Skip to main content

Learning Pinyin With the 23 Consonants-24 Vowels Method

I wrote about how I believe pinyin will bridge the gap in Mandarin learning and how pinyin helped secure business permits. I think a new challenge that some may face is learning pinyin through the 23 consonants and 24 vowels method. Back in college, I took Mandarin as my required foreign language (FOLA) elective. It was my attempt to find out what went wrong with Chinese language classes in Chinese schools. Zhuyin was used for too long (read here) and isn't the ideal bridge between Mandarin and non-Mandarin speakers. Meanwhile, romanizing on your own without learning the pinyin gives the wrong reading. It's like how nobody should Sh in the place of X. I could talk about learning using the 23 vowels and 24 consonants method.

The early stages of teaching pinyin followed the bopomofo method. The Chinese language teacher in college didn't use the 23 consonants-24 vowels method. Instead, we had the pinyin arranged using the bopomofo method. It was simply to translate all the Zhuyin into pinyin, arranging it in that way. I tend to recall my pinyin using the bopomofo arrangement. Part of me still says, "There are two types of bopofomo. One is the zhuyin. The other is the pinyin, which is more friendly for people outside China." I remembered memorizing the pinyin table in the exact order of the Zhuyin table.

It can get confusing since there are certain rules. Learn Chinese in Chinatown presents how w and y are used in the pinyin system:

Notes: The letters "y" and "w" are not included in the table of initials in the official pinyin system. They are an orthographic convention for "i", "u" and "ü" when no initial is present. When "i", "u" or "ü" are finals and no initial is present, they are spelled "yi", "wu", and "yu", respectively.

The letters "y" and "w" are called "half vowels" in Chinese, to make it simple and easier to use, I categorize them as initials here.

Another confusion is when eng is spelled. For example, the pinyin for dragon (é¾™) is lóng. Any Chinese language teacher will mark the Romanization leóng for dragon as wrong. That's why I want to write eng as ng instead of eng to avoid confusion. Yet, any seasoned person may know the rule that when eng is preceded by a vowel followed by a consonant, the letter e must be removed. They would know that when Yu is combined with a vowel, it must be spelled out as Ü instead. 

Meanwhile, the use of the 23 consonants-24 vowels method might actually simplify pinyin in the long run. The final four vowels (of which the two have no Zhuyin equivalents) are Ang, Eng, Ing, and Ong. If one combines the pinyin and Zhuyin methods, one would have Ing and Ong as I+ng and O+ng. There's no Zhuyin equivalent for Ing and Ong either. The use of Üe may have been what would be representing Eh in the older versions of pinyin. The sequence of A-O-E-Ȇ would be inputted as A-O-E-Ue or A-O-E-Eh. For some, knowing the ANG-ENG-ING-ONG might be easier than if they had to do the ING as I+NG and ONG as O+NG. 

I still think using the Bopomofo rhythm of the pinyin will be easier. Reciting the pinyin using the traditional Bopomofo made it easier for me to memorize pinyin. However, it might give room for error if somebody spelled something like JOE using the Pinyin which is downright wrong. I guess the use of the 23 consonants-24 vowels method might be to prevent making the wrong inputs. 

I think neither method is wrong. However, reciting the pinyin like learning Bopomofo should come first. The rhythmic cycle of reciting B up to Ãœ like it was the Zhuyin could be much better. However, learning the 23 consonants-24 vowels method might also be the key to lessening mistakes when using pinyin. I prefer to stick to learning pinyin using the Bopomofo sequence. I prefer to use the 23 consonants-24 vowels method to simply check if one knows how to and how not to combine the consonants and vowels.

Popular posts from this blog

The 2026 Iran War Audit vs. OFW-Reliant Pinoy Pride Economists

It's a shame, really, that I didn't think about writing this article on OFWs again. I got somewhat fixated on the  gas prices , and my mind was exhausted. I thought about how I even asked, " Will #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics even lower down the prices of gasoline? " It's one thing that the Philippines has been overly reliant  on the Middle East for gasoline. What I overlooked was the OFW phenomenon again . It was so easy to hype on the OFW phenomenon, like what happened with the Filipino nurse, Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, way back in 2015. The OFW hype would've compounded the Philippine economy's "reliance model" to a whole new level of bottleneck!  Analyzing the bottleneck of relying on the Middle East It's already a known fact that several OFWs are sent to the Middle East. I even remember running across a presumably retired dancer who would be 64 today, on Facebook. The guy actually bragged about how he was a dancer at the Excelsior Hotel in...

IBON Foundation: Yes to Wealth Taxing the Rich, No to Economic Reforms?

Some time ago, I wrote about why I don't trust the IBON Foundation as an "economic think-tank" . I remember getting a lot of insults (and I've decided to block such people), telling me stuff like, "What have you done for the Philippines compared to IBON?" or "What about your mass base?" There's also that 88% survey result from Pulse Asia, which I heard has a very biased sampling size. Regardless, it's important to speak out facts and figures even if only one percent believes it and 99% doesn't! As I was looking to challenge myself in writing, I thought of challenging IBON's ongoing stance on the wealth tax. They had an article written in 2023. It's all about taxing the super wealthy . Is it good or bad? It's time to think about it.  Differentiating income from net worth Here's a sample of what IBON had written: A billionaire wealth tax can substitute for many consumption taxes that disproportionately burden millions of F...

Basic Economic Knowledge Tells Us Why Ayuda Will Not Help Filipinos Survive Inflation for Long

IBON Foundation I'm getting amazed at how IBON Foundation still has their ever-destructive obsession with ayuda (read here ). Lately, they have written another article where they say that high inflation "confirms" the need for real ayuda which means cash handouts (read here ). That's totally one thing whenever IBON Foundation decries the need for foreign direct investment (FDI) but they keep saying that cash handouts are good for the economy. That statement is purely stupid because handouts equals expenses and there's really no long-term  Return on Investment (ROI) on that one!  However, for the Philippine government to be able to give more cash handouts without FDIs (and rely too much on local businesses)--it can mean doing the following: Start raising taxes for the rich in order to provide more money for cash handouts. If taxes from the rich aren't enough--why not print more money, right?  The demand for ayuda worth PHP 10,000.00 is utterly stupid. The two ...