Skip to main content

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument. It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80%, which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, "Thou grades shalt determine thy future!" That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent. 

I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at that time that I got scammed by a family friend of all people. I always felt, "Is foolishness a condition of the mind or the heart?" I have stored a lt of head knowledge to compensate for my perceived lack of intelligence, under an education system that valued grades over learning. After all, we were told, "If you suck at math, you will be poor." Never mind that classroom mathematics is overly theoretical; it doesn't teach you basic investing, such as using GInvest or bank UITFs to invest in the stock market!

Why are degrees and validations becoming useless with a lousy education system


epanchatantra.com


The situation is pretty much, "You have a lot of master's and doctorates, but still be a complete fool." More often than not, the world fool is confused with stupid. Foolishness means a lack of common sense and not a lack of intelligence. Some people often fire the story of the Scholars and the Lion as a fictional picture of how one can have a lot of degrees, summa laude, etc., and still be a complete fool. The three scholars resurrected the lion, which common sense dictates would eat them if the creature came back alive. One of the scholars did the smart thing by climbing up the tree. The other scholars were eaten alive by the lion. It showed that people, even with a master's degree or a doctorate degree, can commit extreme blunders. The fable in itself, like an Aesop's Fable, shows the problem behind the educational system. 

Whether we want to admit it or not, the classroom system is a one-size-fits-all approach. You enter the class. You have different people with different needs. Some people are more mathematically inclined, while others aren't. The problem lies with how everyone is measured by their ability to parrot rather than their ability to understand. Sure, we need to do some degree of memorization, like you couldn't do mathematics without learning arithmetic. However, as mathematics progresses, it can be seen that people are just learning differentials, integrals, angles, identities, finding X, etc., without knowing the real-world values. For example, trigonometry and geometry are vital tools in engineering. Discrete mathematics is used in computer science to optimize the program.

I actually hated people for simply being good at mathematics. If I wasn't emulating Adolf Hitler, I was emulating Karl Marx. I felt like I may have written a high school essay called "The Mathematician" describing how people good at mathematics oppress those who aren't. There are times I feel like Adolf Hitler's hatred for the Jews was "justified" because Hitler was a poor student in secondary school. However, Warren Buffett would shoot down the idea with, "Don't hate people better than you. Instead, learn from them." Sadly, the classroom environment may be raising more Marxes and Hitlers than it would be raising Dietrich Bonhoeffers and Ninoy Aquinos.

The problem may not be the degrees, but how to get the degrees



When grades become more important than learning, this is what happens. Not all students are created equal. This environment shows different types of learners. Can all of them reach the top of the tree? The answer is a big no. However, the education system can be so one-size-fits-all that it figuratively asks the fish to climb a tree or the pig to fly. The figures of speech get even funnier when you imagine it literally. A pig will never grow wings to fly, nor will a fish climb up a tree. We need to face it that there are different ways to learn mathematics and writing. The fact that a former trivial enemy of mine, who was good in mathematics but not the English language subject, was able to write a simplistic essay about history as a teacher, proves there's room for improvement. The fact that I was able to endure the basic mathematics of business administration or self-learn some trigonometry during the COVID-19 pandemic, defeats the school's fixed mindset.


After all, one can think of the typical classroom environment to look like this. You get a high grade based mostly on compliance with a fixed set of instructions. It made me think of why I had a "justification" to hold a prolonged grudge over a trivial issue with that former trivial enemy of mine. I would hate him for simply being good at mathematics, never mind that his closest friend was also not good at mathematics. My former trivial enemy vs. me was a matter of "who was better" rather than "How can we both help each other?" I even felt that because of mathematics, I can never get the badge of invincibility at Ateneo De Manila University or the University of the Philippines. I felt like getting an MBA could at least get me some degree of invulnerability.

However, the more I think about it, not getting a PhD in business administration will teach me these practical skills:
  1. How to invest in the stock market through UITFs if stock picking isn't for you
  2. How to analyze the international market 
  3. How to speak a new language (such as Mandarin, which is becoming more globally spoken by the second)
All I learned in MBA was just more case studies, more review classes, and the thesis seemed to be nothing more than the finish line. True, I didn't go to Recto to "buy a thesis". Of course, I passed my thesis with flying colors. However, what made my thesis without cheating never taught me were skills like stock market investment, picking the right investment for beginners (ex., bonds), and how to navigate the landmine-filled marketplace!

Because of this, we even get the problem of people who are economists while supporting the economically absurd Filipino First Policy. It doesn't take a doctorate in economics to understand that:
  1. Granting FDI 100% of their ownership is different from selling the Philippines.
  2. FDI can help fill in the revenue gap because they will be required to pay taxes.
  3. FDI means that investors are required to register in the Philippines.
  4. The law of supply and demand isn't legislation, it's economic law. 

Sadly, almost every argument can be easily shot down with a degree, than with the facts. It should be a sad fact that a moron who speaks the truth, is often shot down, based on his or her intelligence. On the other hand, the person with the credentials is treated life as if he could change the laws of business and economics, by just saying something. 
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Good Old Days when Gasoline was Cheaper Under the Late Noynoy Aquino

Millennials' Voice I would like to clarify first and foremost that this post isn't an attempt to say that the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III's legacy was all bad. Some good things happened. However, let me be clear that it's stupid to say, " We don't need economic cha-cha because of the late Noynoy. " However, let me clear that I decided to write this because of a Facebook post called Millennials' Voice , which wrote this: Did you know that during President Noynoy Aquino's time, the price of oil in the world market was high, between $100 and $110 per barrel. But even with those high prices, gasoline and diesel at local pumps in the country were still relatively affordable.  Under President Duterte, world oil prices went up and down, from a low of $41 to a high of $101 per barrel. The big jump to $101 in 2022 happened because of the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Now, under the current president, world oil prices have gone up again to around $...
Read more

The Myth of "Invading" Other Countries Through Foreign Investors and Overseas Filipino Workers

BoardGameGeek Years ago, I could remember how "Filipino pride" seems to be required by the DECS. Some songs in the Filipino subject (or called Tagalog) tend to glorify it. One of the songs was called "Ako'y Isang Pinoy" (or "I'm Pinoy") feels ironic since it was played on an imported music player. We had discussions for years about how Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) are often the unsung heroes or the new heroes. The mentality kept going on with how people desired to take a particular course not because they wanted to--it's because they wanted to go abroad. Why I wanted to take Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) was not just to impress people but also to go abroad . However, more people shifted away from BSIT either because they were eliminated (common cause) or because it was too hard for them. Some of them flat out admitted that they took BSIT in hopes of going abroad. Some were taking nursing in hopes of again-- going abro...
Read more

"Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics Lower Philippine Gas Prices?

Inquirer Gasoline prices have increased again, haven't they?  A few days ago, I wrote  why #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba's view of gas prices is questionable . Today, I feel like writing this after several complaints on Facebook. I would like to create a follow-up post. People are complaining too much without understanding the real reason why some countries have lower prices of gasoline. Real talk. We need to talk about economic policies,  and  of course, please do a study on supply-demand analysis  on supply chain management . Let's examine the complaints made by Bulatlat Bulatlat Here's a chart from Bulatlat that compares the increase in prices of gasoline between the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia. It's always problematic when people ignore simple economics. It's funny, but Bulatlat mentions this on their website: Note also how expensive our diesel and gasoline products are compared to those of our ASEAN neighbors. The estimated common price today of diesel in...
Read more

#SahodItaasPresyoIbaba Economics' Understanding of How Gasoline Prices Work

International State College of the Philippines Today is Flor Contempacion Day , and rallies are expected. However, whether it's Flor's death anniversary or not, rallies are expected for the wrongest of reasons. I would like to address this photo from the International State College of the Philippines' Facebook page. The demands here are rather clunky and stupid. We have the following demands that would naturally clash with each other, such as: No to the oil deregulation law while demanding lower oil prices. This is simply ignoring the basic fundamentals of economics, namely the law of supply and demand . They say that oil companies are greedy for gain. These rallyists probably don't really understand the difference between revenues and profits . Let's understand the Oil Deregulation Law  The Oil Deregulation Law, or the Republic Act No. 8479 , passed on February 10, 1998, under the late Fidel Valdez Ramos. Here's how the liberalization works: CHAPTER II  LIBERAL...
Read more

Learning from the Late Lee Kuan Yew's Proving Protectionist-Driven Economists Wrong About Multinational Corporations

Reading the book From Third World to First is really a must. The late Lee Kuan Yew was faced with the mentality of the development economists of his day. Here's an excerpt from "Chapter 4--Surviving Without a Hinterland" which I'd like to share from Pages 57-58: After several years of disheartening trial and error, we concluded that Singapore's best hope lay with the American multinational corporations (MNCs). When the Taiwanese and Hong Kong entrepreneurs came in the 1960s, they brought low technology such as textile and toy manufacturing, labor-intensive but not large-scale. American MNCs brought higher technology in large-scale operations, creating many jobs. They had weight and confidence. They believed that their government was going to stay in Southeast Asia and their businesses were safe from confiscation or war loss. I gradually crystallized my thoughts and settled on a two-pronged strategy to overcome our disadvantages. The first was to leapfrog the reg...
Read more