third person, using contractions, etc., while the thesis doesn't use such tones. Back on track, I thought about the arrest of Venezuelan President Maduro can spark debate. Was it a violation of sovereignty? I'm no expert on international law. However, Venezuelans can be seen celebrating Maduro's arrest. Right now, I'm using Gemini AI and Google search to help me find some sources for this blog. It's because I don't want my blog to become another gossip central, but a place to discuss facts with my own personal opinions (making sure they don't  derail the facts).  I used Venezuela ...

The Philippines will NEVER Get Richer by Blaming Its Richer Asian Neighbors

Gemini AI Updated: September 27, 2025 It would be nice to talk about the typical blame game in the Philippines. I could remember that, as a child and a teenager, I had this habit of blaming people I disliked for my failing an exam. The reasons are mostly imagined. What I remembered in my later college years was when I met a couple of super irresponsible students. They had this attitude to say something like, "My parents don't care if it'll take me 20 years to finish my bachelor's degree." Some people even say something like, "It's the fault of the rich that we are poor." It was a backfire when I told such people, "Isn't it any wonder why your finances are down? It's because your parents don't even value the money when they don't care if it'll take up to 20 years to finish college!"  Understanding the blame game and why it feels so good Psychology Today presents this on why some people will always blame others . These fin...

Davide vs. Mahathir: Which Lolo Should Filipinos Take Economic Advice From?

The real issue isn't that something is old or new. Instead, if something old or new still works, or doesn't work! Many modern laws are built on some ancient principles, while adjusting to the current times!  The Constitution of Japan is actually older than the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. However, it's more effective for the reasons that (1) their constitution is silent when it comes to regulating economic activities (ex., protectionist measures), and (2) it's a parliamentary system. Honestly, it's a pretty straightforward constitution compared to ours! As Mahatir Mohamad turned 100 today, I would like to raise up Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. once again. The problem isn't Davide's age but his unwillingness to embrace change when needed (read here ). This time, it's time to bring up a contrast between wise old people and unwise old people. A young person can be right where the old person is wrong. A young person can be wiser because he or she lea...

How Many MORE Unmitigated Typhoon Disasters Before Filipinos Realize That the Filipino First Policy is FAILING Them?!

GMA Network I remember surviving through Typhoon Odette last 2022. Tino happened on November 6, 2025, which also reminds me that Yolanda's anniversary came two days later . Yolanda was even worse than Odette! Thankfully, Cebu City's impact wasn't as bad, and power didn't take too long to return, unlike Yolanda. However, seeing news reports such as an investigation done against Slater Young's project in Monterazzas de Cebu should highlight a bigger problem. Looking at the photos of floods on Facebook makes me think, "How many more unmitigated typhoon disasters until Filipinos realize that the Filipino First Policy is failing them and that the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines  badly needs updates?"  For die-hard defenders like Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (who will turn 90 this December 20) or Atty. Christian Monsod (who's 89 this year), they're prone to saying that it's just a matter of implementation . However, whether we want to admit it...

Would You Rather Die of Thirst and/or Heatstroke This Summer Than Accept Quality Water and Electricity Services from MNCs?

Looking at the IBON Foundation's page can be laughable . One may notice Atty. Neri Colmenares, someone who fortunately lost the senatorial race twice . I remember arguing about people who'd believe in the lies that Colmenares would propagate about FDIs. There's the call to stop water privatization (the call for the nationalization of the water industry) and the constant opposition to allowing foreigners to own 100%. Do they even get that 100% FDI ownership is all about share ownership and not land ownership ? As the summer heat intensifies due to the El NiƱo, I decided to write this entry. A good question to ask now is, "Would you rather die of thirst or a heatstroke than accept quality water and electricity services from MNCs?"  What organizations like the IBON Foundation and Migrante International insist is on national industrialization over the acceptance of FDIs. The question is how do they expect to industrialize the nation based on doing everything on their ...