Skip to main content

Yes, It's Possible to Have Higher Income Without Building Wealth


Here's a photo that I found on New Money Blog on Instagram. School is almost ready to resume and the big question can be, "Do you have money to pay for tuition fees?" I wrote some articles related to that such as about payday euphoria before the long weekend, one's definition of savings, and the Philippine holiday debt trap. Some people today believe that the "best solution" is to raise salaries. However, raising salaries during inflation will worsen inflation (read here). By now, I should realize basic IQ in business and economics is a real problem in the Philippines. I don't expect troll pages on Facebook to even develop a business IQ. 

It's true that people with a higher income have a higher advantage. That's why some people seek to work in Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) centers. Others even seek to move abroad (which is caused by rampant economic protectionism). Some people believe that if they have a higher income then certainly their lives can be better. However, what can be sadly observed is that there are some OFW families where, even after years and years of remittances, they're still poor. Some people run huge businesses where they get a lot of income but end up getting stuck in financial losses and/or bad debts. They have high income but what really is the problem? I dare say that they think that having a high income "solves everything" but they never really see the bigger picture.


Some people wish that they can get a high-paying job so they can live luxuriously. It's a pain listening to people wishing they owned all the expensive stuff and "look good". This reminds me that I actually wrote about how nobody gets rich by owning plenty of nice stuff. The real rule of money is to check on the quality rather than the quantity. I may not settle for a cheap bag that breaks easily. However, I'll buy an expensive bag if the quality is good. However, if I'm just buying the name than a quality product then no thanks. I could buy a USD 75.00 sturdy bag and have USD 425.00 in it. The same can also go when people overspend on things that they don't need to impress people who don't know how to value money (read here).

The big problem of many people, whether they belong to the average income or high income, is their inability to save money. I remembered laughing while I wrote dumb ways to drain your paycheck. It's payday, right? Some lower-income people start to have a good time than accounting for what they need. It's no wonder why payday tends to be rather traffic. Sure, it's one thing if people on payday start paying bills and that's acceptable. However, when payday arrives and it's the malls, not the billing centers, that are full, then it's time to say, "What about your priorities?" It doesn't matter how big the paycheck's amount was--it can be lost in less than a day if one splurges the paycheck. I guess that's why some foolish people protest at the roads demanding "Sahod itaas! Presyo ibaba!" In English, that means "Increase salaries! Lower down the prices!" That statement is really based on ignorance of basic accounting (read here). Salaries are part of costing whether it's directly related or indirectly related to the cost of production

What one does with money really matters. Sure, underpaying employees is a really terrible thing. However, even if employees were paid properly, they will not develop wealth if they don't know what to do with the money. If they decide to spend carelessly and not do some investments, they can't expect wealth. It's like they should focus on the essential payments (ex. utility bills, rentals, tuition fees, etc.) instead of the payday blowout. However, they should also at least try to invest in something like allocating a reasonable sum per month in a stock index fund for 5-10 years. If they don't need PHP 1,000.00 to PHP 3,000.00 then why not allocate some of that money into a stock UITF fund for a certain period of time? 

If business booms then it's not a call to splurge all that money. I'm not saying that the money should be hoarded. Instead, some money should be invested and only a reasonably small amount should be splurged. For example, I decide to buy what I need more than what I want. I've even decided to skip super-expensive places and buy only expensive stuff with good quality. It's because even if the net income is that high, it's easy to overspend a million over a million nonsense. Instead, it's all about priorities and not being like General Tomas Mascardo (read here).

Even worse, people may claim they're "investing". But what are they investing in? They might've tried investing expecting to get rich quick fast. The end result is that they stopped investing in valid schemes for get-rich-quick schemes (read here). Sadly, even as I invest in stocks (through managed funds and UITFs), I never felt the thrill of sudden riches like cryptocurrency does. Sure, cryptocurrency rises fast but it will crash even faster. Stocks may be aggressive but so far, I don't really see it rise or fall as fast as cryptocurrency. I wonder if they decided to "invest" by gambling then that's not an investment at all. Gambling will never be investing. Any money that easily comes easily goes. 

That's why some people who started out with an average income become better. Some people who work as employees can retire better than businessmen who waste their hard-earned income. I might see a business shut down and an employee can either rise up as a businessman or be comfortably retired in their old age. Not everyone can be a businessperson and have that high income. However, with proper finances, anybody can have money for their later years. 

Popular posts from this blog

The Idiocy of Typing Anti-FDI Rants Using IMPORTED Devices, IMPORTED Platforms, and IMPORTED Social Media

Bulatlat It's very easy to open Facebook (or any related platform) and find lots of stupidity , right? There have been idiotic comments I find on Facebook such as FDI is this and that. We can find "thought leader groups" such as Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Anakpawis, Anakbayan, Bayan Muna, IBON Foundation, Kabataan Partylist, League of Filipino Students, and Philippine Anti-Fascist League (PH Antifa) who keep ranting about FDI as this and that. I even remember somebody dared to say that FDI caused Egypt to dry up. Ironically, North Korea and Venezuela, two protectionist countries, have very bad pollution problems. I'd blame it that they don't have the money to do a clean-up drive. How can you clean up a polluted river without the right equipment? How can you expect better power efficiency with outdated equipment that keep coughing up, cough, cough, lots of black smoke?  All the talks on social media can be very funny. The big irony is that all calls for "...

Get Stuck with EDSA, End Up Like Nokia

  Yes, we should never forget what history teaches us. A classmate of mine, back in high school, wrote a simple and blunt essay called "History: A Teacher". I doubt he still has a soft copy, given it was already more than 20 years ago. I'd like to quote Duterte critic Andrew James Masigan wrote this in  Philippine Star --something that should remain relevant: I would never undervalue the 1987 Constitution. It dismantled the legal framework of a repressive regime and established the democratic institutions we enjoy today. For this, I am grateful. The 1987 Constitution was crafted with the best of intentions. It sought to put the Filipino first in all aspects of governance and to level the playing field amongst sectors and peoples.  But it is far from perfect. It failed to consider the importance of foreign capital and technologies and the stiff competition we would have to face to obtain them. In short, its economic provisions were short-sighted . So despite the Constitut...

It's Incredibly Frustrating to Discuss Economics with an Overspender

Overspending is just bad economics, isn't it? Economics is defined as the following for the sake of a review of high school basics: Economics is a social science concerned with the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. It studies how individuals, businesses, governments, and nations make choices about how to allocate resources. Economics focuses on the actions of human beings, based on assumptions that humans act with rational behavior, seeking the most optimal level of benefit or utility. The building blocks of economics are the studies of labor and trade. Since there are many possible applications of human labor and many different ways to acquire resources, it is the task of economics to determine which methods yield the best results. Economics can generally be broken down into macroeconomics, which concentrates on the behavior of the economy as a whole, and microeconomics, which focuses on individual people and businesses. It had me thinking of 2016 wh...

[UNPOPULAR OPINION] Why People Power Anniversary Should Be a Special Working Day Instead

  As a blogger, I shouldn't turn on the PC in hopes of becoming popular . It should be to turn on the PC and blog to make a difference . Right now, I think about the controversy when President Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. declared the 1986 EDSA Revolution's anniversary as a working holiday . The call for some of the "minority lawmakers" is that they want to return the People Power Anniversary to a regular holiday once more. There are times I feel like, "Should we let it be a regular holiday again, so as not to repeat the Marcos dictatorship?" Sadly, the real answer is that the Philippines has been relying too much on EDSA , so it's practically ending up like Nokia . I was thinking about the reality of February being the most hectic month. February only has 28 days (and February 25 is near the month's end ). I thought that the Philippines also has too many national holidays more often than not. In fact, the Inquirer article written by...

Talking Economics with an Overeating Glutton

Two years ago, I wrote an entry about why discussing economics with an overspender is frustrating . Now, I was looking at certain fat people who say really dumb things about economics. Just recently, I was looking at a certain fat idiot (fortunately, he only has 1K+ followers) who posted on Facebook that not only will the parliamentary system cause the Philippines to become a dictatorship, but he also says that changing economic provisions will cause the Philippines to collapse and the country to fall into the hands of foreigners. I won't name the person out to avoid getting personal. However, the person is apparently very fat and he blames capitalism day in and day out. The person even says that businessmen do nothing and it's the employers that do everything. Has that fat slob ever heard that businesses are run by bosses and that if the bosses do screw up, they're the ones who are the most answerable? The employees are the cogs and the boss runs the cogs. I was looking at...