Skip to main content

I Support Economic Charter Change Because I Love the Philippines

As talks for economic charter change (read why we need it now here) are on (or I'd better call it economic constitutional reform), I'm not surprised at opposition (for the sake of it) on Facebook. Back in 2021, an economist I admire named Andrew James Masigan wrote about the need for economic charter change. As you already know, I'm not an economist but I'll clarify that gossip against economic charter change is getting prevalent. It's sad that many Filipinos (if ever) still can't understand what foreign direct investment (FDI) is. Some of them believe in lies such as (1) accepting FDI means solely relying on foreigners (read my rebuttal here), (2) that only FDIs will get rich if they invest in the Philippines (read my rebuttal here), (3) that it will just benefit the oligarchy (read my rebuttal here), (4) that FDIs are invaders (read my rebuttal here), (5) that FDIs will only provide jobs for foreigners and none for Filipinos (read rebuttal here), (6) that the 60-40 arrangement is more beneficial (read rebuttal here), and (7) FDIs also include Filipino women dating foreigners, which is absolutely ridiculous (read why here). Those seven things I stated barely cover the depths of foolishness people give. 

The sources of such foolish talk can be traced to foolish talk. Some of the favorite sources of opponents of economic charter change are (1) Atty. Hilario G. Davide Jr. (and I wrote if he really knows how to make the Philippines rise up in the Asian Century), (2) the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) which is incredibly ironic to be a Filipino devout Catholic opposing FDIs (since the Vatican isn't located in the Philippines and it's technically an MNC), (3) the IBON Foundation (which is driving me dizzy making me write about what's their view on FDI), (4) organizations like Kabataan (Youth) Partylist, Bayan Muna, and League of Filipino Students (LFS), and (5) various Facebook pages that can barely hold an argument. One can always talk and talk but can one really see the results? That's why I even ask who one would listen to between Kishore Mahbubani of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) or Davide Jr. (read here). 

As a child, I was taught about Filipino First Policy in the "values education" class (read here). It's said that it's for patriotism and for development. It's often said that buying imported products will only benefit the country of origin. However, if one looks at the history of Singapore (and I expect Flor Contemplacion crybabies to raise her all over again), one can see a big difference. If one looks at the history of China's progress (though today is the 35th anniversary of the unfortunate Tiananmen Square Massacre), Deng Xiaoping wrote the black cat and white cat theory. Ironically, China still progressed despite the Tiananmen Square Massacre. If one looks at Deng's theory, one should ask that angle in the Filipino business environment. First, it doesn't matter if the investor in the Philippines is a foreigner or a Filipino, as long as that investor provides jobs and services for Filipinos (read why here). Second, Filipino investors should care less if the materials are Filipino or foreign, as long as they can use them to improve their businesses (read why here). In short, like Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, the thought of progressing through the Filipino First Policy should be outgrown as fiction.

Results will always speak louder than claims. Until now, the claim that the Philippines is "really that open" to FDI is a lie. The difference between economic restrictions in other countries vs. the Philippines is where they're placed. The Philippines continued to put the restrictions in the constitution while other countries put them only in legislation. The difference is that putting them only in legislation makes it easier to make amendments instead of having to amend the Constitution, which can be a more costly process. To say Vietnam has "more restrictions" in the economy over the Philippines is plain wrong (read here). Is it because Vietnam is a Communist country and the Philippines is a democracy? Vietnam's law on foreign investment is far more flexible than the Philippines. There was some economic improvement under the late Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III. However, let's not get overly complacent and treat Aquino III like a person like no other. Instead, we need to think about how to greatly improve what any leader did better. That's why the late Fidel V. Ramos wanted to change the constitution. Sadly, that attempt was foiled because of gossip. I used to antagonize it because I feared another dictatorship.

After reading From Third World to First, I'd like to boldly declare that the late Lee Kuan Yew called the economists of his day a third-world mentality. Singapore used to be poorer than the Philippines. It used to be infested with dissidents. However, LKY's long journey of more than six years (he ruled for 31 years and it's not a scary thought with a good leader) fixed Singapore. Let me remind people that without a parliamentary system, there will be no LKY nor a Mahathir Mohamad. Sadly, some Filipinos only take LKY's advice on the Marcoses (read here) but not his other advice about economics. In fact, Ramos talked with LKY about how he believed in the need for the Philippines to have a parliamentary system. LKY even gave his speech where the Philippines needed to ease its restrictions. The book's probably not easy to find because of greedy oligarchs and self-serving politicians. Not to mention, LKY even called the Philippine press rambunctious in that same book. I dare people now to point out LKY recommended the Philippines remain protectionist, the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines is the "best in the world", all because they still quote LKY about the Marcoses. 

With economic charter change, a great change can happen in the Philippines. It will mean generating wealth greater than the Marcos Wealth. Filipino businesses will have to shape up or be beaten out. It will mean expanding one's business network. More jobs will be available since MNCs and Filipino companies will compete against each other. Filipino companies will have better opportunities to grow their networks of customers, suppliers, and service providers. If environmental laws are a concern, we cal also learn from LKY's Green Singapore Policy. There's always legislation to make businesses follow environmental laws. Singapore's environmental laws and cleanliness prove it. 

That's why I question if people really love the Philippines or not. It's not loving the Philippines if one loves the country for the bad things that give Filipinos a bad image. It's not loving the Philippines to support policies that have caused Filipinos to fly abroad (and no, they're not conquering that country) because of a lack of jobs. It's not loving the Philippines if one supports policies that make basic needs all too expensive, that Filipinos in the lower income bracket, can't even afford them. If one claims to reject economic charter change out of "love for the Philippines", I dare say they only love the dysfunctionality in the Philippines than the Philippines. 

Popular posts from this blog

COMMUNIST Vietnam Has Defeated DEMOCRATIC Philippines Again This 2025

Cổng thông tin Trung ương Đoàn TNCS Hồ Chí Minh A few days ago, I wrote about warning Filipinos that they shouldn't wait for more unmitigated typhoon disasters, before realizing that the Filipino First Policy isn't working ! There's a statement that says, "Just because being tanga (inattentive) is libre (free), doesn't mean you should be tanga!"  Analyzing the different policies: why policies  matter I found a Business World article, written by Cesar Polvorosa, Jr., on my Facebook news feed discussing the Vietnamese economy . In fact, it would be better to share some hard truths that the article offers about what really went wrong with the  democratic Philippines compared to Communist Vietnam : DIVERGENT ECONOMIC MODELS Vietnam pursued an export-oriented manufacturing strategy which has proven significantly more successful over the past half century than the Philippines’ service-heavy, remittances-dependent model . Export performance alone tells a compellin...

External Validations, like Masters and Doctorate, Mean NOTHING with a LOUSY Education System

I have the tendency to use my MBA as a license to avoid criticism. It's a real problem that some people use their credentials and/or academic achievements to try and win an argument. One incident I wrote about was Rep. Raoul Abellar Manuel flexing his "smarts" by using his cum laude degree to win the argument . It was all about how I would often say, "You're the moron because I have the MBA and you don't." There are times I felt like taking an MBA would make up for my "moral shortcomings" during high school when I was barely passing (and the passing rate was 80% , which is rather high), that I wasn't having honors, and that there was this saying, " Thou grades shalt determine thy future! " That, of course, has led to the reality where cheating is prevalent .  I wanted to make a review. I took my MBA in 2011 and graduated in 2014. I always felt that the MBA program was what I needed to become "invincible". It was also at ...

Economics 101: Pre-Colonial Philippine Natives Already Did Business with Foreigners

Art by Hugo Yunzon It's finally August or Buwan Ng Wika (Month of the Language), though it may be better to call it Buwan Ng Kultura (Month of the Culture). Buwan Ng Wika programs tend to focus more on the uniqueness of several types of Filipino people. What I recall back in my high school days (late 1990s) is how I was asked to play an "American" in a Buwan Ng Wika program. There were also other people asked to portray the Chinese traders, Arab traders, Indian traders, and the Japanese occupation. It would be good to do a review of the pre-colonial Philippines. The name Philippines was derived from the Spanish king, King Philip. Back then, the natives were called Indios which sounds very similar to Indonesia . Yes, most Filipinos are either Malay or Indo. A look at the Indonesians and Malaysians would have one mistake them for Filipinos. A note is that the Chinese population there usually speaks Hokkien.  From Purdue Filpino --here's some basic information about Fili...

Are People Who Insist That Workers Own the Means of Production Be Willing to Open a Business Where Workers Own the Means of Production?

Last 2022, I wrote two articles on the means of production. One article I wrote refutes the idea that workers, not the business owners, own the means of production . Another article discussed whether or not anti-capitalists have no choice because capitalists own the means of production . The other day, I wrote a dare where I want people who insist on #SahodItaasPresyoIbaba economics (higher salaries, lower prices) to open stores that operate on that mindset . I'm afraid that what I wrote was merely the tip of the iceberg . With that in mind, I'd like to ask people who say that the workers own the means of production to open a business, where the workers own the means of production. What's their reasoning behind the logic that the workers own the means of production? The common logic is that because the workers did all the hard work they own the production. They say that the businessman can die but not the workers. It's because according to these smart alecks--it's b...

Instead of Hating Successful Chinese-Filipinos, Why Not LEARN from Their SUCCESS Instead?

It's Chinese New Year and I can remember some crazy stuff back in my childhood. Right now though, there are still some Filipinos of brown descent (either Malay or Indonesian) who still have their typical bitter attitude towards successful people. I was reminded of someone who blamed the rich, rather than their poor attitude towards money, as to why she had to work as a working student. There are still some who have their attitude of hating the rich for simply being rich . I don't deny that some rich people deserve hate. But why hate the rich person who has gotten rich through honest gain and hard work? Why not learn from good rich people who can offer sound advice instead of being bitter about their success?  Some Filipinos of non-Chinese origin may feel too proud about their being "Pure Filipino". However, any study of Filipino history will reveal that their brown skin isn't too unique. We can see Malaysians and Indonesians tend to have brown skin. Some of the ea...