Skip to main content

Rejoicing Over Filipino Businesses Getting 100% Ownership Abroad While Crying Over FDIs Getting Allowed to Own 100% Ownership

The Philippine senatorial elections are on, right? One of the many things candidates (regardless of party) need to hold is the need for economic reform. As  I continue discussing economic charter change, several objections are held. One of the objections is allowing 100% FDI--a subject often subjected to mockery. These mockeries can range from promoting colonial mentality, selling the Filipino to foreigners, borrowing money from abroad (which is definitely not investment, read here), or even the ridiculous notion that FDI includes Filipino women dating foreigners (read here). This time, I would like to address another hypocrisy. This time, it's all about Filipinos who rejoice that Filipino businesses are investing with 100% FDI ownership. All the while, this is crying foul when there's a law passed that will allow foreigners to own 100% FDI ownership, in the Philippines.


This is a meme to expose the hypocrisy. Jollibee has 158 branches in Vietnam, which I assume happened because of franchising. The silly girl above is rejoicing because there are 150 (actually 158 now and may go to 160+ soon) branches of Jollibee in Vietnam. She's saying, "The Philippines has captured Vietnam." However, the silly girl hears the news that Cong Caphe is opening just one branch in Quezon City and she cries, "Waaaaaah Vietnam captured the Philippines." It shows a lack of understanding of what FDI really means.

Last 2022, I wrote an article about the myth of invading other countries through FDIs and OFWs. Do these idiots think that working for other countries mean conquering other countries? Please, working for other countries doesn't mean stealing jobs from their locals. Instead, it's having to work with their locals. If you get the job, by default, you must obey your boss. If you work at Apple in Vietnam, you need to follow what your boss in Apple Vietnam tells you to do. The same goes for Apple investing in Vietnam. Apple must follow the rules and regulations set by the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) if it expects to continue doing business in Vietnam. 

When a country allows FDIs to own 100% ownership of their business shares--it's not selling the country. It's all about allowing FDIs to own up to 100% of their shares ownership. It's all about not requiring foreigners to find a Filipino partner before they can do business. Jollibee most likely used franchising to expand worldwide. Chances are Vietnamese businesses or the CPV franchised Jollibee. Franchising means allowing a business to make money under the the franchisor's business name. That's different from looking for a local partner to split 60% shares of stock. 

Crying foul over foreigners owning 100% of their profits and rejoicing over Filipino MNCs keeping 100% of theirs, sis poor understanding. What's their definition of profits anyway? Do they think that when Jollibee gets profits for its 158 branches, that Jollibee leaves nothing to Vietnam. Meanwhile, in this hypothetical scenario, are they assuming that Cong Caphe getting its profits, means it leaves nothing for the Philippines? 

Business & Plans

It may be because people are confusing profits for revenues (read here). If you think about it, such people may think that profits are the sales for the day. Profits don't belong to the workers, the salary belongs to the workers. It's because profits are basically what's left after the sales have been deducted from all expenses (which includes salaries) and taxes. We have the net profits after taxes. THe sample income statement above shows that sales are deducted from the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and then we have all expenses. SG&A would mean Selling, General, and Administrative expenses, which includes all salaries. We have to spend for interest expenses (borrowing money is inevitable), and then when everything is deducted, we have pre-tax income. The taxable income means taxing what's left of income minus all expenses. The result is the net income after taxes, is barely half of the revenues made! That's why the profit doesn't go to the workers but to those paying the workers!

Those on top were the ones managing the money, so they are the ones who keep the profit. Why would employees be entitled to the profit when they receive money from the SG&A expenses? Of course, when employers refuse to pay the employees properly, work quality suffers in return. The agreement is to pay the workers accordingly. Healthy work environment creates healthy workers. Healthy workers are entitled to their salaries, which is part of expense. They don't get any profit-sharing. However, employee shareholders are entitled to dividends during good times. If those on top mismanage the money, they're the ones who get the biggest blame when the company goes south.

It must be understood that allowing Filipino MNCs to invest 100% abroad and 100% FDIs in the Philippines, is a win-win situation. Filipino MNCs are still subjected to foreign laws, even if they aren't required to find a local partner abroad. The same goes for MNCs who invest in the Philippines--they still follow laws even without a Filipino partner. Filipino MNCs will keep 100% of the net profits after taxes when they invest abroad. Letting FDIs do the same in the Philippines is the same thing. Not having too many restrictions will encourage more FDIs, which will in turn mean more taxable income, more employment generated, and filling in the supply/demand gap. 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

The Myth of "Invading" Other Countries Through Foreign Investors and Overseas Filipino Workers

BoardGameGeek Years ago, I could remember how "Filipino pride" seems to be required by the DECS. Some songs in the Filipino subject (or called Tagalog) tend to glorify it. One of the songs was called "Ako'y Isang Pinoy" (or "I'm Pinoy") feels ironic since it was played on an imported music player. We had discussions for years about how Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) are often the unsung heroes or the new heroes. The mentality kept going on with how people desired to take a particular course not because they wanted to--it's because they wanted to go abroad. Why I wanted to take Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) was not just to impress people but also to go abroad . However, more people shifted away from BSIT either because they were eliminated (common cause) or because it was too hard for them. Some of them flat out admitted that they took BSIT in hopes of going abroad. Some were taking nursing in hopes of again-- going abro...
Read more

Learning from the Late Lee Kuan Yew's Proving Protectionist-Driven Economists Wrong About Multinational Corporations

Reading the book From Third World to First is really a must. The late Lee Kuan Yew was faced with the mentality of the development economists of his day. Here's an excerpt from "Chapter 4--Surviving Without a Hinterland" which I'd like to share from Pages 57-58: After several years of disheartening trial and error, we concluded that Singapore's best hope lay with the American multinational corporations (MNCs). When the Taiwanese and Hong Kong entrepreneurs came in the 1960s, they brought low technology such as textile and toy manufacturing, labor-intensive but not large-scale. American MNCs brought higher technology in large-scale operations, creating many jobs. They had weight and confidence. They believed that their government was going to stay in Southeast Asia and their businesses were safe from confiscation or war loss. I gradually crystallized my thoughts and settled on a two-pronged strategy to overcome our disadvantages. The first was to leapfrog the reg...
Read more